8 tests, 2018 to 2025
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 17%
Record by discipline
Where the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P14 of 16 | 13% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 6 | P38 of 46.3 | 18% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P14 of 16 | 13% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 1 | P12 of 16 | 27% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 1 | P12 of 16 | 27% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P1 of 16 | 100% | 1 |
| Snow Traction | 1 | P2 of 16 | 93% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P15 of 16 | 7% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P1 of 16 | 100% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P5 of 16 | 73% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 8 tests. Updated October 15, 2025.
Across eight winter-focused tests, the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 shows a polarized profile: outstanding snow capability and projected longevity contrasted by consistently weak wet braking and below-average overall rankings. It repeatedly finishes near the back of large Autobild wet-braking screenings, which heavily depresses its average position (34.5). However, ADAC 2024 highlights class-leading snow braking and best-in-test projected mileage, indicating strong value and winter-surface traction when conditions are snowy.
Overall, this tire suits drivers prioritizing snow performance and durability over wet-road stopping distances. Persistent wet braking deficits across years and sizes are the defining weakness, while snow braking/traction and wear are clear bright spots.
Performance Strengths
-
Snow Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place snow braking in 2024 ADAC 17" test (9.3 m)
- 2nd place snow traction in 2024 ADAC (+1.7% from best)
-
Tread Life / Value
Strong
Details
- Best projected mileage 65,100 km in 2024 ADAC (1/16)
- Abrasion 5/16 in 2024 ADAC (+7.3% from best)
-
Snow braking
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
it excels on snow with good braking and traction
- 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
-
Snow handling
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
and very good handling
- 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
it excels on snow with good braking and traction
- 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Braking
Strong
Details
- 33/52 in 2025 Autobild wet braking (+26.8%)
- 46/55 in 2024 Autobild wet braking (+26.3%)
- 47/54 in 2023 Autobild wet braking (+30.3%)
- 52/57 in 2022 Autobild wet braking (+33.4%)
- 36/44 in 2019 Autobild wet braking (+20.9%)
-
Overall Wet Performance / Aquaplaning
Moderate
Details
- 12/16 straight aquaplaning in 2024 ADAC (+8.6% from best)
- 12/16 curved aquaplaning in 2024 ADAC (+29.4% from best)
-
Ice Braking
Moderate
Details
- 15/16 ice braking in 2024 ADAC (+25.5% from best)
-
Overall Ranking Consistency
Strong
Details
- Average overall position 34.5 across 8 tests
- Bottom-tier finishes: 46/55 (2024 Autobild), 47/54 (2023 Autobild), 51/57 (2022 Autobild), 12/12 (2018 ACE)
-
Dry handling
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
barely adequate feedback and precision on dry surfaces, requiring frequent steering corrections and exhibiting a tendency to oversteer
- 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
Every test, newest first 8
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test
The Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 receives a satisfactory rating for driving safety, but with weaknesses on dry roads impacting its overall score. It offers barely adequate feedback and precision on dry surfaces, requiring frequent steering corrections and exhibiting a tendency to oversteer. While it performs satisfactorily on wet roads, its handling is less precise with a low grip level. However, it excels on snow with good braking and traction, and very good handling. Its environmental performance is poor due to its high weight, despite a long lifespan and low abrasion. Concerns about sustainability due to its production in China and manufacturing residues on new tires further detract from its environmental rating.
Back to the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Kenda tires

