Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/55 R17
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
124 ft -21 ft
145 ft Best
147 ft +2 ft
149 ft +4 ft
149 ft +4 ft
150 ft +5 ft
150 ft +5 ft
151 ft +6 ft
151 ft +6 ft
154 ft +9 ft
155 ft +10 ft

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
61.7 mph +1.1 mph
60.6 mph Best
59.8 mph -0.8 mph
59.7 mph -0.9 mph
59.4 mph -1.2 mph
59.3 mph -1.3 mph
59.2 mph -1.4 mph
59.2 mph -1.4 mph
59.2 mph -1.4 mph
58.8 mph -1.8 mph
58.7 mph -1.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.8% (3 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
134 ft -8 ft
142 ft Best
147 ft +5 ft
150 ft +8 ft
151 ft +9 ft
154 ft +12 ft
155 ft +13 ft
158 ft +16 ft
161 ft +19 ft
164 ft +22 ft
192 ft +50 ft

The difference between best and worst was 43% (58 ft ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
55.5 mph +1.1 mph
54.4 mph Best
54.1 mph -0.3 mph
54.1 mph -0.3 mph
53.9 mph -0.5 mph
53.4 mph -1.0 mph
52.9 mph -1.5 mph
52.6 mph -1.8 mph
52.5 mph -1.9 mph
51.9 mph -2.5 mph
49.5 mph -4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.8% (6 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.8 mph Best
48.1 mph -0.7 mph
47.7 mph -1.1 mph
47.5 mph -1.3 mph
RefReference Summer
47.0 mph -1.8 mph
47.0 mph -1.8 mph
46.8 mph -2.0 mph
46.7 mph -2.1 mph
46.5 mph -2.3 mph
46.2 mph -2.6 mph
43.8 mph -5.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.2% (5 mph).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
86 ft Best
86 ft 0 ft
87 ft +1 ft
87 ft +1 ft
88 ft +2 ft
88 ft +2 ft
91 ft +5 ft
91 ft +5 ft
91 ft +5 ft
92 ft +6 ft
RefReference Summer
196 ft +110 ft

The difference between best and worst was 128.4% (110 ft ≈ 7.4 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
536 lbf Best
535 lbf -1 lbf
529 lbf -7 lbf
528 lbf -8 lbf
527 lbf -9 lbf
524 lbf -12 lbf
523 lbf -13 lbf
523 lbf -13 lbf
523 lbf -13 lbf
501 lbf -35 lbf
RefReference Summer
214 lbf -322 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 60.2% (322 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
36.3 mph Best
36.2 mph -0.1 mph
36.2 mph -0.1 mph
36.1 mph -0.2 mph
36.0 mph -0.3 mph
35.5 mph -0.8 mph
35.5 mph -0.8 mph
35.5 mph -0.8 mph
35.4 mph -0.9 mph
35.1 mph -1.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (1.2 mph).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.9 dB Best
70.2 dB +0.30 dB
70.4 dB +0.50 dB
70.6 dB +0.70 dB
71.1 dB +1.20 dB
71.3 dB +1.40 dB
71.4 dB +1.50 dB
71.7 dB +1.80 dB
RefReference Summer
71.9 dB +2.00 dB
71.9 dB +2.00 dB
73.7 dB +3.80 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.4% (3.8 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
RefReference Summer
6.77 kg/t -0.84 kg/t $0
7.61 kg/t Best $0
7.67 kg/t +0.06 kg/t $2
7.68 kg/t +0.07 kg/t $3
7.86 kg/t +0.25 kg/t $10
8.12 kg/t +0.51 kg/t $20
8.13 kg/t +0.52 kg/t $20
8.13 kg/t +0.52 kg/t $20
8.85 kg/t +1.24 kg/t $48
8.95 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $52
9.72 kg/t +2.11 kg/t $81

The difference between best and worst was 43.6% (2.95 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Syron Everest 1+ uses about 23 gal ($81) more fuel than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.