15 tests, 2014 to 2018
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 53%
2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test P6 of 10
Record by discipline
Where the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 2 | P6.5 of 11 | 45% | - |
| Dry Handling | 2 | P5.5 of 11 | 55% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 2 | P7 of 11 | 40% | - |
| Wet Handling | 2 | P6 of 11 | 50% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 2 | P6 of 11 | 50% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 2 | P7 of 11 | 40% | - |
| Snow Handling | 2 | P7 of 11 | 40% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 2 | P5.5 of 11 | 55% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Rolling Resistance | 2 | P5 of 11 | 60% | 1 |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 0 | 9 | - | 0% | |
| 8 | 6 | 2 | - | 75% | |
| 8 | 2 | 6 | - | 25% | |
| 8 | 2 | 6 | - | 25% | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | - | 0% | |
| 7 | 7 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | - | 57% | |
| 7 | 1 | 6 | - | 14% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 This tire | 15 | 0 | 8th | 53% |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO Successor | 7 | 0 | 9th | 52% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 15 tests. Updated October 11, 2025.
Across 15 winter tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 delivers mid-pack overall performance (avg 7.7/field) with standout traction efficiency and aquaplaning security, but inconsistent dry braking and mixed wet/snow results limit headline positions. It achieves several upper-mid finishes in broad-market ADAC/Auto Bild overviews (e.g., 2/14 in 2014 ADAC, 5/19 and 5/16 in 2015 ADAC) and a strong UHP aquaplaning showing, yet suffers notable deficits in dry braking and rolling resistance in certain sizes.
Key strengths are low rolling resistance in some SUV-fitment tests and strong straight-line aquaplaning, alongside generally competitive pricing in context. Weaknesses center on dry braking (occasionally last place) and variable wet/snow braking versus class leaders, leading to few test wins and mostly mid-table results.
Performance Strengths
-
Aquaplaning and Wet Security
Moderate
Details
- 2nd place straight aquaplaning in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter (245/45 R18, +3.6% from best)
- Mid-pack wet handling 5/11 in 2018 Autobild UHP (+2.6% from best)
-
Efficiency / Rolling Resistance
Moderate
Details
- 1st place rolling resistance in 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter (225/55 R17)
- Multiple ADAC results in upper half (2015: 5/19 and 5/16) indicating balanced efficiency/performance mix
-
Overall Consistency in Large Comparative Tests
Moderate
Details
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test 9/20 (205/55 R16)
- 2016 Winter Tire Market Overview 10/43
- 2015 Winter Tire Market Overview 18/51
-
Early-generation Peak Result
Minor
Details
- 2nd/14 overall in 2014 ADAC (195/65 R15)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 5 of 8 tests
Details
Good in the snow
- 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test (2018)good snow traction
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)Excellent in the snow
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test (2016)Good traction values ​​and short braking distances on snow
- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test (2015)Well-balanced winter tire with top marks in the wet, good on dry and snowy roads
- 2014 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2014)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 5 of 8 tests
Details
Winning the aquaplaning tests was the only respite from a general last place finish
- 2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2017)high aquaplaning resistance
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test (2016)High resistance to longitudinal aquaplaning
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)Excellent aquaplaning results
- 2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2016)good safety reserves in aquaplaning
- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet grip
Moderate
in 2 of 8 tests
Details
Good in the snow and wet
- 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test (2018)Well-balanced winter tire with top marks in the wet, good on dry and snowy roads
- 2014 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 (2014)
-
Rolling resistance
Moderate
in 2 of 8 tests
Details
low rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)very good fuel economy
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test (2016)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Braking and Dry Handling
Strong
Details
- 11/11 dry braking in 2018 Autobild UHP Winter (+15% from best)
- 9/11 dry handling in 2018 Autobild UHP (+5.8% from best)
- 8/8 overall in 2017 Auto Express (225/45 R17) highlighting dry/wet trade-offs
-
Wet and Snow Braking Consistency
Moderate
Details
- Wet braking 8/11 in 2018 Autobild UHP (+9.9% from best)
- Snow braking 8/11 in 2018 Autobild UHP (+8.8% from best)
- Mid-pack wet/snow metrics driving 8/12 overall in 2018 ACE (185/65 R15)
-
Aquaplaning Variability
Minor
Details
- Straight aquaplaning 10/11 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV (+10.9% from best)
- Contrasting 2/11 in 2018 Autobild UHP indicates size-dependent volatility
-
Rolling Resistance Variability
Minor
Details
- 9/11 rolling resistance in 2018 Autobild UHP (+17.4% from best)
- Contrasts with 1/11 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV
-
Dry braking
Strong
in 4 of 8 tests
Details
Long dry braking
- 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tire Test (2018)long dry braking distances
- 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test (2016)particularly dry braking where it finished last
- 2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2016)the longest braking distance on dry roads
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)
-
Snow handling
Moderate
in 2 of 8 tests
Details
poor snow handling
- 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test (2017)Moderate cornering on snow
- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 8 tests
Details
average braking performance
- 2016 AZ Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2016)prolonged wet braking distances
- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test (2015)
Every test, newest first 15
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2017 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
Launched in 2014, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is showing its age. Winning the aquaplaning tests was the only respite from a general last place finish, but it's important to remember it only finished 4% overall from the best tire on test, highlighting how close things are at the top.
2016 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 finished last year's winter test dead last, so being close to the Michelin and sixth overall will be a welcome result. Excellent aquaplaning results and low cabin noise boosted the overall score, however the tire struggled in the wet, and particularly dry braking where it finished last. Due an update in 2017.
Back to the Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Bridgestone tires

