Menu
Landsail Winter Lander View Gallery (1)
155-245/40-80 R13-19 92 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Landsail Winter Lander

The Landsail Winter Lander is a High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
77%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
77%
Wear
80%
Comfort
73%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
90%
Ice Grip
90%
3 Reviews
80% Average
3,609 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 29th)
Landsail Winter Lander

Landsail Winter Lander

Winter Economy
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
86.4
1.93x / 7 tests
Dry
86.3
1.13x / 1 test
Comfort
85
0.32x / 1 test
Ice
84.7
1.2x / 1 test
Value
63.6
0.42x / 3 tests
Snow
55.3
1.5x / 5 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
76.7
11 tests
Traction
40
1 test
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 4
Publications: 2
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 3
Avg Rating: 80.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.48
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 30/52 2 metrics
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 23/31 12 metrics
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 31/55 2 metrics
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 33/49 2 metrics
4
Tests
29th
Average
23rd
Best
33rd
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
30th/52
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
23rd/31
The Landsail Winter Lander receives poor ratings on winter roads resulting in poor overall driving safety, with only adequate dry performance and narrowly missing good wet ratings, plus satisfactory environmental performance for a poor overall judgment. On dry roads, it shows barely adequate responsiveness and steering feedback with very imprecise handling requiring constant corrections, oversteering tendencies during dynamic maneuvers with adequate limit behavior, but good braking performance. On wet surfaces, it narrowly misses good overall ratings with good braking distances but only satisfactory aquaplaning resistance and handling due to moderate grip levels and the need for better force combination. In winter conditions, it receives poor ratings with poor snow braking and handling performance due to inadequate force combination resulting in very imprecise control and very low limits with early under/oversteering tendencies, though it achieves adequate snow traction and good ice braking. This Chinese-manufactured tire receives satisfactory environmental ratings with barely satisfactory predicted mileage, low tire wear, slightly elevated weight, but good fuel consumption.
31st/55

Alternative Tires

8.4/10
92% 53 reviews
7.6/10
86% 9 reviews
7.4/10
87% 17 reviews
7.0/10
86% 11 reviews
6.8/10
87% 42 reviews
6.5/10
87% 17 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D B 71
14 inch
165/70R14 81 T D B 71
175/65R14 82 H D B 71
175/65R14 82 T D B 71
175/65R14 82 T C C 71
185/60R14 82 H D B 71
185/60R14 82 T D B 71
15 inch
185/65R15 88 H D B 71
185/65R15 88 T D B 71
185/65R15 88 T C C 71
195/55R15 85 H D B 72
195/65R15 91 H D B 72
195/65R15 91 T D B 72
195/65R15 91 T C C 72
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C B 72
205/55R16 91 T C B 72
205/55R16 91 T C C 72
205/60R16 96 H XL C B 72
205/60R16 96 T XL C B 72
205/60R16 96 T XL C C 72
215/60R16 99 H XL C B 72
215/60R16 99 T XL C B 72
215/60R16 99 T XL C C 72
17 inch
205/50R17 93 H XL D B 72
205/50R17 93 T XL D B 72
205/50R17 93 T XL C C 72
215/55R17 98 H XL C B 72
215/55R17 98 T XL C B 72
215/55R17 98 T XL C C 72
225/45R17 94 H XL C B 72
225/45R17 94 T XL C B 72
225/45R17 94 T XL C C 72
225/45R17 94 V XL C B 72
225/50R17 98 H XL C B 72
225/50R17 98 T XL C B 72
225/50R17 98 T XL C C 72
18 inch
225/40R18 92 H XL C B 72
225/40R18 92 T XL C B 72
225/40R18 92 T XL C C 72
225/40R18 92 V XL C B 72
245/45R18 100 H XL C B 72
245/45R18 100 T XL C B 72
245/45R18 100 T XL C C 72
245/45R18 100 V XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Landsail Winter Lander >>

Questions and Answers for the Landsail Winter Lander

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Landsail Winter Lander. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
Available in 1 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 Landsail Winter Lander Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Skoda (225/50 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 9 easy going miles
Bought these tires as a recommendation. I only have them fitted from early December to Late March, now on my second year of them being used in Winter months. They have probably covered circa 9000 in that time. I have the LS588 for the rest of the year. I am very pleased with their overall performance and would not hesitate to use / buy them again.
November 9, 2020
Given 67% while driving a Ford Focus (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 1,600 miles
Good on snow and ice but loud tire noises on dry asphalt. Also a good response on wet roads. Very good price for fair quality.
wet grip - class C
fuel economy- class C
September 7, 2016
Given 84% while driving a Peugeot 207 GTI (195/65 R17) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
These are the best winter tires I have ever put on and I've had a few, grip in snow unbelievable and road ride very quiet, living in a hilly rural location these tires have been an eye opener, will definitely be sticking with these Lanndsail winter landers.
January 21, 2018

How would you rate the Landsail Winter Lander?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Landsail Winter Lander Reviews

Rate the Landsail Winter Lander