Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
245/45 R19
Tires tested
20
Disciplines
16
Test vehicle
BMW 5 Series

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
115 ft -23 ft 0 mph
138 ft Best 0 mph
139 ft +1 ft 7 mph
140 ft +2 ft 9 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
145 ft +7 ft 17 mph
146 ft +8 ft 18 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
148 ft +10 ft 20 mph
150 ft +12 ft 22 mph
151 ft +13 ft 23 mph
152 ft +14 ft 24 mph
152 ft +14 ft 24 mph
154 ft +16 ft 25 mph
155 ft +17 ft 26 mph
155 ft +17 ft 26 mph
RefReference Budget
156 ft +18 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 36% (41 ft ≈ 2.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Semperit Speed Grip 5 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
70.6 mph +1.2 mph
69.4 mph Best
69.4 mph Best
69.3 mph -0.1 mph
69.2 mph -0.2 mph
68.9 mph -0.5 mph
68.8 mph -0.6 mph
68.8 mph -0.6 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.7 mph -0.7 mph
68.6 mph -0.8 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.5 mph -0.9 mph
68.4 mph -1.0 mph
68.2 mph -1.2 mph
68.0 mph -1.4 mph
67.9 mph -1.5 mph
67.5 mph -1.9 mph
67.3 mph -2.1 mph
RefReference Budget
66.4 mph -3.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6% (4.2 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
169 ft Best 0 mph
174 ft +5 ft 13 mph
184 ft +15 ft 23 mph
186 ft +17 ft 24 mph
RefReference Summer
188 ft +19 ft 25 mph
192 ft +23 ft 27 mph
193 ft +24 ft 28 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
195 ft +26 ft 29 mph
196 ft +27 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
197 ft +28 ft 30 mph
199 ft +30 ft 31 mph
201 ft +32 ft 32 mph
201 ft +32 ft 32 mph
202 ft +33 ft 32 mph
205 ft +36 ft 33 mph
207 ft +38 ft 34 mph
210 ft +41 ft 35 mph
RefReference Budget
260 ft +91 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.3% (91 ft ≈ 6.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.8 mph +0.4 mph
51.4 mph Best
51.4 mph 0.0 mph
51.0 mph -0.4 mph
51.0 mph -0.4 mph
50.8 mph -0.6 mph
50.3 mph -1.1 mph
49.5 mph -1.9 mph
49.4 mph -2.0 mph
49.0 mph -2.4 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.8 mph -2.6 mph
48.7 mph -2.7 mph
48.7 mph -2.7 mph
48.5 mph -2.9 mph
48.3 mph -3.1 mph
48.2 mph -3.2 mph
47.9 mph -3.5 mph
47.7 mph -3.7 mph
47.5 mph -3.9 mph
RefReference Budget
42.2 mph -9.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (9.6 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.59 s -0.55 s
12.14 s Best
12.29 s +0.15 s
12.38 s +0.24 s
12.5 s +0.36 s
12.51 s +0.37 s
12.53 s +0.39 s
12.54 s +0.40 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.56 s +0.42 s
12.62 s +0.48 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.63 s +0.49 s
12.68 s +0.54 s
12.69 s +0.55 s
12.7 s +0.56 s
12.78 s +0.64 s
12.81 s +0.67 s
12.83 s +0.69 s
12.85 s +0.71 s
12.89 s +0.75 s
RefReference Budget
14.54 s +2.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.5% (2.95 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
58.3 mph +0.1 mph
58.2 mph Best
58.1 mph -0.1 mph
57.6 mph -0.6 mph
57.5 mph -0.7 mph
57.5 mph -0.7 mph
57.2 mph -1.0 mph
56.9 mph -1.3 mph
56.8 mph -1.4 mph
56.4 mph -1.8 mph
56.4 mph -1.8 mph
56.2 mph -2.0 mph
56.0 mph -2.2 mph
55.9 mph -2.3 mph
55.9 mph -2.3 mph
55.6 mph -2.6 mph
55.6 mph -2.6 mph
55.4 mph -2.8 mph
55.4 mph -2.8 mph
55.3 mph -2.9 mph
54.7 mph -3.5 mph
RefReference Budget
50.4 mph -7.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (7.9 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
10.7 ft/s² +1.3 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² Best
9.3 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
8.3 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
7.7 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
5.1 ft/s² -4.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 52.3% (5.6 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
95 ft Best 0 mph
95 ft 0 ft 5 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
95 ft 0 ft 7 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 9 mph
96 ft +1 ft 9 mph
96 ft +1 ft 10 mph
96 ft +1 ft 10 mph
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
RefReference Budget
97 ft +2 ft 12 mph
97 ft +2 ft 12 mph
98 ft +3 ft 14 mph
98 ft +3 ft 14 mph
98 ft +3 ft 15 mph
99 ft +4 ft 16 mph
RefReference Summer
146 ft +51 ft 47 mph

