Test Charts / Auto Bild
2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/45 R19
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 16
- Test vehicle
- BMW 5 Series
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
115 ft | -23 ft | 0 mph |
| 138 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 139 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 140 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 143 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 143 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 144 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 144 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 145 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 146 ft | +8 ft | 18 mph | |
| 147 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 147 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 147 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 148 ft | +10 ft | 20 mph | |
| 150 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 151 ft | +13 ft | 23 mph | |
| 152 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 152 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 154 ft | +16 ft | 25 mph | |
| 155 ft | +17 ft | 26 mph | |
| 155 ft | +17 ft | 26 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
156 ft | +18 ft | 27 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 36% (41 ft ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
70.6 mph | +1.2 mph |
| 69.4 mph | Best | |
| 69.4 mph | Best | |
| 69.3 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 69.2 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 68.9 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 68.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 68.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 68.7 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 68.7 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 68.7 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 68.6 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 68.5 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 68.5 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 68.5 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 68.4 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 68.2 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 68.0 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 67.9 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 67.5 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 67.3 mph | -2.1 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
66.4 mph | -3.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 mph).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 169 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 174 ft | +5 ft | 13 mph | |
| 184 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 186 ft | +17 ft | 24 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
188 ft | +19 ft | 25 mph |
| 192 ft | +23 ft | 27 mph | |
| 193 ft | +24 ft | 28 mph | |
| 195 ft | +26 ft | 29 mph | |
| 195 ft | +26 ft | 29 mph | |
| 195 ft | +26 ft | 29 mph | |
| 196 ft | +27 ft | 30 mph | |
| 197 ft | +28 ft | 30 mph | |
| 197 ft | +28 ft | 30 mph | |
| 197 ft | +28 ft | 30 mph | |
| 199 ft | +30 ft | 31 mph | |
| 201 ft | +32 ft | 32 mph | |
| 201 ft | +32 ft | 32 mph | |
| 202 ft | +33 ft | 32 mph | |
| 205 ft | +36 ft | 33 mph | |
| 207 ft | +38 ft | 34 mph | |
| 210 ft | +41 ft | 35 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
260 ft | +91 ft | 47 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (91 ft ≈ 6.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
51.8 mph | +0.4 mph |
| 51.4 mph | Best | |
| 51.4 mph | 0.0 mph | |
| 51.0 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 51.0 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 50.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 49.4 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 48.5 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 48.3 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 48.2 mph | -3.2 mph | |
| 47.9 mph | -3.5 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -3.7 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -3.9 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
42.2 mph | -9.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (9.6 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
11.59 s | -0.55 s |
| 12.14 s | Best | |
| 12.29 s | +0.15 s | |
| 12.38 s | +0.24 s | |
| 12.5 s | +0.36 s | |
| 12.51 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.53 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.54 s | +0.40 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.42 s | |
| 12.56 s | +0.42 s | |
| 12.62 s | +0.48 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.49 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.49 s | |
| 12.68 s | +0.54 s | |
| 12.69 s | +0.55 s | |
| 12.7 s | +0.56 s | |
| 12.78 s | +0.64 s | |
| 12.81 s | +0.67 s | |
| 12.83 s | +0.69 s | |
| 12.85 s | +0.71 s | |
| 12.89 s | +0.75 s | |
RefReference Budget |
14.54 s | +2.40 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (2.95 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
58.3 mph | +0.1 mph |
| 58.2 mph | Best | |
| 58.1 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 57.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 57.5 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 57.5 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 57.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 56.9 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 56.8 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 56.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 56.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 56.2 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 56.0 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 55.9 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 55.9 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 55.6 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 55.6 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 55.4 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 55.4 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 55.3 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 54.7 mph | -3.5 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
50.4 mph | -7.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (7.9 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
10.7 ft/s² | +1.3 ft/s² |
| 9.4 ft/s² | Best | |
| 9.3 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 9.1 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.1 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.0 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 9.0 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 8.8 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.6 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 8.3 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 8.1 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.1 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.0 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 7.7 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 7.6 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 7.6 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 7.5 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 7.3 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
RefReference Budget |
5.1 ft/s² | -4.3 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 52.3% (5.6 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 95 ft | 0 ft | 5 mph | |
| 95 ft | 0 ft | 7 mph | |
| 95 ft | 0 ft | 7 mph | |
| 95 ft | 0 ft | 7 mph | |
| 95 ft | 0 ft | 7 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 9 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 9 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 97 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 97 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
