Menu

Test source TopTireReview

Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire Test

Overall test winnerContinental SportContact 7

Top Tire Review has put three of the most talked-about ultra-high-performance summer tires head to head in its 2026 UUHP test, fitting each in 255/35 R19 to an Audi TT and running them through a full wet, dry, noise and rolling-resistance…

Tires tested
3
Tested size
255/35 R19
Test vehicle
Audi TT
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tire shortlist

3 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental SportContact 7

+The Continental SportContact 7 set the benchmark across the grip tests. It recorded the shortest wet and dry braking, topped both the objective and subjective wet handling tests, and produced the most wet cornering grip in the group. Steering precision and composure when pushed to the limit were the strongest of the three tires, which is what carried it to the overall win.

−The weaknesses of the SportContact 7 are narrow but real. It resisted aquaplaning the least of the three tires, both in a straight line and through a curve, and the cabin was fractionally the loudest. Rolling resistance was only mid-pack rather than class-leading, so there is a little room left on efficiency.

2nd

Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72

+The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 is the balanced all-rounder of the group. It resisted straight-line aquaplaning better than either premium rival, was the most comfortable tire on the road, and stayed close behind the winner in wet braking and wet handling. It delivers that breadth at a much lower price than the front-runner, which makes it the value choice here.

−The shortfalls of the PS72 are in the finer detail. Rolling resistance was the highest in the test, it generated the least wet cornering grip, and it trailed on dry handling both against the stopwatch and in subjective steering feel. It rarely leads outright on the sharper performance tests, tending to settle mid-order instead.

3rd

Pirelli P Zero PZ5

+The Pirelli P Zero PZ5 has clear high points. It set the quickest dry handling lap of the test, ahead even of the overall winner, cleared standing water best through a curve, ran the lowest rolling resistance, and produced the quietest cabin. On a dry road it feels sharp and responsive.

−The problem for the P Zero PZ5 is the wet. It needed the longest distance of the three to stop on a soaked surface by a clear margin, set the slowest wet handling time, and scored lowest for wet steering feel. It was also the weakest tire under dry braking. In a test that weights wet performance most heavily, those shortfalls decide its finishing position.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire Test · 255/35 R19

TireContinental SportContact 7Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72Pirelli P Zero PZ5
Position1st2nd3rd
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.5%96.7%96.8%
Wet98.4%97.1%94.2%
Comfort95.9%99.9%96.2%
Rolling Resistance99%94.7%100%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Top Tire Review has put three of the most talked-about ultra-high-performance summer tires head to head in its 2026 UUHP test, fitting each in 255/35 R19 to an Audi TT and running them through a full wet, dry, noise and rolling-resistance programme. The line-up pits the segment benchmark, the Continental SportContact 7, against the newest premium contender, the Pirelli P Zero PZ5, and the value challenger, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72. The overall score is weighted towards wet performance (40%), then dry (30%), noise and comfort (25%) and rolling resistance (5%).

The Continental SportContact 7 won, and won comfortably, posting the shortest wet and dry braking and topping the wet handling tests to underline its benchmark billing. The story further down the order is the more surprising one: the Pirelli P Zero PZ5, the premium name many would expect to fight for the win, finished last, undone by the longest wet braking and the weakest wet handling of the group, an outcome that sits oddly against its strong form in other recent tests. The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 slotted into a consistent, well-rounded second.

That order matters most because the test leans so heavily on wet grip. The Pirelli was actually the quickest of the three around the dry handling course and the most efficient on rolling resistance, but neither counts for enough to offset its wet-weather deficit. The Kumho, meanwhile, delivered close-to-premium pace with the best comfort and the best straight-line aquaplaning resistance for a fraction of the Continental's price, which makes it the value pick of the test.

Wet

Wet braking split the field clearly. The Continental SportContact 7 stopped shortest, with the Kumho PS72 close behind, but the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 needed a good deal more road to pull up. That single result does more than any other to explain its finishing position in a test weighted so heavily towards the wet.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
110 ft Best
112 ft +2 ft
127 ft +17 ft

The difference between best and worst was 16.2% (17 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).

That wet braking result is well out of character for the P Zero PZ5. In Tire Reviews' own 2025 performance tire test it recorded the shortest wet braking of the entire field, ahead of the SportContact 7, and went on to win that test outright, and it also topped the 2025 Auto Express summer test. Set against that form, its last place for wet braking here reads as an outlier rather than the tire's normal wet behavior, so it is worth weighing this single result against its wider record before drawing firm conclusions.

The pattern repeated through wet handling. The Continental set the quickest lap and drew the highest marks for steering feel and balance, the Kumho again settled into second, and the Pirelli trailed on both the clock and the driver's subjective scores.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
81.33 s Best
83.1 s +1.77 s
84.8 s +3.47 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (3.47 s).

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7 Points Best
6.3 Points -0.70 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).

On the wet circle, which measures average lateral grip, the Continental once more came out on top, with the Pirelli edging ahead of the Kumho this time.

Wet Circle

Average cornering G force in the wet

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
0.91 g Best
0.9 g -0.01 g
0.87 g -0.04 g

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (0.04 g).

Aquaplaning was the one area where the winner slipped. The Kumho resisted straight-line aquaplaning best and the Pirelli cleared standing water best through a curve, leaving the Continental last on both measures even as it dominated everywhere else in the wet.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
47.5 mph Best
46.5 mph -1.0 mph
46.4 mph -1.1 mph

All the tires in the Straight Aqua test finished less than 3% apart.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.9 ft/s² Best
9.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (1.3 ft/s²).

Dry

The Continental stopped shortest in the dry as well, with the Pirelli needing the most road to stop.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
105 ft Best
110 ft +5 ft
112 ft +7 ft

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (7 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).

The dry handling tests produced the biggest upset of the test: the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 set the fastest lap of all three, quicker even than the overall winner. On subjective steering feel, though, the Continental was rated highest, with the Kumho the slowest and least engaging in the dry.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
47.68 s Best
48.23 s +0.55 s
48.35 s +0.67 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.5 Points Best
7.1 Points -0.40 Points
7 Points -0.50 Points

The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (0.5 Points).

Noise and Comfort

Cabin noise separated the tires by almost nothing, with the Pirelli marginally the quietest and the Continental marginally the loudest. Ride comfort favored the Kumho, which felt the most settled of the three, while the two premium tires tied a step behind.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
65.4 dB Best
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
65.7 dB +0.30 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
6.5 Points Best
6 Points -0.50 Points
6 Points -0.50 Points

The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (0.5 Points).

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance went to the premium tires, with the Pirelli the most efficient and the Continental close behind. The Kumho carried the highest resistance and would use a little more fuel over a year of driving.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
9.15 kg/t Best $0
9.24 kg/t +0.09 kg/t $3
9.66 kg/t +0.51 kg/t $16

The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (0.51 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 uses about 5 gal ($16) more fuel than the Pirelli P Zero PZ5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The Pirelli pairing the lowest rolling resistance in the test with the weakest wet braking and wet handling is worth pausing on, because that is exactly the trade-off an original-equipment (OE) tire tends to make: car makers often specify a compound tuned for low rolling resistance, to help the vehicle's official economy and emissions figures, and accept softer wet grip as the price. Set against the P Zero PZ5's strong wet showings in independent aftermarket tests, there is a chance the tire used here was an OE-specification version rather than the standard replacement fitment. It is only a possibility, and not something the test confirms, but it would tie the low rolling resistance and the weak wet braking together neatly.

Results

Weighted across wet, dry, noise and comfort, and efficiency, the Continental SportContact 7 takes the win as the clearest all-rounder, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 lands a genuinely close and much cheaper second, and the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 is left third by its wet-weather shortfalls despite real strengths in the dry, in refinement and in efficiency. The full data set and the original write-up are published by Top Tire Review in their 2026 UUHP tire test.

Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire TestWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube

1st

Continental SportContact 7

255/35 R19
Continental SportContact 7
TopTireReview Test Winner
The Continental SportContact 7 was the clear overall winner of this test. It pairs the best braking and handling in both the wet and the dry with only minor compromises in aquaplaning resistance and refinement, which makes it the all-round performance benchmark of the group and a safe pick for drivers who want grip above all else.
Dry99.5%
Wet98.4%
Comfort95.9%
Rolling Resistance99%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 3105 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 348.23 s+0.55 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 37.5 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 3110 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 381.33 sBest in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 37 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better1st / 30.906 gBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 346.4 mph-1.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 38.6 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 36 Points-0.50 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 365.7 dB+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 39.24 kg/t+0.09 kg/t
2nd

Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72

255/35 R19
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 finished a strong second overall. It has no real weakness and genuine strengths in aquaplaning resistance and comfort, and for the money it makes a compelling case against the established premium names in the UUHP class.
Dry96.7%
Wet97.1%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance94.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 3110 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 348.35 s+0.67 s
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 37 Points-0.50 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 3112 ft+2 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 383.1 s+1.77 s
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 36.3 Points-0.70 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better3rd / 30.874 g-0.03 g
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 347.5 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 39.6 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 36.5 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 365.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 39.66 kg/t+0.51 kg/t
3rd

Pirelli P Zero PZ5

255/35 R19
Pirelli P Zero PZ5
The Pirelli P Zero PZ5 finished third overall, a result at odds with the reputation of the P Zero name. It is quick and precise in the dry and impressively quiet and efficient, but weak wet braking and wet handling leave it behind two rivals that cope far better once the road is wet.
Dry96.8%
Wet94.2%
Comfort96.2%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 3112 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 347.68 sBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 37.1 Points-0.40 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 3127 ft+17 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 384.8 s+3.47 s
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 36 Points-1.00 Points
Wet CircleHigher is better2nd / 30.897 g-0.01 g
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 346.5 mph-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 39.9 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 36 Points-0.50 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 365.4 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 39.15 kg/tBest in this discipline

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

1 comment
  1. p.davsongalle
    re pz5 in the wet:
    my hypothesis is a regional variant compound change; note that the pattern-sensitive aquaplaning tests' results are less jarring.
    #10685
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.