Test Charts / Auto Bild
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 15
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
128 ft | -13 ft | 0 mph |
| 141 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 141 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 142 ft | +1 ft | 7 mph | |
| 143 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 144 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 145 ft | +4 ft | 13 mph | |
| 146 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 146 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 149 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 150 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 151 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 152 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 155 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
155 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
78.0 mph | +1.3 mph |
| 76.7 mph | Best | |
| 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 76.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 76.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 76.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 76.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
75.9 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 75.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 75.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 75.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 75.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 75.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 75.0 mph | -1.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (3 mph).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
159 ft | -9 ft | 0 mph |
| 168 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 175 ft | +7 ft | 16 mph | |
| 177 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 177 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 180 ft | +12 ft | 21 mph | |
| 181 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 181 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 182 ft | +14 ft | 22 mph | |
| 183 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 183 ft | +15 ft | 23 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 184 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 185 ft | +17 ft | 24 mph | |
| 186 ft | +18 ft | 25 mph | |
| 186 ft | +18 ft | 25 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 26 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 27 mph | |
| 189 ft | +21 ft | 27 mph | |
| 191 ft | +23 ft | 28 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
213 ft | +45 ft | 37 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 34.1% (54 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45.2 mph | Best | |
| 45.0 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 44.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 44.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
44.4 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 44.3 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 44.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 43.9 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 43.7 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 43.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 43.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 42.9 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 42.7 mph | -2.5 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
38.5 mph | -6.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6.7 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.02 s | Best | |
| 12.21 s | +0.19 s | |
| 12.21 s | +0.19 s | |
| 12.33 s | +0.31 s | |
| 12.34 s | +0.32 s | |
| 12.39 s | +0.37 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.41 s | +0.39 s | |
| 12.42 s | +0.40 s | |
| 12.43 s | +0.41 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.45 s | |
RefReference Summer |
12.47 s | +0.45 s |
| 12.48 s | +0.46 s | |
| 12.59 s | +0.57 s | |
| 12.62 s | +0.60 s | |
| 12.63 s | +0.61 s | |
| 12.65 s | +0.63 s | |
| 12.66 s | +0.64 s | |
| 12.69 s | +0.67 s | |
| 12.77 s | +0.75 s | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
14.28 s | +2.26 s |
The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (2.26 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.5 mph | Best | |
| 50.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 49.6 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 49.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 49.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
48.8 mph | -1.7 mph |
| 48.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 47.9 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 47.6 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 47.1 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -6.1 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
41.7 mph | -8.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (8.8 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ft/s² | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
9.5 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² |
| 9.3 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 9.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 9.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 9.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.7 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 8.6 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 8.5 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 8.5 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 8.1 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 8.1 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 7.8 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 7.4 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 7.1 ft/s² | -2.5 ft/s² | |
| 6.7 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 5.9 ft/s² | -3.7 ft/s² | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
5.2 ft/s² | -4.4 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 46.6% (4.4 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 84 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 85 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 85 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 86 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 87 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 90 ft | +7 ft | 21 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
