Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2022 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
20
Disciplines
15

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
128 ft -13 ft 0 mph
141 ft Best 0 mph
141 ft 0 ft 4 mph
142 ft +1 ft 7 mph
142 ft +1 ft 7 mph
142 ft +1 ft 7 mph
143 ft +2 ft 9 mph
144 ft +3 ft 11 mph
145 ft +4 ft 13 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
147 ft +6 ft 16 mph
147 ft +6 ft 16 mph
148 ft +7 ft 17 mph
148 ft +7 ft 17 mph
149 ft +8 ft 19 mph
150 ft +9 ft 20 mph
151 ft +10 ft 21 mph
152 ft +11 ft 22 mph
153 ft +12 ft 22 mph
155 ft +14 ft 24 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
155 ft +14 ft 24 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
78.0 mph +1.3 mph
76.7 mph Best
76.6 mph -0.1 mph
76.6 mph -0.1 mph
76.4 mph -0.3 mph
76.3 mph -0.4 mph
76.2 mph -0.5 mph
7
75.9 mph -0.8 mph
75.9 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
75.9 mph -0.8 mph
75.9 mph -0.8 mph
75.7 mph -1.0 mph
75.6 mph -1.1 mph
75.5 mph -1.2 mph
75.5 mph -1.2 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.4 mph -1.3 mph
75.1 mph -1.6 mph
75.0 mph -1.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.8% (3 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
159 ft -9 ft 0 mph
168 ft Best 0 mph
175 ft +7 ft 16 mph
177 ft +9 ft 18 mph
177 ft +9 ft 18 mph
180 ft +12 ft 21 mph
181 ft +13 ft 22 mph
181 ft +13 ft 22 mph
182 ft +14 ft 22 mph
183 ft +15 ft 23 mph
183 ft +15 ft 23 mph
184 ft +16 ft 24 mph
184 ft +16 ft 24 mph
184 ft +16 ft 24 mph
185 ft +17 ft 24 mph
186 ft +18 ft 25 mph
186 ft +18 ft 25 mph
189 ft +21 ft 26 mph
189 ft +21 ft 27 mph
189 ft +21 ft 27 mph
191 ft +23 ft 28 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
213 ft +45 ft 37 mph

The difference between best and worst was 34.1% (54 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 28 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
45.2 mph Best
45.0 mph -0.2 mph
44.8 mph -0.4 mph
44.8 mph -0.4 mph
44.7 mph -0.5 mph
44.7 mph -0.5 mph
44.6 mph -0.6 mph
RefReference Summer
44.4 mph -0.8 mph
44.3 mph -0.9 mph
44.2 mph -1.0 mph
44.2 mph -1.0 mph
44.2 mph -1.0 mph
44.0 mph -1.2 mph
44.0 mph -1.2 mph
43.9 mph -1.3 mph
43.7 mph -1.5 mph
43.6 mph -1.6 mph
43.4 mph -1.8 mph
43.4 mph -1.8 mph
42.9 mph -2.3 mph
42.7 mph -2.5 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
38.5 mph -6.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6.7 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.02 s Best
12.21 s +0.19 s
12.21 s +0.19 s
12.33 s +0.31 s
12.34 s +0.32 s
12.39 s +0.37 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.41 s +0.39 s
12.42 s +0.40 s
12.43 s +0.41 s
12.47 s +0.45 s
RefReference Summer
12.47 s +0.45 s
12.48 s +0.46 s
12.59 s +0.57 s
12.62 s +0.60 s
12.63 s +0.61 s
12.65 s +0.63 s
12.66 s +0.64 s
12.69 s +0.67 s
12.77 s +0.75 s
RefReference Winter Budget
14.28 s +2.26 s

The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (2.26 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.5 mph Best
50.1 mph -0.4 mph
50.0 mph -0.5 mph
49.6 mph -0.9 mph
49.5 mph -1.0 mph
49.3 mph -1.2 mph
49.0 mph -1.5 mph
49.0 mph -1.5 mph
49.0 mph -1.5 mph
48.9 mph -1.6 mph
48.9 mph -1.6 mph
RefReference Summer
48.8 mph -1.7 mph
48.7 mph -1.8 mph
47.9 mph -2.6 mph
47.6 mph -2.9 mph
47.1 mph -3.4 mph
46.7 mph -3.8 mph
46.7 mph -3.8 mph
46.4 mph -4.1 mph
46.2 mph -4.3 mph
44.4 mph -6.1 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
41.7 mph -8.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (8.8 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.6 ft/s² Best
RefReference Summer
9.5 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
9.3 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
9.1 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
8.7 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
8.5 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
8.5 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
8.1 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
7.8 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²
7.1 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
6.7 ft/s² -2.9 ft/s²
5.9 ft/s² -3.7 ft/s²
RefReference Winter Budget
5.2 ft/s² -4.4 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 46.6% (4.4 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
83 ft Best 0 mph
84 ft +1 ft 5 mph
84 ft +1 ft 5 mph
84 ft +1 ft 5 mph
85 ft +2 ft 11 mph
85 ft +2 ft 11 mph
86 ft +3 ft 13 mph
86 ft +3 ft 14 mph
86 ft +3 ft 15 mph
86 ft +3 ft 15 mph
86 ft +3 ft 15 mph
86 ft +3 ft 15 mph
86 ft +3 ft 15 mph
87 ft +4 ft 16 mph
87 ft +4 ft 16 mph
87 ft +4 ft 16 mph
87 ft +4 ft 16 mph
87 ft +4 ft 16 mph
87 ft +4 ft 17 mph
90 ft +7 ft 21 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
91 ft +8 ft 23 mph
RefReference Summer
134 ft +51 ft 49 mph

