The 2020 Auto Bild SUV Tire test has tested ten crossover SUV / 4x4 winter tires in the popular 225/55 R17 size, with a summer tire included as a reference.

Of the ten tires on test, the top four tires were given the "Exemplary" award, which included the new Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+, the much improved Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, the new Michelin Alpin 6 and the Vredestein Wintrac Pro.

The test winning Goodyear had a good all round performance, with the testers noting the winter tire felt precise and dynamic in all conditions. The Bridgestone LM005 performed well in the dry and wet to secure second place, while the joint third Michelin and Vredestein pair performed well in all tests, but either cost more to buy (Michelin) or used more fuel (Vredestein.)

Dunlop and Toyo finished fifth and sixth place overall, both being awarded the label "Good". The Dunlop was the strongest tire in the snow on test, but was let down by the worst dry braking, while the Toyo struggled in the wet.

The final four tires on test all struggled more in the wet than the best on test.

Dry

The reference summer tire had a significant advantage in the dry tests, with the gap a huge 17 feet. While summer tires always out performed all season and winter tires in dry braking, it's rare we see a gap this big, which is probably lengthened by the extra weight and higher center of gravity of the BMW X1 used for testing.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	124 ft	-21 ft
1Vredestein Wintrac Pro	145 ft	Best
2Michelin Alpin 6	147 ft	+2 ft
3Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	149 ft	+4 ft
4Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	149 ft	+4 ft
5Syron Everest 1+	150 ft	+5 ft
5Toyo Observe S 944	150 ft	+5 ft
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	151 ft	+6 ft
8Duraturn Mozzo Winter	151 ft	+6 ft
9Uniroyal MS Plus 77	154 ft	+9 ft
10Dunlop Winter Sport 5	155 ft	+10 ft

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths).

Dry handling kept the summer tires advantage, with the Bridgestone performing extremely well from the winter tires.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	61.7 mph	+1.1 mph
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	60.6 mph	Best
2Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	59.8 mph	-0.8 mph
3Toyo Observe S 944	59.7 mph	-0.9 mph
4Michelin Alpin 6	59.4 mph	-1.2 mph
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	59.3 mph	-1.3 mph
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
8Uniroyal MS Plus 77	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
9Syron Everest 1+	58.8 mph	-1.8 mph
10Duraturn Mozzo Winter	58.7 mph	-1.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (3 mph).

Wet

The Bridgestone took the top stop during the wet braking testing, with the gap between the summer tire and the best winter tire closing to 8 feet.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	134 ft	-8 ft
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	142 ft	Best
2Vredestein Wintrac Pro	147 ft	+5 ft
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	150 ft	+8 ft
4Michelin Alpin 6	151 ft	+9 ft
5Toyo Observe S 944	154 ft	+12 ft
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	155 ft	+13 ft
7Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	158 ft	+16 ft
8Uniroyal MS Plus 77	161 ft	+19 ft
9Syron Everest 1+	164 ft	+22 ft
10Duraturn Mozzo Winter	192 ft	+50 ft

The difference between best and worst was 43% (58 ft ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths).

Vredestein proved to be the best winter tire during wet handling, with the Duraturn again struggling to perform.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	55.5 mph	+1.1 mph
1Vredestein Wintrac Pro	54.4 mph	Best
2Dunlop Winter Sport 5	54.1 mph	-0.3 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	54.1 mph	-0.3 mph
4Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	53.9 mph	-0.5 mph
5Michelin Alpin 6	53.4 mph	-1.0 mph
6Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	52.9 mph	-1.5 mph
7Toyo Observe S 944	52.6 mph	-1.8 mph
8Uniroyal MS Plus 77	52.5 mph	-1.9 mph
9Syron Everest 1+	51.9 mph	-2.5 mph
10Duraturn Mozzo Winter	49.5 mph	-4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (6 mph).

Budget tires often perform well in aquaplaning testing, however the Duraturn struggled again, floating the X1 significantly earlier than the best on test by Maxxis.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	48.8 mph	Best
2Uniroyal MS Plus 77	48.1 mph	-0.7 mph
3Dunlop Winter Sport 5	47.7 mph	-1.1 mph
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	47.5 mph	-1.3 mph
RefReference Summer	47.0 mph	-1.8 mph
5Michelin Alpin 6	47.0 mph	-1.8 mph
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	46.8 mph	-2.0 mph
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	46.7 mph	-2.1 mph
8Syron Everest 1+	46.5 mph	-2.3 mph
9Toyo Observe S 944	46.2 mph	-2.6 mph
10Duraturn Mozzo Winter	43.8 mph	-5.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.2% (5 mph).

