“This is an updated review after 5000 miles. I have the 6Q variant of this tire fitted to my car. After 5000 miles, the tire is still very comfortable and quiet. Dry grip is quite good, and dry handling is okay. Not...”
Continental EcoContact 6
Replaced by the Continental EcoContact 7 Replaces the Continental Eco Contact 5
The Continental EcoContact 6 is a summer touring tire with low rolling resistance and a comfortable ride. Its wet grip and aquaplaning resistance are weak, and many owners report rapid wear.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.
- 175owner reviews
- 2,009,722miles driven
- 7professional tests
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 7 times by independent publications, the Continental EcoContact 6 averages a finish of 11th.
Finishing position in each test
2026 Summer ECO Tire Test P6 of 8
The Continental EcoContact 6 is the efficiency leader, recording the lowest rolling resistance by a significant margin and delivering the longest range on the electric test car. Interior noise is very quiet. On dry roads, it handles securely with stable cornering behavior and precise steering - test drivers gave it the highest score for steering response. The cost of this efficiency focus is severe: wet braking distances are the longest in the test, wet lateral grip is the weakest, and wet handling times are the slowest. The gap is substantial - it slides 21 feet further than the Dunlop when braking on wet surfaces. Its EU label reflects this trade-off with an A rating for rolling resistance but only B for wet grip, the only tire in the group not rated A for wet grip. Dry braking is also on the longer side.
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2026 Summer ECO Tire TestSport Auto · 195/55 R16 | P6 / 8 | gut (Good) |
| 2022 | 2022 AZ SUV Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 215/55 R17 | P7 / 10 | |
| 2022 | 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tire TestVi Bilagare · 205/55 R16 | P8 / 10 | |
| 2022 | 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 215/55 R17 | P19 / 21 | |
| 2022 | 2022 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 15 InchADAC · 185/65 R15 | P8 / 16 | |
| 2022 | 2022 Summer Tire Market OverviewAuto Bild · 215/55 R17 | P21 / 50 | |
| 2020 | 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tire TestADAC · 235/55 R17 | P8 / 12 |
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Running Costs
View TestIn 215/55 R17, the Continental EcoContact 6 is projected to cost €25.22 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €630 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View AllEU LabelAcross 193 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.
Fuel
Wet
Noise
68-75dB A/B
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Continental EcoContact 6 in the wet?
How good is the Continental EcoContact 6 in the dry?
How fuel efficient is the Continental EcoContact 6?
How many miles does the Continental EcoContact 6 last?
What do owners say about the Continental EcoContact 6?
More questions about the Continental EcoContact 6 (11)
How much does the Continental EcoContact 6 cost to run?
What is the Continental EcoContact 6's EU tire label rating?
How comfortable and quiet are the Continental EcoContact 6?
How well do the Continental EcoContact 6 wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Continental EcoContact 6 again?
What do owners say about the Continental EcoContact 6's tread life?
What do owners say about the Continental EcoContact 6's wet grip?
What do owners say about the Continental EcoContact 6's road noise?
What does the Continental EcoContact 6 replace?
Has the Continental EcoContact 6 been replaced?
What sizes does the Continental EcoContact 6 come in?
Owner Questions (5)
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Continental EcoContact 6
I have a BMW 218i Gran Coupe which was fitted with Continental Ecocontact 6s from new. Reviews of these tires are not very encouraging and I am nervous of their… Show more
I have a BMW 218i Gran Coupe which was fitted with Continental Ecocontact 6s from new.
Reviews of these tires are not very encouraging and I am nervous of their performance in potential aquaplaning conditions.
When it comes time to replace them does it make sense to fit the best possible tires such as UUHP tires as, while I won’t do any track days, will a better tire help me in potentially dangerous situations.
Would you have a recommendation as to the best possible tire for my car which I might have remapped at some stage.
Regards Andrew Show less
Show all questions (5)
Continental EcoContact 6 Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 157 reviews
Owner feedback on the Continental EcoContact 6 is mixed (average 56%), with the strongest consensus being that it delivers excellent fuel economy thanks to very low rolling resistance (mentioned by around one in five owners). However, a much larger share complain about short tread life and fast wear (just over half of owners), and wet-road confidence is a recurring weakness, with over a third criticising wet grip and around one in eight unhappy with wet handling. Comfort is often praised (around one in five owners) and noise levels divide opinion, with similar numbers calling it quiet as those finding it noisy.
What owners mention most counted across 154 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 175 ratings
- Owner score 58%
- Dry Grip 73%
- Comfort 69%
- Handling 60%
- Road Feedback 59%
- Wet Grip 56%
- Wear 53%
Featured reviews
“The tires have been fine in all ways, as fitted new on to a Volvo XC60, except for the wear that has been appalling. We do not drive fast, but we have had to change the two rear tires (in a front wheel drive car) after...”
“I am extremely pleased with the tires. Especially, you feel the full quality with its superior handling and quiet driving performance. It provides excellent balance even at high speeds and increases steering control...”
