Menu
Apollo Alnac 4g View Gallery (1)
175-215/45-70 R14-17 94 sizes 2013

Apollo Alnac 4g

The Apollo Alnac 4g is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.2
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
73%
Wet Grip
65%
Road Feedback
67%
Handling
68%
Wear
69%
Comfort
70%
Buy again
59%
17 Reviews
67% Average
276,450 miles driven
13 Tests (avg: 14th)
Apollo Alnac 4g

Apollo Alnac 4g

Summer Economy
BETA
6.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
84.3
2x / 5 tests
Comfort
73.8
0.32x / 2 tests
Dry
72.7
1.8x / 2 tests
Value
60.3
0.42x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
80.9
5 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 13
Publications: 5
Period: 2013 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 17
Avg Rating: 67.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.4
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 27/50 12 metrics
2021 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2021 205/55 R16 6/15 1 metrics
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 21/53 2 metrics
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 28/50 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 15/18 0 metrics
2015 Test World Summer Tire Test Test World 2015 205/55 R16 15/15 0 metrics
2015 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 17/52 0 metrics
2015 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test ACE 2015 205/55 R16 9/12 0 metrics
2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire Test ADAC 2014 195/65 R15 16/17 0 metrics
2014 Test World Summer Tire Test Test World 2014 205/55 R16 2/16 0 metrics
2013 Test World Summer Tire Test Test World 2013 205/55 R16 7/13 0 metrics
2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2013 215/55 R16 9/12 0 metrics
2013 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test ACE 2013 195/65 R15 9/16 0 metrics
13
Tests
14th
Average
2nd
Best
28th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test
205/55 R16 • 2023
27th/50
21st/53
Relatively little wear, relatively low fuel consumption.
Average dry and wet grip.
The Apollo Alnac 4G has imprecise steering in the dry with an oversteer balance, but a short dry braking distance.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/60 R 14 82 H D B 70
185/60 R 14 82 H D C 69
185/70 R 14 88 H D C 70
185/60 R 14 82 H D B 70
15 inch
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 70
195/55 R 15 85 V C C 70
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 70
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C C 69
185/65 R 15 88 H D C 70
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 69
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C C 69
185/65 R 15 92 T XL D C 70
195/55 R 15 85 V D C 70
185/65 R 15 88 T C D 71
195/65 R 15 91 T C D 71
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 69
195/65 R 15 91 H C C 70
195/65 R 15 91 V C C 70
195/55 R 15 85 V C C 70
195/65R15 95 H XL C D 71
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
195/55R15 85 H D C 70
16 inch
215/60 R 16 99 V XL C C 70
205/55 R 16 91 V C C 70
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C C 70
205/55 R 16 91 H C C 70
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 70
205/55 R 16 91 V C C 70
205/55 R 16 91 H C C 70
205/60 R 16 92 H C C 70
205/60 R 16 96 V XL C C 70
215/60 R 16 99 V XL D C 70
205/60 R 16 92 V D D 71
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C D 71
205/55 R 16 91 H B B 69
205/55 R 16 91 H B C 69
205/55 R 16 91 H C C 70
205/55 R 16 91 V C C 70
205/55 R 16 94 V XL C C 70
215/60 R 16 99 V XL C C 70
205/60 R 16 92 V C C 70
205/60 R 16 96 H XL C C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
215/60R16 99 H B C 70
17 inch
205/50 R 17 89 V D C 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Apollo Alnac 4g >>

Questions and Answers for the Apollo Alnac 4g

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Apollo Alnac 4g. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 14 user reviews

Drivers of the Apollo Alnac 4g largely praise its long tread life and reliable dry-road grip and handling, with many reporting 60,000-90,000 km of use and consistent performance even on rough roads. Comfort is generally acceptable. However, several users note weaker wet performance, including aquaplaning concerns, and a minority report poor customer service and warranty support.