Snow

The snow braking group was very close, with the Dunlop edging out the Uniroyal and Goodyear tires.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Dunlop Winter Sport 5	86 ft	Best
2Uniroyal MS Plus 77	86 ft	0 ft
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	87 ft	+1 ft
4Syron Everest 1+	87 ft	+1 ft
5Duraturn Mozzo Winter	88 ft	+2 ft
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	88 ft	+2 ft
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	91 ft	+5 ft
7Toyo Observe S 944	91 ft	+5 ft
9Michelin Alpin 6	91 ft	+5 ft
10Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	92 ft	+6 ft
RefReference Summer	196 ft	+110 ft

The difference between best and worst was 128.4% (110 ft ≈ 7.4 Car Lengths).

Snow traction again had the Dunlop at the top of the test.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Dunlop Winter Sport 5	536 lbf	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	535 lbf	-1 lbf
3Syron Everest 1+	529 lbf	-7 lbf
4Toyo Observe S 944	528 lbf	-8 lbf
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	527 lbf	-9 lbf
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	524 lbf	-12 lbf
7Uniroyal MS Plus 77	523 lbf	-13 lbf
7Michelin Alpin 6	523 lbf	-13 lbf
7Duraturn Mozzo Winter	523 lbf	-13 lbf
10Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	501 lbf	-35 lbf
RefReference Summer	214 lbf	-322 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 60.2% (322 lbf).

Dunlop rounded out the snow testing with a triple win, performing best in snow handling.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Dunlop Winter Sport 5	36.3 mph	Best
2Duraturn Mozzo Winter	36.2 mph	-0.1 mph
3Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	36.2 mph	-0.1 mph
4Uniroyal MS Plus 77	36.1 mph	-0.2 mph
5Syron Everest 1+	36.0 mph	-0.3 mph
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
8Michelin Alpin 6	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
9Toyo Observe S 944	35.4 mph	-0.9 mph
10Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	35.1 mph	-1.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (1.2 mph).

Environment

The Michelin was strangely noisy in this test, something we've not seen before for this tire.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Syron Everest 1+	69.9 dB	Best
2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	70.2 dB	+0.30 dB
3Duraturn Mozzo Winter	70.4 dB	+0.50 dB
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	70.6 dB	+0.70 dB
5Uniroyal MS Plus 77	71.1 dB	+1.20 dB
6Dunlop Winter Sport 5	71.3 dB	+1.40 dB
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	71.4 dB	+1.50 dB
8Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	71.7 dB	+1.80 dB
RefReference Summer	71.9 dB	+2.00 dB
9Toyo Observe S 944	71.9 dB	+2.00 dB
10Michelin Alpin 6	73.7 dB	+3.80 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (3.8 dB).

The summer tire used the least fuel on test, with the Uniroyal a surprise best of the winter tires.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
RefReference Summer	6.77 kg/t	-0.84 kg/t	$0
1Uniroyal MS Plus 77	7.61 kg/t	Best	$0
2Duraturn Mozzo Winter	7.67 kg/t	+0.06 kg/t	$2
3Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	7.68 kg/t	+0.07 kg/t	$3
4Michelin Alpin 6	7.86 kg/t	+0.25 kg/t	$10
5Dunlop Winter Sport 5	8.12 kg/t	+0.51 kg/t	$20
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	8.13 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t	$20
6Toyo Observe S 944	8.13 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t	$20
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	8.85 kg/t	+1.24 kg/t	$48
9Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	8.95 kg/t	+1.34 kg/t	$52
10Syron Everest 1+	9.72 kg/t	+2.11 kg/t	$81

The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (2.95 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Syron Everest 1+ uses about 23 gal ($81) more fuel than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Be sure to check out the Auto Bild website for the full results.

Excellent.

Dry97.1%

Wet97.1%

Snow99.5%

Comfort97.9%

Rolling Resistance93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	151 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	59.3 mph	-1.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	150 ft	+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	54.1 mph	-0.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	46.7 mph	-2.1 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	87 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	535 lbf	-1 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	36.2 mph	-0.1 mph
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	71.4 dB	+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	8.13 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t

Price: 545.00

Excellent.

Dry98.7%

Wet99.2%

Snow97.8%

Comfort99.6%

Rolling Resistance99.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	149 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	60.6 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	142 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	53.9 mph	-0.5 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	46.8 mph	-2.0 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	88 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	527 lbf	-9 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	70.2 dB	+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.68 kg/t	+0.07 kg/t

Price: 505.00

Excellent.