All 157 Continental EcoContact 6 reviews
- Suzuki SX4 Scross 1.4T Boosterjet
- 215/55 R17
- 15,000 miles
Comfortable compared to my previous tires, very good rolling resistence. Dry grip accetable, not impresie, feel safe on the wet (i have not push them on wet yet?
- BMW 530e xDrive
- 245/45 R18
- 10,000 miles
The EcoContact 6 came stock on my BMW G31, and I didn't enjoy it at all. While it was acceptable in the dry and good for fuel economy, the wet grip and braking were terrible. The ride comfort left a lot to be desired, too. I switched to proper summer (Conti PremiumContact 7) and winter (Michelin Alpin 5) tires as soon as possible.
- 245/50 R19
- 10,000 miles
Poor handling in wet and low comfort
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Continental EcoContact 6? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Maserati Grecale
- 255/45 R20
- 20,000 miles
Solid grip when dry, OK comfort, however, very significant drawback of this tire is mileage - barely lasted me 20,000 km, very soft sidewall with multiple bulges at the end of life, very shallow tread at start (about 6mm) and very soft - reached about 3mm in 19,000 km. Very bad tire, do NOT recommend to anyone.
- Suzuki ERTIGA 2022
- 195/60 R15
- 12,000 miles
It's a good tire, and reliable
- Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT
- 235/50 R20
- 2,000 miles
My ID. Buzz has standard mounted EcoContact 6Q's on 20" rims. The tires feel both comfy and quiet with low road noise on most surfaces along with very little harshness on rough surfaces. Unfortunately the positive things to say end here. The tires are scarily bad at handling wet roads. At highway speeds the sudden micro-aqua/hydroplaning, even on very thin film of water, will certainly wake you up, if not the understeering at city speeds. In the dry the performance is at least acceptable but with very little steering feedback. Also the tire corners poorly, feeling squirmy and unable to handle both the weight and power of the car. As I've only driven 2500km (1600miles) my final verdict will have to wait, but for now I'm not impressed.
- 225/45 R17
- 28,000 miles
Tire have performed flawlessly. We had an issue with a puncture and external tire wall damage to the rear tires which meant early replacement - at 23,000 miles with estimated remaining life (using starting depth - remaining depth) as 27000 miles. Fronr set were replaced at 31,000 miles, at legal limit.
Never any issue with road holding or noise which means reluctant to change to another brand (we have been offered good year EV tires which were significantly cheaper.
- BMW 218d Active Tourer
- 245/45 R19
- 10,000 miles
These tires are dangerous! My BMW X1 U11 25e came with OEM 19" EcoContact 6Qs...from the very first kilometers driven I knew they had poor grip. No matter dry or wet, but when its wet it gets dangerous...hard braking not possible at all: abs comes on, car is literally uncontrollable and starts sliding and all other safety features on the car comes on. Surprisingly they perform well in heavy rains, but not sure if that's due to the tire or that I am driving slow.
Ride quality and noise are pretty good, wear too...I believe it will be impossible to wear these out. Worst tire ever to come out of Continental factory.
I have other cars equipped with eco tires (mainly Bridgestone Turanza Enlitens), but none is that bad.
If you have to choose - NEVER get these tires
- BYD Seal EV AWD
- 235/45 R19
- 14,000 miles
They’re not really suitable for anything more than leisurely driving. They’re very soft and lack structural rigidity. On any bend taken at even a slightly higher speed – nothing out of the ordinary – you can immediately feel the tire deforming. Nor do they last as long as you’d expect from a Michelin. They won’t last another 3,000 ml.
- Ford Focus MK4.5 1.0 Ecoboost Hybrid
- 215/50 R17
- 6,400 miles
After three years driving, 10.000 km, the tires no longer flake. They have stabilized. The tread depth was 6 mm when new. Now it is 5 mm on the front tires and 5.5 mm on the rear tires.. 90% driven in Milan City, few miles on the motorway and a few on A-roads • average 40.6 MPG. • 6,636 miles / 164 gallons of petrol."
- Ford Focus MK4.5 1.0 Ecoboost Hybrid
- 225/45 R17
- 6,220 miles
After three years of driving , 10,000 km, the tires no longer flake. They have stabilized. The tread depth was 6 mm when new. Now it is 5 mm on the front tires and 5.5 mm on the rear tires..
- Suzuki vitara s 1,4 boosterjet
- 215/55 R17
- 15,534 miles
I just had the first service on my SUZUKI VITARA Hybrid 1.4 Style 2025.
I have 20,000 km / 1 year!
The garage noted on the invoice > "front tires to be changed in 5,000 km"!
This means that this set of tires will have lasted ... 25,000 km?
For long-lasting, economical tires - this is not normal.
I change cars every 2 or 3 years (I drive under warranty!) > I have NEVER changed my tires before 50,000 km - even sold the car at ... 60,000 km.
In your opinion, is 25,000 km on this vehicle "normal"?
Thank you.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.







