19 tests, 2014 to 2018
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 60%
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test P11 of 20
Record by discipline
Where the Michelin Alpin 5 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 3 | P9 of 18 | 52% | - |
| Dry Handling | 3 | P7.3 of 18 | 60% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 3 | P9 of 18 | 56% | - |
| Wet Handling | 3 | P6.3 of 18 | 66% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 3 | P4 of 18 | 85% | 1 |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 3 | P12.3 of 18 | 41% | - |
| Snow Handling | 3 | P10.7 of 17.7 | 47% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 3 | P10 of 18 | 50% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 2 | P2 of 20.5 | 95% | 1 |
| Value | 2 | P5.5 of 20.5 | 76% | 1 |
| Rolling Resistance | 3 | P15.7 of 18 | 18% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Michelin Alpin 5. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 5 | 9 | - | 36% | |
| 13 | 5 | 8 | - | 38% | |
| 11 | 0 | 11 | - | 0% | |
| 10 | 6 | 4 | - | 60% | |
| 9 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 13% | |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | - | 75% | |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | - | 63% | |
| 8 | 1 | 7 | - | 13% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | - | 57% | |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | - | 67% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Alpin A4 Predecessor | 41 | 4 | 4th | 72% |
| Michelin Alpin 5 This tire | 19 | 0 | 6th | 60% |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Successor | 30 | 2 | 4th | 74% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 19 tests. Updated October 11, 2025.
Michelin Alpin 5 delivers consistently solid, well-rounded winter performance with standout longevity and value, frequently finishing upper-midfield to podium in large comparison tests. It shows reliable wet handling/braking and good aquaplaning resistance, plus competitive snow capability, helping it achieve several top-5 overall results and multiple podiums. However, it is held back by higher rolling resistance, occasional weak wet/snow braking in certain sizes, and premium purchase prices.
Across 19 winter tests (avg position 6.4), Alpin 5 scored podiums in 2016-2017 big tests (2/20 Auto Bild 2016; 3/11 Auto Bild SUV 2017; 2/21 Auto Bild 2017) and remained competitive in ADAC (5/16 in 2017 SUV; 5/16 in 2018). Its hallmark is outstanding wear, repeatedly leading to best value ratings despite high initial cost.
Performance Strengths
-
Wear and Value
Strong
Details
- 1st place wear and best value in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (72450 km; Value 1/21)
- 3rd place wear in 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (44250 km; noted best value among premium)
-
Overall Competitiveness in Large Comparative Tests
Strong
Details
- 2nd overall out of 20 in 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test
- 2nd overall out of 21 in 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test; 3rd/43 in 2016 Market Overview
-
Wet Performance (handling/braking) and Aquaplaning
Moderate
Details
- Wet handling 3rd/21 (+3.4%) and wet braking 4th/21 in 2017 Auto Bild Winter
- Straight aquaplaning 1st/11 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV; 4th/22 in 2018 Auto Bild
-
Snow Handling/Overall Winter Balance
Moderate
Details
- Snow braking 3rd/11 and snow handling 4th/11 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV
- Multiple mid-to-high placements in ADAC (5/16 in 2017 SUV; 5/16 in 2018) indicating balanced winter capability
-
Dry Performance (especially braking)
Minor
Details
- Auto Zeitung 2016 notes: 'Unsurprisingly the Michelin dominates under dry braking'
- Multiple mid-to-upper placements: Dry handling 6th/11 and 9th/21 in 2017 tests
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 6 of 14 tests
Details
Good in the wet
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)Winter specialist with very good wet grip and low wear. Balance handling in the snow and dry, good aquaplaning resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)good in the wet
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)good overall grip in the wet
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)Great in the wet and dry
- 2015 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry grip
Strong
in 5 of 14 tests
Details
Best tire in the dry and lowest wear
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2018)- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)
good in the dry
- 2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2017)very good in the dry
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)Great in the wet and dry
- 2015 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2015)
-
Tread life
Strong
in 5 of 14 tests
Details
extremely low wear
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)Best tire in the dry and lowest wear
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2018)Top marks in wear
- 2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2017)Top marks in wear
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)Winter specialist with very good wet grip and low wear. Balance handling in the snow and dry, good aquaplaning resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 5 of 14 tests
Details
Winter specialist with the best snow results
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test (2016)proved to be a snowmaster
- 2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2016)Good traction in the snow
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)Good in the snow
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2015)Top marks on snow and ice, good in the wet
- 2014 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2014)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Rolling Resistance/Efficiency
Strong
Details
- 22nd/22 (+31.3% from best) rolling resistance in 2018 Auto Bild
- 18th/21 (+20%) rolling resistance in 2017 Auto Bild Winter
-
Purchase Price
Moderate
Details
- Price 10th/10 (+153.8% from best) in 2017 Auto Bild SUV
- Auto Bild 2016 criticism: 'initial purchase price drew criticism; Michelins are often the most expensive'
-
Wet and Snow Braking Variability (certain sizes)
Moderate
Details
- Wet braking 19th/22 (+8.2%) and snow braking 17th/22 (+5.2%) in 2018 Auto Bild 195/65 R15
- Snow braking 17th/21 (+10.8%) in 2017 Auto Bild 225/50 R17
-
Noise/Comfort (select tests)
Minor
Details
- Noise 20th/22 in 2018 Auto Bild
- Average-to-midpack noise in 2017 tests (5th/21; 5th/11), indicating inconsistency
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 6 of 14 tests
Details
high rolling resistance
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)Slightly weak in the snow and fuel consumption tests compared to the best
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2018)high fuel consumption
- 2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2017)Slightly high rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)Not the best rolling resistance on test, but not the worst
- 2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2016)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 5 of 14 tests
Details
Average snow performance
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2018)Slightly weak in the snow and fuel consumption tests compared to the best
- 2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2018)Weak on snow
- 2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2017)Slightly weak in the snow
- 2017 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/65 R16 (2017)but the leaders are better in the snow
- 2015 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry braking
Moderate
in 2 of 14 tests
Details
Average braking performance on dry surfaces
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)long dry braking
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2015)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Michelin Alpin 5 (14 tests) and 26 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Wet grip strength in 6 of 14 tests 11 praise, 0 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
- Tread life strength in 5 of 14 tests 9 praise, 1 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry grip strength in 5 of 14 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort strength in 2 of 14 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Ice grip strength in 1 of 14 tests 1 praise, 3 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Warm-weather behavior no test mentions it 0 praise, 5 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
- Performance when worn no test mentions it 1 praise, 3 criticise of 26 reviews · Read those reviews
Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners
- Rolling resistance weakness in 6 of 14 tests no owner mentions it
- Snow handling strength in 4 of 14 tests no owner mentions it
- Wet braking strength in 3 of 14 tests no owner mentions it
Every test, newest first 19
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
Recommended
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Exemplary.
2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
The Michelin Alpin 5 is another tire that seems more comfortable in 16" sizes than the 17" on test here. Beating only last placed Bridgestone in most of the tests, the Alpin 5 is due an update to keep it with the best tires on the market.
2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
The Michelin Alpin 5 proved to be a snowmaster, winning the snow circle and snow handling tests, but as with many modern Michelin tires, had a compromised aquaplaning result. A strong balance in the dry, and third place in the wet handling tests were highlights. Not the best rolling resistance on test, but not the worst.
Back to the Michelin Alpin 5 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Michelin tires

