2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test

Moving on from the 51 set braking test, the full Auto Bild winter tire test is once again, excellent. Testing 225/40 R18 using an AWD BMW M135i (but also fitted to the Audi S3, VW Golf GTI and R, Mercedes-AMG A35, and Hyundai i30 N and more) Auto Bild have once again put all the tires through snow, wet and dry testing, and tested wear, noise, comfort and rolling resistance.

Test Publication:

225/40 R18 20 tires 5 categories

Similar Tests

Images courtesy of Auto Bild

Test Publication:

https://www.autobild.de/ratgeber/reifen/

Images courtesy of Auto Bild

Test Size: 225/40 R18

Tires Tested: 20 tires

Test Categories:
5 categories (16 tests)

Similar Tests

Performance Trends and Surprising Results

The test revealed a clear dominance of established manufacturers and their secondary brands among top performers. Michelin secured first place with the Pilot Alpin 5, while its secondary brands BF Goodrich and Kleber achieved notable success in snow-specific disciplines, often outperforming the premium parent product in individual snow tests. Kumho emerged as a surprising success story, placing fourth overall and earning recognition as a price-performance winner.

The test identified a fundamental development challenge in winter tire design: the inherent conflict between snow performance and wet/dry capabilities. BF Goodrich and Kleber exemplified this trade-off, achieving the shortest snow braking distances in the entire test (27.1 and 27.3 meters respectively) but struggling with extended wet braking distances (36.0 and 36.2 meters). Conversely, Goodyear established itself as the rain specialist with excellent wet performance across all disciplines but slightly compromised snow capability. This pattern highlights that truly balanced winter tires require significant development resources and experience.

Unexpected Weaknesses in Premium Products

Several premium manufacturers delivered surprisingly inconsistent results. Continental's WinterContact TS 870 P, Hankook's Winter i*Cept evo3, and Vredestein's Wintrac Pro+ all showed extended wet braking distances despite their premium positioning and typically well-rounded product portfolios. Pirelli's Cinturato Winter 2 achieved strong wet performance but suffered notably imprecise dry handling, an unusual weakness for Pirelli.

Toyo's Observe Winter Sport 1 and Falken's Eurowinter HS02 Pro also performed below expectations, with extended braking distances across multiple conditions and, in Falken's case, the lowest projected mileage in the test. 

Consistent Performers

Michelin's Pilot Alpin 5 demonstrated the most balanced performance profile, achieving what testers described as the "golden middle" across all road conditions. It never claimed the absolute best result in any single discipline but maintained consistently strong performance in every test, justifying its premium pricing through reliability rather than singular excellence. Bridgestone's Blizzak 6 and Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance 3 both delivered consistent competence across their respective focuses—Bridgestone leaning toward dry handling and longevity, Goodyear dominating wet performance—while achieving the highest projected mileage of 53,000 kilometers.

Reference Summer Tire Performance

AUTO BILD included a reference summer tire in all testing disciplines to provide performance context. The results clearly illustrated the fundamental differences between tire categories. On snow, the summer tire was essentially non-functional, requiring 51.1 meters to stop from 50 km/h compared to 27-30 meters for winter tires, and recording such poor handling performance that it was rated "not drivable" in the snow handling test. However, the summer tire demonstrated its intended superiority in dry conditions, stopping from 100 km/h in just 37.8 meters—nearly 5 meters shorter than the best winter tire (Michelin at 42.6 meters).

In wet conditions, the comparison proved more nuanced. The summer tire achieved a 47.8-meter braking distance from 100 km/h, outperforming all winter tires (best winter: Goodyear at 50.9 meters.) The summer tire also completed the wet handling course at 83.8 km/h compared to the best winter tire (Pirelli at 84.4 km/h), showing minimal difference in this discipline. This data reinforces why enthusiastic drivers of compact sports cars continue to maintain seasonal tire changes despite the convenience of all-season alternatives—summer tires provide measurably better performance and precision during warmer months.

