Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 24
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 90% · 6
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 4 times and the Dynaxer HP5 not once. The Ventus Evo stopped 7.4% shorter in the wet; the Dynaxer HP5 had 12.3% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Hankook Ventus Evo if you want maximum wet/dry safety margins, sharper handling and strong all-round test performance (it's the clear winner in grip and braking). Choose the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 mainly if efficiency/low rolling resistance and a calmer touring feel matter most-and you're comfortable trading away wet braking/handling performance, particularly in rain or in wider 19-inch fitments.
Where the Ventus Evo is stronger
- Consistently superior wet braking (up to ~10% shorter: 42.1 m vs 46.7 m; 27.0 m vs 29.9 m) and strong wet handling/wet circle results across multiple tests
- Stronger dry performance and sportier feel (e.g., dry braking 32.8 m vs 34.9 m; higher dry handling speeds and much higher subjective dry ratings)
- Better aquaplaning resistance in both straight and curved measures (typically ~6-7% advantage; e.g., 78.8 vs 73.4 km/h in 225/45 R17 straight aquaplaning)
Where the Dynaxer HP5 is stronger
- Lower rolling resistance/greater efficiency (about 11-13% better in shared tests), supporting lower fuel/energy consumption
- Comfort-leaning, predictable touring behavior noted by testers; can score slightly better on subjective comfort in the 225/45 R17 datasets (6.9 vs 6.5)
- Even, balanced mid-pack behavior without major quirks in day-to-day driving (described as safe and predictable)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Ventus Evo vs Dynaxer HP5 at a glance
| Category | Ventus Evo | Gap | Dynaxer HP5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 4 | 0 | |
| Dry10 measurements | 10 | The Ventus Evo stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 0 |
| Wet18 measurements | 18 | The Ventus Evo stopped 7.4% shorter in the wet (4 tests) | 0 |
| Comfort6 measurements | 3 | The Ventus Evo was 0.8 dB quieter (3 tests) | 2 |
| Value5 measurements | 1 | The Dynaxer HP5 had 12.3% lower rolling resistance (3 tests) | 4 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Ventus Evo by 1.1 | 8.3/10 |
| Owner rating24 and 6 reviews | 86% | The Dynaxer HP5 by 4 points | 90% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 78% | The Dynaxer HP5 by 2 points | 80% |
| Pricein the 2 tests that listed prices | +7.8% | The Ventus Evo was dearer in 1 of 2 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 106 | 53 sizes made in both | 99 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Ventus Evo | Field | Dynaxer HP5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Motor Summer Tire Test | P3 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P19 of 20 | |
| The BEST Summer Tires for 2026 Tested and Rated | P3 of 12 | P7 of 12 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P2 of 50 | P19 of 50 |
Performance profile
12 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Ventus Evo
Dynaxer HP5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Ventus Evo
Dynaxer HP5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Ventus Evo
Dynaxer HP5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Ventus Evo | Gap | Dynaxer HP5 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 115 | 3.9% | 120 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.84 | 1.5% | 74.97 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 63.1 | 2.6% | 61.5 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 37.7% | scored | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 115 | 7.4% | 124 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.8 | 4.2% | 72.89 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.9 | 5.3% | 49.3 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 25.5% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1.7 | 7.6% | 1.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.35 | 4.6% | 14 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.4 | 5.3% | 48.9 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.1 | 6.9% | 11.3 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.9% | scored | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.1 | 0.8 dB | 69.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 34,989 | 12.1% | 31,218 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | 12.3% | 5.08 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,470 | 23.7% | 1,122 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the Dynaxer HP5 8.3 out of 10.
| Ventus Evo | Category | Dynaxer HP5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 69 | ||
| 99 | Wet | 60 | ||
| 50 | Comfort | 47 | ||
| 47 | Value | 81 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Ventus Evo | Category | Dynaxer HP5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 9.3 | ||
| 9.2 | Wet Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.3 | Road Feedback | 8.7 | ||
| 9 | Handling | 8.5 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 10 | ||
| 7.9 | Comfort | 9.5 | ||
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Hankook Ventus Evo
- 86%from 24 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 106,316 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Hankook Ventus Evo very highly overall, with most praising strong dry and wet grip that inspires confidence. A clear majority also highlight low road noise and a comfortable, compliant ride for an everyday performance tire. The main drawback is steering feel: around one in three owners say it lacks initial feedback or sharpness versus premium rivals, even if outright grip remains strong.
- Very strong dry grip
- Very strong wet grip
- Generally quiet at speed
- Comfortable, compliant ride
- Steering feel lacks feedback/initial bite for some drivers
- Can be a bit noisy on certain surfaces or at particular speeds
- Ride can feel slightly firm on low-profile fitments
Summarised by AI from 21 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 24 Ventus Evo reviewsI bought set of these in SUV version to replace OEM worn-out Bridgestone Dueller tires. The Hankooks were one of few options available in size for Lexus RX and the price was very good. Obviously, they are sport-biased, not intended for a comfortable relaxed SUV. Their grip both in dry and wet is perfect, steering precise. But, they are not the choice for maximum comfort and silence. Winter set (Conti 870P) in the same size are significantly quieter and more comfortable. However, these tires are a smart choice- good price, peak safety and also good wear- after 20000km stil about 4-5mm. I would buy them again, but not for RX.
