Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 Test Results
Tested 30 times by independent publications, the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 has taken 3 test wins with an average finish of 7th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 74% of the field across 8 tests; its weakest is Snow Braking, at 20% across 10 tests.
- 30Independent tests
- 3Test wins
- 8Podium finishes
- 7thAverage finish
- 52%Field beaten on average
- 8Publications
30 tests, 2013 to 2021
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 52%
Record by discipline
Where the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking Strong | 8 | P3.8 of 14.5 | 74% | - |
| Dry Handling | 8 | P8.1 of 14.5 | 44% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1 | P6 of 11 | 50% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 10 | P7.8 of 20.9 | 58% | - |
| Wet Handling | 8 | P8 of 14.5 | 49% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 1 | P6 of 11 | 50% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 7 | P8.1 of 15 | 53% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking Weak | 10 | P14.4 of 17.6 | 20% | - |
| Snow Traction | 1 | P18 of 21 | 15% | - |
| Snow Handling | 8 | P10.1 of 14.3 | 35% | - |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 1 | P8 of 11 | 30% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 1 | P2 of 11 | 90% | - |
| Noise | 7 | P9.9 of 15.1 | 34% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 3 | P17 of 20 | 16% | - |
| Value | 3 | P19.7 of 20 | 2% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 | P6.6 of 15 | 59% | 2 |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 1 | 17 | - | 6% | |
| 13 | 2 | 11 | - | 15% | |
| 12 | 1 | 11 | - | 8% | |
| 10 | 10 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 10 | 4 | 6 | - | 40% | |
| 9 | 1 | 8 | - | 11% | |
| 9 | 0 | 9 | - | 0% | |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | - | 63% | |
| 8 | 3 | 5 | - | 38% | |
| 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 29% | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | - | 0% | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 3 | 4 | - | 43% | |
| 7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% | |
| 7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% | |
| 7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 30 tests. Updated September 10, 2025.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 delivers a mixed but clearly UHP-leaning profile: repeatedly strong in dry braking/handling and consistently efficient in rolling resistance, yet often let down by snow performance, aquaplaning limits, wear and value. Early tests (2013-2015) include multiple wins and podiums, but later large-comparison tests (2017-2021) show mid-to-lower placements driven by weak snow grip and durability. Wet braking/handling ranges from very good to mid-pack, indicating size/test variability.
Overall, it suits performance-oriented drivers prioritizing dry road precision and fuel efficiency over deep-winter snow capability and longevity. Awards and top-3 category results show it can shine in select metrics, but aggregate rankings (avg. 7.4/field) reflect notable trade-offs in snow, aquaplaning, and wear/value.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st overall 2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 test with strong dry results
- 2nd place dry braking 2018 AutoBild UHP (41.4 m); 2nd place dry braking 2017 Auto Bild (43.7 m)
- Top-3 dry handling 2018 AutoBild UHP (3/11); multiple mid-high dry handling finishes (e.g., 2017 Sport Auto 7/10 within +1.2%)
-
Rolling Resistance / Efficiency
Strong
Details
- 1st rolling resistance 2018 AutoBild UHP (8.05 kg/t)
- 1st rolling resistance 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter (6.95 kg/t) with article mention "lowest impact on fuel use"
- Generally competitive RR across tests (e.g., 2019 Auto Bild 8/21 within +8.2%)
-
Wet Braking/Handling (select tests)
Moderate
Details
- 2nd wet braking and 2nd wet handling 2017 Auto Bild (225/50 R17)
- 6th/44 wet braking in 2019 AB market overview (+7.2%)
- 3rd wet braking 2017 Auto Bild SUV (53.7 m, +0.6% from best)
-
Overall Results / Awards (early lifecycle)
Moderate
Details
- Test wins: 2014 Auto Bild 50-tire braking overview (1/48), 2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 (1/6), 2013 Auto Bild Sports (1/9)
- Multiple podiums: 2015 AMS UHP (2/10), 2013 AMS (2/8), 2016 ADAC (2/13), 2015 Auto Bild Performance (3/8)
-
Wet braking
Strong
in 7 of 18 tests
Details
Stable handling and short braking in the wet, low fuel use
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)Short wet and dry braking distances
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)Short braking distance on dry and wet surfaces
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)Best tire overall in snow with good braking in wet and dry
- 2016 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test (2016)Shorest wet and dry braking
- 2014 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2014)
-
Snow handling
Strong
in 6 of 18 tests
Details
Good dry braking, best drivability in the snow
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)Excellent lateral stability and excellent handling on snow
- 2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test (2015)Winter specialist with excellent cornering and handling qualities on snow
- 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2015)superb handling on snow
- 2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 Winter Tire Test (2014)Great handling on wet and snowy roads
- 2014 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2014)
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 6 of 18 tests
Details
Good in the snow and dry, low fuel use
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)Stable handling and short braking in the wet, low fuel use