Cost Analysis and Longevity

The test conducted wear simulation to project real-world mileage, revealing significant differences in long-term value. Bridgestone and Goodyear led with 53,000-kilometer projections, while Falken managed only 33,920 kilometers—a difference of nearly 20,000 kilometers that dramatically affects cost per kilometer. When purchase price was factored against projected mileage, Ceat emerged as the value leader at €7.32 per 1,000 kilometers despite modest purchase pricing, while Falken became the most expensive at €15.04 per 1,000 kilometers due to rapid wear. This proved that premium-priced tires with high mileage can offer better value than cheap tires that wear quickly.

Safety Implications of Budget Tires

The deliberate inclusion of an anonymous budget tire provided evidence of the safety risks associated with extremely low-priced products. While achieving acceptable snow braking (28.6 meters), this tire became progressively dangerous in other conditions. Its 70.5-meter wet braking distance from 100 km/h represented a 13.2-meter disadvantage versus the best performer—equivalent to nearly three car lengths and potentially the difference between collision avoidance and impact. The dry braking distance of 46.5 meters and wet handling speed of just 72.1 km/h (versus 84.4 km/h for Pirelli) further demonstrated comprehensive performance deficiencies. The testers concluded explicitly that "cheap no-name tires are a real danger in traffic," providing quantitative justification for this warning.

Dry

Michelin leads the dry braking results with the shortest stopping distance of 42.6 meters from 100 km/h, though even this best performer stands 4.8 meters behind the reference summer tire, demonstrating the fundamental trade-off winter tires make with their softer compounds and more aggressive tread patterns optimized for cold conditions.

Bridgestone claims top honors in dry handling with the most car-like precision and highest average speed through the test course, followed closely by Michelin and Continental, while the anonymous budget tire trails significantly at 111.0 km/h compared to the leader's 116.9 km/h.

Wet

Goodyear dominates wet braking with a 50.9-meter stopping distance, establishing itself as the rain specialist, while the anonymous budget tire posts a catastrophic 70.5-meter result—a 19.6-meter disadvantage that could mean the difference between accident avoidance and collision.

Pirelli takes the wet handling victory with the highest average speed, marginally ahead of Goodyear which continues its wet-weather dominance, while the budget tire again finishes last with handling speeds 12.3 km/h slower than the leader, demonstrating comprehensively compromised wet performance.

The reference summer tire demonstrates its superiority in lateral aquaplaning resistance, while among winter tires Hankook leads with the highest lateral acceleration before losing grip, and the budget tire again finishes last with less than half the performance of the leader.

Snow

Kleber achieves the shortest snow braking distance at 27.1 meters, narrowly ahead of stablemate BF Goodrich at 27.3 meters—both Michelin secondary brands outperforming their premium parent—while the reference summer tire requires 51.1 meters, nearly double the distance and effectively undrivable in winter conditions.

Kleber continues its snow dominance in the traction test with the highest measured force, again marginally ahead of BF Goodrich, demonstrating these two Michelin secondary brands' clear optimization for maximum snow grip, while the reference summer tire produces only 248 Newtons compared to the leader's 2,619 Newtons.

BF Goodrich and Michelin tie for the highest average speed through the snow handling course, though notably the top snow brakers Kleber and BF Goodrich don't maintain this advantage in handling where steering precision and feedback become as important as pure grip.

Comfort

Michelin receives the highest comfort rating for its combination of refined ride quality and low noise levels, while the anonymous budget tire finishes last with noticeably harsher impact absorption and less controlled damping over road irregularities.

Barum and Michelin emerge as the quietest tires with the lowest exterior noise measurements, while Semperit records the highest noise levels—though all finalists remain within acceptable ranges, demonstrating that modern winter tire design has largely solved historical noise concerns.

Value

Bridgestone and Goodyear project the longest service life at 53,000 kilometers based on wear testing, while Falken suffers the most rapid wear with only 33,920 kilometers expected—a nearly 20,000-kilometer difference that dramatically impacts long-term value regardless of purchase price.

