Following on from the fifty six winter tire braking shootout, these are the top twenty winter tires in the full Auto Bild Full Winter Tire Test!
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
As with the Auto Bild All Season tire test, Auto Bild have performed one of the best winter tire tests of the year, and have even tested wear! Overall the results are going to cause a little confusion, as the Michelin Alpin 6 wins this test overall, after performing relatively poorly in the 2022/23 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test.
While the test sizes are similar, both 17" wheels, it's important to note that the Tire Reviews test was 225/45 R17 and this test 215/55 R17. This result for the Alpin 6 is far more in line with the norm for the French winter tire, which makes us further believe there was a problem with the tires we tested earlier this year. In short, there's no need to avoid the Michelin Alpin 6!
Other standouts are the new Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 finishing tied first place overall, and the new aging Goodyear and Dunlop winter tire combination finishing third and fourth!
Auto Bild also included an unnamed budget winter tire to highlight out good this group of tires really is. You can see it listed as "Reference Budget" in the charts below.
Wear
Projected tire tread life is a treat for tire tests, and with over 13,000 kms (8,000 miles) difference between the best and worst, it's data we love to see!
Recent Kumho products have been testing extremely well in wear tests, and this test is no different with the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 just edging out the Michelin Alpin 6 for top spot! Third to fifth spots essentially tied for third, with Firestone, Fulda and Pirelli all performing very well in the wear test.
Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 25,919 miles | Best | |
| 25,435 miles | -484 miles | |
| 24,760 miles | -1,159 miles | |
| 24,727 miles | -1,192 miles | |
| 24,708 miles | -1,211 miles | |
| 24,058 miles | -1,861 miles | |
| 23,597 miles | -2,322 miles | |
| 22,892 miles | -3,027 miles | |
| 22,738 miles | -3,181 miles | |
| 21,446 miles | -4,473 miles | |
| 20,933 miles | -4,986 miles | |
| 20,826 miles | -5,093 miles | |
| 20,817 miles | -5,102 miles | |
| 19,517 miles | -6,402 miles | |
| 19,223 miles | -6,696 miles | |
| 19,193 miles | -6,726 miles | |
| 19,008 miles | -6,911 miles | |
| 18,829 miles | -7,090 miles | |
| 18,627 miles | -7,292 miles | |
| 17,710 miles | -8,209 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (8,209 miles).
When you combine the projected wear with the purchase price, you can work out a value based on euros per 1000km. As the Kumho was one of the lower priced tires in the test, it naturally has the best value, with Michelin dropping to the second half of the table thanks to the expensive purchase price.
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.03 Price/1000 | Best | €35.46 | |
| 12.67 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 | €33.65 | |
| 13.44 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €34.01 | |
| 14.85 Price/1000 | +3.82 Price/1000 | €44.98 | |
| 15.29 Price/1000 | +4.26 Price/1000 | €42.00 | |
| 15.44 Price/1000 | +4.41 Price/1000 | €46.92 | |
| 15.79 Price/1000 | +4.76 Price/1000 | €39.17 | |
| 16.09 Price/1000 | +5.06 Price/1000 | €41.84 | |
| 16.12 Price/1000 | +5.09 Price/1000 | €33.82 | |
| 16.33 Price/1000 | +5.30 Price/1000 | €49.98 | |
| 16.67 Price/1000 | +5.64 Price/1000 | €39.64 | |
| 17.31 Price/1000 | +6.28 Price/1000 | €39.54 | |
| 17.35 Price/1000 | +6.32 Price/1000 | €41.55 | |
| 17.64 Price/1000 | +6.61 Price/1000 | €45.97 | |
| 17.78 Price/1000 | +6.75 Price/1000 | €32.25 | |
| 17.91 Price/1000 | +6.88 Price/1000 | €42.64 | |
| 19.35 Price/1000 | +8.32 Price/1000 | €45.83 | |
| 19.74 Price/1000 | +8.71 Price/1000 | €45.79 | |
| 20.59 Price/1000 | +9.56 Price/1000 | €46.86 | |
| 23.7 Price/1000 | +12.67 Price/1000 | €45.77 |
The difference between best and worst was 114.9% (12.67 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Uniroyal WinterExpert) works out €443 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken Eurowinter HS01).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.
