Test Charts / Auto Centrum
2017 AC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 185/65 R15
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 91 ft | Best | |
| 93 ft | +2 ft | |
| 96 ft | +5 ft | |
| 97 ft | +6 ft | |
| 99 ft | +8 ft | |
| 99 ft | +8 ft | |
| 100 ft | +9 ft | |
| 103 ft | +12 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 98 ft | Best | |
| 99 ft | +1 ft | |
| 103 ft | +5 ft | |
| 107 ft | +9 ft | |
| 107 ft | +9 ft | |
| 108 ft | +10 ft | |
| 121 ft | +23 ft | |
| 130 ft | +32 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 32.6% (32 ft ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 13.8 s | Best | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14 s | +0.20 s | |
| 14.1 s | +0.30 s | |
| 14.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 14.8 s | +1.00 s | |
| 15.1 s | +1.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (1.3 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55.2 mph | Best | |
| 52.9 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 52.8 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 52.6 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 51.7 mph | -3.5 mph | |
| 49.6 mph | -5.6 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -7.2 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -8.5 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (8.5 mph).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52 ft | Best | |
| 53 ft | +1 ft | |
| 53 ft | +1 ft | |
| 53 ft | +1 ft | |
| 54 ft | +2 ft | |
| 54 ft | +2 ft | |
| 55 ft | +3 ft | |
| 56 ft | +4 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 7.5% (4 ft).
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.82 s | Best | |
| 4.86 s | +0.04 s | |
| 4.95 s | +0.13 s | |
| 4.96 s | +0.14 s | |
| 5.04 s | +0.22 s | |
| 5.06 s | +0.24 s | |
| 5.18 s | +0.36 s | |
| 5.43 s | +0.61 s |
The difference between best and worst was 12.7% (0.61 s).
Ice
3Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64 ft | Best | |
| 70 ft | +6 ft | |
| 71 ft | +7 ft | |
| 72 ft | +8 ft | |
| 74 ft | +10 ft | |
| 74 ft | +10 ft | |
| 75 ft | +11 ft | |
| 78 ft | +14 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.49 s | Best | |
| 6.57 s | +0.08 s | |
| 7.02 s | +0.53 s | |
| 7.03 s | +0.54 s | |
| 7.12 s | +0.63 s | |
| 7.32 s | +0.83 s | |
| 7.33 s | +0.84 s | |
| 8.23 s | +1.74 s |
The difference between best and worst was 26.8% (1.74 s).
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 25.8 s | Best | |
| 27.4 s | +1.60 s | |
| 28.2 s | +2.40 s | |
| 29.8 s | +4.00 s | |
| 29.8 s | +4.00 s | |
| 30 s | +4.20 s | |
| 30.1 s | +4.30 s | |
| 30.2 s | +4.40 s |
The difference between best and worst was 17.1% (4.4 s).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.99 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 8.12 kg/t | +0.13 kg/t | $5 | |
| 8.26 kg/t | +0.27 kg/t | $10 | |
| 8.29 kg/t | +0.30 kg/t | $11 | |
| 8.81 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | $30 | |
| 8.87 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $32 | |
| 8.95 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | $35 | |
| 9.07 kg/t | +1.08 kg/t | $40 |
The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (1.08 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Alpin A4 uses about 11 gal ($40) more fuel than the Debica Frigo 2.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tire Test
185/65 R1516 tires tested
4 of these 8 tires tested again
2018 AMS Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1611 tires tested
4 of these 8 tires tested again
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tire Test
185/65 R1512 tires tested
4 of these 8 tires tested again