When purchase price is divided by projected mileage, Ceat delivers the best value at just €7.32 per 1,000 kilometers despite modest pricing, while Falken becomes the most expensive option at €15.04 per 1,000 kilometers due to its combination of mid-range pricing and rapid wear.

Barum achieves the lowest rolling resistance and highest fuel efficiency at 7.77 kg/tonne, closely followed by Continental and Uniroyal, while the budget tire posts the worst result at 10.37 kg/tonne—meaning noticeably higher fuel consumption in addition to its safety deficiencies.

Results

1^st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/70
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 630.00

The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 emerges as the overall test winner, described as an allrounder that strikes the golden balance across all road conditions. Its standout quality is being extremely quiet, making it the most refined choice for daily driving. The tire excels particularly in dry conditions with strong lateral grip and precise handling, though it requires a slightly longer braking distance on dry pavement compared to summer tires. On snow, it delivers solid performance with good traction and braking, while on wet roads it maintains predictable handling and stable braking. The tire's main weakness is its premium pricing, making it the most expensive option in the test at approximately €630 per set. Despite the high cost, its balanced performance across all conditions and exceptional comfort make it the top recommendation for drivers seeking the best overall winter tire experience.

Dry

99.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	42.6 M			100%
Dry Handling	2nd	116.7 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-0.2 Km/H	99.83%

Wet

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	51.9 M	50.9 M	+1 M	98.07%
Wet Handling	3rd	83.4 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-1 Km/H	98.82%
Wet Circle	3rd	12.12 s	12.04 s	+0.08 s	99.34%
Straight Aqua	12th	75.2 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-2.1 Km/H	97.28%
Curved Aquaplaning	13th	2.23 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.49 m/sec2	81.99%

Snow

96.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	4th	27.8 M	27.1 M	+0.7 M	97.48%
Snow Traction	9th	2501 N	2619 N	-118 N	95.49%
Snow Handling	1st	59.3 Km/H			100%
Snow Slalom	13th	2.81 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.22 m/sec2	92.74%

Comfort

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	1st	65 dB			100%

Value

77.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	9th	47170 KM	53000 KM	-5830 KM	89%
Value	19th	13.36 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+6.04 Price/1000	54.79%
Rolling Resistance	9th	8.7 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.93 kg / t	89.31%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Dunlop Winter

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 510.00

The Dunlop Winter proves itself as a snow specialist that combines excellent winter performance with strong value for money. It particularly shines on snow-covered roads with high traction and exceptional lateral grip, making it one of the most confident choices for severe winter conditions. The tire also performs admirably on wet surfaces, delivering short braking distances and stable handling. Its main compromise comes in dry conditions, where it requires slightly longer braking distances than some competitors, though this is typical for winter tires with aggressive snow-focused tread designs. The handling on dry pavement is still more than adequate for safe daily driving. At around €510 per set, it offers compelling value, especially for drivers in regions with regular snowfall who prioritize winter grip over ultimate dry road performance.

Dry

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	11th	45.5 M	42.6 M	+2.9 M	93.63%
Dry Handling	14th	114.4 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	97.86%

Wet

94.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	52 M	50.9 M	+1.1 M	97.88%
Wet Handling	16th	80.4 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-4 Km/H	95.26%
Wet Circle	14th	12.56 s	12.04 s	+0.52 s	95.86%
Straight Aqua	15th	74.1 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-3.2 Km/H	95.86%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	2.34 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.38 m/sec2	86.03%

Snow

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	3rd	27.5 M	27.1 M	+0.4 M	98.55%
Snow Traction	4th	2576 N	2619 N	-43 N	98.36%
Snow Handling	7th	58.6 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	98.82%
Snow Slalom	4th	2.98 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.05 m/sec2	98.35%

Comfort

99.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	3rd	65.2 dB	65 dB	+0.2 dB	99.69%

