4 tests, 2020 to 2025
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 9%
Record by discipline
Where the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P21 of 31 | 33% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 4 | P41.3 of 46.5 | 11% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P29 of 31 | 7% | - |
| Wet Circle | 1 | P12 of 30 | 62% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 1 | P26 of 31 | 17% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 1 | P23 of 31 | 27% | - |
| Snow Traction | 1 | P13 of 31 | 60% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P4 of 31 | 90% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 1 | P7 of 31 | 80% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P5 of 31 | 87% | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 1 | P1 of 31 | 100% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P6 of 31 | 83% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 4 tests. Updated October 15, 2025.
Across four winter-focused tests, the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 shows a clear split: extremely weak wet braking performance but standout efficiency, wear, and ice braking in the comprehensive ADAC test. It routinely finishes near the back in large wet-braking shootouts (Auto Bild), indicating a systemic wet grip shortfall. Conversely, ADAC's full assessment highlights top-tier fuel consumption, very good wear/abrasion, low noise, and surprisingly strong ice braking, with snow traction/braking in the mid-pack.
Performance Strengths
-
Efficiency and Wear
Strong
Details
- 1st place fuel consumption in 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (225/40 R18)
- 5th/31 wear 66500 KM (+17.9% from best) in 2025 ADAC
- 6th/31 abrasion 58 mg/km/t (+16% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Ice Performance
Moderate
Details
- 4th/31 ice braking 15.9 m (+4.6% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Noise/Comfort
Moderate
Details
- 7th/31 noise 71.6 dB (+1.8% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Tread life
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
very high predicted mileage rated as very good
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Weather Performance
Strong
Details
- 47/52 wet braking (+35% from best) in 2025 Autobild braking test
- 50/54 wet braking (+34.7% from best) in 2023 Auto Bild
- 39/49 wet braking (+29.7% from best) in 2020 Auto Bild
- 29/31 wet braking 40.4 m (+27.4% from best) and 29/31 wet braking (concrete) 47.3 m (+29.6% from best) in 2025 ADAC
- 26/31 aquaplaning straight (+13.9% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Overall Competitive Standing
Strong
Details
- 46/52 overall in 2025 Autobild braking test
- 51/54 overall in 2023 Auto Bild braking test
- 39/49 overall in 2020 Auto Bild braking test
- 27/31 overall in 2025 ADAC
-
Dry Braking
Minor
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
- 21/31 dry braking 44.8 m (+8.2% from best) in 2025 ADAC
narrowly missing good braking distances
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)
-
Wet Handling/Circle
Minor
Details
- 12/30 wet circle (+19.4% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Snow Performance
Moderate
Details
- 23/31 snow braking (+8.7% from best) in 2025 ADAC
- 13/31 snow traction (+6.3% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
poor on wet roads
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)
-
Wet handling
Strong
in 1 of 1 tests
Details
very early under/oversteering tendencies and poor force combination
- 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test (2025)
Every test, newest first 4
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
The Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 receives adequate ratings on dry roads, satisfactory on winter surfaces, but poor on wet roads, resulting in poor overall driving safety despite good environmental performance for a poor overall judgment. On dry roads, it shows barely adequate responsiveness and steering feedback with very imprecise handling requiring constant corrections, oversteering tendencies during dynamic maneuvers with adequate limit behavior, and narrowly missing good braking distances. On wet surfaces, it receives poor ratings overall with very early under/oversteering tendencies and poor force combination compared to other test products, plus very low grip and limit performance, with only satisfactory ratings for braking and aquaplaning resistance. In winter conditions, it achieves satisfactory ratings across all criteria including snow and ice braking, snow traction, and handling, though control isn't particularly precise with moderate limits and early under/oversteering tendencies requiring better force combination. This Chinese-manufactured tire receives clearly good environmental ratings with very high predicted mileage rated as very good, low tire wear, and good efficiency thanks to low weight and fuel consumption.
Back to the Tomket Snowroad Pro 3 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Tomket tires

