Menu

Nokian Snowproof P

The Nokian Snowproof P is offered in speed categories H (210 km/h), V (240 km/h) and W (270 km/h), and its comprehensive size selection covers 55 products from 17 to 21 inches.

8.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
92%
Wet Grip
89%
Road Feedback
86%
Handling
90%
Wear
80%
Comfort
79%
Buy again
86%
Snow Grip
92%
Ice Grip
86%
9 Reviews
87% Average
23,700 miles driven
7 Tests (avg: 10th)
Nokian Snowproof P

Nokian Snowproof P

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
93.9
0.32x / 7 tests
Ice
91.9
1.2x / 1 test
Snow
85.5
1.5x / 19 tests
Value
81.6
0.42x / 13 tests
Dry
72.3
1.13x / 10 tests
Wet
70
1.93x / 24 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
86
5 tests
Braking
83.6
19 tests
Handling
69.9
15 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 7
Publications: 5
Period: 2021 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 86.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.32
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 8/31 12 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 18/22 16 metrics
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2022 225/45 R19 9/10 14 metrics
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 13/57 2 metrics
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2022 225/45 R17 4/8 16 metrics
2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 12/18 0 metrics
2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test Tire Reviews 2021 225/40 R18 7/10 14 metrics
7
Tests
10th
Average
4th
Best
18th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
225/40 R18 • 2025
8th/31
The Nokian Tires Snowproof P fails to achieve good ratings on all three road surfaces and therefore misses a good overall driving safety score, and despite achieving a good environmental rating, only manages a satisfactory overall evaluation. For driving safety, the tire provides only satisfactory steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring occasional corrections during steering input and cornering due to its elastic response feel, and the test vehicle tends to oversteer during dynamic evasive maneuvers or lane changes with only satisfactory limit behavior, though it achieves good braking distances that are slightly above average for the test field. On wet surfaces, the Nokian delivers satisfactory overall performance - while it still scores well for braking distances, it only achieves satisfactory ratings for both longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning resistance and handling, where the tire tends to understeer early and lacks precision with moderate limit performance. In winter conditions, the Snowproof P also only manages satisfactory ratings overall, achieving good scores only for ice braking while receiving satisfactory evaluations for snow braking distances, traction, and handling, where the test vehicle cannot be steered with particular precision and the limit range is again only at a moderate level with early tendencies toward under- or oversteering, though the tire still offers some reserves. Regarding environmental performance, this Finnish-manufactured tire receives good ratings with good predicted mileage and tire wear, plus good overall efficiency primarily due to low fuel consumption, though its weight is rated only as satisfactory.
4th/8
Good on snow and dry roads, but when it's wet the WR SnowProof P is weaker.
9th/10
Short dry braking distances, fuel-saving rolling resistance, low pass-by noise.
Moderate cornering on snow, low safety reserves for aquaplaning, understeering wet handling, longer wet braking distances.
Conditionally Recommended.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
225/50R17 94 V C B 70
225/45R17 91 H D B 70
225/45R17 94 V XL B B 70
225/50R17 94 H D B 70
225/50R17 98 V XL C B 70
215/45R17 91 V XL C B 69
215/55R17 98 V XL C B 69
18 inch
245/40R18 97 V XL C B 71
245/45R18 100 V XL D B 71
225/40R18 92 V XL C B 70
245/45R18 100 V XL C B 71
20 inch
245/35R20 95 W XL C B 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nokian Snowproof P >>

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Snowproof P

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian Snowproof P. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 8 user reviews

Most drivers report the Nokian Snowproof P delivers excellent winter capability with strong snow/ice traction, confident wet grip and aquaplaning resistance, and very good dry handling and stability. Noise is the main drawback noted by a minority, with some speed-specific resonance; one low-scoring review reports deformation, but this is contradicted by multiple high-scoring experiences. Overall comfort and security at speed are praised, with quietness acceptable for many in colder temps.

Strengths
  • Snow and ice traction
  • Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Dry handling and stability
  • Overall winter confidence
  • Comfort/quiet at typical winter temps
Areas for Improvement
  • Noise/resonance at certain speeds

Top 3 Nokian Snowproof P Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Volkswagen Polo GTI (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Fitted the snow proof P to my 2023 VW Polo GTI 2ltr (205ps). After six months use (central Germany) I've found them to be very capable tires, even in fresh deep snow after a heavy fall. At temperatures below 7°c they are quiet & comfortable to drive. They provide plenty of grip in dry conditions. In the wet they are very capable but suffer a little understeer in tight corners at speed. On the Autobahn at speed they're very quiet & feel secure in standing water. No worries with aquaplaning.
August 27, 2024
Given 98% while driving a Mercedes Benz C250 CDI Blutec (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
After wra3 and wra4 (both excellent on dry and wet, excellent on snow and ice, the wra3 better at very low, almost freezing temperatures, the wra4 better on snow), I tried the snowproof P. I haven't yet tried the new directional design on snow , but on dry surfaces they essentially follow the excellent handling performance of the two previous models with asymmetrical design. With the rudder, in the absence of longitudinal channels, the footprint on the ground seems to be wider, and the cornering grip perhaps slightly greater. The sidewall is stiffer than previous models, and this gives better handling, a lower steering angle and lateral lie, further improving driving dynamics. Anyone who says that Nokians don't handle the road well on wet, dry and snow either doesn't know how to drive in different road conditions, or their car has problems. I've read about deformations on this model, well it depends on whether during season changes you keep the tires resting in the right place, in the right way, and this applies to every brand and model.
January 21, 2024
Given 59% while driving a Mercedes Benz (245/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Worst tires I've ever used! They deformed after 10.000km (2 seasons) of use and now they will go straight to the garbage - the car shakes. Shame on you, Nokian!
January 8, 2024

How would you rate the Nokian Snowproof P?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian Snowproof P Reviews

Given 92% while driving a Subaru Impreza WRX (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,500 spirited miles
I love Nokian Tires in the Winter. The new Snow proof P is a very good and sporty tire. Snow and overall grip is outstanding. Will by it again.
July 27, 2022
Given 68% while driving a Tesla Model 3 Performance (245/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 6,200 average miles
The main reason to buy Nokian is definitively the Cost-Quality ratio, almost unbeatable. That being said, I found the tire very noise, and with a resonance issue between 126 and 129 km/h where they they start to rumble and they become very noisy. But at least the steering wheels does not vibrate. This is a design issue. On the snow and Ice, are not the best for sure, but they are safe enough and I never got stuck (I live in the Swiss Alps).
February 9, 2022
Given 98% while driving a Jeep compass (235/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Despite the test results regarding low aquaplaning resistance I had no issues with it. Water drainage is really effective. Snow performance is magnificent. 35 cm thick snow with ice underneath without a single issue. I was using c. climate + SUV before and the difference is really big in winter performance. I drove through deep and shallow water patches both straight and curves. Really assuring tires.
January 25, 2022
Given 91% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Using on Honda Civic Sport+, dry handling is great. On slippery conditions such as melty snow tires are awesome. Despite the wide dimensions, in heavy snow braking and handling is better than expected. At 150 km/h a strange noise comes from tires but after 160 it stops.
April 6, 2021
Given 91% while driving a Tesla Model 3 Performance (235/35 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Very pleased with these tires on my Tesla Model 3 Performance. Rock solid on snow and ice and in cold, wet conditions. A little more noisy than my Summer Michelin Pilot Sports (only at slower speeds) but to be expected.
December 30, 2020
Rate the Nokian Snowproof P