The difference between best and worst was 53.6% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Lassa Competus Winter 2+ would still be travelling at 16 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
1,209 lbf Best
1,209 lbf 0 lbf
1,195 lbf -14 lbf
1,187 lbf -22 lbf
1,182 lbf -27 lbf
1,181 lbf -28 lbf
1,179 lbf -30 lbf
1,177 lbf -32 lbf
1,176 lbf -33 lbf
1,174 lbf -35 lbf
RefReference Budget
1,164 lbf -45 lbf
1,162 lbf -47 lbf
1,158 lbf -51 lbf
1,152 lbf -57 lbf
1,151 lbf -58 lbf
1,143 lbf -66 lbf
1,139 lbf -70 lbf
1,139 lbf -70 lbf
1,138 lbf -71 lbf
1,132 lbf -77 lbf
1,120 lbf -89 lbf
RefReference Summer
567 lbf -642 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 53.1% (642 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
36.0 mph Best
36.0 mph Best
35.9 mph -0.1 mph
35.9 mph -0.1 mph
35.7 mph -0.3 mph
35.5 mph -0.5 mph
RefReference Budget
35.4 mph -0.6 mph
35.4 mph -0.6 mph
35.3 mph -0.7 mph
35.2 mph -0.8 mph
35.0 mph -1.0 mph
35.0 mph -1.0 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.9 mph -1.1 mph
34.0 mph -2.0 mph
34.0 mph -2.0 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.7 mph -2.3 mph
33.4 mph -2.6 mph
RefReference Summer
17.8 mph -18.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 50.6% (18.2 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.5 ft/s² Best
11.4 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
10.9 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
6.5 ft/s² -5.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 43.3% (5 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.8 Points Best
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
8.6 Points -1.20 Points
8.4 Points -1.40 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8 Points -1.80 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points
7.2 Points -2.60 Points

The difference between best and worst was 26.5% (2.6 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Budget
69.8 dB -1.20 dB
71 dB Best
71 dB Best
71.1 dB +0.10 dB
71.6 dB +0.60 dB
71.7 dB +0.70 dB
71.8 dB +0.80 dB
71.9 dB +0.90 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.1 dB +1.10 dB
72.3 dB +1.30 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.4 dB +1.40 dB
72.5 dB +1.50 dB
72.6 dB +1.60 dB
72.7 dB +1.70 dB
72.9 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Summer
73 dB +2.00 dB
73.4 dB +2.40 dB
73.5 dB +2.50 dB
73.8 dB +2.80 dB
74.6 dB +3.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4.8 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
35,107 miles Best
34,983 miles -124 miles
34,517 miles -590 miles
33,989 miles -1,118 miles
33,834 miles -1,273 miles
33,740 miles -1,367 miles
33,461 miles -1,646 miles
32,529 miles -2,578 miles
32,405 miles -2,702 miles
32,063 miles -3,044 miles
31,876 miles -3,231 miles
31,690 miles -3,417 miles
30,323 miles -4,784 miles
30,261 miles -4,846 miles
30,199 miles -4,908 miles
29,919 miles -5,188 miles
29,515 miles -5,592 miles
28,738 miles -6,369 miles
28,707 miles -6,400 miles
27,030 miles -8,077 miles

The difference between best and worst was 23% (8,077 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
10.27 Price/1000 Best €23.73
11.16 Price/1000 +0.89 Price/1000 €23.35
11.42 Price/1000 +1.15 Price/1000 €21.63
12.12 Price/1000 +1.85 Price/1000 €26.64
12.8 Price/1000 +2.53 Price/1000 €29.09
13.04 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €24.91
13.81 Price/1000 +3.54 Price/1000 €27.09
14.12 Price/1000 +3.85 Price/1000 €31.82
14.25 Price/1000 +3.98 Price/1000 €25.53
14.4 Price/1000 +4.13 Price/1000 €26.23
14.5 Price/1000 +4.23 Price/1000 €31.02
14.61 Price/1000 +4.34 Price/1000 €27.42
14.86 Price/1000 +4.59 Price/1000 €27.14
15.2 Price/1000 +4.93 Price/1000 €30.18
17.05 Price/1000 +6.78 Price/1000 €31.15
17.3 Price/1000 +7.03 Price/1000 €37.90
17.57 Price/1000 +7.30 Price/1000 €30.95
18.23 Price/1000 +7.96 Price/1000 €35.21
19.3 Price/1000 +9.03 Price/1000 €36.33
20.49 Price/1000 +10.22 Price/1000 €39.50

The difference between best and worst was 99.5% (10.22 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Petlas SnowMaster 2 Sport) works out €447 cheaper than the most expensive (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.46 kg/t Best $0
7.55 kg/t +0.09 kg/t $4
7.62 kg/t +0.16 kg/t $6
7.64 kg/t +0.18 kg/t $7
7.66 kg/t +0.20 kg/t $8
7.74 kg/t +0.28 kg/t $11
7.76 kg/t +0.30 kg/t $12
7.77 kg/t +0.31 kg/t $12
7.95 kg/t +0.49 kg/t $19
7.99 kg/t +0.53 kg/t $21
8 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $21
8.06 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $24
8.14 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $27
8.2 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $29
8.34 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $35
8.35 kg/t +0.89 kg/t $35
8.38 kg/t +0.92 kg/t $36
8.59 kg/t +1.13 kg/t $45
8.67 kg/t +1.21 kg/t $48
8.8 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $53

The difference between best and worst was 18% (1.34 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ uses about 15 gal ($53) more fuel than the Viking WinTech NewGen.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.