Strengths
  • Long tread life and durability
  • Strong dry grip and handling
  • Reliable performance on rough roads
  • Good value for money
Areas for Improvement
  • Weak wet grip and aquaplaning risk
  • Poor customer service and warranty support

Top 3 Apollo Alnac 4g Reviews

Given 79% while driving a Maruti Udyog dezire (165/85 R15) on a combination of roads for 94,000 average miles
After driven 94000 km still the tires gives comfort driving.
September 8, 2025
Given 97% while driving a Fiat Punto Evo Sporting (135) (195/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
These are stock tires of my Punto 90HP. Absolutely perfect tires. Believe me I rode the vehicle for about 64000 as of now and they are still holds good grip. Recently checked with Fiat showroom and also a local wheel alignment center, both of them told that they can run for another 5k km with out any problem. Just go for it.
April 11, 2023
Given 94% while driving a Suzuki Baleno (195/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
My four tires lasted till 88000 kms.
November 17, 2022

How would you rate the Apollo Alnac 4g?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Apollo Alnac 4g Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 49% while driving a Volkswagen Virtus GT 1.5 110Kw DSG (205/50 R17) on for 19,000 miles
Tires came standard on 2025 VW Virtus GT. Apollo tires are appalling in the wet. Dry grip is adequate, moderate road noise and excellent wear. Had an Aquaplaning incident and vowed to never use apollo tires again. Swapping out to Michelin PS5 in 225/45r17
February 22, 2026
Given 89% while driving a Suzuki Dzire 2021 (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 25,000 average miles
I've been using it for 5 years and still the grip is strong.
December 18, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 10% while driving a Suzuki Baleno (195/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 0 easy going miles
Please do not buy Apollo Tire i request you from my bottom of heart. after buying tire warranty service is very bad. He not receiving your calls & service engineer not telling actual points & not sharing any information. Apollo service is worst & very bad. he did not entertain you & not change your tire in warranty. Please buy another tire rather than apollo tire. I am using baleno car, only 8000KM tire is very bad condition.
October 12, 2023
Given 66% while driving a Kia Motors Seltos S (215/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 14,000 spirited miles
(Kia Sonet, 2019) These tire are good for dry road, good handling for aggresive drive. Wet grip and comfort is so so. I just can not stand for the noise at 100+, especially on concrete road in Indonesia
March 12, 2023
Given 89% while driving a Toyota Corolla Altis (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
One of the most underrated tires around , if you own a not very powerful under 140 go fwd car I don’t find any particular reason why I wouldn’t rebuy them , put them through the harshest roads and they never gave up .
October 12, 2022
Given 17% while driving a Maruti Udyog ALTO (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Worst customer service
March 12, 2022
Given 67% while driving a Audi S6 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
I bought a set of Alnac 4G for the Audi Quattro since i need the good budget tires for my daily.on the Dry road,it's fairly good with this price range,No road noise @ 18,000kms at the moment.handling is good so far.On the wet road,Alnac 4G seems to be quite poor on the wet.Beware of Aquaplanning.it's easily slide out your car from the Lane.I would go for Aspire 4G next time.i'm good with increasing road noises as trade off for better road grip.
August 4, 2020
Given 61% while driving a Toyota Corolla T Sport E12 (195/55 R16 V) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
I found these fitted on my car when I bought it. It handles acceptable on a dry, well-paved road surface. Straight line acceleration is commendable of tires in this performance and price range. Cornering on dry surfaces is also positive, but nothing to brag about.

These tires handle less than acceptable on wet surfaces and make me uncomfortable driving during moderate rain fall. They feel like they can slide any time during cornering on roundabouts. I have to decelerate firmly when approaching roundabouts, dry and (especially) wet.

Thread wear is great. They haven't worn much over time I had them installed. Not much more than I would find worth mentioning.

I wouldn't buy these again, because of the astonishing difference in performance compared to premium tires.
September 18, 2018
Given 77% while driving a Hyundai i20 (195/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 50 average miles
Had Apollo Alnac 4g in my i20 active. Tire life was about 40-45k kms with rough usage. Good handling and good dry grip specially off-road. Wet grip is also good but not as good as other top tires available in market. Will recommend these for those looking for good long durable tires.
July 10, 2018
Given 59% while driving a Skoda Fabia 1.4 (195/55 R15) on mostly country roads for 6,000 average miles
too soft shoulder, irregular wear
September 13, 2016
Given 89% while driving a SEAT 1.4 TSI (205/55 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 18,000 spirited miles
Very good all around tire! I am very pleased that i chose this tire after seeing the reviews on this site! So i want to help others too by posting! ( if it helps the tires was used in greek tarmac and country roads!!!)
August 8, 2016
Given 46% while driving a Skoda Fabia 1.4TDi (185/60 R14) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Second, not the end, the other tire is now showing a same kind of mark at the outer side and I requested an online comlaint but they say it is because of allow wheels, I guess no Apollo tire should be able to bear the weight of the vehicle fitted with an alloy wheel, again there is no visit and they say it can not be replaced when I talk to them over the phone.
May 31, 2016
Rate the Apollo Alnac 4g