The difference between best and worst was 61% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
589 lbf Best
586 lbf -3 lbf
586 lbf -3 lbf
583 lbf -6 lbf
581 lbf -8 lbf
580 lbf -9 lbf
580 lbf -9 lbf
580 lbf -9 lbf
577 lbf -12 lbf
575 lbf -14 lbf
575 lbf -14 lbf
575 lbf -14 lbf
574 lbf -15 lbf
573 lbf -16 lbf
571 lbf -18 lbf
569 lbf -20 lbf
566 lbf -23 lbf
562 lbf -27 lbf
553 lbf -36 lbf
549 lbf -40 lbf
RefReference Winter Budget
519 lbf -70 lbf
RefReference Summer
194 lbf -395 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 67% (395 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
34.5 mph Best
34.1 mph -0.4 mph
33.9 mph -0.6 mph
33.9 mph -0.6 mph
33.9 mph -0.6 mph
33.8 mph -0.7 mph
33.8 mph -0.7 mph
33.8 mph -0.7 mph
33.7 mph -0.8 mph
33.7 mph -0.8 mph
33.4 mph -1.1 mph
33.4 mph -1.1 mph
33.3 mph -1.2 mph
33.3 mph -1.2 mph
33.2 mph -1.3 mph
33.1 mph -1.4 mph
33.1 mph -1.4 mph
33.0 mph -1.5 mph
32.9 mph -1.6 mph
32.7 mph -1.8 mph
RefReference Winter Budget
32.1 mph -2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (2.4 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.6 ft/s² Best
12.5 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
12.3 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
12.0 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
RefReference Winter Budget
11.4 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
5.9 ft/s² -6.7 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 52.9% (6.7 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.7 dB Best
69.7 dB Best
70.3 dB +0.60 dB
70.3 dB +0.60 dB
70.5 dB +0.80 dB
70.5 dB +0.80 dB
70.6 dB +0.90 dB
70.7 dB +1.00 dB
71.2 dB +1.50 dB
71.2 dB +1.50 dB
RefReference Winter Budget
71.3 dB +1.60 dB
71.5 dB +1.80 dB
71.7 dB +2.00 dB
71.8 dB +2.10 dB
71.9 dB +2.20 dB
72.1 dB +2.40 dB
72.2 dB +2.50 dB
72.2 dB +2.50 dB
72.6 dB +2.90 dB
RefReference Summer
72.7 dB +3.00 dB
72.8 dB +3.10 dB
73.5 dB +3.80 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.8 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
25,919 miles Best
25,435 miles -484 miles
24,760 miles -1,159 miles
24,727 miles -1,192 miles
24,708 miles -1,211 miles
24,058 miles -1,861 miles
23,597 miles -2,322 miles
22,892 miles -3,027 miles
22,738 miles -3,181 miles
21,446 miles -4,473 miles
20,933 miles -4,986 miles
20,826 miles -5,093 miles
20,817 miles -5,102 miles
19,517 miles -6,402 miles
19,223 miles -6,696 miles
19,193 miles -6,726 miles
19,008 miles -6,911 miles
18,829 miles -7,090 miles
18,627 miles -7,292 miles
17,710 miles -8,209 miles

The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (8,209 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
11.03 Price/1000 Best €35.46
12.67 Price/1000 +1.64 Price/1000 €33.65
13.44 Price/1000 +2.41 Price/1000 €34.01
14.85 Price/1000 +3.82 Price/1000 €44.98
15.29 Price/1000 +4.26 Price/1000 €42.00
15.44 Price/1000 +4.41 Price/1000 €46.92
15.79 Price/1000 +4.76 Price/1000 €39.17
16.09 Price/1000 +5.06 Price/1000 €41.84
16.12 Price/1000 +5.09 Price/1000 €33.82
16.33 Price/1000 +5.30 Price/1000 €49.98
16.67 Price/1000 +5.64 Price/1000 €39.64
17.31 Price/1000 +6.28 Price/1000 €39.54
17.35 Price/1000 +6.32 Price/1000 €41.55
17.64 Price/1000 +6.61 Price/1000 €45.97
17.78 Price/1000 +6.75 Price/1000 €32.25
17.91 Price/1000 +6.88 Price/1000 €42.64
19.35 Price/1000 +8.32 Price/1000 €45.83
19.74 Price/1000 +8.71 Price/1000 €45.79
20.59 Price/1000 +9.56 Price/1000 €46.86
23.7 Price/1000 +12.67 Price/1000 €45.77

The difference between best and worst was 114.9% (12.67 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Uniroyal WinterExpert) works out €443 cheaper than the most expensive (Falken Eurowinter HS01).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.68 kg/t Best $0
7.3 kg/t +0.62 kg/t $27
7.39 kg/t +0.71 kg/t $31
8.06 kg/t +1.38 kg/t $61
8.18 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $66
8.21 kg/t +1.53 kg/t $67
8.31 kg/t +1.63 kg/t $72
8.32 kg/t +1.64 kg/t $72
8.32 kg/t +1.64 kg/t $72
8.33 kg/t +1.65 kg/t $73
8.33 kg/t +1.65 kg/t $73
8.37 kg/t +1.69 kg/t $74
8.4 kg/t +1.72 kg/t $76
8.74 kg/t +2.06 kg/t $91
8.87 kg/t +2.19 kg/t $96
RefReference Summer
8.87 kg/t +2.19 kg/t $96
8.89 kg/t +2.21 kg/t $97
9.04 kg/t +2.36 kg/t $104
18
9.12 kg/t +2.44 kg/t $107
9.41 kg/t +2.73 kg/t $120
9.53 kg/t +2.85 kg/t $125
9.94 kg/t +3.26 kg/t $143

The difference between best and worst was 48.8% (3.26 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 40 gal ($143) more fuel than the Uniroyal WinterExpert.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.