Value

86.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	5th	50880 KM	53000 KM	-2120 KM	96%
Value	10th	10.02 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.7 Price/1000	73.05%
Rolling Resistance	7th	8.58 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.81 kg / t	90.56%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: C/B/70
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 600.00

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 positions itself as a sporty choice with particularly high lateral grip in dry conditions, making it feel more responsive and agile than typical winter tires. This performance-oriented character extends to impressive wear resistance, achieving the highest mileage potential in the test alongside Goodyear. The tire handles predictably across all conditions with strong overall balance. However, it shows a slight weakness in wet cornering situations, where lateral grip isn't quite as strong as in other conditions. On snow, it delivers reliable performance with good braking and traction. The tire's sporty nature and long lifespan make it an excellent choice for enthusiastic drivers of compact sports cars who don't want to sacrifice too much handling precision during winter months, though the approximately €600 price tag reflects its premium positioning.

Dry

97.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	10th	44.9 M	42.6 M	+2.3 M	94.88%
Dry Handling	1st	116.9 Km/H			100%

Wet

94.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	10th	54.7 M	50.9 M	+3.8 M	93.05%
Wet Handling	11th	81.1 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-3.3 Km/H	96.09%
Wet Circle	10th	12.46 s	12.04 s	+0.42 s	96.63%
Straight Aqua	4th	76.4 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.84%
Curved Aquaplaning	9th	2.45 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.27 m/sec2	90.07%

Snow

96.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	28 M	27.1 M	+0.9 M	96.79%
Snow Traction	12th	2483 N	2619 N	-136 N	94.81%
Snow Handling	7th	58.6 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	98.82%
Snow Slalom	7th	2.89 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.14 m/sec2	95.38%

Comfort

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	17th	66.8 dB	65 dB	+1.8 dB	97.31%

Value

85.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	1st	53000 KM			100%
Value	15th	11.32 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+4 Price/1000	64.66%
Rolling Resistance	6th	8.54 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.77 kg / t	90.98%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

3^rd

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/A/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 430.00

The Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ delivers a remarkable combination of performance and value, earning its place as a price-performance winner. This Korean tire impresses particularly on snow with strong grip and confident handling, while also performing admirably on wet roads. Its standout feature is the W-speed rating (270 km/h), making it suitable for high-performance compact sports cars that might occasionally be driven at higher speeds. The tire maintains balanced characteristics across all conditions without any major weaknesses, though it's slightly less sharp in dry handling compared to the most sporty options. At approximately €430 per set, it represents exceptional value, offering near-premium performance at a mid-range price. This makes it an ideal choice for budget-conscious drivers who refuse to compromise significantly on safety and performance during winter.

Dry

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	8th	44.5 M	42.6 M	+1.9 M	95.73%
Dry Handling	13th	114.5 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.4 Km/H	97.95%

Wet

95.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	52.3 M	50.9 M	+1.4 M	97.32%
Wet Handling	4th	82.6 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-1.8 Km/H	97.87%
Wet Circle	8th	12.43 s	12.04 s	+0.39 s	96.86%
Straight Aqua	8th	76 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	98.32%
Curved Aquaplaning	11th	2.32 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.4 m/sec2	85.29%

Snow

96.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	12th	28.3 M	27.1 M	+1.2 M	95.76%
Snow Traction	10th	2492 N	2619 N	-127 N	95.15%
Snow Handling	4th	59.1 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.2 Km/H	99.66%
Snow Slalom	7th	2.89 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.14 m/sec2	95.38%

Comfort

91.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	16th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	8th	65.7 dB	65 dB	+0.7 dB	98.93%

Value

83%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	16th	44520 KM	53000 KM	-8480 KM	84%
Value	7th	9.66 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.34 Price/1000	75.78%
Rolling Resistance	9th	8.7 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.93 kg / t	89.31%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 580.00

