Every year it becomes harder and harder to argue that the German publication AutoBild aren't leading the tire testing game, and once again they seem to be a huge step ahead of everyone else.

For their 2023 summer tire test, AutoBild have started with fifty 225/45 R18 tires, mostly ultra high performance tires but also some touring bias rubber, and put them through a huge dry and wet braking test.

As always, the real fun will be published in the full review in a few weeks where the top twenty tires from this test will be put through a full examination, but this braking data does give us some interesting insights.

Once again Hankook dominate braking with the Ventus S1 Evo3, with the shortest average and the best performance in the wet, but the updated Pirelli P Zero PZ4 is now pretty close in the wet. The full test will include wear testing, so it will be interesting to see how these two tires perform when run on for a long time.

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is again excellent overall, as is the new Continental PremiumContact 7 and Michelin Pilot Sport 5. It's also great to see Yokohama up near the front with the Advan Sport V107, a tire we hope to test later this year.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph

If you've scanned down to the results, you should have noticed at least one surprise, that is the Linglong Sport Master finishing seventh overall! Linglong have been quietly improving their products for year, so this isn't a huge surprise, but if it does that well in the full test it will be a huge step forward for the Chinese brand.

Bridgestone might be disappointed with the performance of the new Turanza 6, as will Continental as their tier 2 brand Semperit finished near the end of the field.

Stay tuned for the full test in a few weeks which will really show us how the top twenty tires stack up.

Wet

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	81 ft	Best	0 mph
2Pirelli P Zero PZ4	82 ft	+1 ft	5 mph
3Continental PremiumContact 7	83 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
4Yokohama Advan Sport V107	83 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
4Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6	83 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
6Linglong Sport Master	85 ft	+4 ft	16 mph
7Michelin Pilot Sport 5	85 ft	+4 ft	17 mph
8Uniroyal RainSport 5	87 ft	+6 ft	20 mph
9Kumho Ecsta PS71	87 ft	+6 ft	21 mph
10Maxxis Victra Sport 5	88 ft	+7 ft	21 mph
11Toyo Proxes Sport 2	88 ft	+7 ft	22 mph
12Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2	89 ft	+8 ft	23 mph
12Falken Azenis FK520	89 ft	+8 ft	23 mph
14Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	89 ft	+8 ft	24 mph
15GT Radial SportActive 2	90 ft	+9 ft	24 mph
16Sava Intensa UHP 2	90 ft	+9 ft	25 mph
17Bridgestone Turanza 6	91 ft	+10 ft	25 mph
18Cooper Zeon CS8	91 ft	+10 ft	26 mph
19Kleber Dynaxer UHP	92 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
19Avon ZV7	92 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
21Giti GitiSportS2	92 ft	+11 ft	27 mph
22Ceat SportDrive	93 ft	+12 ft	28 mph
23Sumitomo HTR Z5	95 ft	+14 ft	30 mph
24Fulda SportControl 2	95 ft	+14 ft	30 mph
24Federal Evoluzion ST 1	95 ft	+14 ft	30 mph
26Lassa DriveWays Sport	96 ft	+15 ft	31 mph
27Barum Bravuris 5HM	97 ft	+16 ft	32 mph
27Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	97 ft	+16 ft	32 mph
29Laufenn S Fit EQ+	97 ft	+16 ft	32 mph
30Apollo Aspire 4G	98 ft	+17 ft	33 mph
31Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport	98 ft	+17 ft	33 mph
32Infinity Ecomax	100 ft	+19 ft	34 mph
33Radar Dimax R8+	100 ft	+19 ft	35 mph
34Firestone RoadHawk	101 ft	+20 ft	36 mph
35Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3	102 ft	+21 ft	36 mph
36Semperit Speed Life 3	103 ft	+22 ft	36 mph
36Viking Protech Newgen	103 ft	+22 ft	36 mph
38Sportiva Super Z+	103 ft	+22 ft	37 mph
39Platin RP 420	103 ft	+22 ft	37 mph
40Imperial Ecosport 2	104 ft	+23 ft	37 mph
41Minerva Radial F 205	108 ft	+27 ft	40 mph
41Rotalla RU01 S Pace	108 ft	+27 ft	40 mph
43Tristar Sportpower 2	109 ft	+28 ft	40 mph
43Riken Riken UHP	109 ft	+28 ft	40 mph
45Zeetex HP6000 eco	110 ft	+29 ft	41 mph
46Tracmax X Privilo TX3	110 ft	+29 ft	41 mph
47Triangle SporteX TH201	130 ft	+49 ft	49 mph
48Zeta Alventi	132 ft	+51 ft	50 mph

