4 tests, 2018 to 2026
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 29%
Record by discipline
Where the Nankang SV3 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 3 | P32.3 of 53.7 | 41% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P27 of 30 | 10% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Nankang SV3. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nankang SV2 Predecessor | 14 | 0 | 20th | 16% |
| Nankang SV3 This tire | 4 | 0 | 28th | 29% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 4 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.
The Nankang SV3 has a consistent wet-braking weakness across three Auto Bild qualifiers, supported by ADAC's earlier criticism of wet grip. In 2026 it ranked 29th of 50 for wet braking, 29.1% behind the best. The corresponding results were 34th of 54 and 22.3% behind in 2023, and 34th of 57 and 23.4% behind in the 2022 market overview. These are lower-half results across different sizes and years, rather than one unusually poor stop.
Winter grip is another concern. Snow braking was 27th of 30 in the 2026 qualifier, although the gap to the best was relatively small at 3.8%. ADAC placed it last of 12 in its 2018 test and described it as very weak on snow as well as in the wet, with high fuel consumption. Good dry-road performance was ADAC's one positive, but there are no detailed dry results here to establish a broader advantage. The record is dominated by braking qualifiers, so it gives a clearer picture of stopping limitations than of handling, comfort or long-term wear.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry grip
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 2018 ADAC 175/65 R14 test described it as good in the dry.
Good in the dry
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 175/65 R14 (2018)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Moderate
Details
- 29th of 50, 29.1% behind the best, 2026 Auto Bild qualifier.
- 34th of 54, 22.3% behind, 2023 Auto Bild qualifier.
- 34th of 57, 23.4% behind, 2022 Auto Bild market overview.
-
Snow braking
Minor
Details
- 27th of 30, 3.8% behind the best, 2026 Auto Bild qualifier.
-
Snow traction
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 2018 ADAC described it as very weak on snow.
Very weak in the wet and on snow, high fuel consumption
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 175/65 R14 (2018)
-
Rolling resistance
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 2018 ADAC criticised high fuel consumption.
Very weak in the wet and on snow, high fuel consumption
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 175/65 R14 (2018)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
Very weak in the wet and on snow, high fuel consumption
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 175/65 R14 (2018)
Every test, newest first 4
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
Back to the Nankang SV3 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Nankang tires

