Menu
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S View Gallery (1)
215-295/30-70 R16-22 30 sizes 2015 Winter rated

Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

The Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.3
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
84%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
85%
Wear
71%
Comfort
86%
Buy again
78%
Snow Grip
87%
Ice Grip
87%
9 Reviews
82% Average
52,500 miles driven
12 Tests (avg: 9th)
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
92.9
1.5x / 2 tests
Wet
89.3
1.93x / 3 tests
Comfort
82.5
0.32x / 1 test
Dry
60.1
1.13x / 2 tests
Value
54
0.42x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
84.9
3 tests
Handling
82.8
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 12
Publications: 9
Period: 2014 - 2017
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 81.8%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.01
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test Auto Bild Allrad 2017 225/55 R17 7/11 10 metrics
2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 27/45 0 metrics
2016 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2016 215/60 R17 6/10 0 metrics
2016 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2016 235/40 R18 6/6 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild Winter UHP Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2016 245/40 R18 7/8 0 metrics
2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Zeitung 2016 205/55 R16 12/14 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 10/13 0 metrics
2015 ACE 17 Inch Winter Tire Test ACE 2015 225/50 R17 8/8 0 metrics
2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2015 235/35 R19 4/7 0 metrics
2015 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2015 225/45 R17 7/8 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2015 225/40 R18 7/8 0 metrics
2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2014 235/35 R19 4/6 0 metrics
12
Tests
9th
Average
4th
Best
27th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
27th/45
7th/11
Short braking distance and generally high wet grip, Low noise level
Poor snow grip, poor dry grip, high rolling resistance
Satisfactory
10th/13
Especially good in the wet, good on dry roads
Weak on snow, high fuel consumption and wear
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/70 R 16 100 H C C 72
215/70 R 16 100 H C C 72
17 inch
265/65 R 17 112 H C C 73
265/65 R 17 112 H C C 73
18 inch
235/60 R 18 103 H C B 71
235/60 R 18 103 H C B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S >>

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S

Ask a question
October 30, 2016

Can Vredestein Wintrac Extreme S tires be used in Summer. I drive to Portugal every Summer, the distance from home is approximately 1000 miles one way with suitcases etc. Thanks for your advice.

All winter tires can be used in summer, however you may notice increased wear, and you will have a dry braking penalty of around 20% when compared to a summer tire. We always recommend summer tires for the summer months.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S Reviews

Given 74% while driving a Volvo XC60 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
While cornering on dry roads the car would be sleighting of hand, should perhaps be, from my point of view (xc60 for a year) would be only negative review. Higjway driving at 150kmh in winter has been a fairytale for now. I probably wouldn't buy it again because I will be buying the best rated winter tire next time because of a newborn sitting behind; otherwise, it would have been a choice, why not
December 3, 2022
Given 93% while driving a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 18,000 average miles
Astonishing snow and ice grip in a 4x4 Evoque. Up Honister Pass with side to side sheet ice without a slip or a skid. Hardly anything for the snow and ice programme to do.
February 6, 2019
Given 78% while driving a Audi Q7 (295/35 R21 W) on a combination of roads for 200 average miles
Reference Audi Q7.
Early days as yet. Just fitted within last two months, as older one of Michelins developed a bulge on sidewall. I don't drive sedately or too fast, but like to push when needed. Initial impressions are good overall. Compared to the summer Michelins they feel similar in the dry being driven normally. Time will tell when pushed. The Michelins let me down in the wet on a field, as not suited to off road even on very soft and wet grass. Wheels were sinking in to around 5/6 inches trying to pull a 2 tonne caravan! So I expect more grip under those conditions with the Vredsteins. So far in torential rain at speed the Vredsteins gave a confident feel. They seem quiet on the road so far but the Michelins were the same until the treads were worn down by half, then became very noisy.
I took a chance with the Vredsteins as they are really winter tires, but I don't cover a high mileage in this car, so wear should not be the limiting factor. They will possibly be due replacement due to age before the treads are worn too much (hopefully).
August 14, 2018

How would you rate the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S Reviews

Given 92% while driving a Audi SQ5 (255/45 R20 V) on mostly country roads for 15,000 average miles
Reference car: Audi SQ5 2014

I bought our SQ5 second hand and these tires came with it;

I see positive and negative reviews but people need to realise that this tire is released in 2014
And at the time these tires were extremely recommended for Hig Performance Cars such as Porsche 911 , Aston Martin etc.

Of my personal experience with these tires (living in Switzerland in the Ski area) these handle our SQ5 extremely good. Never slippery or whobby. In the wet they stay safe, dry also. On my size: 255/45/20 they do good.

They are very quite and also comfort is not to bad.
I would only buy these if you are driving an HP car.

Next winter (2019) when these are done i try the new versions of the Extreme S the Wintrac Pro. :)
They are absolutely the go for high performance cars.

Just like i said these tires are from 2014... and only if you can buy these cheap i would buy them otherwise go dor the Vredestein Wintrac Pro :))

December 30, 2018
Given 50% while driving a Mitsubishi Outlander (215/70 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
Initial impressions were good, unfortunately one of the tires was defective, and made the car unsafe to use. A big chunk or rubber came off it. I have sent it back to the company I bought them from, and now waiting for decision. Unacceptable for this to happen on a brand new tire, from a reputable company. That is why I didn't buy Chinese tires..but maybe that was a mistake.
January 25, 2018
Chevrolet camaro (275/40 R20) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
I drive my car in 30cm snow and icy/wet conditions. All what I can say it is a perfect tire. My car is a 400HP RWD but still it drives like in summer.
January 13, 2017
Given 76% while driving a BMW E90 325i (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 spirited miles
A good all round winter tire. Not as good as my Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta in the dry or wet when it's warmer, but the Wintrac extreme S comes into its own when it get near freezing!!
January 9, 2016
Rate the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S