91 ft | +8 ft | 23 mph |
RefReference Summer |
134 ft | +51 ft | 49 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 61% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 589 lbf | Best | |
| 586 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 586 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 583 lbf | -6 lbf | |
| 581 lbf | -8 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 580 lbf | -9 lbf | |
| 577 lbf | -12 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 575 lbf | -14 lbf | |
| 574 lbf | -15 lbf | |
| 573 lbf | -16 lbf | |
| 571 lbf | -18 lbf | |
| 569 lbf | -20 lbf | |
| 566 lbf | -23 lbf | |
| 562 lbf | -27 lbf | |
| 553 lbf | -36 lbf | |
| 549 lbf | -40 lbf | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
519 lbf | -70 lbf |
RefReference Summer |
194 lbf | -395 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 67% (395 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.5 mph | Best | |
| 34.1 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.9 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.8 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 33.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 33.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 33.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 33.2 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 33.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 33.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 32.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 32.7 mph | -1.8 mph | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
32.1 mph | -2.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (2.4 mph).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 12.6 ft/s² | Best | |
| 12.5 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 12.0 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
11.4 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² |
RefReference Summer |
5.9 ft/s² | -6.7 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (6.7 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 69.7 dB | Best | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.3 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.5 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.50 dB | |
RefReference Winter Budget |
71.3 dB | +1.60 dB |
| 71.5 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +2.40 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +2.90 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
72.7 dB | +3.00 dB |
| 72.8 dB | +3.10 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +3.80 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.8 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 25,919 miles | Best | |
| 25,435 miles | -484 miles | |
| 24,760 miles | -1,159 miles | |
| 24,727 miles | -1,192 miles | |
| 24,708 miles | -1,211 miles | |
| 24,058 miles | -1,861 miles | |
| 23,597 miles | -2,322 miles | |
| 22,892 miles | -3,027 miles | |
| 22,738 miles | -3,181 miles | |
| 21,446 miles | -4,473 miles | |
| 20,933 miles | -4,986 miles | |
| 20,826 miles | -5,093 miles | |
| 20,817 miles | -5,102 miles | |
| 19,517 miles | -6,402 miles | |
| 19,223 miles | -6,696 miles | |
| 19,193 miles | -6,726 miles | |
| 19,008 miles | -6,911 miles | |
| 18,829 miles | -7,090 miles | |
| 18,627 miles | -7,292 miles | |
| 17,710 miles | -8,209 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (8,209 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.03 Price/1000 | Best | €35.46 | |
| 12.67 Price/1000 | +1.64 Price/1000 | €33.65 | |
| 13.44 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €34.01 | |
| 14.85 Price/1000 | +3.82 Price/1000 | €44.98 | |
| 15.29 Price/1000 | +4.26 Price/1000 | €42.00 | |
| 15.44 Price/1000 | +4.41 Price/1000 | €46.92 | |
| 15.79 Price/1000 | +4.76 Price/1000 | €39.17 | |
| 16.09 Price/1000 | +5.06 Price/1000 | €41.84 | |
| 16.12 Price/1000 | +5.09 Price/1000 | €33.82 | |
| 16.33 Price/1000 | +5.30 Price/1000 | €49.98 | |
| 16.67 Price/1000 | +5.64 Price/1000 | €39.64 | |
| 17.31 Price/1000 | +6.28 Price/1000 | €39.54 | |
| 17.35 Price/1000 | +6.32 Price/1000 | €41.55 | |
| 17.64 Price/1000 | +6.61 Price/1000 | €45.97 | |
| 17.78 Price/1000 | +6.75 Price/1000 | €32.25 | |
| 17.91 Price/1000 | +6.88 Price/1000 | €42.64 | |
| 19.35 Price/1000 | +8.32 Price/1000 | €45.83 | |
| 19.74 Price/1000 | +8.71 Price/1000 | €45.79 | |
| 20.59 Price/1000 | +9.56 Price/1000 | €46.86 | |
| 23.7 Price/1000 | +12.67 Price/1000 | €45.77 |
The difference between best and worst was 114.9% (12.67 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Uniroyal WinterExpert) works out €443 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken Eurowinter HS01).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.68 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.3 kg/t | +0.62 kg/t | $27 | |
| 7.39 kg/t | +0.71 kg/t | $31 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.38 kg/t | $61 | |
| 8.18 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $66 | |
| 8.21 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | $67 | |
| 8.31 kg/t | +1.63 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.64 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.65 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.37 kg/t | +1.69 kg/t | $74 | |
| 8.4 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | $76 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +2.06 kg/t | $91 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | $96 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.87 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | $96 |
| 8.89 kg/t | +2.21 kg/t | $97 | |
| 9.04 kg/t | +2.36 kg/t | $104 | |
| 9.12 kg/t | +2.44 kg/t | $107 | |
| 9.41 kg/t | +2.73 kg/t | $120 | |
| 9.53 kg/t | +2.85 kg/t | $125 | |
| 9.94 kg/t | +3.26 kg/t | $143 |
The difference between best and worst was 48.8% (3.26 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 40 gal ($143) more fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tires tested
19 of these 20 tires tested again
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
14 of these 20 tires tested again
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1655 tires tested
12 of these 20 tires tested again