Dry
The reference summer tire had a clear lead in dry braking, stopping the VW Golf nearly 13 feet shorter than the best winter tire! The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 and Michelin Alpin 6 were the best of the winters, with the reference budget winter being the worst.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
128 ft | -13 ft | 0 mph |
| 141 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 141 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 143 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 144 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 145 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 146 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 146 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 149 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 150 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 151 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 152 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 155 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
155 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry handling was also led by the summer tire, with the Bridgestone again the best of the winter tires.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
78.0 mph | +1.3 mph |
| 76.7 mph | Best | |
| 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 76.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 76.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 76.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
75.9 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 75.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 75.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 75.0 mph | -1.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (3 mph).
Wet
The summer tire was also best in wet braking, which is very normal for this sort of testing. Once again the Bridgestone was the best of the winter tires, with Michelin in second place.
The reference budget tire had dangerously low levels of grip in both the wet grip tests.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
159 ft | -9 ft | 0 mph |
| 168 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 175 ft | +7 ft | 16 mph | |
| 177 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 177 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 180 ft | +12 ft | 21 mph | |
| 181 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 181 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 182 ft | +14 ft | 22 mph | |
| 183 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 183 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 185 ft | +17 ft | 24 mph | |
| 186 ft | +18 ft | 25 mph | |
| 186 ft | +18 ft | 25 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 26 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 27 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 27 mph | |
| 191 ft | +23 ft | 28 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
213 ft | +45 ft | 37 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 34.1% (54 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Bridgestone led wet handling, with the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 second. The reference summer tire could only manage top third.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45.2 mph | Best | |
| 45.0 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
44.4 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 44.3 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 43.9 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 43.7 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 43.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 42.9 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 42.7 mph | -2.5 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
38.5 mph | -6.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6.7 mph).
The Hankook Winter Icept RS3 had the best straight aquaplaning result.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.5 mph | Best | |
| 50.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 49.6 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 49.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
48.8 mph | -1.7 mph |
| 48.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 47.9 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 47.6 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 47.1 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -6.1 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
41.7 mph | -8.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (8.8 mph).
Snow
BFGoodrich led snow braking.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 85 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 85 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 90 ft | +7 ft | 21 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
91 ft | +8 ft | 23 mph |
RefReference Summer |
134 ft | +51 ft | 49 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 61% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Uniroyal WinterExpert led snow traction testing.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 589 lbf | Best | |
| 586 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 586 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 583 lbf | -6 lbf | |
| 581 lbf | -8 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 577 lbf | -12 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 574 lbf | -15 lbf | |
| 573 lbf | -16 lbf | |
| 571 lbf | -18 lbf | |
| 569 lbf | -20 lbf | |
| 566 lbf | -23 lbf | |
| 562 lbf | -27 lbf | |
| 553 lbf | -36 lbf | |
| 549 lbf | -40 lbf | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
519 lbf | -70 lbf |
RefReference Summer |
194 lbf | -395 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 67% (395 lbf).
The Uniroyal also led snow handling.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.5 mph | Best | |
| 34.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 33.2 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 33.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 32.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 32.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
32.1 mph | -2.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (2.4 mph).
Environment
The Nokian Snowproof P was the quietest tire on test.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
71.3 dB | +1.60 dB |
| 71.5 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +2.90 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
72.7 dB | +3.00 dB |
| 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +3.80 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.8 dB).
The Uniroyal had the lowest rolling resistance, with the Continental WinterContact TS870P in second.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.68 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.3 kg/t | +0.62 kg/t | $27 | |
| 7.39 kg/t | +0.71 kg/t | $31 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.38 kg/t | $61 | |
| 8.18 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $66 | |
| 8.21 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | $67 | |
| 8.31 kg/t | +1.63 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.37 kg/t | +1.69 kg/t | $74 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | $76 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +2.06 kg/t | $91 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | $96 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | $96 |
| 8.89 kg/t | +2.21 kg/t | $97 | |
| 9.04 kg/t | +2.36 kg/t | $104 | |
| 9.12 kg/t | +2.44 kg/t | $107 | |
| 9.41 kg/t | +2.73 kg/t | $120 | |
| 9.53 kg/t | +2.85 kg/t | $125 | |
| 9.94 kg/t | +3.26 kg/t | $143 |
The difference between best and worst was 48.8% (3.26 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 40 gal ($143) more fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The Continental and Michelin were the most expensive tires to buy.
