Menu

Giti GitiSynergyH2 Test Results

Tested 2022 to 2026 3 publications

Tested 5 times by independent publications, the Giti GitiSynergyH2 averages a finish of 15th.

  • 5Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 15thAverage finish
  • 41%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

5 tests, 2022 to 2026

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 41%
The latest test

2026 Summer ECO Tire Test P8 of 8

The Giti Synergy H2 carries an ambitious A/A/A EU label - the best possible ratings for rolling resistance, wet grip, and noise - but the test results do not support those claims. Wet braking is the worst in the field at 144 feet, and wet grip scores are consistently near the bottom. On dry roads, it is sluggish and imprecise but still safe and manageable, with reasonably comfortable ride quality. Rolling resistance lab results place it second behind Continental, which is decent but not the class-leading performance the A label implies. The article concludes that the gap between label and actual performance is more about optimistic self-labeling than poor engineering. Manufactured in China, it finishes last in the overall ranking.

Strong: Dry Handling, Rolling Resistance, Energy Consumption Weak: Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Straight Aqua, Curved Aquaplaning Winner: Dunlop Blue Response TG

Record by discipline

Where the Giti GitiSynergyH2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 4 P13.3 of 33.5 57% -
Dry Handling 2 P9.5 of 14.5 53% -
Wet
Wet Braking 4 P20.8 of 33.5 26% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P38 of 50 24% -
Wet Handling 2 P8.5 of 14.5 35% -
Wet Circle 2 P9 of 14.5 37% -
Straight Aqua 3 P10.3 of 26.3 44% -
Curved Aquaplaning 3 P12 of 26.3 39% -
Comfort
Noise 3 P21.3 of 26.3 23% -
Tire Weight 1 P36 of 50 29% -
Value
Wear 2 P16 of 35 56% -
Value 2 P10.5 of 35 73% -
Rolling Resistance 2 P11.5 of 14.5 43% -
Fuel Consumption 1 P10 of 50 82% -
Energy Consumption 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Abrasion 1 P33 of 50 35% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Giti GitiSynergyH2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
BFGoodrich Advantage 4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind 4 2 2 - 50%
Fulda EcoControl HP2 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Firestone RoadHawk 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Dunlop Sport BluResponse 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Semperit Speed Life 3 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Vredestein Ultrac 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
GT Radial FE2 3 shared: 1 ahead, 1 behind 3 1 1 1 50%
Nexen N Fera Primus 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Kumho Ecsta HS52 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Michelin Primacy 4+ 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Toyo Proxes Comfort 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Giti GitiSynergy E1 Predecessor 3 0 16th 34%
Giti GitiSynergyH2 This tire 5 0 15th 41%
Giti GitiSynergy H2+ Successor 0 - - -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 5 tests. Updated April 9, 2026.

Across five summer tire tests, the Giti GitiSynergyH2 shows a consistent pattern: competitive dry performance and occasionally good efficiency metrics, but repeated and often severe weaknesses in wet braking and overall wet safety. Overall results are typically mid-to-lower pack in large-group tests (14/21 AutoBild 2024, 29/50 ADAC 2023, 17/55 AutoBild overview 2024) and last in a smaller ECO-focused comparison (8/8 in 2026), indicating its strengths are not strong enough to compensate for wet-performance deficits.

