Menu
Nokian WR D4 View Gallery (1)
155-225/45-80 R13-17 33 sizes 2015 Winter rated

Nokian WR D4

The Nokian WR D4 is a Premium Touring Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
79%
Handling
79%
Wear
68%
Comfort
83%
Buy again
74%
Snow Grip
91%
Ice Grip
79%
72 Reviews
79% Average
733,243 miles driven
25 Tests (avg: 6th)
Nokian WR D4

Nokian WR D4

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
88
1.5x / 8 tests
Comfort
74.7
0.32x / 3 tests
Value
73.9
0.42x / 10 tests
Ice
68.8
1.2x / 3 tests
Wet
67.6
1.93x / 12 tests
Dry
65.9
1.13x / 7 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
80
2 tests
Braking
76.4
13 tests
Handling
69.4
11 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 25
Publications: 8
Period: 2015 - 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 72
Avg Rating: 79.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.57
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tire Test ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 9/16 0 metrics
2018 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2018 205/55 R16 3/11 10 metrics
2018 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2018 205/55 R16 7/10 0 metrics
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tire Test ACE 2018 185/65 R15 3/12 0 metrics
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 9/22 12 metrics
2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 175/65 R14 ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 4/12 0 metrics
2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2018 205/55 R16 10/16 0 metrics
2018 51 Winter Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2018 195/65 R15 14/52 0 metrics
2017 AC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 Auto Centrum 2017 185/65 R15 1/8 10 metrics
2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 11/45 0 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 14/21 11 metrics
2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 4/16 0 metrics
2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 ADAC 2017 195/65 R15 11/16 0 metrics
2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2017 225/45 R17 5/8 0 metrics
2016 AMS Winter SUV Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2016 215/60 R17 2/10 0 metrics
2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test Auto Express 2016 205/55 R16 2/8 0 metrics
2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 7/20 0 metrics
2016 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 7/43 0 metrics
2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Zeitung 2016 205/55 R16 2/14 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 3/15 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 6/13 0 metrics
2015 AMS UHP Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2015 225/50 R17 5/10 0 metrics
2015 ACE 17 Inch Winter Tire Test ACE 2015 225/50 R17 4/8 0 metrics
2015 Sport Auto 19 Inch Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2015 235/35 R19 5/7 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2015 225/40 R18 6/8 0 metrics
25
Tests
6th
Average
1st
Best
14th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
9th/16
Excellent in snow and ice, low fuel consumption
Relatively poor dry grip, high wear
Good
7th/10
Lowest rolling resistance, excellent dry handling, good snow braking.
Poor wet grip.
Good in the wet and on ice
Relatively weak in the snow
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D B 68
14 inch
175/65R14 82 T C B 68
165/70R14 81 T D B 68
15 inch
195/65R15 91 T C B 69
195/55R15 89 H XL C B 69
185/65R15 88 T C B 68
195/65R15 95 H XL C B 69
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C B 69
205/60R16 92 H C B 69
205/55R16 91 T C B 69
215/60R16 99 H XL C B 69
205/60R16 96 H XL C B 69
17 inch
225/45R17 91 H C B 69
225/45R17 94 V XL C B 69
18 inch
245/45R18 100 V XL C B 69
225/40R18 92 V XL C B 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nokian WR D4 >>

Questions and Answers for the Nokian WR D4

Ask a question
April 30, 2018

I have 2017 My WR D4 (195/55/16) winter tires on my Honda CR Z sports model. Can I keep on using them for the summer season at the average temperature of btw 25-35 Celcius? What is the max temperature?

There is no maximum temperature for the WR D4, they are heat tested like all other tires. That said, the compound will be much less effective at warmer temperatures, especially in the wet so it is not advised to use them in the summer months.
February 24, 2023

My daughters car. NOKIAN tires have 60CL as the dot date! Unable to find any age info?!....As they were made in Russia?...

The D4 will have a standard DOT code on, they might be on the inside of the tire. They will also have the country they were made in somewhere on the sidewall!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian WR D4 Reviews

Given 23% while driving a Honda Jazz (175/65 R15) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
Very noisy, away from the value expected from ranking
November 1, 2024
Given 96% while driving a Ford Fiesta (175/65 R14) on mostly town for 30,000 spirited miles
Best winter tires! Period. I had these WR D4 for 5 years on my 2010 Fiesta and I even used them during 3 summers and they still have some tread. I would choose them even over Conti or other premium brands! You cant go wrong with these winter tires at least at the 175/65/R14 size. Got them at a very good price I will definitely buy them again!
November 5, 2024
Given 79% while driving a Volvo XC70 D5 (235/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 15,000 easy going miles
I got the tires with the car, I drove on them for two winters. Due to the law, they saw 2cm of snow for two days. So I can't say how they are in the snow.
They are cracked on the side from age, since the DOT number says they are from 2017. The depth of the saree was about 6mm.
September 4, 2024

How would you rate the Nokian WR D4?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian WR D4 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 92% while driving a Hyundai Getz (175/65 R14) on mostly motorways for 100,000 miles
I wish they were on sale again, I'd buy them right away. They're a great tire, I was very happy with them. I used them for 7 years.
January 1, 2026
Given 47% while driving a BMW 3 series (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 3,500 spirited miles
I felt the car very unstable when using these tires..on snow they were amazing, but other than that I would not recommend. After 4 years and very little use( about 5k kilometres) the rubber aged quickly and soon started to disintegrate and by that I mean not only micro cracks at the surface, but big chunks of it fell apart.
December 30, 2022
Given 78% while driving a Dacia Sandero 1.4 (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
The best tire for grip on snow and ice I experienced so far. You won't find a better tires for such price. It really surprised me how good it holds on snow slowly going up a hill without any problems while others had to go much faster and still were not sure if they would make it.
December 11, 2022
Given 67% while driving a Audi A3 (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
Beware that this is a snow tire! It is not suitable for mild climates where temperatures are usually around 6 to 12 degrees celsius.The Compound is very soft and if you do not see snow and ice regularly and snow is an exception rather then the rule this will ruin the tire.My driving is usually around town and the rather hot autumns and springs for the tire and somewhat aggressive take offs from stop lights and intersections have torn off the sipes from the side..
December 10, 2022
Given 83% while driving a Volkswagen Golf IV 1.9 TDI 110 (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Hi! I used few kinds of winter tires in time. No 1 I think it is Nokian Hakkapeliita 6 (or 5) on both FWD and AWD very good ones. You can feel the difference right away. On the FWD vehicle I used to have Yokohama normal ones and then Verdrestein directionals (v shaped pattern). Vedrestein were better but nothing like Nokian. Then after buying the AWD for my wife I got a parking spot under the building I was living in and she always got out regardless of how bad was the uphill exit from the parking. Ice, wet show, dry snow, deep snow (~20 cm). At times she was the only one able to get out in the morning from that parking. One time we went to a cabin in the mountains and it showed a lot over night building it up to the top of the bumper of my Toyota RAV4, about half the tire diameter. I got out of there in few long minutes. Had to back up few times to get some momentum to push forward. All the others had to shovel their way out about 10-15 m and they had AWDs too. I think my Nokians had their part to this performance. Same winter my neighbour slide back trying to get out of parking and she damaged her car, a Honda Fit. Tires, some Motomasters directionals, loose grip exactly close to top of the hill at street level. She had the presence to press the button of her remote control to open the garage door while she was slowly sliding back while car whells were spinning foeward and she just lost her left side mirror. Other neighbours had to fix that door after finding themselves in same situation (sliding back into closing garage door). She asked for my help and since the new Nokians were too expensive for her she got a set of used Hakkapeliitas (7 or something, better than mine) on internet. No 6 was still visible on pattern so they were above 6mm tread. Well she never had the random excitement getting out of parking after snowing or ice rain again. When I got my RAV4 it came with Bridgestones. Then I had some Michelin X ICE used from a neighbour that sold his car. Bridgestone were better on snow and Michelins better on ice. These were my best winter tires until I got the Hakkapeliitas. Nokians are better than those on both surfaces. They are also noisier on dry but not by much. If you plan to use them summer time too, don't. They will loose some of their grip on ice next winter. Michelins are the best as summer tires or rain tires if you buy the directional ones. Other tires I had over time on a FWD vehicle were some Continentals directionals too. Better than Yokohama and Vedrestein but when they were less than half something happened and they loose their ballance to the point I had to replace them. Now I got some Nokian WRs since I was unable to find the Hakkapeliita. Hope they will perform next winter. Is not first time I got WRs. I had 2 new ones on the front axle of a FWD VW Golf Variant. Somehow one of them got some side bump and got unballanced, later developed some sort of cut about 6 cm long just beside the rolling pattern while rolling on dry about 10 degr C. Had to replace that one on road. I managed to get out of highway and make it to a shop after inflating it twice with my small portable 12V compressor. While I had that tire car was driven by me, my wife and my sister. (I can't say for sure if tire was abused or not.) This is a second chance I give to WRs based on my expecience with them. I can say, I think they are thinner than Hakkapeliita, also lighter, maybe an inferior kind. I hope those will do better than previous ones. I will still use the "survivor" mounted on rear pairing a Fulda (only one that had about similar pattern and thichness to my good WR in that shop inventory when I had to replace the failing WR. When it happenend I already had them switched to rear axle since I was unable to use them on front due to vibration given the unballance. I was hoping to make it to the end of winter, one month and a half, but it didn't happen. Tire gave up after about 1000 kms on rear axle). Oh! One more thing. One of my friends bought some asian tires that had a pattern identical with Nokian Hakkapeliita. Don't get hooked into that. They start to get some strange chipped wear on rolling pattern and one of them got a side damage by a splint of wood!!! How weird is that! He had to replace that one. Guy was unable to fix it. Grip on snow was compared with some average all season ones even the mountain and snowflake was displayed on them.
June 19, 2022
Given 97% while driving a Citroën C4 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 35,000 average miles
Exceptional winter tire, if you are in snowy weather and not so good, for mild winters. You have to be careful with it, if the temperature rises about 10 degrees, as it's very soft and you can ruin it, especially at high speed or fast cornering, in those conditions. If you drive in the snow, though and at around 0 degrees, or bellow, these have no rival. They are quiet and comfortable, with very good road feedback, at low temperatures. They are a very good choice, for true winter tires. The wet grip is very good, handling also, they are a joy to ride, in low temperatures, from all aspects.
September 4, 2021
Given 92% while driving a Chevrolet aveo (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
When you decide to buy winter tires , you must know that its made for snow and winter conditions. This means that you will drive at wet roads with speed 20% less than you drive with your summer tires (especially at turns). This is an excellent tire for snow . This is a tire which make your driving easylly at difficult snow and icy conditions. You dont have to expect from this tire to have handling on wet or dry turns as your summer tire because you never expect from your summer tire to climb on a 10% road covered with snow..... + traction on snow + handling on snow + braking distance on snow + buy them again (please nokian dont do that!!! i learn that you will change them with snowproof which are not better than wrd4) - fuel consumption (+ 0.5 lt/ 100km from my summer tires)
March 13, 2021
Given 79% while driving a Renault Clio 1.4 16v (195/65 R15 T) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
Every one has something to say about wearing off too fast. This is not true. I drove them for 5 winters and full 2 summer seasons. They wore close to 4 mm marker. The issue was on ice grip. But can complain. Buy again.
January 13, 2021
Given 82% while driving a BMW 320d efficient dynamics (205/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 2,500 spirited miles
These tires have been surprising me every day since I got them fitted to my BMW F30 320d EfficientDinamics LCI. What I liked most about these tires was by far the comfort levels. They absorb the bumps better than the Continentals and Bridgestones I have tried and they are also very quiet. Also, my fuel efficiency seem to have gotten a bit better since fitting these tires. As dry/wet performance, for a tire that is so good in the snow I have to give it first place. The feedback is good, the car does not seem understeery, nor oversteery and it is very predictable. Overall, this is still one of the best tire choices for winter driving especially in the sizes 16-19 inch. The price performance can't get any better and these tires don't make compromises.
January 11, 2021
Given 74% while driving a Volkswagen Jetta 1.4 TSI (195/65 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 15,500 average miles
I've fitted these tires now for the forth season. Firs 3 seasons they were great. In the dry - good as any other winter tire, wet - ok, stable enough so that you don't understear in every corner, snow grip was just excelant! I've driven them through a heavy snow storm, about 10-20cm of snow on the highway and no problems. The problems started this year, I've noticed problems with wet grip. I have to be verry careful how fast I come into a corner (especially if the toad is already old and slipary as it is) on a wet road, because the tires break lose verry fast and u end up understearing. Wear after about 25K km is verey good, in my opiniom. On front tires (now feeted on the back) I have a bit less than 6 mm of thread left and on the back tires (now on the front) I have about 6,5mm. Verry confortable tire, quiet, as a winter tire can be haha, and deals with bumps in the road verry well. Generaly verry good tires, but I won't buy them again because of the lack of wet grip. And another "problem" that I find is that I have to balance them every year when I fit them for the winter. That's probably because of the softer compond.
November 14, 2020
Given 53% while driving a (215/60 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Very bad on wet roads. Not buying again
February 6, 2020
Given 76% while driving a SEAT LEON 1.8TSI (225/40 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 spirited miles
Used for 2 months. First I can say that these tires are really quiet. Snow handling is great, I was driving in a snow storm on a highway and felt very safe. Haven't tested too much icy roads yet, but seems to be okay by the first impression.
Sometimes tends to be searching for a path on a straight road, need to adjust with the steering wheel. But not too bad, considering the 225 width.
Dry grip is average, wet grip is bit loose, powerful FWD car cannot put the torque onto the tarmac, gets wheel spin little too easy. Although aquaplaning is great, deep thread works well.
December 3, 2019
Rate the Nokian WR D4