Menu

Yokohama W drive V905

The Yokohama W drive V905 is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.8
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
82%
Handling
83%
Wear
86%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
79%
Snow Grip
63%
Ice Grip
50%
17 Reviews
76% Average
161,653 miles driven
10 Tests (avg: 11th)
Yokohama W drive V905

Yokohama W drive V905

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
86.8
1.5x / 4 tests
Wet
71.4
1.93x / 5 tests
Comfort
61.8
0.32x / 1 test
Dry
59.9
1.13x / 4 tests
Value
58.1
0.42x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
76.9
6 tests
Handling
72.3
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 10
Publications: 4
Period: 2014 - 2017
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 17
Avg Rating: 76.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.42
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2017 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test Sport Auto 2017 225/40 R18 5/10 6 metrics
2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 12/45 0 metrics
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2017 225/50 R17 15/21 11 metrics
2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 ADAC 2017 195/65 R15 8/16 0 metrics
2016 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 21/43 0 metrics
2016 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 225/45 R17 ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 11/13 0 metrics
2015 AMS UHP Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2015 225/50 R17 7/10 0 metrics
2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2015 205/55 R16 2/19 0 metrics
2015 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R14 24/51 0 metrics
2014 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 ADAC 2014 195/65 R15 6/14 0 metrics
10
Tests
11th
Average
2nd
Best
24th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
Best marks in the dry, good on snow
Weak in the wet, high wear
15th/21
Good traction and short braking in the snow, stable wet handling.
Poor snow handling, low aquaplaning resistance, poor comfort, high rolling resistance.
Average.
12th/45

Questions and Answers for the Yokohama W drive V905

Ask a question
November 25, 2016

is the Yokohama tire "W drive V905" size 225/55/19 suitable for 4x4 SUV cars?

As long as the load index is at least as high as specified by your vehicle manufacturer, the V905 will be suitable.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Yokohama W drive V905 Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Skoda (225/50 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 28,000 average miles
Some doubts to use winter tires on the snow monster there were, but the space lost by the chains (spyke-spiders) that I needed to buy (YETI has 17 inc wheels) had pushed me to have winter set! At home we have winter Bridgestone and Pirelli, both very good, the shop has suggested the YOKOHAMA, so I did some research on web and the reviews were good. I said, ok try, if not good, destroy them and change fast. On wet, as all winter tires are not the best, but on snow and cold I cannot say where is the limit (still don't know if thanks to haldex system or the tires). One thing is quite strange: they are lighter on the steering wheel vs summer tires, so parking and manoeuvres are easier. Finally d/t the lockdown in Italy I've been obliged to stay in France till summer and they lost some grip d/t the high temp (above 24[°C]) and I expected to destroy them on the motorway, but they were still good.
November 1, 2020
Given 62% while driving a Mazda Mazda 6 2.5 GH (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 16,000 average miles
I bought these tires with car. Spent one winter with them. These are one of the worst tires I had. In temperatures under 0°C it is almost ok except wet. Between 0-5°C it become slip litzle bit in wet. Between 5-10°C it become slip in dry. Above 15°C it acts like in mud when you drive on dry road. And they are too noisy like have siren still turned on. Compared to Goodyear Ultragrip 9 fitted on the other cars in family it is sh*t. I will never buy them and for next winter season will take the Goodyear UG Performance Gen 1 tires.
February 16, 2020
Given 65% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (205/55 R16 H) on mostly motorways for 15 spirited miles
So, diese Woche habe ich meine V905 vom Auto geschmissen. Gesamt KM-Leistung 24895km, die Reifen auf der VA zwischen 5,7-6,1mm, HA ca. 5,3-5,5mm. Nur mit den Michelin Alpin 4 hatte ich ähnlich niedrigen Verschleiß. 24895km droven, tread from 5,3mm-6,1mm. I have droven some winter tires on similar car, only with the Michelin Alpin A4 I had a tire which lasts similar. Bought this tire in 2014 and replaced it IN december 2017. Already wrote a review in 2016, after 2 seasons, so I write here only a short conclusion. Wet: Still surprisingly good. Much better than some tests showed with a new tire Dry: Good, but still I liked the Michelin Alpin A4 more Snow: Ouch! I wrote this in 2016: The weak point on my FWD is cornering in snow. The V905 react nervous, I had to correct the direction harder and more often as with tires like Michelin A4, Dunlop Winter Response, Fulda Montero 2. No recommendation for inexperienced drivers. In the 4th season, still with good tread, the tire was very bad in snow. Accelerate still OK but dangerous in the corners. I was in a ruck, had to stop uphill because of a turning car. So far not a problem. A bit later tow 90° corners almost let me crash. I drove slow but I had almost 0 grip at front wheels, I had luck to not end on a snowy meadow or in a tree. With a speed around 25km/h my ESP-light lights constantly, oversteed, understeer, almost undriveable. After this adventure I contact my tire dealer and 2 ays later I fit new winter tires on my car because it´s much cheaper than a new car and more healthy than make a crash. I wrote I don´t trust this tire if the tread is getting lower and was more right than I ever thought. Can´t remember I throwed winter tires away with around 5mm tread. Conclusion: Funny tire if you don´t drive more than 2mm down. Now the V906 is on the way. It looks much more generic, like so many other winter tires. Will Yokohama improve and make the new tire also driveable in snow if the tread is
March 9, 2020

