Menu

2017 AC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Snow
  5. Ice
  6. Results
  7. Nokian WR D4
  8. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
  9. Michelin Alpin A4
  10. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
  11. Debica Frigo 2
  12. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
  13. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
  14. Sava Eskimo Ice

Test Summary
Wet Braking Nokian WR D4
Dry Braking Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Wet Handling Debica Frigo 2
Sava Eskimo Ice
Wear Nokian WR D4
Rolling Resistance Debica Frigo 2
Straight Aqua Debica Frigo 2
Sava Eskimo Ice
Snow Handling Nokian WR D4
For 2017 the Polish publication AutoCentrum has tested eight studless winter tires in 185/65 R15. As with the other winter tire tests we've featured across 2017, AutoCentrum tests the winter tires in the dry, wet and snow, but also includes ice testing, a first for 2017.

Six of the tires on test are European winter tires which are available to the UK market, and two of the tires (Debica Frigo 2 and Sava Eskimo Ice) are full nordic friction studless winter tires, so it should give us a good overview of how these two different types of tires perform, and why Nordic winter tires aren't suitable for the UK market.

Dry

In the dry testing, the Nokian was supreme, stopping the car in 27.76 meters. The more heavily siped nature of Nordic winter tires means they struggle in dry testing, with the Debica 3 meters and Sava nearly 4 meters behind the best European winter tire on test when braking down from 80 km/h.

Dry Braking

Spread: 3.55 M (12.8%)|Avg: 29.63 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Rolling Resistance

Spread: 1.08 kg / t (13.5%)|Avg: 8.55 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
  1. Debica Frigo 2
    7.99 kg / t
  2. Nokian WR D4
    8.12 kg / t
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    8.26 kg / t
  4. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    8.29 kg / t
  5. Sava Eskimo Ice
    8.81 kg / t
  6. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    8.87 kg / t
  7. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    8.95 kg / t
  8. Michelin Alpin A4
    9.07 kg / t

19,000 km
£1.45/L
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Wet

As in the dry testing, the Nordic winter tires were last by a huge margin. The best European tire on test stopped the vehicle in under 30 meters when braking from 80 km/h, with the Sava Nordic winter tire a full 10 meters behind.

Wet Braking

Spread: 9.75 M (32.6%)|Avg: 33.29 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

The gap was similar in the wet slalom, with both Nordic winter tires a long way off the pace and controllability of the European winter tires.

Wet Handling

Spread: 1.30 s (9.4%)|Avg: 14.25 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    13.80 s
  2. Michelin Alpin A4
    14.00 s
  3. Nokian WR D4
    14.00 s
  4. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    14.00 s
  5. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    14.10 s
  6. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    14.20 s
  7. Sava Eskimo Ice
    14.80 s
  8. Debica Frigo 2
    15.10 s

Goodyear rounded out an impressive wet performance by winning the aquaplaning test too.

Straight Aqua

Spread: 13.70 Km/H (15.4%)|Avg: 82.38 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    88.80 Km/H
  2. Michelin Alpin A4
    85.10 Km/H
  3. Nokian WR D4
    84.90 Km/H
  4. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    84.70 Km/H
  5. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    83.20 Km/H
  6. Debica Frigo 2
    79.90 Km/H
  7. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    77.30 Km/H
  8. Sava Eskimo Ice
    75.10 Km/H

Snow

Snow is where the Nordic winter tire should take the advantage, but during the snow braking test the Goodyear once again won, stopping the car in just 15.79 meters from 40 km/h.

Snow Braking

Spread: 1.18 M (7.5%)|Avg: 16.34 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

The Goodyear was also strongest in snow traction, who's results mirrored snow braking closely.

Snow Traction

Spread: 0.61 s (12.7%)|Avg: 5.04 s
Snow acceleration time (Lower is better)
  1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    4.82 s
  2. Debica Frigo 2
    4.86 s
  3. Sava Eskimo Ice
    4.95 s
  4. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    4.96 s
  5. Nokian WR D4
    5.04 s
  6. Michelin Alpin A4
    5.06 s
  7. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    5.18 s
  8. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    5.43 s

Ice

Ice braking is finally where the Nordic winter tires won a test, with the Debica Frigo having a big advantage when braking down from just 25 km/h.

Ice Braking

Spread: 4.25 M (21.8%)|Avg: 21.96 M
Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)
Ice Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

As with snow traction, the results were broadly similar to ice braking, with the Nordic winter tires having a strong advantage.

Ice Traction

Spread: 1.74 s (26.8%)|Avg: 7.14 s
Ice acceleration time (Lower is better)
  1. Debica Frigo 2
    6.49 s
  2. Sava Eskimo Ice
    6.57 s
  3. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    7.02 s
  4. Nokian WR D4
    7.03 s
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    7.12 s
  6. Michelin Alpin A4
    7.32 s
  7. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    7.33 s
  8. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    8.23 s

The ice slalom was again won by the Nordic winter tires.

Ice Handling

Spread: 4.40 s (17.1%)|Avg: 28.91 s
Ice handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
  1. Sava Eskimo Ice
    25.80 s
  2. Debica Frigo 2
    27.40 s
  3. Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
    28.20 s
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip 9
    29.80 s
  5. Nokian WR D4
    29.80 s
  6. Michelin Alpin A4
    30.00 s
  7. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
    30.10 s
  8. Kumho Winter Craft WP51
    30.20 s
 

Results

The overall results are below. If you've ever wondered why we don't get the more extreme Nordic winter tires in the UK, this is your answer, with both Nordic tires on test struggling in the dry and wet when compared to our European winter tires.

1st

Nokian WR D4

185/65 R15
Nokian WR D4
Total: 160.5
Dry 19
Wet 35
Snow 23
Ice 31
Subjective 35
Rolling Resistance 9
Overall 8.5
2nd

Goodyear UltraGrip 9

185/65 R15
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
Total: 155.3
Dry 15
Wet 39
Snow 25
Ice 29
Subjective 31
Rolling Resistance 8
Overall 8.3
3rd

Michelin Alpin A4

185/65 R15
Michelin Alpin A4
Total: 146.9
Dry 17
Wet 35
Snow 22
Ice 28
Subjective 31
Rolling Resistance 6
Overall 7.9
4th

Fulda Kristall Montero 3

185/65 R15
Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Total: 126.9
Dry 13
Wet 31
Snow 19
Ice 26
Subjective 23
Rolling Resistance 8
Overall 6.9
5th

Debica Frigo 2

185/65 R15
Debica Frigo 2
Total: 134.7
Dry 11
Wet 18
Snow 26
Ice 37
Subjective 26
Rolling Resistance 10
Overall 6.7
6th

Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2

185/65 R15
Nexen Winguard Snow G WH2
Total: 123.6
Dry 12
Wet 29
Snow 19
Ice 27
Subjective 24
Rolling Resistance 6
Overall 6.6
7th

Kumho Winter Craft WP51

185/65 R15
Kumho Winter Craft WP51
Total: 111.5
Dry 11
Wet 28
Snow 16
Ice 27
Subjective 17
Rolling Resistance 6
Overall 6.5
8th

Sava Eskimo Ice

185/65 R15
Sava Eskimo Ice
Total: 131.2
Dry 10
Wet 17
Snow 26
Ice 37
Subjective 29
Rolling Resistance 6
Overall 6.2

comments powered by Disqus