Nokian Snowproof P - Test Results
Test Statistics
7
Tests Completed10th
Average Position4th
Best Result18th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Nokian Snowproof P delivers a mixed winter performance with standout comfort/efficiency and strong dry braking, but clear limitations in wet grip and aquaplaning alongside variable snow capability. Across seven winter tests it averages P10.1 overall, with frequent top results for external noise and rolling resistance, plus several top-tier dry braking finishes. However, multiple tests show bottom-tier wet circle and aquaplaning performance, and snow results range from excellent braking to weaker traction/handling.
Overall, it suits drivers prioritizing quietness, low fuel use and confident dry stopping, while those facing frequent heavy rain or deep water should note its consistent aquaplaning deficit. Snow performance is mixed-capable in braking but less convincing in traction/handling versus class leaders.
Performance Strengths
-
Comfort and Noise
Strong
Details
• 1st place noise in 2022 Auto Bild Winter (1/22)
• 1st place noise in 2022 Auto Zeitung (1/8)
• 1st place noise in 2021 Tire Reviews (1/10)
• 2nd place noise in 2025 ADAC (2/31)
-
Efficiency and Rolling Resistance
Strong
Details
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2022 Auto Bild SUV (1/11)
• 1st place rolling resistance in 2022 Auto Zeitung (1/8)
• 3rd place rolling resistance in 2021 Tire Reviews (3/10)
• Fuel consumption 8th/31 (+1.8% from best) in 2025 ADAC
-
Dry Braking and Dry Performance
Strong
Details
• Best dry braking in 2022 Auto Zeitung (1/8)
• 3rd dry braking in 2025 ADAC (3/31, +1.9% from best)
• Solid dry handling: 4th/10 in 2021 Tire Reviews (+1.4% from best) and 3rd/8 subjective dry in 2022 Auto Zeitung
-
Ice and Select Snow Metrics
Moderate
Details
• Ice braking 5th/31 in 2025 ADAC (+5.3% from best)
• Snow braking 2nd/10 in 2021 Tire Reviews (+2.2% from best)
• Snow braking 8th/22 in 2022 Auto Bild (+3.1% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Grip (Handling/Circle/Braking)
Strong
Details
• Wet circle 27/30 (+35.5%) and wet handling mid-pack in 2025 ADAC; wet braking 11/31 (+5.4%)
• Wet circle 10/11 (+6.2%) and wet braking 10/11 (+15.7%) in 2022 Auto Bild SUV
• Wet handling 7/10 (+4.5%) and wet braking 8/10 (+12.5%) in 2021 Tire Reviews
• Wet braking 13/22 (+16.1%) and wet circle 14/22 (+3.8%) in 2022 Auto Bild Winter
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Strong
Details
• Straight aqua 27/31 (+14.1%) in 2025 ADAC
• Straight aqua 21/22 (+12.1%) and curved aqua 21/22 (+38.4%) in 2022 Auto Bild Winter
• Straight aqua 10/11 (+11.7%) and curved aqua 10/11 (+28.3%) in 2022 Auto Bild SUV
• Straight aqua 9/10 (+9.3%) and curved aqua 10/10 (+10.1%) in 2021 Tire Reviews
• Straight aqua 8/8 (+13.8%) and curved aqua 8/8 (+45.6%) in 2022 Auto Zeitung
-
Snow Traction and Handling Consistency
Moderate
Details
• Snow traction 25/31 (+10.2%) and snow braking 23/31 (+8.7%) in 2025 ADAC
• Snow handling 20/21 (+5.0%) and snow slalom 20/22 (+5.7%) in 2022 Auto Bild Winter
• Snow traction 7/10 (+5.5%) and snow handling 6/10 (+4.5%) in 2021 Tire Reviews
• Mid-pack snow metrics in 2022 Auto Bild SUV (traction 8/11, handling 7/10)
-
Value/Price Positioning
Minor
Details
• Price 17/20 in 2022 Auto Bild Winter (+52.3% from best)
• Price 7/10 in 2021 Tire Reviews (+82.5% from best)
Performance Over Time
Test History
2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test
2025
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Noise
Noise
Snow Handling, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua
Rolling Resistance
Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua, Wet Braking, Wet Circle
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
2022
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Noise, Subj. Comfort, Dry Braking, Rolling Resistance
Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua, Subj. Wet Handling, Wet Handling
2021 Tire Reviews Winter Tire Test
2021
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Noise, Snow Braking, Snow Circle
Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua