Menu

Test source ADAC

2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15

Overall test winnerContinental WinterContact TS 860

This year the German motoring orginisation ADAC have tested winter tires in 195/65 R15 and 215/65 R16. The 195/65 R16 winter tire test continues Continentals winter dominance, with another win for the Continental WinterContact TS860.

Tires tested
16
Tested size
195/65 R15

At a glance

Tire shortlist

16 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 860

+Very well-balanced, top marks in the wet, especially good on snow. Good on dry roads and low fuel consumption

−None mentioned

2nd

ESA Tecar Super Grip 9

+A very balanced tire, best scores on ice and lowest fuel consumption. Strong on dry, wet and snow covered roads

−None mentioned

3rd

Kleber Krisalp HP3

+A very balanced winter tire with low wear. Good in the dry and on snowy roads

−None mentioned

4th

Dunlop Winter Response 2

+Good in the wet and on snow and ice. Low fuel consumption

−Compared to the best, slightly weak in the dry

5th

Goodyear UltraGrip 9

+Especially good in the wet, good in the dry. Low wear

−Slightly weaker in the snow

6th

Hankook Winter i cept RS2

+Good on wet roads

−Slightly weaker than the best on test in the snow and wet

7th

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

+Particularly good on dry roads

−Weak in the snow, slightly weak in the wet. Relatively high wear

8th

Yokohama W drive V905

+Best marks in the dry, good on snow

−Weak in the wet, high wear

9th

Falken Eurowinter HS01

+Very low fuel consumption and wear

−Weak on snow and ice, slightly weak on dry and wet roads

10th

Firestone Winterhawk 3

+Good in the dry, low fuel consumption

−Relatively weak in the wet and on snow

11th

Nokian WR D4

+Top marks in the snow, good in the dry, low fuel consumption

−Weak in the wet, high wear

12th

Michelin Alpin 5

+Top marks in wear, good in the dry

−Weak on snow, high fuel consumption

13th

Aeolus SnowAce2

+Good in the dry

−Weak on snowy and wet roads, high wear

14th

Kumho Winter Craft WP51

+Good in the dry

−Weak on wet and snow covered roads

15th

Sava Eskimo S3+

+Especially good in the snow

−Weak on dry roads, relatively weak in the wet

16th

Semperit Master Grip 2

+Good in the snow, quietest internal road noise on test

−Weak in the dry and ice covered roads. High wear

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 · 195/65 R15

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

This year the German motoring orginisation ADAC have tested winter tires in 195/65 R15 and 215/65 R16.

The 195/65 R16 winter tire test continues Continentals winter dominance, with another win for the Continental WinterContact TS860. 

Second and third places were taken by new products from mid-range manufacturers ESA Tecar and the Michelin owned Kleber brand.

Results

The dry results are weighted 15% overall, wet 30%, snow 20%, ice 10%, noise/comfort 5%, fuel consumption 10% and wear 10%.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 860

195/65 R15
Continental WinterContact TS 860
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.6
Wet8.4
Snow8.2
Ice7
Rolling Resistance8.2
Noise5.2
Wear7
Overall7.8

Total: 59.4

2nd

ESA Tecar Super Grip 9

195/65 R15
ESA Tecar Super Grip 9
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.4
Wet7.4
Snow7.4
Ice7.8
Rolling Resistance8.6
Noise5.4
Wear7
Overall7.4

Total: 58.4

3rd

Kleber Krisalp HP3

195/65 R15
Kleber Krisalp HP3
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.4
Wet7
Snow7.8
Ice7
Rolling Resistance8
Noise5.4
Wear8
Overall7.2

Total: 57.8

4th

Dunlop Winter Response 2

195/65 R15
Dunlop Winter Response 2
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6.8
Wet8
Snow7.8
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance8.4
Noise5.6
Wear7
Overall6.8

Total: 57.6

5th

Goodyear UltraGrip 9

195/65 R15
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.2
Wet8.2
Snow6.6
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance7.8
Noise5.8
Wear8
Overall6.6

