Menu

GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Test Results

Tested 2015 to 2023 4 publications

Tested 5 times by independent publications, the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP averages a finish of 11th.

  • 5Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 11thAverage finish
  • 29%Field beaten on average
  • 4Publications
GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP

5 tests, 2015 to 2023

0%50%100%201520162023Average 29%2015 AMS UHP Winter Tire Test (2015): P6 of 10, Beat 44% of the field2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016): P13 of 14, Beat 8% of the field2016 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test (2016): P5 of 6, Beat 20% of the field2016 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test (2016): P9 of 10, Beat 11% of the field2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test (2023): P22 of 54, Beat 60% of the field
Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 29%

Record by discipline

Where the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Wet
Wet Braking 1 P19 of 54 66% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P27 of 31 13% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
Nokian WR D4 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 5 tests. Updated October 15, 2025.

Across five winter tests, the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP trends below mid-pack with only one mid-field finish and multiple bottom-third results. Braking-focused testing in 2023 highlights notable deficits in both wet and snow stopping distances, while earlier full-comparison tests show consistent underperformance against leading competitors. There are limited signs of competitiveness in certain sizes/contexts, but overall consistency and braking performance lag the class leaders.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    Details
    • 36.2 m wet braking, 19/54 and +15.3% from best in 2023 Auto Bild 54-tire braking test
    • Overall 13/14 in 2016 AZ 205/55 R16 test (indicative of weak wet handling/braking versus peers)
  • Snow Braking/Traction Moderate
    Details
    • 31.6 m snow braking, 27/31 and +9% from best in 2023 Auto Bild braking test
    • 5/6 overall in 2016 Sport Auto 235/40 R18 test (bottom tier implying weak snow metrics in sporty size)
  • Overall Consistency vs. Class Strong
    Details
    • Average overall position 11 across 5 tests
    • 13/14 overall in 2016 AZ test; 9/10 in 2016 AMS SUV test; 5/6 in 2016 Sport Auto test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Rolling resistance Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet grip Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Every test, newest first 5

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2023 1 test
2016 3 tests
2015 1 test

Back to the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All GT Radial tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.