Results
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 146 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 177 ft | +9 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 45.0 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 20 | 12.41 s | +0.39 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 8.1 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 573 lbf | -16 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 12.6 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 12th / 20 | 71.7 dB | +2.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 24,708 miles | -1,211 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 8th / 20 | 16.09 Price/1000 | +5.06 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 14th / 20 | 8.74 kg/t | +2.06 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/71
- Price
- 640.00
Michelin Alpin 6
215/55 R17 94VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 141 ft | 0 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 76.2 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 175 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 20 | 12.34 s | +0.32 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 8.6 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 580 lbf | -9 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 16th / 20 | 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 25,435 miles | -484 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 13th / 20 | 17.35 Price/1000 | +6.32 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 20 | 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/69
- Price
- 720.00
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 20 | 145 ft | +4 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 20 | 182 ft | +14 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 12.21 s | +0.19 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 20 | 9.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 84 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 580 lbf | -9 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 20 | 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 22,738 miles | -3,181 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 11th / 20 | 16.67 Price/1000 | +5.64 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 20 | 8.21 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/71
- Price
- 610.00
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 12th / 20 | 147 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 75.7 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 20 | 181 ft | +13 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 44.6 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 4th / 20 | 12.33 s | +0.31 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 46.4 mph | -4.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 8.5 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 18th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 586 lbf | -3 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 16th / 20 | 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 22,892 miles | -3,027 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 16th / 20 | 17.91 Price/1000 | +6.88 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 12th / 20 | 8.37 kg/t | +1.69 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/C/71
- Price
- 660.00
Cooper Discoverer Winter
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 142 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 20 | 180 ft | +12 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 43.9 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 11th / 20 | 12.43 s | +0.41 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 47.6 mph | -2.9 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 8.1 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 577 lbf | -12 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 20 | 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 20,933 miles | -4,986 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 5th / 20 | 15.29 Price/1000 | +4.26 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 16th / 20 | 8.89 kg/t | +2.21 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/71
- Price
- 515.00
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 20 | 141 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 76.7 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 20 | 168 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 45.2 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 20 | 12.02 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 48.7 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 9.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 575 lbf | -14 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 19th / 20 | 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 19,517 miles | -6,402 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 18th / 20 | 19.74 Price/1000 | +8.71 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 20 | 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 620.00
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 148 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 20 | 76.4 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 20 | 181 ft | +13 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 12th / 20 | 12.47 s | +0.45 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 50.5 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 9.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 19th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 562 lbf | -27 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 11th / 20 | 71.5 dB | +1.80 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 19,193 miles | -6,726 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 14th / 20 | 17.64 Price/1000 | +6.61 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 15th / 20 | 8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 545.00
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 142 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 177 ft | +9 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 12.21 s | +0.19 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 9.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 84 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 581 lbf | -8 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 20 | 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 19,008 miles | -6,911 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 20th / 20 | 23.7 Price/1000 | +12.67 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 7.3 kg/t | +0.62 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/B/71
- Price
- 725.00
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 11th / 20 | 147 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 183 ft | +15 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 15th / 20 | 12.62 s | +0.60 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 20 | 49.6 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 8.7 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 20 | 83 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 575 lbf | -14 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 20,826 miles | -5,093 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 19th / 20 | 20.59 Price/1000 | +9.56 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 20 | 8.31 kg/t | +1.63 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/69
- Price
- 690.00
Semperit Speed Grip 5
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 17th / 20 | 151 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 185 ft | +17 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 14th / 20 | 12.59 s | +0.57 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 50.1 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 9.6 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 20 | 85 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 571 lbf | -18 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 13th / 20 | 71.8 dB | +2.10 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 20,817 miles | -5,102 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 9th / 20 | 16.12 Price/1000 | +5.09 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 7.39 kg/t | +0.71 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/C/72
- Price
- 540.00
Kleber Krisalp HP3
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 146 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 75.1 mph | -1.6 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 20th / 20 | 191 ft | +23 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 43.7 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 17th / 20 | 12.65 s | +0.63 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 50.0 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 8.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 84 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 586 lbf | -3 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 34.1 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 20 | 70.7 dB | +1.00 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 21,446 miles | -4,473 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 7th / 20 | 15.79 Price/1000 | +4.76 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 20 | 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/69
- Price
- 545.00