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)low rolling resistance
- 2014 AutoBild 235/35 R19 Winter Tire Test (2014)low rolling resistance
- 2014 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2014)low rolling resistance
- 2013 AMS Sports Winter Tire Test (2013)
-
Wet handling
Strong
in 6 of 18 tests
Details
Stable handling and short braking in the wet, low fuel use
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)dynamic wet handling
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)Good lateral stability on wet surfaces
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)Good handling and grip in the wet
- 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test (2017)stable safe driving behavior on wet and dry roads
- 2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2015)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Snow Performance
Strong
Details
- 2017 Auto Bild: 20/21 snow braking (+15.1%), 18/20 snow handling (+4.6%)
- 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch: 20/21 snow braking (+10%), 19/20 snow handling (+4%)
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance: 18/21 snow braking (+6.2%), 18/21 traction (+8.8%)
-
Aquaplaning / Wet Stability (consistency)
Moderate
Details
- 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch: straight aquaplaning 16/20 (+12.7%)
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance: straight aquaplaning 16/21 (+8.2%); wet handling 18/21 (+5.2%)
- 2018 AutoBild UHP wet braking 9/11 (+12.6%) and wet handling 9/11 (+3.7%)
-
Wear and Value
Strong
Details
- 2017 Auto Bild: wear 19/20 (+38.8%), value 20/20 (+123.6%)
- 2019 Auto Bild 17-inch: wear 19/20 (+29.6%), value 19/20 (+52.8%)
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance: wear 13/20 (+17.1%), value 20/20 (+55.8%)
-
Noise/Comfort (select tests)
Minor
Details
- 2019 AMS SUV: noise 11/11 (+2.6%)
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV: noise 10/11 (+2.5%)
-
Overall Placement in Recent Large Tests
Moderate
Details
- 2021 ADAC 225/50 R17: 12/18
- 2020 ADAC 235/55 R17: 9/13
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance: 19/21
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 5 of 18 tests
Details
weak aquaplaning resistance
- 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test (2019)low aquaplaning resistance
- 2016 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test (2016)Weak resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test (2015)Average aquaplaning results and average wear
- 2014 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2014)Relatively weak resistance to aquaplaning
- 2013 AMS Sports Winter Tire Test (2013)
-
Tread life
Strong
in 4 of 18 tests
Details
Average wet grip, high price, high wear
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)Average snow performance, average comfort, high wear
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)high wear
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)Average aquaplaning results and average wear
- 2014 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2014)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 3 of 18 tests
Details
Low drivability in the dry, weak in the wet
- 2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)Average wet grip, high price, high wear
- 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test (2020)struggled in the wet
- 2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Road noise
Strong
in 3 of 18 tests
Details
Increased noise level
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)relatively noisy
- 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test (2017)increased noise level
- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 (18 tests) and 53 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Snow traction strength in 5 of 18 tests 17 praise, 2 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Snow handling strength in 6 of 18 tests 15 praise, 2 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet braking strength in 7 of 18 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Steering feel strength in 6 of 18 tests 6 praise, 2 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Road noise weakness in 3 of 18 tests 3 praise, 14 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry handling strength in 4 of 18 tests 7 praise, 0 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Ice grip no test mentions it 8 praise, 2 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort no test mentions it 8 praise, 1 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
- Slush performance no test mentions it 5 praise, 0 criticise of 53 reviews · Read those reviews
Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners
- Dry braking strength in 5 of 18 tests no owner mentions it
Every test, newest first 30
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2019 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test
Average
2017 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test
Conditionally recommended
2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
Recommended
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Average.
2017 235/55 R17 SUV Winter Tire Test
Recommended.
2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
The Pirelli Sottozero 3 proved to be happiest in the dry, but struggled in the wet and snow testing.
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test
Recommended with restrictions
2016 AutoBild Winter UHP Tire Test
Exemplary.
2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test
Recommended
2015 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
Poor snow performance, good in the wet and dry
2013 AMS Sports Winter Tire Test
Particularly recommended
2013 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 225/45 R17
Satisfactory
Back to the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Pirelli tires

