Menu

2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Snow
  5. Environmental
  6. Result
  7. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
  9. Michelin Alpin 5
  10. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
  11. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
  12. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
  13. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
  14. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
  15. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
  16. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
  17. Reference Summer

Test Summary
Wet Braking Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Dry Braking Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
Wet Handling Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
Rolling Resistance Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Noise Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
Snow Handling Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
For 2017, the "All Road" edition of the German publication Auto Bild has tested ten 225/55 R17 winter tires. This size is commonly used by compact crossovers, such as the BMW X1 used in this test.

The biggest interest in this test was the Chinese budget winter tire from Pace. With the most expensive set of winter tires costing 660 euros at time of test, the budget Pace tires were a full 400 euros cheaper, at just 260 euros. Are the savings worth the performance drop? Read on below to find out.

Dry

In the dry, the summer tire dominates braking, and wins the handling test. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is the best of the winter tires, while the test-topping Goodyear and Continental tires could only manage mid-pack. The budget Pace tire is acceptable under dry braking conditions, but is by far the worst during the dry handling lap.

Dry Braking

Spread: 9.00 M (23%)|Avg: 45.57 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Dry Handling

Spread: 3.50 Km/H (3.1%)|Avg: 113.33 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Reference Summer
    114.70 Km/H
  2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    114.40 Km/H
  3. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    114.00 Km/H
  4. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    113.80 Km/H
  5. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    113.70 Km/H
  6. Michelin Alpin 5
    113.50 Km/H
  7. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    113.20 Km/H
  8. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    113.00 Km/H
  9. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    112.90 Km/H
  10. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    112.20 Km/H
  11. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    111.20 Km/H

Wet

For the top five winter tires, wet braking was closely contested with the summer tire, with the Goodyear winter tire finishing top. Wet handling puts the summer reference back on top, with the Goodyear winter being the best of the winter tires on test. In both tests, the budget Pace tire again performs the worst.

Wet Braking

Spread: 10.40 M (19.5%)|Avg: 56.66 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Wet Handling

Spread: 5.50 Km/H (7.4%)|Avg: 71.73 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Reference Summer
    74.00 Km/H
  2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    73.50 Km/H
  3. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    73.30 Km/H
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    73.20 Km/H
  5. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    72.80 Km/H
  6. Michelin Alpin 5
    72.70 Km/H
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    70.80 Km/H
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    70.80 Km/H
  9. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    70.40 Km/H
  10. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    69.00 Km/H
  11. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    68.50 Km/H

Straight Aqua

Spread: 11.20 Km/H (14.2%)|Avg: 73.27 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Alpin 5
    79.00 Km/H
  2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    76.00 Km/H
  3. Reference Summer
    74.80 Km/H
  4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    74.70 Km/H
  5. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    74.50 Km/H
  6. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    73.10 Km/H
  7. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    72.70 Km/H
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    72.30 Km/H
  9. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    70.70 Km/H
  10. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    70.40 Km/H
  11. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    67.80 Km/H

Snow

Surprisingly the Pace budget tire wins the snow braking test, proving that it's easy for a budget tire manufacturer to make a tire which works well in one road condition, but not all three. Snow handling is also closely contested, with only the Maxxis and Vredestein noticeably behind the rest.

Snow Braking

Spread: 35.90 M (163.2%)|Avg: 25.91 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Snow Handling

Spread: 11.60 Km/H (23.9%)|Avg: 46.85 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    48.60 Km/H
  2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    48.50 Km/H
  3. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    48.30 Km/H
  4. Michelin Alpin 5
    48.20 Km/H
  5. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    48.10 Km/H
  6. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    48.10 Km/H
  7. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    48.00 Km/H
  8. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    47.70 Km/H
  9. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    47.00 Km/H
  10. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    45.80 Km/H
  11. Reference Summer
    37.00 Km/H

Environmental

Both the Continental and Bridgestone winter tires have a lower rolling resistance than the summer tire on test, and every winter tire proves to be quieter than the summer.

Rolling Resistance

Spread: 1.84 kg / t (22.3%)|Avg: 9.18 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
  1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    8.26 kg / t
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    8.34 kg / t
  3. Reference Summer
    8.71 kg / t
  4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    9.12 kg / t
  5. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    9.14 kg / t
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    9.18 kg / t
  7. Michelin Alpin 5
    9.21 kg / t
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    9.31 kg / t
  9. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    9.69 kg / t
  10. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    9.91 kg / t
  11. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    10.10 kg / t

19,000 km
£1.45/L
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Noise

Spread: 2.40 dB (3.3%)|Avg: 73.36 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    72.10 dB
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    72.50 dB
  3. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    72.80 dB
  4. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    73.20 dB
  5. Michelin Alpin 5
    73.50 dB
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    73.60 dB
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    73.60 dB
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    73.60 dB
  9. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    73.70 dB
  10. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    73.90 dB
  11. Reference Summer
    74.50 dB

Price

Spread: 400.00 (153.8%)|Avg: 512.00
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
  1. Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
    260.00
  2. Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
    400.00
  3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
    420.00
  4. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    480.00
  5. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
    520.00
  6. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    560.00
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
    580.00
  8. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
    600.00
  9. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    640.00
  10. Michelin Alpin 5
    660.00

Result

Auto Bild started the test asking whether the huge cost saving of a budget winter tire was worth the risk? Their answer is a firm no, unless you only ever drive it on snow covered roads - the dry and wet penalty is too vast.

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
Total: 53
Dry 8
Wet 11
Snow 8
Comfort 10
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
Total: 50
Dry 8
Wet 8
Snow 10
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
3rd

Michelin Alpin 5

225/55 R17
Michelin Alpin 5
Total: 50
Dry 8
Wet 10
Snow 8
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Total: 50
Dry 8
Wet 10
Snow 8
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
5th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001

225/55 R17
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Total: 51
Dry 10
Wet 8
Snow 8
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 9
Noise 8
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Total: 44
Dry 6
Wet 8
Snow 8
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
Total: 46
Dry 8
Wet 10
Snow 6
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 8
8th

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

225/55 R17
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Total: 46
Dry 8
Wet 8
Snow 8
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
9th

Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05

225/55 R17
Maxxis Arctictrekker WP05
Total: 44
Dry 8
Wet 6
Snow 8
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 8
10th

Pace Antarctica 5 Pace

225/55 R17
Pace Antarctica 5 Pace
Total: 39
Dry 6
Wet 4
Snow 8
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 9

comments powered by Disqus