Menu

Deestone Vincente R302

The Deestone Vincente R302 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.6
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
55%
Wet Grip
30%
Road Feedback
30%
Handling
29%
Wear
60%
Comfort
20%
Buy again
10%
8 Reviews
33% Average
44,212 miles driven
Deestone Vincente R302

Deestone Vincente R302

Summer Budget
BETA
5.6 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 8
Avg Rating: 33.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.26
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Deestone Vincente R302

Questions and Answers for the Deestone Vincente R302

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Deestone Vincente R302. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Deestone Vincente R302 Reviews

Given 40% while driving a Toyota Yaris (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
i have been using them for 20k km so far .. Their traction is very bad on highways, dusty roads. very terrible and slippery on wet roads . They also started to get noisy after 10K. There are many cheap tires out there that can outperform these tires. to be honest, they can be good for inside city driving or for those low speed drivers that don’t demand performance. otherwise, I do not recommend them at all.
March 24, 2021
Given 36% while driving a Mazda RX8 (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Shocking tires, can't wait to get them removed. Incredibly noisy above 50mph, virtually no grip in the wet, poor grip in the dry. Had the abs kick in on a slightly damp road under strong but not heavy braking. Should be banned from sale.
These were fitted to my Mazda rx8 when I bought it, have already changed the rears to Goodyear Eagle F1's and the difference is night and day.
November 3, 2019
Given 20% while driving a Peugeot 508SW HDi estate with 17" wheels (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 200 easy going miles
My wife had these fitted less than 2 months ago whilst driving on a dual carriageway last night at 60 miles an hour the rear tire split apart like a remould and we nearly lost control so dangerous will never buy these again I would post a picture if I could
September 25, 2018

How would you rate the Deestone Vincente R302?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Deestone Vincente R302 Reviews

Given 40% while driving a Nissan 2002 patrol (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12 average miles
road noisy lovle very bad at low speed, but they seam be wearing quite well for price paid
March 25, 2018
Given 39% while driving a Honda Civic Diesel (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
These Chinese poverty tires are terrible in all aspects. The wet grip is alarming and resembles driving on a beginning layer of ice. Noisy and uncomfortable ride. There are better economy tires that cost only a bit more, and your life is worth that extra. A garage near me buys in Chinese tires at £8 a tire and fits them when anybody asks for something cheap, because clearly a dangerous car is preferable to a few less packs of cigarettes or a few less gallons of booze. They're rubbish and dangerous. Avoid.
March 25, 2018
Given 34% while driving a Honda 1.8 VTi (225/45 R17 W) on for 12,000 miles
Tire annoyingly noisy after 20,00 km, I will not recommend this and may not buy again.
May 14, 2017
Given 23% while driving a BMW 1 series (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 1,000 easy going miles
Just purchase a 2009 BMW 118d M Sport, first drive in the rain tires are a complete disaster, no rear lateral grip causing the DSC to operate to keep the car from sliding. Poor hill starts, again causing wheel spin. I would say im a 53 year old drive and I am far from aggressive in my driving style. I will be changing the tires even thought there is over 5mm tread left.
Avoid like the plague.
January 31, 2017
Given 53% while driving a Citroën C3 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 4,000 average miles
Only had them for 3 months but the noise is deafening. The kids can't sit in the back. Seen them rated as noise level 2 and 3. They are at their worst around 60 mph but once you go above 75 mph the noise reduces. Stuck them on the car as a low budget but will not buy again. Noise at 30 mph reminds me of army jeeps going along tarmac.
January 13, 2017
Rate the Deestone Vincente R302