Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 finished ahead 2 times and the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro not once. The Winter I*cept Evo 4 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Winter I*cept Evo 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
Not ahead in any category
Winter I*cept Evo 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tire did better.
| Measurement | EUROWINTER HS02 Pro | Gap | Winter I*cept Evo 4 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking ft | 143 | 3.4% | 138 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling mph | 69.5 | 2% | 70.9 | 0-1 |
| Wet Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking ft | 149 | 10.3% | 134 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling mph | 51.7 | 1.3% | 52.4 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 16.33 | 0.1% | 16.35 | 1-0 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 48 | 7.4% | 51.6 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 8.9 | 33.3% | 11.8 | 0-1 |
| Snow Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking ft | 97 | 3% | 94 | 0-2 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 809 | 2.1% | 825 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling mph | 25.8 | 1.4% | 26.2 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 12.7 | 5.2% | 13.4 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 26.3% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 72 | 1.1 dB | 70.9 | 0-1 |
| Value Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 8.1 | 3.7% | 7.8 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EUROWINTER HS02 Pro | Field | Winter I*cept Evo 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets | P28 of 50 | P4 of 50 | |
| 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P1 of 10 |
EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Winter I*cept Evo 4: your questions
Is the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro or the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 the better tire?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 finished ahead 2 times and the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro scores 7.9 and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 9.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro or the Winter I*cept Evo 4?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 5 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 10.3% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 5 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro and 10/10 for the Winter I*cept Evo 4.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro 91% from 4 reviews and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 96% from 2.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EUROWINTER HS02 Pro is made in 110 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 in 87 (17 to 22 inch). 48 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter I*cept Evo 4 B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2025, the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro in 2022.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Kumho Winter Craft WP52
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
0-9 in 9 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
16-0 in 16 shared tests
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-12 in 12 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
12-0 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Linglong Sport Master Winter
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-18 in 18 shared tests
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
0-6 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the EUROWINTER HS02 Pro Review the Winter I*cept Evo 4
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.