Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Falken Azenis FK520
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 77% · 73
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 55
The Bridgestone Turanza 6 and the Falken Azenis FK520 have met in 4 independent tests and the record is level at 2-2. The Turanza 6 had 14% lower rolling resistance; the Azenis FK520 stopped 5.6% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Falken Azenis FK520 for performance-oriented driving, shorter stopping distances, and stronger value. Choose Bridgestone Turanza 6 for maximum efficiency, quieter comfort, and superior safety margins in heavy rain; especially compelling for high-mileage, commuting, and EV/hybrid use.
Where the Turanza 6 is stronger
- Class-leading rolling resistance (≈12-17% lower vs FK520 in multiple tests)
- Very good curved aquaplaning resistance and rain security
- Lower exterior noise and refined road manners
Where the Azenis FK520 is stronger
- Shorter dry and frequent wet braking (dry advantage ~3-8%)
- More dynamic handling feel on dry and wet circuits
- Stronger value: lower price and better wear in UHP size
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Turanza 6 vs Azenis FK520 at a glance
| Category | Turanza 6 | Gap | Azenis FK520 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 2 | 2 | |
| Dry7 measurements | 0 | The Azenis FK520 stopped 5.6% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 7 |
| Wet15 measurements | 6 | The Azenis FK520 stopped 2.8% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 9 |
| Off road4 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Comfort3 measurements | 3 | The Turanza 6 was 0.5 dB quieter (3 tests) | 0 |
| Value4 measurements | 3 | The Turanza 6 had 14% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.4/10 | The Azenis FK520 by 0.7 | 9.1/10 |
| Owner rating73 and 55 reviews | 77% | The Azenis FK520 by 5 points | 82% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 63% | The Azenis FK520 by 13 points | 76% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +19.6% | The Turanza 6 was dearer in 2 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 148 | 93 sizes made in both | 133 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza 6 | Field | Azenis FK520 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tire Test | P7 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tire Test | P4 of 8 | P7 of 8 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test | P5 of 20 | P8 of 20 | |
| 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview | P16 of 50 | P8 of 50 |
Performance profile
8 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza 6
Azenis FK520
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza 6
Azenis FK520
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza 6
Azenis FK520
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the Azenis FK520 82% from 55. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Turanza 6 | Gap | Azenis FK520 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | 5.6% | 111 | 0-4 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 65.9 | 0.8% | 66.4 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 125 | 2.8% | 121 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 47.9 | 0.9% | 48.4 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 18.5 | 1.8% | 18.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 21.25 | 5% | 20.18 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.7 | 0.3% | 54.8 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | 6.5% | 15.3 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 37.2 | 1.5% | 37.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,513 | 6.2% | 2,367 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 2,122 | 6.5% | 2,259 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.72 | 1.7% | 1.75 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.8 | 0.5 dB | 69.27 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 25,103 | 10.9% | 27,837 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.65 | 14% | 7.75 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza 6 scores 8.4 and the Azenis FK520 9.1 out of 10.
| Turanza 6 | Category | Azenis FK520 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70 | Dry | 90 | ||
| 68 | Wet | 83 | ||
| 57 | Comfort | 57 | ||
| 85 | Value | 54 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Turanza 6 | Category | Azenis FK520 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | Dry Grip | 8.8 | ||
| 8.4 | Wet Grip | 8.3 | ||
| 7.4 | Road Feedback | 7.9 | ||
| 7.6 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 7.2 | Wear | 7.7 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 8.1 | ||
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the Azenis FK520 82% from 55. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Turanza 6
- 77%from 73 reviews
- 63%would buy again
- 616,298 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Bridgestone Turanza 6 as a quiet, very comfortable touring tire with strong wet and dry grip, reflected in a 74% average score and around seven in ten positive reviews. Comfort and refinement are the clear headline, with about half of owners mentioning low road noise and a smooth ride, while wet grip is widely praised by those who discuss it. The main drawback is a fairly common complaint about muted or vague steering feel (around one in five owners), and a similar share report issues with wear behavior, including uneven wear and shorter-than-expected life for some.
- Very comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Good dry grip
- Vague or heavy steering feel
- Soft sidewalls affecting precision and confidence
- Uneven wear across the tread
Summarised by AI from 65 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 73 Turanza 6 reviewsSuperb, very low noise, superb confort, mid handling. Over 20k miles and not even at 50%
Falken Azenis FK520
- 82%from 55 reviews
- 76%would buy again
- 403,489 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Falken Azenis FK520 highly (average 79.6%), most often praising its strong dry grip and capable wet grip for the money. Comfort and refinement also come through well, with many describing it as quiet and compliant for a UHP-style tire, and around one in five explicitly calling it great value. The main recurring drawbacks are mixed steering feel (some find it sharp, others a bit numb) and a smaller but notable group reporting vibration/balance issues; wet handling is also more divided than outright wet grip.
