Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/35 R19
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
122 ft -14 ft 0 mph
136 ft Best 0 mph
137 ft +1 ft 7 mph
138 ft +2 ft 10 mph
142 ft +6 ft 16 mph
142 ft +6 ft 16 mph
143 ft +7 ft 17 mph
144 ft +8 ft 18 mph
145 ft +9 ft 20 mph
145 ft +9 ft 20 mph
159 ft +23 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 30.4% (37 ft ≈ 2.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
65.8 mph +1.7 mph
64.1 mph Best
63.8 mph -0.3 mph
63.6 mph -0.5 mph
63.5 mph -0.6 mph
62.8 mph -1.3 mph
62.3 mph -1.8 mph
62.1 mph -2.0 mph
62.0 mph -2.1 mph
61.4 mph -2.7 mph
58.1 mph -6.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (7.7 mph).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
158 ft Best 0 mph
160 ft +2 ft 9 mph
RefReference Summer
161 ft +3 ft 11 mph
162 ft +4 ft 12 mph
167 ft +9 ft 18 mph
168 ft +10 ft 20 mph
169 ft +11 ft 20 mph
175 ft +17 ft 25 mph
190 ft +32 ft 33 mph
204 ft +46 ft 38 mph
266 ft +108 ft 51 mph

The difference between best and worst was 68.3% (108 ft ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 would still be travelling at 51 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.0 mph Best
51.8 mph -0.2 mph
51.1 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Summer
50.8 mph -1.2 mph
50.1 mph -1.9 mph
50.1 mph -1.9 mph
50.0 mph -2.0 mph
49.9 mph -2.1 mph
48.9 mph -3.1 mph
48.0 mph -4.0 mph
44.4 mph -7.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (7.6 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
56.9 mph +1.5 mph
55.4 mph Best
55.2 mph -0.2 mph
54.1 mph -1.3 mph
54.1 mph -1.3 mph
53.9 mph -1.5 mph
53.3 mph -2.1 mph
51.4 mph -4.0 mph
50.6 mph -4.8 mph
49.5 mph -5.9 mph
49.4 mph -6.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.2% (7.5 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.1 ft/s² Best
RefReference Summer
11.9 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -4.5 ft/s²
6.3 ft/s² -5.8 ft/s²
4.7 ft/s² -7.4 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 61.5% (7.4 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
97 ft Best 0 mph
99 ft +2 ft 10 mph
100 ft +3 ft 12 mph
101 ft +4 ft 14 mph
101 ft +4 ft 15 mph
102 ft +5 ft 17 mph
103 ft +6 ft 19 mph
103 ft +6 ft 19 mph
104 ft +7 ft 20 mph
104 ft +7 ft 21 mph
RefReference Summer
197 ft +100 ft 57 mph

The difference between best and worst was 101.7% (100 ft ≈ 6.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Ceat WinterDrive Sport would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Autogreen Snow Chaser 2 AW08 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
508 lbf Best
501 lbf -7 lbf
495 lbf -13 lbf
488 lbf -20 lbf
486 lbf -22 lbf
485 lbf -23 lbf
482 lbf -26 lbf
479 lbf -29 lbf
464 lbf -44 lbf
458 lbf -50 lbf
RefReference Summer
171 lbf -337 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 66.4% (337 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
38.7 mph Best
38.6 mph -0.1 mph
37.8 mph -0.9 mph
37.8 mph -0.9 mph
37.2 mph -1.5 mph
37.2 mph -1.5 mph
37.2 mph -1.5 mph
37.1 mph -1.6 mph
37.1 mph -1.6 mph
36.7 mph -2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (2 mph).

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.9 ft/s² Best
9.8 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
9.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
2.9 ft/s² -7.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 70.5% (7 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.7 dB Best
70.3 dB +0.60 dB
70.7 dB +1.00 dB
70.8 dB +1.10 dB
70.8 dB +1.10 dB
RefReference Summer
70.9 dB +1.20 dB
70.9 dB +1.20 dB
71.2 dB +1.50 dB
71.3 dB +1.60 dB
72.4 dB +2.70 dB
73.2 dB +3.50 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
RefReference Summer
8.15 kg/t -0.04 kg/t $0
8.19 kg/t Best $0
8.33 kg/t +0.14 kg/t $5
8.41 kg/t +0.22 kg/t $8
8.47 kg/t +0.28 kg/t $10
8.79 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $22
8.89 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $25
9.1 kg/t +0.91 kg/t $33
9.32 kg/t +1.13 kg/t $41
9.45 kg/t +1.26 kg/t $45
9.92 kg/t +1.73 kg/t $62

The difference between best and worst was 21.7% (1.77 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Radar Dimax Alpine uses about 17 gal ($62) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.