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 20 | 143 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 18th / 20 | 189 ft | +21 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 20 | 12.41 s | +0.39 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 47.9 mph | -2.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 8.5 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 575 lbf | -14 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 14th / 20 | 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 15th / 20 | 72.1 dB | +2.40 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 18,627 miles | -7,292 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 17th / 20 | 19.35 Price/1000 | +8.32 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 13th / 20 | 8.4 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Price
- 580.00
Falken Eurowinter HS01
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 13th / 20 | 148 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 20 | 75.6 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 15th / 20 | 186 ft | +18 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 18th / 20 | 12.66 s | +0.64 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 49.5 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 8.7 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 20 | 85 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 553 lbf | -36 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 14th / 20 | 71.9 dB | +2.20 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 23,597 miles | -2,322 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 10th / 20 | 16.33 Price/1000 | +5.30 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 20th / 20 | 9.94 kg/t | +3.26 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/70
- Price
- 620.00
Nexen Winguard Sport
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 15th / 20 | 149 ft | +8 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 15th / 20 | 186 ft | +18 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 20 | 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 10th / 20 | 12.42 s | +0.40 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 7.4 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 4th / 20 | 583 lbf | -6 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 32.9 mph | -1.6 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 12.2 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 20 | 69.7 dB | Best in this discipline |
| WearHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 18,829 miles | -7,090 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 4th / 20 | 14.85 Price/1000 | +3.82 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 18th / 20 | 9.41 kg/t | +2.73 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/70
- Price
- 450.00
Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 16th / 20 | 150 ft | +9 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 183 ft | +15 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 6th / 20 | 12.39 s | +0.37 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 49.3 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 7.8 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 566 lbf | -23 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 33.2 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 11th / 20 | 12.3 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 17,710 miles | -8,209 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 6th / 20 | 15.44 Price/1000 | +4.41 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 19th / 20 | 9.53 kg/t | +2.85 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/70
- Price
- 440.00
Firestone Winterhawk 4
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 19th / 20 | 153 ft | +12 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 20 | 184 ft | +16 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 44.3 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 20 | 12.41 s | +0.39 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 20 | 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 7.9 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 14th / 20 | 87 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 8th / 20 | 580 lbf | -9 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 12.5 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 20 | 70.6 dB | +0.90 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 3rd / 20 | 24,760 miles | -1,159 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 2nd / 20 | 12.67 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 20 | 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/71
- Price
- 505.00
Kumho Winter Craft WP52
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 142 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 11th / 20 | 184 ft | +16 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 20th / 20 | 12.77 s | +0.75 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 6.7 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 20th / 20 | 90 ft | +7 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 549 lbf | -40 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 17th / 20 | 12.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 18th / 20 | 72.6 dB | +2.90 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 25,919 miles | Best in this discipline |
| ValueLower is better | 1st / 20 | 11.03 Price/1000 | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 17th / 20 | 9.04 kg/t | +2.36 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Price
- 460.00
Nokian Snowproof P
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 20 | 144 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 20 | 76.3 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 20 | 184 ft | +16 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 43.6 mph | -1.6 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 13th / 20 | 12.48 s | +0.46 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 44.4 mph | -6.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 5.9 ft/s² | -3.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 16th / 20 | 569 lbf | -20 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 32.7 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 20 | 69.7 dB | Best in this discipline |
| WearHigher is better | 6th / 20 | 24,058 miles | -1,861 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 12th / 20 | 17.31 Price/1000 | +6.28 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 20 | 8.06 kg/t | +1.38 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/69
- Price
- 670.00
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 18th / 20 | 152 ft | +11 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 17th / 20 | 189 ft | +21 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 42.7 mph | -2.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 19th / 20 | 12.69 s | +0.67 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 47.1 mph | -3.4 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 20 | 9.3 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 13th / 20 | 574 lbf | -15 lbf |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 33.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 20th / 20 | 73.5 dB | +3.80 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 4th / 20 | 24,727 miles | -1,192 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 3rd / 20 | 13.44 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 20 | 8.18 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/C/72
- Price
- 535.00
Uniroyal WinterExpert
215/55 R17 98V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 20th / 20 | 155 ft | +14 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 20th / 20 | 75.0 mph | -1.7 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 18th / 20 | 189 ft | +21 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 42.9 mph | -2.3 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 16th / 20 | 12.63 s | +0.61 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 19th / 20 | 46.2 mph | -4.3 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 18th / 20 | 7.1 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 20 | 86 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 589 lbf | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 20 | 34.5 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 12th / 20 | 12.2 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 20 | 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB |
| WearHigher is better | 15th / 20 | 19,223 miles | -6,696 miles |
| ValueLower is better | 15th / 20 | 17.78 Price/1000 | +6.75 Price/1000 |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 20 | 6.68 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- C/C/72
- Price
- 550.00


That Type R in dry handling and rolling resistance is some new tire made by Honda? :)
??
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
I guess the vtec didn't kick in, should be much higher.
The Continental 870 was also tested in the last year Bild test, scoring the first place for projected wear (45000 km). How is possibile that the same tire, with similar dimensions, this year has a result of 30000 km, which let heavely down the total score?
Just checked on Autobild site, Nexen shoud be Winguard Sport 2
Different size with different results, not the first time, do you know what car was used by them?Maybe a tire performance can be affected by the car, Thanks