Menu
Kleber Dynaxer HP5 View Gallery (3)
185-275/35-65 R16-20 161 sizes 2025
Tested by Tire Reviews View Test »

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Kleber Tires Premium Touring Summer

The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
92%
Wet Grip
90%
Road Feedback
84%
Handling
82%
Wear
0%
Comfort
94%
Buy again
78%
5 Reviews
87% Average
4,800 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 15th)
Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Dry
87.6
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
81.2
2x / 1 test
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
84.2
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 86.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.9
History Points: 3
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 19/20 15 metrics
The BEST Summer Tires for 2026 Tested and Rated Tire Reviews 2026 225/45 R17 7/13 12 metrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 19/50 2 metrics

Videos

The BEST Summer Tires for 2026 - 12 Tires Tested and Rated!

The BEST Summer Tires for 2026 - 12 Tires Tested and Rated!

All Tests
View Test Results
3
Tests
15th
Average
7th
Best
19th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
The BEST Summer Tires for 2026 Tested and Rated
225/45 R17 • 2026
7th/13
A very even all-rounder with predictable behaviour and no big weaknesses across the main tests.
It didn't have the outright wet or dry lap time pace to run with the leading group.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finished 7th overall. It delivered a very even set of results: mid-pack in wet braking, dry braking, wet handling and dry handling, plus decent aquaplaning and a solid rolling resistance figure. Subjectively it also landed around the middle with a good wet handling score and a strong comfort score. My wet notes were positive about predictability and smooth transitions, but the lap time data shows it didn't have the final step of grip to match the tires at the front.
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
245/45 R19 • 2026
19th/50
2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test
245/45 R19 • 2026
19th/20
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finishes nineteenth with the lowest rolling resistance of all twenty finalists, which translates to measurably lower fuel or energy consumption. Projected mileage is reasonable and tread wear is the lowest recorded in the test. The main limitation is wet grip, where braking distances and lateral performance are below the mid-field, requiring more caution in wet conditions.
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/60R16 95 H B A 71
215/60R16 95 V B A 71
215/60R16 99 H XL B A 70
215/60R16 99 V XL B A 70
205/55R16 91 H C A 71
205/60R16 96 V XL B A 72
205/55R16 91 V C A 71
205/60R16 92 V B A 71
205/55R16 94 V XL B A 72
205/55R16 94 W XL B A 72
205/60R16 96 W XL B A 72
205/55R16 91 W C A 71
205/60R16 92 H B A 71
17 inch
215/55R17 98 W XL B A 70
205/50R17 93 Y XL B A 70
215/55R17 94 Y B A 71
205/50R17 93 W XL B A 70
215/55R17 94 W B A 71
205/50R17 93 V XL B A 70
215/55R17 94 V B A 71
225/45R17 94 W XL C A 70
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 70
205/50R17 89 V C A 71
205/50R17 89 Y C A 71
225/45R17 91 W C A 71
225/45R17 94 Y XL C A 70
225/45R17 91 V C A 71
225/45R17 91 Y C A 71
215/45R17 91 W XL B A 70
225/50R17 98 W XL B A 70
225/50R17 98 V XL B A 70
215/45R17 91 Y XL B A 70
225/50R17 98 Y XL B A 70
215/45R17 91 V XL B A 70
225/50R17 94 W C A 71
225/50R17 94 Y C A 71
225/50R17 94 V C A 71
215/45R17 87 W C A 71
225/60R17 99 V B A 71
18 inch
245/40R18 97 Y XL B A 70
245/40R18 97 W XL B A 70
245/40R18 93 H C A 70
245/40R18 93 Y C A 70
225/40R18 92 W XL B A 70
225/40R18 92 Y XL B A 70
225/40R18 88 Y C A 71
245/45R18 100 H XL B A 70
245/45R18 100 Y XL B A 70
245/45R18 96 Y B A 70
245/45R18 100 W XL B A 70
245/45R18 96 W B A 70
255/35R18 94 W XL C A 73
255/35R18 94 Y XL C A 73
19 inch
235/35R19 91 Y XL B A 70
235/35R19 87 Y C A 70
20 inch
245/35R20 95 Y XL C A 70
245/35R20 91 Y C A 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 >>

Questions and Answers for the Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kleber Dynaxer HP5. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Reviews

Given 95% while driving a Mercedes Benz W213 E220d All terrain (255/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 1,800 spirited miles
Got them on my MB W213 E220d in April. They're reliable in all conditions. Drove them in wet, drove them in 35 celsius heat - all is well. When it's hot, the road noise increases. On wet, handling is exceptional and extremely reliable. You're conifdent that the tire grip does not worsen, it feels.
I'm dumbstruck there's zero, I mean zero tests/official reviews of these tires. It's a hint as to which brands get all the media noise = which brands pay for reviews ;) Get Kleber, you'll thank me later.
Helpful 796
August 7, 2025
Given 100% while driving a Lancia Delta 1.4 Multiair (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Got these tires with the car, they have just been put on as new. Quiet and comfortable, no noise even at speeds over 120 km/h.
Helpful 819
July 16, 2025
Given 93% while driving a Peugeot 407 4 door sedan 2.0 petrol (215/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
First time with this brand, Decided to give it a try since I didn't have Michelline Primacy for my specific tire size in my country. My previous tires were Primacy 4 and I have to admit, these tires feels pretty similar! Just a tad more grip and hardness feel on them. Feels very safe to drive with them and comfortable. I have alot of bumpers on the roads in my area and they are not very noticeable, handles them well. I have them only for about 2-3 weeks now, Will give an update when I wear them out some more...
Helpful 194
September 28, 2025

How would you rate the Kleber Dynaxer HP5?

Click a star to start your review

210 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Kleber Dynaxer HP5 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 50% while driving a Lexus IS200 (225/45 R17) on for 1,500 miles
Due to a blowout of both left tires caused by a pothole, I had to move the right rear tire to the left front and replace both rear tires.

I chose Kleber Dynaxer HP5s because we have HP4s on our second car and we're happy with them.

In this case, I'm quite disappointed. The difference in handling compared to the front Assymetric 6s is noticeable in terms of drift, and it's very apparent that the rear tires take too long to follow the behavior of the front tires, resulting in considerable imprecision at high speed. I think the main problem is that the sidewall is too soft compared to the GY tires.

As soon as I can, I'll put four GY Assymetric 6s back on.
Kleber Dynaxer HP5 image
Helpful 5
March 15, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 100% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (205/55 R17) on for 500 miles
Only have them for a few days, but initial impressions are great.
Grip and handling are very good, very quiet, and soft/smooth over road cracks. Recommended.
Helpful 101
January 13, 2026
Rate the Kleber Dynaxer HP5