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 establishes itself as the rain specialist of the test, excelling particularly in wet conditions across all disciplines. It delivers the shortest wet braking distances and most confident wet handling, making it the safest choice for regions with frequent winter rainfall rather than consistent snow. The tire also achieves the joint-highest mileage projection in the test, promising excellent long-term value through extended wear life. However, this wet-weather optimization comes with a tradeoff in dry performance, where handling and braking aren't quite as sharp as the most performance-focused competitors. On snow, it provides solid if not exceptional performance. At around €580, it's positioned in the premium segment but justifies the cost through its outstanding wet weather safety and longevity, making it ideal for drivers in milder, wetter winter climates.

Dry

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	13th	45.7 M	42.6 M	+3.1 M	93.22%
Dry Handling	10th	114.8 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.1 Km/H	98.2%

Wet

99.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	50.9 M			100%
Wet Handling	2nd	83.9 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-0.5 Km/H	99.41%
Wet Circle	1st	12.04 s			100%
Straight Aqua	4th	76.4 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.84%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	2.65 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.07 m/sec2	97.43%

Snow

94.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	13th	28.5 M	27.1 M	+1.4 M	95.09%
Snow Traction	16th	2413 N	2619 N	-206 N	92.13%
Snow Handling	9th	58.5 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.8 Km/H	98.65%
Snow Slalom	11th	2.84 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2	93.73%

Comfort

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	6th	65.6 dB	65 dB	+0.6 dB	99.09%

Value

83.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	1st	53000 KM			100%
Value	11th	10.94 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+3.62 Price/1000	66.91%
Rolling Resistance	18th	9.16 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.39 kg / t	84.83%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 480.00

The Hankook Winter i*Cept evo3 proves itself as a snow expert delivering excellent value for money. It shines particularly on snow-covered roads with strong performance across all winter disciplines, providing confident grip and handling when temperatures drop. The tire maintains respectable performance on wet roads, though it doesn't quite match the wet-weather specialists in this category. Its main weakness appears in damp conditions where braking distances are slightly extended compared to the best performers. The tire offers a compelling package for drivers prioritizing snow capability, with solid all-around performance that doesn't embarrass itself in any condition. At approximately €480 per set, it represents strong value in the premium mid-range segment, making it an intelligent choice for drivers who experience regular snowfall but don't want to pay top-tier prices.

Dry

97.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	44.3 M	42.6 M	+1.7 M	96.16%
Dry Handling	9th	114.9 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2 Km/H	98.29%

Wet

96.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	55.6 M	50.9 M	+4.7 M	91.55%
Wet Handling	8th	81.6 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.8 Km/H	96.68%
Wet Circle	16th	12.63 s	12.04 s	+0.59 s	95.33%
Straight Aqua	3rd	76.5 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-0.8 Km/H	98.97%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	2.72 m/sec2			100%

Snow

97.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	8th	28.1 M	27.1 M	+1 M	96.44%
Snow Traction	5th	2560 N	2619 N	-59 N	97.75%
Snow Handling	3rd	59.2 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.1 Km/H	99.83%
Snow Slalom	6th	2.92 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.11 m/sec2	96.37%

Comfort

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	11th	66.3 dB	65 dB	+1.3 dB	98.04%

Value

88.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	3rd	51940 KM	53000 KM	-1060 KM	98%
Value	4th	9.24 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+1.92 Price/1000	79.22%
Rolling Resistance	13th	8.9 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.13 kg / t	87.3%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: C/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 610.00

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P demonstrates the German manufacturer's expertise with a tire that emphasizes efficiency and balanced behavior across snow and dry conditions. It features low rolling resistance, making it one of the most fuel-efficient options in the test while maintaining strong environmental credentials. The handling characteristics are well-sorted and predictable across different road surfaces, with particularly good performance on snow. However, the tire shows a weakness on wet roads with slightly extended braking distances compared to wet-weather specialists, which is unusual for Continental's typically well-rounded products. The dry performance is solid with good handling precision. At around €610, it's positioned at premium pricing, making it best suited for drivers who value brand heritage, efficiency, and balanced winter performance, particularly those who prioritize snow capability over ultimate wet braking performance.