Its best recurring traits are dry handling capability (including a standout 2/8 in 2026) and some efficiency-related outcomes (fuel/consumption and occasionally rolling resistance/energy consumption). However, wet braking repeatedly ranks near the bottom with large percentage gaps to the best, which likely dominates its overall scoring and makes wet safety the defining limitation.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry Handling / Steering Response Moderate
    Details
    • 2nd place dry handling in 2026 ECO test (107.2 km/h, +0.2% from best; noted as 'fastest... followed by the Giti')
    • Dry braking generally mid-pack rather than poor: 10/21 in AutoBild 2024 (36.6 m, +3.4% from best) and 10/55 in AutoBild market overview 2024 (+3.4% from best)
  • Efficiency / Energy Consumption Moderate
    Details
    • 2nd place energy consumption in 2026 ECO test (10.1 kWh/100 km, +2% from best)
    • 10/50 fuel consumption in ADAC 2023 (5.7 l/100 km, +3.6% from best)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance (Straight/Curved) Minor
    Details
    • 10/50 straight aquaplaning in ADAC 2023 (82.4 km/h, +5% from best) and 14/50 curved aquaplaning (+10% from best)
    • Mid-pack aquaplaning in AutoBild 2024: 14/21 straight (+6.3% from best) and 15/21 curved (+12.7% from best)
  • Purchase Price / Value Positioning Minor
    Details
    • 5/20 price ranking in AutoBild 2024 (295; +11.3% from best) and 6/20 value ranking (+34.8% from best)
    • ADAC 2023 price and value are mid-pack: 16/50 price and 15/50 value

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet Braking / Wet Safety Strong
    Details
    • Last place wet braking in 2026 ECO test: 8/8 (43.8 m, +23.4% from best; article notes 'At the other end, the Giti needed 43')
    • Bottom-tier wet braking in AutoBild 2024: 19/21 (46.5 m, +15.4% from best) and in AutoBild market overview 2024: 20/55 (+15.5% from best)
    • Very poor wet braking in ADAC 2023: 36/50 (+26.5% from best) and wet braking on concrete 38/50 (+23% from best)
  • Overall Wet Handling / Grip Consistency Moderate
    Details
    • Weak wet handling in 2026 ECO test: 7/8 (53 km/h, +5% from best) with supporting note that it 'struggled near the bottom'
    • Wet grip measures are mostly mid-to-lower pack elsewhere: AutoBild 2024 wet circle 12/21 (+7.2% from best) and wet handling 10/21 (+2.2% from best)
  • Rolling Resistance (in some tests) / Energy Losses Moderate
    Details
    • Last place rolling resistance in AutoBild 2024: 21/21 (9.19 kg/t, +22.9% from best)
    • Despite strong ECO-test consumption, rolling resistance is not consistently strong: 2/8 in 2026 (+13.8% from best indicates still notably behind the best even when ranking high)
  • Noise / Refinement Moderate
    Details
    • 20/21 noise in AutoBild 2024 (74.4 dB, +2.9% from best)
    • 39/50 noise in ADAC 2023 (71.8 dB, +3.9% from best)
  • Steering feel Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
  • Rolling resistance Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Giti GitiSynergyH2 (3 tests) and 19 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Steering feel weakness in 2 of 3 tests 1 praise, 3 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet grip strength in 1 of 3 tests 6 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Value for money strength in 1 of 3 tests 5 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Ride comfort strength in 1 of 3 tests 1 praise, 4 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Road noise no test mentions it 2 praise, 5 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 5

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
P8 of 8 Beat 0% of the field

2026 Summer ECO Tire Test

Sport Auto 195/55 R16 gut (Good)

The Giti Synergy H2 carries an ambitious A/A/A EU label - the best possible ratings for rolling resistance, wet grip, and noise - but the test results do not support those claims. Wet braking is the worst in the field at 144 feet, and wet grip scores are consistently near the bottom. On dry roads, it is sluggish and imprecise but still safe and manageable, with reasonably comfortable ride quality. Rolling resistance lab results place it second behind Continental, which is decent but not the class-leading performance the A label implies. The article concludes that the gap between label and actual performance is more about optimistic self-labeling than poor engineering. Manufactured in China, it finishes last in the overall ranking.

StrongDry HandlingRolling ResistanceEnergy Consumption WeakWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight AquaCurved Aquaplaning WinnerDunlop Blue Response TG

2024 2 tests
2023 1 test
2022 1 test
P6 of 16 Beat 67% of the field

2022 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 15 Inch

ADAC 185/65 R15

The Giti GitiSynergy H2 offers a successful overall package. It secures good ratings in all main criteria and is particularly recommendable.

WinnerGoodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Back to the Giti GitiSynergyH2 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Giti tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.