Menu

Minerva Radial F 205 Test Results

Tested 2020 to 2026 1 publication

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Minerva Radial F 205 averages a finish of 40th.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 40thAverage finish
  • 21%Field beaten on average
  • 1Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Minerva Radial F 205 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 3 P40.3 of 49 18% -
Wet
Wet Braking 3 P38 of 49 23% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Minerva Radial F 205. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Imperial Ecosport 2 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Rotalla RU01 S Pace 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Tracmax X Privilo TX3 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Sava Intensa UHP 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Fulda SportControl 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Minerva Radial F 205 has a consistently weak braking record across three Auto Bild comparisons, with larger relative deficits in the wet than in the dry. It finished 35th of 50 overall in the 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test, in 245/45 R19, with a 38 m dry stop, 15.9% from best, and a 33 m wet stop, 31% from best. In the 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview, in 225/45 R18, it was 46th of 50 overall; dry braking was 15.4% from best and wet braking 33.1% behind.

The 2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test, in 245/45 R18, placed it 38th of 50 overall. Dry braking was 36.9 m, 15% from best, and wet braking 36 m, 25.4% behind. The similar dry deficits and repeated large wet gaps give a more consistent picture than the changing overall positions. Different sizes and test conditions mean the stopping distances should not be compared directly between years. No awards or written tester verdicts are recorded. These braking tests establish limitations in stopping performance, but do not assess handling, comfort, wear or fuel efficiency.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet braking Moderate
    Details
    • 33 m and 31% from best, 2026 Auto Bild Summer Braking Super Tire Test
    • 33 m and 33.1% from best, 2023 Auto Bild Summer Tire Market Overview
    • 36 m and 25.4% from best, 2020 Auto Bild Tire Market Overview Braking Test
  • Dry braking Moderate
    Details
    • 38 m and 15.9% from best, 2026 Auto Bild braking test
    • 38.3 m and 15.4% from best, 2023 Auto Bild Summer Tire Market Overview
    • 36.9 m and 15% from best, 2020 Auto Bild braking test

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
2023 1 test
2020 1 test

Back to the Minerva Radial F 205 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Minerva tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.