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
- 90%from 6 reviews
- 80%would buy again
- 5,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 tire delivers strong overall performance, with frequent praise for quiet running, a soft/comfortable ride, and confident grip-especially in wet conditions. Most high-scoring reviews describe stable, safe handling and good value for money. One lower-scoring review notes noticeably softer sidewalls leading to imprecise high-speed response compared with Goodyear Asymmetric 6, suggesting handling sharpness may not satisfy drivers wanting a firmer, sportier feel.
- Quiet/low road noise
- Comfortable, soft ride and good bump absorption
- Good grip and confident handling (notably in wet)
- Good value for money
Summarised by AI from 6 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 6 Dynaxer HP5 reviewsOnly have them for a few days, but initial impressions are great.
Grip and handling are very good, very quiet, and soft/smooth over road cracks. Recommended.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 106 sizes of the Ventus Evo and 99 of the Dynaxer HP5, 53 of them made in both.
| Category | Ventus Evo | Dynaxer HP5 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 106 sizes, 17 to 22 inch | 99 sizes, 16 to 21 inch |
| Made in both | 53 sizes 205/45 R17205/55 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17225/60 R17245/45 R17205/40 R18215/40 R18215/45 R18225/40 R18and 41 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A97%B3% | A100%B0% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C83%A10%B7%D1% | B63%C37% |
| EU label noise | 68-73 dB B76%A24% | 70-73 dB B100% |
| On the market since | - | 2025 |
| Replaced | Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 (2021) | - |
| Awards | Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2026/27) Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2025) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 1 of the 2 tests that listed prices, by 7.8% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a slightly unusual matchup because the tires are aimed at different buyers: the Hankook Ventus Evo is a max-performance summer tire tuned for grip and sharp dynamics, while the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 is a premium-touring summer tire designed to be safe, easy-going and efficient. In other words, you're comparing a “driver's tire” with a “daily comfort/efficiency” tire.
Across four shared 2026 tests in two key sizes (225/45 R17 and 245/45 R19), the pattern is extremely consistent: the Hankook repeatedly lands near the top of the rankings (including 1st/20 in Autobild), while the Kleber sits mid-pack to lower-pack (as low as 19th/20). The biggest, most repeatable separation is in wet safety margins (braking, handling, aquaplaning), while the Kleber's counterpunch is lower rolling resistance (better fuel/EV efficiency) and a slightly more comfort-oriented feel in some assessments.
Conclusion
On objective performance, Hankook's Ventus Evo is the clear winner in this head-to-head. It beats the Kleber in every shared safety-critical metric across the datasets: dry braking (e.g., 32.8 m vs 34.9 m in 245/45 R19, ~6% shorter), wet braking (e.g., 42.1 m vs 46.7 m in Autobild, ~10% shorter; and 27.0 m vs 29.9 m in the braking supertest, ~10% shorter), and wet control/aquaplaning (often ~5-7% better). Those aren't “lab-only” differences-on the road they translate into meaningfully larger buffers when something changes suddenly (standing water, emergency stops, or a mid-corner correction).
Kleber's Dynaxer HP5 makes most sense when your priorities are efficiency and relaxed touring manners rather than chasing outright grip. It repeatedly posts lower rolling resistance (about 11-13% better in the shared tests), and it can feel smooth and predictable with decent comfort scores-however, the consistent gap in wet braking and wet handling means it demands more caution in rain, especially in heavier cars and wider sizes.
Practical takeaway: if you want the tire that behaves more like a “premium-class performer” and you regularly drive briskly or deal with wet motorways, the Hankook is the safer, more capable choice even if it costs you some efficiency. If your driving is calm, you value lower energy use, and you're willing to accept longer wet stopping distances, the Kleber's efficiency-led profile can still be a rational buy.
Ventus Evo vs Dynaxer HP5: your questions
Is the Hankook Ventus Evo or the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 the better tire?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tires, the Hankook Ventus Evo finished ahead 4 times and the Dynaxer HP5 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Ventus Evo scores 9.4 and the Dynaxer HP5 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Ventus Evo or the Dynaxer HP5?
The Ventus Evo led 18 of the 18 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.4% shorter in the wet across 4 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Ventus Evo led 10 of the 10 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.9% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Dynaxer HP5 had 12.3% lower rolling resistance (3 tests). Owners rate wear 7.8/10 for the Ventus Evo and 10/10 for the Dynaxer HP5.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Ventus Evo was 0.8 dB quieter (3 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.9/10 for the Ventus Evo and 9.5/10 for the Dynaxer HP5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Ventus Evo 86% from 24 reviews and the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6. 78% of Ventus Evo owners would buy it again, against 80% for the Dynaxer HP5.
Which is more expensive?
In the 2 tests that listed prices, the Ventus Evo was the dearer tire in 1 of them, by 7.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Ventus Evo is made in 106 sizes (17 to 22 inch) and the Dynaxer HP5 in 99 (16 to 21 inch). 53 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Ventus Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Dynaxer HP5 A and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6-2 in 8 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
2-3 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-0 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3-0 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Hankook Ventus Evo vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
5-0 in 5 shared tests
vs
Falken Azenis FK520 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
0-3 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion