Menu
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus View Gallery (1)
195-325/30-65 R17-22 137 sizes 2024 Winter rated

Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.6
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
90%
Wet Grip
100%
Road Feedback
90%
Handling
90%
Wear
90%
Comfort
100%
Buy again
100%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
100%
1 Reviews
96% Average
3,500 miles driven
8 Tests (avg: 8th)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8.6 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
80.5
1.93x / 35 tests
Comfort
66.2
0.32x / 11 tests
Snow
66
1.5x / 27 tests
Dry
58.9
1.13x / 16 tests
Value
52.3
0.42x / 12 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
72
27 tests
Traction
68.7
6 tests
Braking
65.9
23 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 7
Period: 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 95.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.33
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 High Performance Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2025 275/35 R19 6/7 13 metrics
2025 AZ Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2025 245/45 R19 6/10 19 metrics
2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2025 235/50 R19 4/13 12 metrics
2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 13/22 16 metrics
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 17/52 2 metrics
2025 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2025 215/55 R17 5/10 16 metrics
2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tire Test Die Reifentester 2025 215/55 R17 4/8 12 metrics
2025 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2025 225/45 R17 6/8 11 metrics
8
Tests
8th
Average
4th
Best
17th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
6th/8
The magazine notes that there is “a good feel in the wet,” but a mixed set of results leaves the Vredestein in the mid‑field. It offers reasonable comfort and grip without standing out in any one area.
17th/52
The recently revised Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ represents a significant performance improvement, offering good capability at a fair price point. Testers found it delivered good traction and decent braking on snow, along with balanced, neutral-to-understeering wet handling and very good aquaplaning prevention. The downsides include weak cornering grip on snow despite good longitudinal dynamics, long wet braking distances, and typical winter-tire limitations in driving stability at high cornering speeds and during evasive maneuvers. It also recorded the highest rolling resistance in the test. For budget-conscious buyers who don't frequently encounter heavy snow, it offers reasonable value despite its limitations.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
225/45 R 17 94 V XL C C 71
225/45 R 17 94 H XL C C 71
225/45 R 17 91 H C C 71
215/45 R 17 91 V XL C B 71
225/50 R 17 98 V XL C B 71
225/50 R 17 98 H XL C B 71
205/50 R 17 93 V XL C B 71
205/50 R 17 93 H XL C B 71
215/55 R 17 98 V XL C B 71
225/60 R 17 103 V XL C B 71
235/65 R 17 108 V XL B C 71
215/55R17 94 H D B 71
18 inch
245/40 R 18 97 W XL D C 70
225/40 R 18 92 W XL D B 71
245/45 R 18 100 V XL C C 72
235/60 R 18 107 V XL C C 71
225/40R18 92 V XL D B 71
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL D C 71
20 inch
245/35 R 20 95 Y XL D C 71
255/45 R 20 105 V XL C C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus >>

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 96% while driving a Audi E tron 50 quattro (255/50 R20) on for 3,500 miles
Very good impression compared to Bridgestone LM005 that I had before
March 10, 2026
Rate the Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus