Top Tire Review has put three of the most talked-about ultra-high-performance summer tires head to head in its 2026 UUHP test, fitting each in 255/35 R19 to an Audi TT and running them through a full wet, dry, noise and rolling-resistance programme. The line-up pits the segment benchmark, the Continental SportContact 7, against the newest premium contender, the Pirelli P Zero PZ5, and the value challenger, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72. The overall score is weighted towards wet performance (40%), then dry (30%), noise and comfort (25%) and rolling resistance (5%).
The Continental SportContact 7 won, and won comfortably, posting the shortest wet and dry braking and topping the wet handling tests to underline its benchmark billing. The story further down the order is the more surprising one: the Pirelli P Zero PZ5, the premium name many would expect to fight for the win, finished last, undone by the longest wet braking and the weakest wet handling of the group, an outcome that sits oddly against its strong form in other recent tests. The Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 slotted into a consistent, well-rounded second.
That order matters most because the test leans so heavily on wet grip. The Pirelli was actually the quickest of the three around the dry handling course and the most efficient on rolling resistance, but neither counts for enough to offset its wet-weather deficit. The Kumho, meanwhile, delivered close-to-premium pace with the best comfort and the best straight-line aquaplaning resistance for a fraction of the Continental's price, which makes it the value pick of the test.
Wet
Wet braking split the field clearly. The Continental SportContact 7 stopped shortest, with the Kumho PS72 close behind, but the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 needed a good deal more road to pull up. That single result does more than any other to explain its finishing position in a test weighted so heavily towards the wet.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 110 ft | Best | |
| 112 ft | +2 ft | |
| 127 ft | +17 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 16.2% (17 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).
That wet braking result is well out of character for the P Zero PZ5. In Tire Reviews' own 2025 performance tire test it recorded the shortest wet braking of the entire field, ahead of the SportContact 7, and went on to win that test outright, and it also topped the 2025 Auto Express summer test. Set against that form, its last place for wet braking here reads as an outlier rather than the tire's normal wet behavior, so it is worth weighing this single result against its wider record before drawing firm conclusions.
The pattern repeated through wet handling. The Continental set the quickest lap and drew the highest marks for steering feel and balance, the Kumho again settled into second, and the Pirelli trailed on both the clock and the driver's subjective scores.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 81.33 s | Best | |
| 83.1 s | +1.77 s | |
| 84.8 s | +3.47 s |
The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (3.47 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).
On the wet circle, which measures average lateral grip, the Continental once more came out on top, with the Pirelli edging ahead of the Kumho this time.
Wet Circle
Average cornering G force in the wet
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 g | Best | |
| 0.9 g | -0.01 g | |
| 0.87 g | -0.04 g |
The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (0.04 g).
Aquaplaning was the one area where the winner slipped. The Kumho resisted straight-line aquaplaning best and the Pirelli cleared standing water best through a curve, leaving the Continental last on both measures even as it dominated everywhere else in the wet.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.5 mph | Best | |
| 46.5 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -1.1 mph |
All the tires in the Straight Aqua test finished less than 3% apart.
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.9 ft/s² | Best | |
| 9.6 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.6 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (1.3 ft/s²).
Dry
The Continental stopped shortest in the dry as well, with the Pirelli needing the most road to stop.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 105 ft | Best | |
| 110 ft | +5 ft | |
| 112 ft | +7 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (7 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).
The dry handling tests produced the biggest upset of the test: the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 set the fastest lap of all three, quicker even than the overall winner. On subjective steering feel, though, the Continental was rated highest, with the Kumho the slowest and least engaging in the dry.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.68 s | Best | |
| 48.23 s | +0.55 s | |
| 48.35 s | +0.67 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7.5 Points | Best | |
| 7.1 Points | -0.40 Points | |
| 7 Points | -0.50 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 6.7% (0.5 Points).
Noise and Comfort
Cabin noise separated the tires by almost nothing, with the Pirelli marginally the quietest and the Continental marginally the loudest. Ride comfort favored the Kumho, which felt the most settled of the three, while the two premium tires tied a step behind.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 65.4 dB | Best | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 65.7 dB | +0.30 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5 Points | Best | |
| 6 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6 Points | -0.50 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 7.7% (0.5 Points).
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance went to the premium tires, with the Pirelli the most efficient and the Continental close behind. The Kumho carried the highest resistance and would use a little more fuel over a year of driving.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.15 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 9.24 kg/t | +0.09 kg/t | $3 | |
| 9.66 kg/t | +0.51 kg/t | $16 |
The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (0.51 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 uses about 5 gal ($16) more fuel than the Pirelli P Zero PZ5.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The Pirelli pairing the lowest rolling resistance in the test with the weakest wet braking and wet handling is worth pausing on, because that is exactly the trade-off an original-equipment (OE) tire tends to make: car makers often specify a compound tuned for low rolling resistance, to help the vehicle's official economy and emissions figures, and accept softer wet grip as the price. Set against the P Zero PZ5's strong wet showings in independent aftermarket tests, there is a chance the tire used here was an OE-specification version rather than the standard replacement fitment. It is only a possibility, and not something the test confirms, but it would tie the low rolling resistance and the weak wet braking together neatly.
Results
Weighted across wet, dry, noise and comfort, and efficiency, the Continental SportContact 7 takes the win as the clearest all-rounder, the Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 lands a genuinely close and much cheaper second, and the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 is left third by its wet-weather shortfalls despite real strengths in the dry, in refinement and in efficiency. The full data set and the original write-up are published by Top Tire Review in their 2026 UUHP tire test.
Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tire TestWatch the full video of this test on YouTube Watch on YouTube
Continental SportContact 7
255/35 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 105 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 48.23 s | +0.55 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 7.5 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 110 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 81.33 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 0.906 g | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 46.4 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 8.6 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 6 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 65.7 dB | +0.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 9.24 kg/t | +0.09 kg/t |
Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72
255/35 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 110 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 48.35 s | +0.67 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 7 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 112 ft | +2 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 83.1 s | +1.77 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 6.3 Points | -0.70 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 0.874 g | -0.03 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 47.5 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 9.6 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 6.5 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 65.6 dB | +0.20 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 9.66 kg/t | +0.51 kg/t |
Pirelli P Zero PZ5
255/35 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 112 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 47.68 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 7.1 Points | -0.40 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 127 ft | +17 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 84.8 s | +3.47 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 0.897 g | -0.01 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 46.5 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 9.9 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 6 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 3 | 65.4 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 3 | 9.15 kg/t | Best in this discipline |


my hypothesis is a regional variant compound change; note that the pattern-sensitive aquaplaning tests' results are less jarring.