Dry98.5%

Wet96.3%

Snow96.5%

Comfort94.8%

Rolling Resistance96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	147 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	59.4 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	151 ft	+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	53.4 mph	-1.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	47.0 mph	-1.8 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	91 ft	+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	523 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	73.7 dB	+3.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	7.86 kg/t	+0.25 kg/t

Price: 615.00

Excellent.

Dry98.9%

Wet98.4%

Snow96.8%

Comfort99%

Rolling Resistance86%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	145 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	147 ft	+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	54.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	47.5 mph	-1.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	91 ft	+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	524 lbf	-12 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	35.5 mph	-0.8 mph
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	70.6 dB	+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	8.85 kg/t	+1.24 kg/t

Price: 500.00

Good.

Dry95.7%

Wet95.9%

Snow100%

Comfort98%

Rolling Resistance93.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	155 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	155 ft	+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	54.1 mph	-0.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	47.7 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	86 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	536 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	36.3 mph	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	71.3 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	8.12 kg/t	+0.51 kg/t

Price: 590.00

Good.

Dry97.6%

Wet94.5%

Snow97%

Comfort97.2%

Rolling Resistance93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	150 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	59.7 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	154 ft	+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	52.6 mph	-1.8 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	46.2 mph	-2.6 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	91 ft	+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	528 lbf	-8 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	35.4 mph	-0.9 mph
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	71.9 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	8.13 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t

Price: 465.00

Fair.

Dry96%

Wet93.1%

Snow98.8%

Comfort98.3%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	154 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	59.2 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	161 ft	+19 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	52.5 mph	-1.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	48.1 mph	-0.7 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	86 ft	0 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	523 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	36.1 mph	-0.2 mph
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	71.1 dB	+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	7.61 kg/t	Best in this discipline

Price: 470.00

Fair.

Dry98.1%

Wet94.2%

Snow94.7%

Comfort97.5%

Rolling Resistance85%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	149 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	59.8 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	158 ft	+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	52.9 mph	-1.5 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	48.8 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	92 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	501 lbf	-35 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	35.1 mph	-1.2 mph
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	71.7 dB	+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	8.95 kg/t	+1.34 kg/t

Price: 385.00

Not Recommended.

Dry96.9%

Wet91.6%

Snow98.7%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance78.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	150 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	58.8 mph	-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	164 ft	+22 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	51.9 mph	-2.5 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	46.5 mph	-2.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	87 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	529 lbf	-7 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	36.0 mph	-0.3 mph
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	69.9 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	9.72 kg/t	+2.11 kg/t

Price: 310.00

Not Recommended.

Dry96.4%

Wet83.3%

Snow98.4%

Comfort99.3%

Rolling Resistance99.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (10)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	151 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	58.7 mph	-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	192 ft	+50 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	49.5 mph	-4.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	43.8 mph	-5.0 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	88 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	523 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	36.2 mph	-0.1 mph
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	70.4 dB	+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	7.67 kg/t	+0.06 kg/t

Price: 230.00

Discussion

2 comments

Migelbg Oct 24, 2020 archived

Hi Jonathan!
There are a lot of tests for different tire sizes. And we know same model tire acts differently depending on it's size. What if we have tire size that it's not include in tests. I have 205/55/R17 and I wonder which tire size I should take as reference?
Looking for width (205), rim size (R17) or circumference? Please, share your thoughts!
If someone else has an opinion I'll be glad to read it!
Regards!

#6254
1. TireReviews Migelbg Oct 25, 2020 archived
  
  I'd probably take a balance of close results, but if you wanted a common size to look at there should be some 225/45 r17 tests
  
  #6258

Tire	Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+	Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	Michelin Alpin 6	Vredestein Wintrac Pro	Dunlop Winter Sport 5	Toyo Observe S 944	Uniroyal MS Plus 77	Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	Syron Everest 1+	Duraturn Mozzo Winter
Position	1^st	2^nd	Joint 3^rd	Joint 3^rd	5^th	6^th	7^th	8^th	9^th	10^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	97.1%	98.7%	98.5%	98.9%	95.7%	97.6%	96%	98.1%	96.9%	96.4%
Wet	97.1%	99.2%	96.3%	98.4%	95.9%	94.5%	93.1%	94.2%	91.6%	83.3%
Snow	99.5%	97.8%	96.5%	96.8%	100%	97%	98.8%	94.7%	98.7%	98.4%
Comfort	97.9%	99.6%	94.8%	99%	98%	97.2%	98.3%	97.5%	100%	99.3%
Rolling Resistance	93.6%	99.1%	96.8%	86%	93.7%	93.6%	100%	85%	78.3%	99.2%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Dry

Wet

Snow

Environment

Results

Cross-check this test