How would you rate the Yokohama W drive V905?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Yokohama W drive V905 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Audi A7 3.0TDi Auto (255/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 36,500 spirited miles
bought mine in winter 2014:
witer 2014: 16 400km
winter 2015: 15 500km
winter 2016: 14 574km
winter 2017: 11 331km
total km: 57 805km; total miles: 36 500miles
And they stilll could go one season if necessary!
Great tires, quiet and great grip on highways. Felt very comfortable driving. Highly Recomend!
November 22, 2018
Toyota Verso 1.6 D4 D mpv (225/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 4,000 easy going miles
Two winters on these W Drive tires now. No problems in the snows of winter 2017-18 in a pennine area with gradients and with a steep driveway too. Plenty of grip. Car always feels planted and solid in cornering. Very good wet and slushy braking characteristics. Slightly more noisy than summer Bridgestones in the dry. Definitely would buy again.
October 17, 2018
Given 94% while driving a Honda CIVIC 1.6 VTEC (195/60 R15) on a combination of roads for 18 average miles
Very balanced tires with good handling in all winter conditions like snow and wet. Very comfortable and silent. I used the tires for 3 winter seasons and also in third season I was able to drive normally in all conditions. Deifinitely recommended!
March 23, 2018
Given 86% while driving a Mazda 6 (225/55 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 500 average miles
Very good in snow - steep hills no problem, traction control light didn't even flicker. A bit noisy at 70mph but comfortable ride. Survived a pothole that wrote off the tire and wheel of a folliowing car.
March 19, 2018
Given 87% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (195/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
I 've driven these tires for 5 months now, I can say I am very satisfied. Grip at low temparatures in dry is excellent (under 5'C) In the snow showd no problems, in deep fresh snow (10cm) I drove like I had 4x4.... On icy roads was very good, ofcourse you have to have feeling for the limit, no tire can save you from losing grip on ice.....overall very satisfied...definitely recommend them....they were a bargain 42€/tire in my country. Only negative Is noise level....i dont mind it, but some may get frustrated 😃
March 2, 2017
Given 94% while driving a BMW 320 d (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Bought this tires for my BMW E90 320d and i was very supprised of the tire grip on all road conditions. I had a chance to try them on heavy snow and the performance was suprisingly good for a RWD. The only not so good thing is the noise. Aldo it is expected to be louder than the summer tire this yokohama tire is louder than i expected. Not that it botherd to me but i have to mention it. I would definitly recomend this tires.
November 14, 2016
Given 71% while driving a Subaru Forester (225/60 R17 H) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Tire feels nice on dry roads and in fresh snow. Wet grip should be better, but at least you get good feedback when aqua planning will start.
October 6, 2016
Given 69% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (205/55 R16 H) on mostly motorways for 8,420 spirited miles
Wet: A bit weak in aquaplaning, but many winter tires do have that. The grip on wet roads is surprising good for a Yokohama tire. It´s not compareable to my summer tires P Zero, but still good. The biggest difference is the V905 loose it´s grip earlier but you feel how fast you can go, It´s not an tire that surprise you like "Oh that was much to fast", it will be not a problem for an average driver

Dry: According to an review from ADAC magazine it´s the best winter tire on wet roads. I agree a lot, but not complete. It´s good and a s far the temperature is below 15° celsius it´s nice to drive, but I drove on an other Focus MK3 the Michelin A4 which was more progressive on dry roads.

Snow: There were only some days I have to drive in snow, the V905 did manage it also in difficult road conditions. To start in snow causes no problems, braking is good but could be better. The weak point on my FWD is cornering in snow. The V905 react nervous, I had to correct the direction harder and more often as with tires like Michelin A4, Dunlop Winter Response, Fulda Montero 2. No rrecommendation for inexperienced drivers.

Comfort: The tire is noisy and harsh, even for an winter tire. ot a problem for me, but it means a lot if I feel it so obvious.

Wear: I drove about 8400 miles in the past two winters, I think I can drive it the next two winters without problem, think 10000 miles are possible.

Other thoughts: I´m not sure, but the tire tread looks like the lamellars aren´t that deep; maybe the performance in the snow will be very poor if the thread is below 5mm

Conclusion: Overall it´s an tire without highlights. On the other hands it have only one low, it´s nervous on snow. It´s still not bad but it could be better.
I bought it because I was curious how good are asian winter tires 2dy, my last japanese winter tires were Toyo Snowprox S940 which were really good in all conditions, but it was long time ago.

So I can´t recommend the V905 to the average driver, because I miss the highlights, it´s an average tire, it´s not a must buy.
August 7, 2016
Given 76% while driving a Fiat Punto Evo 1.4 Natural Power (185/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
This set of tires lasted three winters on my Fiat Punto Natural Power.
Not bad at all, good in dry and wet conditions. Excellent in the snow !
These are winter tires and not for aggressive driving, but they manage well at high speed and under hard braking.
Maybe they have a little bit too soft compound, but it's ok, because are designed for winter conditions.
Good deal, I will probably fit again new set of these next winter.
July 20, 2016
Given 89% while driving a Volkswagen Golf MK4 TDI 100 (195/65 R15 T) on mostly town for 3,500 spirited miles
Very nice ride, confident on snow, really good on dry road also, can be compared with best winter tire - Michelin Alpin 4.
After 5000 kms, no signs of thread wear, probably they will last for some 30 000 kilometers.
Definitely will buy again because they are cheaper then most Michelins and Pirellis.
March 27, 2016
Given 83% while driving a Ford Focus mk2 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 6,000 average miles
Good tires for reasonable price.
February 14, 2016
Given 89% while driving a Nissan Almera Tino 2.2 DI (195/65 R15 T) on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
Great in snow.I will buy again!
January 7, 2015
Rate the Yokohama W drive V905