- Strong dry grip, comparable to premium brands
- Reassuring wet grip
- Comfortable ride despite sporty intent
- Low road noise on motorway speeds
- Occasional vibration or balancing issues at speed
- Steering feel can be a bit numb or lacking feedback
- Wet handling feels less confidence-inspiring for some
Summarised by AI from 49 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 55 Azenis FK520 reviewsFalken Azenis fk520 have been a great tire, noise level is not intrusive and they give a good return on fuel economy. These tires are very progressive and give good feed back. Having watched a back to back comparison with the Michelin PS4, the Falkens are punching way above their price range. If you want near PS4 performance at kumho prices, you won't go far wrong...will definitely try out the latest incarnation, Falken azenis R820 when the fk520's are done.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 148 sizes of the Turanza 6 and 133 of the Azenis FK520, 93 of them made in both.
| Category | Turanza 6 | Azenis FK520 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 148 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 133 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 93 sizes 205/45 R17205/50 R17215/40 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17235/45 R17235/55 R17235/60 R17235/65 R17245/40 R17and 81 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A63%B37% | A95%B5% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B47%A44%C8% | C68%A12%B12%D8% |
| EU label noise | 66-73 dB B60%A40% | 68-72 dB B51%A49% |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Turanza T005 (2016) | Falken Azenis FK510 (2016) |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best Tires for Small & Mid-Size SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Recommended: Best Tires for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tires for Large SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Summer Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2025) Winner: Best Tires for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2024/25) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Turanza 6 was the dearer tire in 2 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 19.6% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pits Bridgestone's premium-touring Turanza 6 against Falken's max-performance Azenis FK520. Across four shared summer tests spanning SUV and UHP sizes, the FK520 consistently stops shorter and feels crisper on dry and wet tarmac, while the Turanza 6 counters with standout efficiency, comfort/noise, and superior aquaplaning security.
The data shows meaningful gaps where it matters: Falken repeatedly leads dry braking (by 3-8%) and often wet braking too, while Bridgestone posts class-leading rolling resistance (typically 12-17% lower) and quieter pass-by noise. In SUV formats, results diverge: FK520 ranked 2/10 in AutoBild Off-Road (2025), but 7/8 in AMS (2024), whereas Turanza 6 landed 7/10 and 4/8 respectively-highlighting that tire-character fit can vary by vehicle and test emphasis.
Conclusion
If your priorities are sporty road feel and short braking, the Falken Azenis FK520 is the stronger performer; it wins most dry and wet grip metrics and often handles more dynamically, while typically costing less and promising longer wear. Drivers who value efficiency, low noise, and rain-storm security will gravitate to the Bridgestone Turanza 6, which delivers best-in-test rolling resistance, consistently lower noise, and superior curved aquaplaning margins.
Practically: the FK520 suits enthusiastic drivers and value seekers who want confident stopping and responsive handling without paying full-premium prices. The Turanza 6 is ideal for commuters, EV/hybrid owners, and long-distance travelers focused on fuel/electricity savings, comfort, and safety in heavy rain. The memorable takeaway: Falken stops sooner; Bridgestone sips fewer watts and keeps calmer in deep water.
Turanza 6 vs Azenis FK520: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza 6 or the Falken Azenis FK520 the better tire?
The Bridgestone Turanza 6 and the Falken Azenis FK520 have met in 4 independent tests and the record is level at 2-2. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza 6 scores 8.4 and the Azenis FK520 9.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza 6 or the Azenis FK520?
The Azenis FK520 led 9 of the 15 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.8% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Azenis FK520 led 7 of the 7 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.6% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza 6 had 14% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 7.2/10 for the Turanza 6 and 7.7/10 for the Azenis FK520.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Turanza 6 was 0.5 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Turanza 6 and 8.1/10 for the Azenis FK520.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza 6 77% from 73 reviews and the Azenis FK520 82% from 55. 63% of Turanza 6 owners would buy it again, against 76% for the Azenis FK520.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Turanza 6 was the dearer tire in 2 of them, by 19.6% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Turanza 6 is made in 148 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Azenis FK520 in 133 (17 to 22 inch). 93 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Turanza 6 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Azenis FK520 A and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Continental PremiumContact 7
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
5-2 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4+
1-4 in 5 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4
6-1 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
0-14 in 14 shared tests
vs 
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1-8 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Uniroyal RainSport 5
4-0 in 4 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
People usually report this feeling subsiding around 500 miles in. Another option is to add a couple of PSI to give the carcass a bit more stability