For 2017, the "All Road" edition of the German publication Auto Bild has tested ten 225/55 R17 winter tires. This size is commonly used by compact crossovers, such as the BMW X1 used in this test.
The biggest interest in this test was the Chinese budget winter tire from Pace. With the most expensive set of winter tires costing 660 euros at time of test, the budget Pace tires were a full 400 euros cheaper, at just 260 euros. Are the savings worth the performance drop? Read on below to find out.
Dry
In the dry, the summer tire dominates braking, and wins the handling test. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is the best of the winter tires, while the test-topping Goodyear and Continental tires could only manage mid-pack. The budget Pace tire is acceptable under dry braking conditions, but is by far the worst during the dry handling lap.
Dry Braking
Spread: 9.00 M (23%)|Avg: 45.57 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Dry Handling
Spread: 3.50 Km/H (3.1%)|Avg: 113.33 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
114.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
114.40 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
114.00 Km/H
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
113.80 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
113.70 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
113.50 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
113.20 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
113.00 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
112.90 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
112.20 Km/H
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
111.20 Km/H
Wet
For the top five winter tires, wet braking was closely contested with the summer tire, with the Goodyear winter tire finishing top. Wet handling puts the summer reference back on top, with the Goodyear winter being the best of the winter tires on test. In both tests, the budget Pace tire again performs the worst.
Wet Braking
Spread: 10.40 M (19.5%)|Avg: 56.66 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Wet Handling
Spread: 5.50 Km/H (7.4%)|Avg: 71.73 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
74.00 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
73.50 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
73.30 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
73.20 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72.80 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
72.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
70.80 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
70.80 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
70.40 Km/H
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
69.00 Km/H
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
68.50 Km/H
Straight Aqua
Spread: 11.20 Km/H (14.2%)|Avg: 73.27 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Michelin Alpin 5
79.00 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
76.00 Km/H
Reference Summer
74.80 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
74.70 Km/H
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
74.50 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
73.10 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
72.70 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
72.30 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
70.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
70.40 Km/H
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
67.80 Km/H
Snow
Surprisingly the Pace budget tire wins the snow braking test, proving that it's easy for a budget tire manufacturer to make a tire which works well in one road condition, but not all three. Snow handling is also closely contested, with only the Maxxis and Vredestein noticeably behind the rest.
Snow Braking
Spread: 35.90 M (163.2%)|Avg: 25.91 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Snow Handling
Spread: 11.60 Km/H (23.9%)|Avg: 46.85 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
48.60 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
48.50 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
48.30 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
48.20 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
48.10 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
48.10 Km/H
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
48.00 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
47.70 Km/H
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
47.00 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
45.80 Km/H
Reference Summer
37.00 Km/H
Environmental
Both the Continental and Bridgestone winter tires have a lower rolling resistance than the summer tire on test, and every winter tire proves to be quieter than the summer.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 1.84 kg / t (22.3%)|Avg: 9.18 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
8.26 kg / t
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
8.34 kg / t
Reference Summer
8.71 kg / t
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
9.12 kg / t
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
9.14 kg / t
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
9.18 kg / t
Michelin Alpin 5
9.21 kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
9.31 kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
9.69 kg / t
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
9.91 kg / t
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
10.10 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
Noise
Spread: 2.40 dB (3.3%)|Avg: 73.36 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
72.10 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
72.50 dB
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
72.80 dB
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
73.20 dB
Michelin Alpin 5
73.50 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
73.60 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
73.60 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
73.60 dB
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
73.70 dB
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73.90 dB
Reference Summer
74.50 dB
Price
Spread: 400.00 (153.8%)|Avg: 512.00
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
260.00
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
400.00
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
420.00
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
480.00
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
520.00
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
560.00
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
580.00
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
600.00
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
640.00
Michelin Alpin 5
660.00
Result
Auto Bild started the test asking whether the huge cost saving of a budget winter tire was worth the risk? Their answer is a firm no, unless you only ever drive it on snow covered roads - the dry and wet penalty is too vast.