Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Test Results
Tested 9 times by independent publications, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 averages a finish of 11th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 73% of the field across 5 tests; its weakest is Dry Handling, at 6% across 5 tests.
- 9Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 11thAverage finish
- 35%Field beaten on average
- 6Publications
9 tests, 2016 to 2019
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 35%
Record by discipline
Where the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking Strong | 5 | P5 of 15 | 73% | - |
| Dry Handling Weak | 5 | P14.2 of 15 | 6% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 6 | P7.8 of 19.8 | 54% | - |
| Wet Handling | 5 | P10 of 15 | 32% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 5 | P10 of 14.8 | 35% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 6 | P10.8 of 17.5 | 43% | - |
| Snow Handling | 5 | P9 of 14.4 | 47% | 1 |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 5 | P5.2 of 15 | 67% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 2 | P12.5 of 20 | 39% | - |
| Value | 2 | P8.5 of 20 | 61% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 5 | P10 of 15 | 35% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Kumho WinterCraft WP71. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 2 | 5 | - | 29% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | - | 60% | |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | - | 40% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 9 tests. Updated October 13, 2025.
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 shows a split personality: frequent excellence in specific sub-tests (notably snow handling and dry braking) but inconsistent all-round performance that drags down overall rankings. It delivers standout snow handling/grip in UHP sizes and often strong dry braking/noise/value results, yet recurrent weaknesses in dry handling, aquaplaning, rolling resistance, and occasionally wear keep it mid-to-lower table across diverse tests and sizes.
Overall, the WP71 suits drivers prioritizing snow traction and short dry stopping in winter conditions, but it lags in dynamic handling precision and efficiency. Variability across sizes is evident-good showings in 19-inch UHP snow/dry braking contrast with weaker 17-18 inch comprehensive tests-limiting its consistency versus top-tier competitors.
Performance Strengths
-
Snow Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place snow handling in 2019 19-inch test
- 2nd place snow braking in 2019 19-inch test (+1.4% from best)
-
Dry Braking
Moderate
in 4 of 6 tests
Details
- 2nd place dry braking in 2017 AMS 18-inch test (+1.8% from best)
- 3rd place dry braking in 2017 Auto Bild 225/50 R17 (+17.4% from best)
- 3rd place dry braking in 2019 19-inch test (+10.6% from best)
short dry braking distances
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)
short wet and dry braking distances
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)Short braking distances on snow and in the dry
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
-
Noise/Comfort and Value
Moderate
Details
- Noise 3rd/12 in 2019 19-inch (+1.8% from best)
- Noise 5th/21 in 2017 AB 225/50 R17 (+1.8% from best)
- Value 4th/20 in 2017 AB (price/1000)
- Price 3rd/11 in 2019 19-inch (+17.5% from best)
-
Wet Braking (screening/market overview)
Minor
Details
- 7th/44 wet braking in 2019 market overview (+7.9% from best)
- 8th/21 wet braking in 2019 AB 17-inch (+7.9% from best)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Short wet braking, good wet handling, low noise
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)short wet and dry braking distances
- 2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Wet handling
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Short wet braking, good wet handling, low noise
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)acceptable braking and balanced behavior on wet surfaces
- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Road noise
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Short wet braking, good wet handling, low noise
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)low noise
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)
-
Snow handling
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Sporty driving qualities in the snow
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)Good snow handling
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Handling
Strong
in 4 of 6 tests
Details
- 12th/12 in dry handling in 2019 19-inch (+4.8% from best)
- 21st/21 in dry handling in 2019 AB 17-inch (+5.3% from best)
- 19th/21 in dry handling in 2017 AB 225/50 R17 (+5.2% from best)
- 9th/10 in dry handling in 2017 AMS 18-inch (+2.6% from best)
Understeer in the dry and wet
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)poor dry grip and handling
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)Unstable behavior during an emergency maneuver on dry surfaces
- 2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test (2017)weak lateral stability
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
-
Aquaplaning/Water Evacuation
Moderate
Details
- Straight aqua 20th/21 in 2017 AB (+9.1% from best)
- Straight aqua 9th/11 in 2017 SUV (+10.5% from best)
- Straight aqua 8th/10 in 2017 AMS (+3.1% from best)
-
Rolling Resistance/Efficiency
Strong
Details
- 10th/10 rolling resistance in 2017 AMS (+27.3% from best)
- 21st/21 rolling resistance in 2019 AB 17-inch (+34.5% from best)
- 8th/12 rolling resistance in 2019 19-inch (+16% from best)
-
Wear/Longevity
Moderate
Details
- 20th/20 wear in 2019 AB 17-inch (+31.2% from best, nearly 15,000 km sooner than Michelin)
-
Wet Handling (overall dynamics)
Moderate
Details
- 10th/12 wet handling in 2019 19-inch (+4.9% from best)
- 9th/11 wet handling in 2017 SUV (+4.9% from best)
- 15th/21 wet handling in 2017 AB (+7% from best)
-
Snow Braking Consistency (non-UHP sizes)
Minor
Details
- 19th/21 snow braking in 2017 AB (+12.7% from best)
- 15th/21 snow braking in 2019 AB 17-inch (+3.3% from best)
-
Dry grip
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Poor dry grip, high wear, high rolling resistance
- 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test (2019)poor dry grip and handling
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
long wet braking
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)long braking distances and generally poor grip in the wet
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
-
Behavior at the limit
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
Understeer in the dry and wet
- 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tire Test (2019)Tendency to understeer in the snow and dry surfaces
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
-
Wet grip
Moderate
in 2 of 6 tests
Details
low wet grip
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)generally poor grip in the wet
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 (6 tests) and 13 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Snow traction strength in 1 of 6 tests 7 praise, 2 criticise of 13 reviews · Read those reviews
- Snow braking strength in 2 of 6 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 13 reviews · Read those reviews
- Steering feel weakness in 1 of 6 tests 1 praise, 3 criticise of 13 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Dry grip weakness in 2 of 6 tests 4 praise, 1 criticise of 13 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Ice grip no test mentions it 1 praise, 3 criticise of 13 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 9
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test
Conditionally recommended
2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
Satisfactory
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Average.
2017 235/55 R17 SUV Winter Tire Test
Recommended.
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test
Recommended with restrictions
Back to the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Kumho tires

