Menu

Falken FK453

The Falken FK453 is a Max Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.4
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
63%
Handling
60%
Wear
60%
Comfort
69%
Buy again
59%
30 Reviews
65% Average
274,200 miles driven
9 Tests (avg: 13th)
Falken FK453

Falken FK453

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.4 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 9
Publications: 5
Period: 2012 - 2016
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 30
Avg Rating: 65.2%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.06
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2016 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2016 235/40 R18 6/8 0 metrics
2015 Auto Express Tire Test Auto Express 2015 225/45 R17 8/11 0 metrics
2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tire Test 2015 235/35 R19 6/8 0 metrics
2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2015 225/40 R18 9/14 0 metrics
2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2014 225/50 R17 6/12 0 metrics
2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tire Shootout Auto Bild 2014 225/50 R17 37/50 0 metrics
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2013 225/40 R18 10/10 0 metrics
2013 European Summer Sports Tire Test ADAC 2013 225/45 R17 13/18 0 metrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 25/45 0 metrics
9
Tests
13th
Average
6th
Best
37th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
6th/8
Good braking performance on wet and dry roads, quick reaction to steering and good handling in the dry, low noise
Average wet performance, high rolling resistance
9th/14
Good resistance to aquaplaning, good lateral stability and late transition to understeer in the wet, stable handling on dry roads
Relatively long braking distances on wet surfaces, high rolling resistance
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 67
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 67
215/45R17 91 W XL C A 67
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Falken FK453 >>

Questions and Answers for the Falken FK453

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Falken FK453. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
245/45 R19 $235.99 - $235.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 6 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 Falken FK453 Reviews

Given 97% while driving a Pontiac G8 (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
best tire i had
July 6, 2023
Given 58% while driving a Mercedes Benz S400 W222 (245/40 R20) on mostly motorways for 25,000 spirited miles
The Falken Azensis F453 offers better than expected dry performance and grip for a big luxury saloon. The tire manages dry grip well enough, to hold the large luxury saloon on to the line in corners through low - mid speed city and high speed motorways cat and mouse chases. But, braking on the dry is a bit worrying, on numerous occassion the ABS had to intervene really aggressively. Braking grip on offer makes me feel that the brakes are too strong for the wheels. Wet performance is not the tires strength, especially in tropical monsoon rain, with many water puddles. The tire does not inspire confidence, conversely i fear of aquaplaning so much that i give up the chase against a honda city. >.
February 25, 2022
Given 40% while driving a Volvo S60 R AWD (235/45 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 12,000 easy going miles
12 000 miles (20 000km) on the set. VolvoT6 AWD. Not an aggressive driver. Long distance driving. Was given a long story by the Falken Rep but all added up to nothing. Been a Falken supporter on 3 of my Volvo's but after using this "Flagship" tire I am leaving the brand
July 17, 2019

How would you rate the Falken FK453?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Falken FK453 Reviews

Given 31% while driving a Mazda 6 (225/45 R19 W) on a combination of roads for 12,500 spirited miles
Very bad experience with this tires. Really not fit for spirited drivers. Very bad during cornering, even in straight line driving can feel car not stable. Used only for 20k km mileage. Like a night mare having this tires. Replaced it with continental. Never ever will consider falken tires anymore.
January 16, 2019
Given 79% while driving a BMW Z4 3.0 (225/45 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Great value for money, decent life expectancy considering the driving style.
There are better tires out there but I found those to be fun and predictable.
Grip is not my priority as I like a lively car.
I had preferred the FK452, but those are OK replacements...
December 8, 2017
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 64% while driving a BMW 520d M Sport (275/35 R19 W) on mostly motorways for 12,000 average miles
Having changed all 4 of my Run-Flat tires only 18 months (and 12000 miles) ago, I was today shocked to hear I only had 1mm left on the rear tires. All of my driving has been long motor drives across Europe. My last tires (Michelins) lasted 38000 miles, hence the reason I'm so shocked. The front tires still have 5mm.
September 28, 2017
Given 80% while driving a Toyota supra turbo (275/40 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Past 20years i have been through a wide range of tires on my turbo cars but it's the first time i have been impressed with a budget street tire.
On my mildly modified supra (400hp) they perform much better than i expected.
Biggest suprise is how much grip they had in the wet. The grip in the wet is nearly as good as in the dry (straight line acceleration). And for a wide tires they aren't unsettled by big puddles of water on the freeway. Everything else i've had in a 275 width would aquaplane badly.
Highly recommended and will buy again.
January 19, 2017
Given 74% while driving a Mercedes Benz 190 2.3 16 (255/35 R18 W) on mostly town for 0 average miles
Only done 2000 miles, I'm really happy with them on my Mercedes E350 Coupe.
January 12, 2017
Given 60% while driving a BMW 330i M SPORT SALOON (245/35 R18) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Cornering in the wet and dry was good. If the road was wet the wheels would spin quite easily when taking off from a stand still. Comfort I don't really know about, nothing really feels comfortable with msport suspension. Wear was pretty bad, rears are basically bald after 10000miles, 1500miles of that was on road trips with spirited driving and the other 8500miles was on straight roads driving normally doing 60mph. The fronts still have at least half their tread left so might keep them on the front, but will probably go with something else on the rears as they cost about $450 per tire.
March 13, 2016
Given 97% while driving a BMW 320D M Sport (255/40 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Very good tires, with excellent dry & wet grip, even when pushed hard, These are now down to the legal limit and are still holding the road, Wear has been at a very good rate and I would defo buy again.
February 22, 2016
Given 62% while driving a BMW E60 M5 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
Good looking budget tire and value for money if you don't need the 'nth degree of performance . Only travelled >2000 kms so far so no wear to report and no track work to test limits but satisfactory for all road use. Only downside so far is noise/comfort levels which are both below average, but again value for money.
October 28, 2015
Given 74% while driving a Honda (245/45 R19 W) on mostly country roads for 200 average miles
I bought these for my Honda C-RV, grip is surprisingly good with road noise at a minimal, and compared to my last tires, the ride is smoother. So first impression for the first couple of hundred miles is a good one.
July 16, 2015
Given 70% while driving a Subaru Legacy (215/45 R17 W) on mostly motorways for 28,000 spirited miles
Wrote on these tires when I got them first and they were not the greatest. BUT.
I put on 215/45/17 91y XL, and the tires that came with the car were 215/45/17 87w, so the Falkens were the wrong tire for my car, having said that I put them on my car at 89900km and replaced them at 135000km and still had 3mm left on all 4 of them,
The ride was hard, steering was twitchy, could feel ridges and lumps on the road, as I said, I picked the wrong tire, (91 xl) but the road holding was great and wear I can't complain about, over 45000km, longer than the Bridgstones that are recommended usually 30000km,
March 6, 2015
Given 23% while driving a Honda Civic Type R (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Without doubt the worst tire i have ever purchased for any car. I have had tires for half the cost and perform better than these in every single way, road feedback is non existent no grip what so ever in the wet can move off without them struggling to grip, have tried a number of different tire pressures and no difference. can not wait for them to be done which will more than likely be sooner rather than later with the amount they struggle to grip.
March 3, 2015
Given 100% while driving a BMW 320D M Sport (255/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
These tires have gone on the rear off the car.
I loved the 452, the 453 are even better, with great feedback, no noise, amazing grip in the dry & wet. Even tried to push it to the limit and they still gripped the road and wanted more. Feel very confident with these tires in dry & wet. would defo buy again.

September 24, 2014
Rate the Falken FK453