Menu

GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO Test Results

2026 1 publication

Tested 2 times by independent publications, the GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO averages a finish of 10th.

  • 2Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 10thAverage finish
  • 70%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications
GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO

2 tests in 2026

The latest test

2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test P8 of 20

The GT Radial SportActive 2 Evo finishes eighth with competitive wet and dry results and the second-lowest cost-per-km figure in the test. Wet safety margins are adequate, and dry performance is consistent. Rolling resistance is slightly higher than average, and rolling comfort is rated below the mid-field. For buyers prioritising running costs, it offers a strong case.

Strong: Curved Aquaplaning, Value Winner: Hankook Ventus Evo

Record by discipline

Where the GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P16 of 35 45% -
Dry Handling 1 P12 of 20 42% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P7 of 20 68% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P11 of 35 63% -
Wet Handling 1 P6 of 20 74% -
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P11 of 20 47% -
Wet Circle 1 P11 of 20 47% -
Straight Aqua 1 P8 of 20 63% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P2 of 20 95% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P18 of 20 11% -
Noise 1 P4 of 20 84% -
Value
Wear 1 P11 of 20 47% -
Value 1 P2 of 20 95% -
Rolling Resistance 1 P15 of 20 26% -
Abrasion 1 P17 of 20 16% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 2 tests. Updated August 2, 2026.

Across two 2026 Auto Bild summer datasets (245/45 R19), the GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO lands in the upper mid-pack overall (8/20 and 12/50; average overall position 10). Its performance pattern is "good wet dynamics/value, average-to-weak stopping and efficiency"-showing particular competence in aquaplaning and wet handling speed, while braking distances and rolling resistance trail the leaders.

The tire's standout positives are wet safety margins against aquaplaning and strong purchase value, complemented by low external noise. The main drawbacks are consistently below-top-tier braking (both wet and dry), plus clear weaknesses in rolling resistance and material abrasion/comfort, suggesting higher energy use and less refined ride alongside only mid-pack longevity.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet Weather Stability (Aquaplaning & Wet Handling) Strong
    Details
    • 2nd place Curved Aquaplaning in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (3.85 m/sec2, +3% from best)
    • 6th place Wet Handling in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (82.5 km/h, +1.3% from best)
    • 8th place Straight Aquaplaning in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (92.8 km/h, +2.2% from best)
  • Value for Money Moderate in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 2nd place Value in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (11.12 price/1000, +1% from best)
    • Finished 8/20 overall in the 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test despite mid-pack braking results, indicating competitive total package for the price point
  • Noise (External Pass-By) Minor
    Details
    • 4th place Noise in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (71.1 dB, +0.7% from best)

Performance Weaknesses

  • Braking Performance (Dry & Wet) Moderate
    Details
    • 16th place Dry Braking in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (35 m, +6.7% from best)
    • 16th place Dry Braking in 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test (35 m, +6.7% from best)
    • 11th place Wet Braking in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (43.6 m, +10.9% from best) and 11th place Wet Braking in 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test (27.9 m, +10.7% from best)
  • Energy Efficiency (Rolling Resistance) Strong
    Details
    • 15th place Rolling Resistance in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (8.7 kg/t, +30.4% from best)
  • Material Loss / Abrasion Strong
    Details
    • 17th place Abrasion in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (1791 g, +59.6% from best)
  • Comfort / Refinement Moderate
    Details
    • 18th place Subjective Comfort in 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test (6.7 points, +16.3% from best)

Every test, newest first 2

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 2 tests
P8 of 20 Beat 63% of the field

2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test

Auto Bild 245/45 R19 gut (Good)

The GT Radial SportActive 2 Evo finishes eighth with competitive wet and dry results and the second-lowest cost-per-km figure in the test. Wet safety margins are adequate, and dry performance is consistent. Rolling resistance is slightly higher than average, and rolling comfort is rated below the mid-field. For buyers prioritising running costs, it offers a strong case.

StrongCurved AquaplaningValue WinnerHankook Ventus Evo

Back to the GT Radial SportActive 2 EVO overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All GT Radial tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.