The difference between best and worst was 62.5% (51 ft ≈ 3.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Zeta Alventi would still be travelling at 50 mph when the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6	109 ft	Best	0 mph
2Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3	109 ft	0 ft	4 mph
3Yokohama Advan Sport V107	110 ft	+1 ft	8 mph
4Falken Azenis FK520	111 ft	+2 ft	10 mph
4Continental PremiumContact 7	111 ft	+2 ft	10 mph
6Pirelli P Zero PZ4	112 ft	+3 ft	12 mph
7Toyo Proxes Sport 2	112 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
7Michelin Pilot Sport 5	112 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
7Maxxis Victra Sport 5	112 ft	+3 ft	13 mph
10Sava Intensa UHP 2	113 ft	+4 ft	14 mph
11Linglong Sport Master	113 ft	+4 ft	15 mph
12Nexen N Fera Sport SU2	114 ft	+5 ft	16 mph
13Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2	114 ft	+5 ft	17 mph
14Fulda SportControl 2	115 ft	+6 ft	18 mph
15Kumho Ecsta PS71	115 ft	+6 ft	19 mph
16Gripmax SuperGrip Pro Sport	116 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
17Federal Evoluzion ST 1	116 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
17Laufenn S Fit EQ+	116 ft	+7 ft	20 mph
19Lassa DriveWays Sport	117 ft	+8 ft	21 mph
19Bridgestone Turanza 6	117 ft	+8 ft	21 mph
21Giti GitiSportS2	117 ft	+8 ft	22 mph
22Kleber Dynaxer UHP	118 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
22GT Radial SportActive 2	118 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
22Ceat SportDrive	118 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
22Sportiva Super Z+	118 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
26Firestone RoadHawk	118 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
27Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+	118 ft	+9 ft	23 mph
28Riken Riken UHP	119 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
28Sumitomo HTR Z5	119 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
30Apollo Aspire 4G	120 ft	+11 ft	24 mph
31Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3	120 ft	+11 ft	24 mph
32Infinity Ecomax	121 ft	+12 ft	25 mph
32Avon ZV7	121 ft	+12 ft	25 mph
34Radar Dimax R8+	122 ft	+13 ft	26 mph
34Cooper Zeon CS8	122 ft	+13 ft	26 mph
36Uniroyal RainSport 5	122 ft	+13 ft	27 mph
37Viking Protech Newgen	123 ft	+14 ft	27 mph
38Zeetex HP6000 eco	124 ft	+15 ft	28 mph
39Platin RP 420	124 ft	+15 ft	28 mph
40Barum Bravuris 5HM	125 ft	+16 ft	29 mph
40Rotalla RU01 S Pace	125 ft	+16 ft	29 mph
42Minerva Radial F 205	126 ft	+17 ft	29 mph
43Tracmax X Privilo TX3	127 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
44Imperial Ecosport 2	127 ft	+18 ft	30 mph
45Semperit Speed Life 3	128 ft	+19 ft	31 mph
46Tristar Sportpower 2	129 ft	+20 ft	31 mph
47Zeta Alventi	131 ft	+22 ft	33 mph
48Triangle SporteX TH201	132 ft	+23 ft	34 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21.4% (23 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Triangle SporteX TH201 would still be travelling at 34 mph when the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Results

Dry99.7%

Wet100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 48	109 ft	0 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 48	81 ft	Best in this discipline

Dry100%

Wet97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 48	109 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 48	83 ft	+2 ft

Dry97.7%

Wet99.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 48	112 ft	+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 48	82 ft	+1 ft

Dry99.1%

Wet97.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 48	110 ft	+1 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 48	83 ft	+2 ft

Dry98.5%

Wet98%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 48	111 ft	+2 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 48	83 ft	+2 ft

Dry97.4%

Wet95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 48	112 ft	+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 48	85 ft	+4 ft

Dry96.5%

Wet96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	11^th / 48	113 ft	+4 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 48	85 ft	+4 ft

Dry98.5%

Wet91.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 48	111 ft	+2 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 48	89 ft	+8 ft

Dry97.4%

Wet92.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 48	112 ft	+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 48	88 ft	+7 ft

Dry97.4%

Wet92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 48	112 ft	+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 48	88 ft	+7 ft

Dry96.8%

Wet90.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 48	113 ft	+4 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 48	90 ft	+9 ft

Dry94.6%

Wet93.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	15^th / 48	115 ft	+6 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 48	87 ft	+6 ft

Dry95.4%

Wet91.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	13^th / 48	114 ft	+5 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 48	89 ft	+8 ft

Dry96%

Wet91.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	12^th / 48	114 ft	+5 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 48	89 ft	+8 ft

Dry92.5%

Wet90.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 48	90 ft	+9 ft

Dry93%

Wet89.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	19^th / 48	117 ft	+8 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	17^th / 48	91 ft	+10 ft

Dry89%

Wet93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	36^th / 48	122 ft	+13 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 48	87 ft	+6 ft

Dry95.1%

Wet85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	14^th / 48	115 ft	+6 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	24^th / 48	95 ft	+14 ft

Dry92.7%

Wet88.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	21^st / 48	117 ft	+8 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	21^st / 48	92 ft	+11 ft

Dry92.5%

Wet88.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 48	92 ft	+11 ft

Dry92.5%

Wet87.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 48	93 ft	+12 ft

Dry93.5%

Wet85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17^th / 48	116 ft	+7 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	24^th / 48	95 ft	+14 ft

Dry90%

Wet88.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 48	121 ft	+12 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 48	92 ft	+11 ft

Dry89.3%

Wet89.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	34^th / 48	122 ft	+13 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 48	91 ft	+10 ft

Dry93%

Wet84.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	19^th / 48	117 ft	+8 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 48	96 ft	+15 ft

Dry93.5%

Wet83.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17^th / 48	116 ft	+7 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	29^th / 48	97 ft	+16 ft

Dry91.7%

Wet85.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	28^th / 48	119 ft	+10 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 48	95 ft	+14 ft

Dry93.8%

Wet82.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	16^th / 48	116 ft	+7 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	31^st / 48	98 ft	+17 ft

Dry92%

Wet84.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	27^th / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	27^th / 48	97 ft	+16 ft

Dry91%

Wet83.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	30^th / 48	120 ft	+11 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 48	98 ft	+17 ft

Dry92.2%

Wet80.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	26^th / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 48	101 ft	+20 ft

Dry90%

Wet81.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 48	121 ft	+12 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 48	100 ft	+19 ft

Dry92.5%

Wet79%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 48	118 ft	+9 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	38^th / 48	103 ft	+22 ft

Dry86.9%

Wet84.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	40^th / 48	125 ft	+16 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	27^th / 48	97 ft	+16 ft

Dry90.7%

Wet79.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	31^st / 48	120 ft	+11 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	35^th / 48	102 ft	+21 ft

Dry89.3%

Wet81.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	34^th / 48	122 ft	+13 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	33^rd / 48	100 ft	+19 ft

Dry88.3%

Wet79.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	37^th / 48	123 ft	+14 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 48	103 ft	+22 ft

Dry91.7%

Wet74.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	28^th / 48	119 ft	+10 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 48	109 ft	+28 ft

Dry87.6%

Wet78.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	39^th / 48	124 ft	+15 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 48	103 ft	+22 ft

Dry84.9%

Wet79.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	45^th / 48	128 ft	+19 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 48	103 ft	+22 ft

Dry85.6%

Wet78.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	44^th / 48	127 ft	+18 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	40^th / 48	104 ft	+23 ft

Dry87.8%

Wet74.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	38^th / 48	124 ft	+15 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	45^th / 48	110 ft	+29 ft

Dry86.9%

Wet75.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	40^th / 48	125 ft	+16 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 48	108 ft	+27 ft

Dry86.7%

Wet75.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	42^nd / 48	126 ft	+17 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 48	108 ft	+27 ft

Dry85.8%

Wet73.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 48	127 ft	+18 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 48	110 ft	+29 ft

Dry84.7%

Wet74.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	46^th / 48	129 ft	+20 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 48	109 ft	+28 ft

Dry82.4%

Wet62.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	48^th / 48	132 ft	+23 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	47^th / 48	130 ft	+49 ft

Dry83.2%

Wet61.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	47^th / 48	131 ft	+22 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better	48^th / 48	132 ft	+51 ft

Discussion

6 comments

Mr Paul Anderson Jan 29, 2024 archived

Sort out your grammar.

#9334
1. TireReviews Mr Paul Anderson Jan 29, 2024 archived
  
  *you're
  
  #9335
Saeed Piroozfard Dec 9, 2023 archived

Hey guys, I wanna buy tires for my crossover (255/45/R20) and have three options:
Nexen nfera Supreme (N5000 Platinum) : $175 each,
Nankang SP-9 Cross-Sport : $115,
Giti Sport S2 SUV :$125
which one will provide more comfort on the road

#9268
1. TireReviews Saeed Piroozfard Dec 10, 2023 archived
  
  Sorry, we've not seen any test data on these or tested them outselves.
  
  #9271
Bibbi Feb 22, 2023 archived

Are you making a summer tire review soon?
Time to put the focus on most silent tire for all Tesla owners 😉
Michelin Primacy 4+, SUV or EV?

#8660
1. TireReviews Bibbi Feb 22, 2023 archived
  
  e.Primacy is quietest, however limited wet grip.
  MY summer test out tomorrow.
  
  #8661

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Wet

Dry

Results

Cross-check this test