Total: 57.4

6th

Hankook Winter i cept RS2

195/65 R15
Hankook Winter i cept RS2
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.6
Wet6.8
Snow6.6
Ice7
Rolling Resistance7.6
Noise4.6
Wear7
Overall6.6

Total: 53.8

7th

Vredestein Snowtrac 5

195/65 R15
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry8
Wet6.6
Snow6.2
Ice7
Rolling Resistance8
Noise4.4
Wear6
Overall6

Total: 52.2

8th

Yokohama W drive V905

195/65 R15
Yokohama W drive V905
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry8.6
Wet6.8
Snow7.6
Ice7
Rolling Resistance8
Noise4.6
Wear6
Overall6

Total: 54.6

9th

Falken Eurowinter HS01

195/65 R15
Falken Eurowinter HS01
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6.8
Wet6.8
Snow5.8
Ice6.2
Rolling Resistance7.4
Noise4.8
Wear7
Overall5.8

Total: 50.6

10th

Firestone Winterhawk 3

195/65 R15
Firestone Winterhawk 3
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.8
Wet5.8
Snow6.2
Ice7
Rolling Resistance8.4
Noise5.2
Wear7
Overall5.8

Total: 53.2

11th

Nokian WR D4

195/65 R15
Nokian WR D4
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.4
Wet5.8
Snow8.6
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance8.2
Noise4.8
Wear6
Overall5.8

Total: 53.8

12th

Michelin Alpin 5

195/65 R15
Michelin Alpin 5
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.8
Wet7
Snow5.6
Ice6.8
Rolling Resistance6.8
Noise5
Wear9
Overall5.6

Total: 53.6

13th

Aeolus SnowAce2

195/65 R15
Aeolus SnowAce2
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.2
Wet6.6
Snow5.4
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance8
Noise5.2
Wear6
Overall5.4

Total: 51

14th

Kumho Winter Craft WP51

195/65 R15
Kumho Winter Craft WP51
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7.2
Wet5.4
Snow6.8
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance7.4
Noise4.8
Wear7
Overall5.4

Total: 51.2

15th

Sava Eskimo S3+

195/65 R15
Sava Eskimo S3+
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5.4
Wet6.2
Snow8.2
Ice7.2
Rolling Resistance7.6
Noise5
Wear7
Overall5.4

Total: 52

16th

Semperit Master Grip 2

195/65 R15
Semperit Master Grip 2
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry4.8
Wet7
Snow7.8
Ice6.6
Rolling Resistance8.2
Noise6
Wear6
Overall4.8

Total: 51.2

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

4 comments
  1. kayman archived

    How is the 6.8 of Yokohama weak in wet and 6.8 of Falken and 6.6 of Vredestein slightly weak? Also Hankook's 6.8 on wet is "good on wet road".. This is why I hate ADAC tests, maybe they are true but noone knows why.. :)

    #2976
    1. TireReviews kayman archived

      "maybe they are true but no one knows why" - this sometimes makes more sense than the test itself!

      They have quite a complex score weighting, it might have been the Falken and Vred had good aquaplaning but bad wet grip, and the Hankook had poor aquaplaning, but good wet grip!

      #2977
      1. kayman TireReviews archived

        I was studying ADAC's web site, which is hard because my german is very bad. But I found out that the overall cannot be better then the worsest parameter of main six parameters (dry/wet/snow/ice/wear/rollingresistance) under some point. Yokohama and Vredestein has Wear 6 and their Overall score can be 6 and worse. In your data of the test, It seems that if one of the 6 parameters is lower then 7, overall score is that parameter.

        I would love to see all their datas, AutoBild presents all of them, or the most of them..

        #2982
        1. TireReviews kayman archived

          Thanks for the info! It's such a shame ADAC don't publish their data, it's why we only give them small coverage on the website, where as a test from someone like Auto Bild gets a great big write up!

          #2983
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.