Tested 6 times by independent publications, the Barum Polaris 6 averages a finish of 8th. Its strongest discipline is Snow Braking, beating 86% of the field across 6 tests; its weakest is Wet Braking, at 58% across 6 tests.
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test P10 of 20
The Barum Polaris 6 finishes tenth with a 'good' verdict and no safety penalty. Auto Bild names it as one of the good-value choices, with strong snow braking offset by weaker wet and dry handling.
Where the Barum Polaris 6 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 4 | P13.8 of 16.8 | 24% | - |
| Dry Handling | 3 | P11 of 17 | 37% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking Weak | 6 | P9.7 of 28.2 | 58% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P13 of 16 | 20% | - |
| Wet Handling | 3 | P11 of 17 | 48% | - |
| Wet Circle | 3 | P14 of 17 | 22% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 4 | P13 of 16.8 | 29% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 4 | P12.3 of 16.8 | 28% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking Strong | 6 | P4.5 of 21.5 | 86% | 2 |
| Snow Traction | 4 | P8 of 16.8 | 66% | 1 |
| Snow Handling | 3 | P9.3 of 16.7 | 55% | - |
| Snow Slalom | 2 | P9.5 of 22 | 60% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P4 of 16 | 80% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 2 | P7.5 of 20 | 66% | - |
| Noise | 4 | P2.5 of 16.8 | 93% | 2 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 3 | P12 of 18.7 | 37% | - |
| Value | 3 | P6 of 18.7 | 71% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 3 | P7 of 16.3 | 68% | 2 |
| Fuel Consumption | 1 | P1 of 16 | 100% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P13 of 16 | 20% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Barum Polaris 6. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
5 shared: 1 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with UltraGrip Performance 3 |
5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% |
 BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Semperit Speed Grip 5
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Linglong Sport Master Winter
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Firestone Winterhawk 4
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Kleber Krisalp HP3
4 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
Compare with Krisalp HP3 |
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 67% |
 Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
 Vredestein Wintrac Pro+
4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
 Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind
|
4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% |
 Bridgestone Blizzak 6
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Giti GitiWinterW2
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Fulda Kristall Control HP2
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Viking WinTech NewGen
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
Drawn from 5 tests. Updated October 13, 2026.
Across five independent winter tests, the Barum Polaris 6 consistently stands out as a snow-focused, low-running-cost Central European winter tire: it repeatedly posts front-running snow braking/traction results and is regularly the most efficient and quietest option. It was 1st for snow braking in the 2026 ADAC test (10.0 m) and again 1st in the 2025 Autozurnál test, where it also won snow traction and finished 2nd overall. Efficiency is a major recurring theme: it had the lowest rolling resistance in the 2025 Auto Bild full test (1/22) and was also 1st for fuel consumption in ADAC and 1st for rolling resistance in Autozurnál; testers explicitly called out it as “having the lowest rolling resistance” and “among the most fuel-efficient”. Refinement is another pattern, with 1st for noise in ADAC (69.9 dB) and Autozurnál, plus 4th/22 for noise in Auto Bild.
The consistent caveat is wet and especially dry-road safety margins versus the best tires. Wet braking is repeatedly below the sharp end (e.g. 12/16 in ADAC at +18.8% from best; 12/52 and 8/50 in the two Auto Bild braking qualifiers at ~+15% from best), while aquaplaning can be a clear weakness in some tests (Auto Bild 2025 full test: 20/22 straight aquaplaning and 17/22 curved). The biggest exception to its generally “good enough” road performance is dry braking: it was near the bottom in ADAC (15/16, +9.5% from best) and very weak in Auto Bild 2025 (17/22, +21.7% from best), with ADAC noting “poor precision and a lot of oversteer when changing direction” and concluding it is not recommended despite strong snow/ice ability.
it had the shortest snow braking- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
stopped among the shortest on snow- 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2026)
ranked first overall by winning the braking, acceleration, and traction tests- 2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test (2025)
among the most fuel-efficient- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
exceptionally low rolling resistance- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)
having the lowest rolling resistance- 2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test (2025)
the quietest tire in the pass-by test- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
one of the quieter tires on the pass-by noise test- 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2026)
being the quietest tire at both tested speeds- 2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test (2025)
the second-highest snow traction- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
ranked first overall by winning the braking, acceleration, and traction tests- 2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test (2025)
safe and reliable on both snow and dry roads- 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test (2025)
good ice braking- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
precise snow handling- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
placing second in handling- 2025 Autozurnal Winter Tire Test (2025)
one of the longest dry braking distances- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
Among the longer stoppers on dry roads- 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2026)
weak on dry roads, with poor precision and a lot of oversteer when changing direction- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
high abrasion and a short predicted tread life- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
was slow on the wet handling course- 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2026)
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Barum Polaris 6 finishes tenth with a 'good' verdict and no safety penalty. Auto Bild names it as one of the good-value choices, with strong snow braking offset by weaker wet and dry handling.
The Barum Polaris 6 shares eighth place. It is very capable on snow and ice, but its dry-road behavior means ADAC does not recommend it.
The Barum Polaris 6, as Continental's budget brand, delivers impressive value as a genuine bargain option with the highest fuel-saving potential in the test. Its exceptionally low rolling resistance translates directly to lower fuel consumption, making it economical to run over its lifetime. The tire proves itself safe and reliable on both snow and dry roads, providing confidence-inspiring performance in typical winter conditions without breaking the bank. However, it shows its budget positioning more clearly on wet roads, where overall performance lags slightly behind premium competitors. Despite this, it never falls into the dangerous category, maintaining acceptable safety standards. At approximately €380 per set—the lowest price among quality brand tires in the test—it represents outstanding value for budget-conscious drivers who need a reliable winter tire but can't justify premium pricing. The tire proves that low cost doesn't necessarily mean compromised safety.
The Barum Polaris 6 was an exceptional performer, finishing second in the final overall standings. Its biggest strength was on snow, where it ranked first overall by winning the braking, acceleration, and traction tests and placing second in handling. On dry surfaces, it was rated second-best, largely due to having the lowest rolling resistance and being the quietest tire at both tested speeds. Its performance in wet conditions was also solid, placing fourth in that category with strong results in handling and aquaplaning resistance, showcasing its excellent all-around capabilities for winter driving.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Barum tires