97 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph |
| 97 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 98 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 98 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 98 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 99 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
146 ft | +51 ft | 47 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 53.6% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ would still be travelling at 16 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1,209 lbf | Best | |
| 1,209 lbf | 0 lbf | |
| 1,195 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 1,187 lbf | -22 lbf | |
| 1,182 lbf | -27 lbf | |
| 1,181 lbf | -28 lbf | |
| 1,179 lbf | -30 lbf | |
| 1,177 lbf | -32 lbf | |
| 1,176 lbf | -33 lbf | |
| 1,174 lbf | -35 lbf | |
RefReference Budget |
1,164 lbf | -45 lbf |
| 1,162 lbf | -47 lbf | |
| 1,158 lbf | -51 lbf | |
| 1,152 lbf | -57 lbf | |
| 1,151 lbf | -58 lbf | |
| 1,143 lbf | -66 lbf | |
| 1,139 lbf | -70 lbf | |
| 1,139 lbf | -70 lbf | |
| 1,138 lbf | -71 lbf | |
| 1,132 lbf | -77 lbf | |
| 1,120 lbf | -89 lbf | |
RefReference Summer |
567 lbf | -642 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 53.1% (642 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 36.0 mph | Best | |
| 36.0 mph | Best | |
| 35.9 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 35.9 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 35.7 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 35.5 mph | -0.5 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
35.4 mph | -0.6 mph |
| 35.4 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 35.3 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 35.2 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 35.0 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 35.0 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 34.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 34.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 34.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 34.0 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 34.0 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 33.4 mph | -2.6 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
17.8 mph | -18.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 50.6% (18.2 mph).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 11.4 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 11.4 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
RefReference Budget |
11.1 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² |
| 11.1 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 11.1 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 11.0 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 11.0 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 10.9 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
RefReference Summer |
6.5 ft/s² | -5.0 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (5 ft/s²).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.8 Points | Best | |
| 9.6 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.6 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.6 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.6 Points | -0.20 Points | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.40 Points | |
| 9.4 Points | -0.40 Points | |
| 8.6 Points | -1.20 Points | |
| 8.4 Points | -1.40 Points | |
| 8.2 Points | -1.60 Points | |
| 8.2 Points | -1.60 Points | |
| 8.2 Points | -1.60 Points | |
| 8.2 Points | -1.60 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.80 Points | |
| 7.8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7.8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7.6 Points | -2.20 Points | |
| 7.6 Points | -2.20 Points | |
| 7.4 Points | -2.40 Points | |
| 7.2 Points | -2.60 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 26.5% (2.6 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Budget |
69.8 dB | -1.20 dB |
| 71 dB | Best | |
| 71 dB | Best | |
| 71.1 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 72.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.90 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
73 dB | +2.00 dB |
| 73.4 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 74.6 dB | +3.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4.8 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 35,107 miles | Best | |
| 34,983 miles | -124 miles | |
| 34,517 miles | -590 miles | |
| 33,989 miles | -1,118 miles | |
| 33,834 miles | -1,273 miles | |
| 33,740 miles | -1,367 miles | |
| 33,461 miles | -1,646 miles | |
| 32,529 miles | -2,578 miles | |
| 32,405 miles | -2,702 miles | |
| 32,063 miles | -3,044 miles | |
| 31,876 miles | -3,231 miles | |
| 31,690 miles | -3,417 miles | |
| 30,323 miles | -4,784 miles | |
| 30,261 miles | -4,846 miles | |
| 30,199 miles | -4,908 miles | |
| 29,919 miles | -5,188 miles | |
| 29,515 miles | -5,592 miles | |
| 28,738 miles | -6,369 miles | |
| 28,707 miles | -6,400 miles | |
| 27,030 miles | -8,077 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 23% (8,077 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.27 Price/1000 | Best | €23.73 | |
| 11.16 Price/1000 | +0.89 Price/1000 | €23.35 | |
| 11.42 Price/1000 | +1.15 Price/1000 | €21.63 | |
| 12.12 Price/1000 | +1.85 Price/1000 | €26.64 | |
| 12.8 Price/1000 | +2.53 Price/1000 | €29.09 | |
| 13.04 Price/1000 | +2.77 Price/1000 | €24.91 | |
| 13.81 Price/1000 | +3.54 Price/1000 | €27.09 | |
| 14.12 Price/1000 | +3.85 Price/1000 | €31.82 | |
| 14.25 Price/1000 | +3.98 Price/1000 | €25.53 | |
| 14.4 Price/1000 | +4.13 Price/1000 | €26.23 | |
| 14.5 Price/1000 | +4.23 Price/1000 | €31.02 | |
| 14.61 Price/1000 | +4.34 Price/1000 | €27.42 | |
| 14.86 Price/1000 | +4.59 Price/1000 | €27.14 | |
| 15.2 Price/1000 | +4.93 Price/1000 | €30.18 | |
| 17.05 Price/1000 | +6.78 Price/1000 | €31.15 | |
| 17.3 Price/1000 | +7.03 Price/1000 | €37.90 | |
| 17.57 Price/1000 | +7.30 Price/1000 | €30.95 | |
| 18.23 Price/1000 | +7.96 Price/1000 | €35.21 | |
| 19.3 Price/1000 | +9.03 Price/1000 | €36.33 | |
| 20.49 Price/1000 | +10.22 Price/1000 | €39.50 |
The difference between best and worst was 99.5% (10.22 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport) works out €447 cheaper than the most expensive (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.46 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.55 kg/t | +0.09 kg/t | $4 | |
| 7.62 kg/t | +0.16 kg/t | $6 | |
| 7.64 kg/t | +0.18 kg/t | $7 | |
| 7.66 kg/t | +0.20 kg/t | $8 | |
| 7.74 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t | $11 | |
| 7.76 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | $12 | |
| 7.77 kg/t | +0.31 kg/t | $12 | |
| 7.95 kg/t | +0.49 kg/t | $19 | |
| 7.99 kg/t | +0.53 kg/t | $21 | |
| 8 kg/t | +0.54 kg/t | $21 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $24 | |
| 8.14 kg/t | +0.68 kg/t | $27 | |
| 8.2 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | $29 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $35 | |
| 8.35 kg/t | +0.89 kg/t | $35 | |
| 8.38 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | $36 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.13 kg/t | $45 | |
| 8.67 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | $48 | |
| 8.8 kg/t | +1.34 kg/t | $53 |
The difference between best and worst was 18% (1.34 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ uses about 15 gal ($53) more fuel than the Viking WinTech NewGen.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets
245/45 R1950 tires tested
20 of these 20 tires tested again
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tires tested
13 of these 20 tires tested again
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
225/40 R1831 tires tested
12 of these 20 tires tested again

