Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs Vredestein Ultrac Pro

In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro to find out which tire is best for your own driving.

There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Toyo Proxes Sport 2 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars

Proxes-Sport-2 VS Ultrac-Pro

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tires directly!

Out of these three tests:

  • Vredestein Ultrac Pro finished ahead of the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 in three of the tests

While it might look like the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is better than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 stopped the vehicle in 3.15% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
33.77M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
34.87M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:33.6M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 35M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:35.4M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 36.6M
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:32.3M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 33M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 1.44% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
48.76s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
49.47s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:68.7s Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 69.6s
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:28.82s Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 29.34s

Dry Circle

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
0.98g
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
0.96g
Average cornering G force in the dry, higher is better

Best In Dry Circle: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

Subj. Road Score

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one subj. road score tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro scored 9.89% more points than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
6.83Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.58Points
Subjective Real World Driving Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Road Score: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:6.83Points Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 7.58Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.57% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
40.2M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
40.43M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:46.6M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 47.3M
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:31M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 31M
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:43M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 43M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro stopped the vehicle in 0.79% less distance than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
37.8M
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:37.8M Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 37.5M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was 0.23% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
52.1s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
52.22s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:72.8s Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 72.6s
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:31.39s Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 31.84s

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 scored 5.58% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
7.88 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7.44 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:7.88 Points Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 7.44 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in wet circle tests.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
0.83m/s
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
0.83m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Both tires performed equally well

2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test
275/35 R19
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:0.83m/s Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 0.83m/s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro floated at a 1.61% higher speed than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
76.6Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
77.85Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:75.2Km/H Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 76.6Km/H
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:78Km/H Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 79.1Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in curved aquaplaning tests.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
3m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
3m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Both tires performed equally well

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:3m/sec2 Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 3m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
7 Points
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
7 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:7 Points Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 7 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro measured 1.83% quieter than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
71.2dB
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
69.9dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:70dB Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 68dB
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:72.4dB Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 71.8dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two wear tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro is predicted to cover 8.26% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
33300KM
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
36300KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:30000KM Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 32500KM
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:36600KM Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 40100KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during two value tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro proved to have a 5.46% better value based on price/1000km than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
15.56Price/1000
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
14.71Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:19Price/1000 Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 17.85Price/1000
2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:12.11Price/1000 Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 11.57Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 had a 0.56% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
8.8kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
8.85kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 AZ Summer Tire Test
225/45 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:8.8kg / t Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 8.85kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 used 1.75% less fuel than the Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
5.6l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Toyo Proxes Sport 2

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:5.6l/100km Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 5.7l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac Pro emitted 12.11% less particle wear matter than the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Toyo Proxes Sport 2
85.9mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
75.5mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Vredestein Ultrac Pro

2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test
225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport 2:85.9mg/km/t Vredestein Ultrac Pro: 75.5mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 and Vredestein Ultrac Pro.

In total the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 has been reviewed 7 times and drivers have given the tire 92% overall.

The Vredestein Ultrac Pro has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tire 86% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Toyo Proxes Sport 2.

Best Review for the Toyo Proxes Sport 2
Given 86% 225/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 1,500 spirited miles
Previously, I had the Toyo Proxes Sports fitted - and I can honestly say that there is a night and day difference with the 2nd iteration.

It is simply a better tire in absolutely every single way. I drive like a ****, and these tires just give so much confidence. I can brake stupidly quick in both dry and mildly wet conditions, even through the corners. They hook up so well and are incredibly predictable - they really bite the road and mitigate so much understeer in my 2006 Leon FR.

When there’s a more significant layer of water on the road they don’t perform... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 288 - tire reviewed on September 25, 2023
View all Toyo Proxes Sport 2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro
Given 83% 225/45 R18 on mostly motorways for 3,000 spirited miles
Firstly, the Ultrac Pro is a sexy tire. The sidewall is designed by italodesign, and it really looks good. Dry grip (intermediate temps ~10-20°C) is very good. The car feels to have endless grip and you really feel comfortable pushing some twisty roads. Obviously, the warmer it got, the stickier the tire was. The Ultrac Pro seems to like temperature.
Wet grip is also very handsome. You really feel comfortable driving in heavy rain, and the grip is also very reassuring. Especially in the wet
Helpful 339 - tire reviewed on March 27, 2024
View all Vredestein Ultrac Pro driver reviews >>

Conclusion

In conclusion the Toyo Proxes Sport 2 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], wet braking, wet handling [s], subj. wet handling, rolling resistance and fuel consumption, while the Vredestein Ultrac Pro performed better in subj. road score, wet braking - concrete, straight aqua, noise, wear, value and abrasion.

Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, wet circle, curved aquaplaning and subj. comfort, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.

Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Both tires performed equally well seems to be the best tire overall.

Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.