Dry

98.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	43.7 M	42.6 M	+1.1 M	97.48%
Dry Handling	3rd	116.5 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.66%

Wet

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	12th	55.6 M	50.9 M	+4.7 M	91.55%
Wet Handling	14th	80.8 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-3.6 Km/H	95.73%
Wet Circle	9th	12.45 s	12.04 s	+0.41 s	96.71%
Straight Aqua	6th	76.3 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1 Km/H	98.71%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	2.61 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.11 m/sec2	95.96%

Snow

97.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	28 M	27.1 M	+0.9 M	96.79%
Snow Traction	8th	2524 N	2619 N	-95 N	96.37%
Snow Handling	10th	58.4 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	98.48%
Snow Slalom	5th	2.95 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.08 m/sec2	97.36%

Comfort

99.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	9th	65.9 dB	65 dB	+0.9 dB	98.63%

Value

80.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	10th	46640 KM	53000 KM	-6360 KM	88%
Value	17th	13.08 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+5.76 Price/1000	55.96%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	8.02 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.25 kg / t	96.88%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 460.00

The Uniroyal WinterExpert stands out as a well-rounded performer with particular emphasis on fuel efficiency. It achieves the highest fuel-saving potential in the test thanks to exceptionally low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice for high-mileage drivers concerned about operating costs. The tire delivers balanced performance across all conditions without any severe weaknesses, showing competent behavior on snow, wet, and dry surfaces. However, it doesn't claim top honors in any single discipline, representing a jack-of-all-trades approach. Dry braking distances are slightly longer than the sportiest options, but still within acceptable limits for safe winter driving. At approximately €460 per set, it offers solid value, particularly when factoring in the fuel savings over its lifetime. This makes it an intelligent choice for practical drivers who want dependable winter performance combined with low running costs.

Dry

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	14th	45.8 M	42.6 M	+3.2 M	93.01%
Dry Handling	6th	115.6 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	98.89%

Wet

94.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	53.3 M	50.9 M	+2.4 M	95.5%
Wet Handling	12th	81 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-3.4 Km/H	95.97%
Wet Circle	7th	12.38 s	12.04 s	+0.34 s	97.25%
Straight Aqua	13th	75 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	97.02%
Curved Aquaplaning	11th	2.32 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.4 m/sec2	85.29%

Snow

93.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	14th	28.6 M	27.1 M	+1.5 M	94.76%
Snow Traction	15th	2417 N	2619 N	-202 N	92.29%
Snow Handling	15th	57.8 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	97.47%
Snow Slalom	17th	2.76 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.27 m/sec2	91.09%

Comfort

90.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	16th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	15th	66.7 dB	65 dB	+1.7 dB	97.45%

Value

87.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	8th	47700 KM	53000 KM	-5300 KM	90%
Value	6th	9.64 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.32 Price/1000	75.93%
Rolling Resistance	3rd	8.09 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.32 kg / t	96.04%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Barum Polaris 6

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: C/C/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 380.00

The Barum Polaris 6, as Continental's budget brand, delivers impressive value as a genuine bargain option with the highest fuel-saving potential in the test. Its exceptionally low rolling resistance translates directly to lower fuel consumption, making it economical to run over its lifetime. The tire proves itself safe and reliable on both snow and dry roads, providing confidence-inspiring performance in typical winter conditions without breaking the bank. However, it shows its budget positioning more clearly on wet roads, where overall performance lags slightly behind premium competitors. Despite this, it never falls into the dangerous category, maintaining acceptable safety standards. At approximately €380 per set—the lowest price among quality brand tires in the test—it represents outstanding value for budget-conscious drivers who need a reliable winter tire but can't justify premium pricing. The tire proves that low cost doesn't necessarily mean compromised safety.

Dry

95.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	16th	46 M	42.6 M	+3.4 M	92.61%
Dry Handling	8th	115.1 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-1.8 Km/H	98.46%

Wet

90.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	11th	54.8 M	50.9 M	+3.9 M	92.88%
Wet Handling	14th	80.8 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-3.6 Km/H	95.73%
Wet Circle	15th	12.62 s	12.04 s	+0.58 s	95.4%
Straight Aqua	19th	71.4 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-5.9 Km/H	92.37%
Curved Aquaplaning	16th	2.11 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.61 m/sec2	77.57%

Snow

94.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	9th	28.2 M	27.1 M	+1.1 M	96.1%
Snow Traction	13th	2471 N	2619 N	-148 N	94.35%
Snow Handling	12th	58 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	97.81%
Snow Slalom	17th	2.76 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.27 m/sec2	91.09%

Comfort

95.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	3rd	65.2 dB	65 dB	+0.2 dB	99.69%

Value

90.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	13th	45050 KM	53000 KM	-7950 KM	85%
Value	3rd	8.44 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+1.12 Price/1000	86.73%
Rolling Resistance	1st	7.77 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

10^th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 620.00

The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 establishes itself as a wet-weather specialist with exceptional grip talent on damp and rainy roads. It delivers particularly strong performance in wet conditions, providing confident handling and reliable braking when rain falls. However, this wet-focused optimization creates an imbalanced character with notably imprecise and vague handling on dry pavement, which is disappointing for a premium Italian brand typically known for sporty characteristics. The tire also carries a high price tag at approximately €620 per set, making it one of the most expensive options. An important note is that this tire has since been succeeded by the Cinturato Winter 3, so availability may be limited. The Pirelli is best suited for drivers in regions with wet but relatively mild winters who rarely encounter snow and prioritize wet-weather safety above all else, though the handling compromises and high price may steer many toward more balanced alternatives.

Dry

97.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	44.1 M	42.6 M	+1.5 M	96.6%
Dry Handling	18th	114.1 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.8 Km/H	97.6%

Wet

93.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	7th	53.9 M	50.9 M	+3 M	94.43%
Wet Handling	1st	84.4 Km/H			100%
Wet Circle	2nd	12.11 s	12.04 s	+0.07 s	99.42%
Straight Aqua	13th	75 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	97.02%
Curved Aquaplaning	15th	2.13 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.59 m/sec2	78.31%

Snow

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	15th	28.7 M	27.1 M	+1.6 M	94.43%
Snow Traction	17th	2368 N	2619 N	-251 N	90.42%
Snow Handling	5th	59 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.49%
Snow Slalom	10th	2.85 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.18 m/sec2	94.06%

Comfort

99.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	6th	65.6 dB	65 dB	+0.6 dB	99.09%

Value

77.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	7th	48230 KM	53000 KM	-4770 KM	91%
Value	16th	12.86 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+5.54 Price/1000	56.92%
Rolling Resistance	16th	9.05 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.28 kg / t	85.86%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

11^th

Semperit Speed Grip 5

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 490.00

The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 presents a somewhat mixed character with strengths and weaknesses across different conditions. On dry and wet roads, it delivers balanced and predictable performance that inspires confidence in typical autumn and early spring conditions. However, it reveals its main weakness on snow, where it struggles particularly with lateral grip and cornering stability, making it less suitable for regions with consistent winter snowfall. The tire doesn't excel in any particular area but maintains acceptable performance across most disciplines. At around €490 per set, it sits in the mid-premium price range, though the compromised snow performance makes the value proposition questionable for drivers who regularly face winter conditions. It might be best suited for urban drivers in milder climates who occasionally encounter light snow but primarily drive on cleared roads, where its decent wet and dry characteristics can shine without exposing its winter weaknesses.

Dry

95.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	15th	45.9 M	42.6 M	+3.3 M	92.81%
Dry Handling	5th	115.8 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-1.1 Km/H	99.06%

Wet

95.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	9th	54.5 M	50.9 M	+3.6 M	93.39%
Wet Handling	7th	82.1 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	97.27%
Wet Circle	11th	12.52 s	12.04 s	+0.48 s	96.17%
Straight Aqua	6th	76.3 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1 Km/H	98.71%
Curved Aquaplaning	8th	2.48 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.24 m/sec2	91.18%

Snow

93.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	18th	29 M	27.1 M	+1.9 M	93.45%
Snow Traction	14th	2436 N	2619 N	-183 N	93.01%
Snow Handling	18th	57.2 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-2.1 Km/H	96.46%
Snow Slalom	14th	2.8 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2	92.41%

Comfort

90%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	16th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	20th	67.6 dB	65 dB	+2.6 dB	96.15%

Value

81.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	17th	43990 KM	53000 KM	-9010 KM	83%
Value	13th	11.14 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+3.82 Price/1000	65.71%
Rolling Resistance	4th	8.15 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.38 kg / t	95.34%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

12^th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/69
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 510.00

The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 establishes itself as an absolute snow king with outstanding performance on snow-covered surfaces across all disciplines. As one of Michelin's secondary brands, it achieves the shortest braking distance on snow in the entire test and delivers exceptional traction and grip when temperatures plunge. However, this intense focus on winter performance creates a notably unbalanced tire. It struggles on both wet and dry roads, with the dry performance being particularly compromised—handling feels spongy and imprecise, while braking distances are extended. The tire essentially sacrifices three-season capability for maximum winter competence. At approximately €510 per set, it's reasonably priced for a specialized product. This tire is specifically suited for drivers in harsh winter climates with consistent snow cover who primarily drive during winter months and are willing to sacrifice dry and wet performance for ultimate snow confidence and safety.

Dry

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	12th	45.6 M	42.6 M	+3 M	93.42%
Dry Handling	17th	114.3 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.6 Km/H	97.78%

Wet

94.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	16th	56.3 M	50.9 M	+5.4 M	90.41%
Wet Handling	17th	80.3 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-4.1 Km/H	95.14%
Wet Circle	18th	12.67 s	12.04 s	+0.63 s	95.03%
Straight Aqua	1st	77.3 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.5 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.22 m/sec2	91.91%

Snow

99.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	2nd	27.3 M	27.1 M	+0.2 M	99.27%
Snow Traction	2nd	2608 N	2619 N	-11 N	99.58%
Snow Handling	1st	59.3 Km/H			100%
Snow Slalom	1st	3.03 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	11th	66.3 dB	65 dB	+1.3 dB	98.04%

Value

80.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	12th	45580 KM	53000 KM	-7420 KM	86%
Value	14th	11.19 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+3.87 Price/1000	65.42%
Rolling Resistance	11th	8.72 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.95 kg / t	89.11%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

13^th

Vredestein Wintrac Pro plus

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 500.00

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro+ demonstrates strong lateral grip and handling precision on wet roads, making it a confident performer when rain falls during the winter months. It also shows respectable performance on snow with reliable traction. However, the tire reveals a significant weakness with extended braking distances in dry conditions, which is concerning for a tire from a brand positioning itself in the premium segment. The handling on dry roads also feels less precise and communicative than competitors. This combination of compromised dry performance and premium pricing around €500 per set makes the value proposition questionable. The tire might appeal to drivers in regions with very wet but mild winters who rarely encounter dry cold conditions, but for most drivers seeking balanced winter performance, there are better options that don't sacrifice dry safety for wet grip.

Dry

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	17th	46.9 M	42.6 M	+4.3 M	90.83%
Dry Handling	14th	114.4 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	97.86%

Wet

91.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	16th	56.3 M	50.9 M	+5.4 M	90.41%
Wet Handling	6th	82.2 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.39%
Wet Circle	5th	12.3 s	12.04 s	+0.26 s	97.89%
Straight Aqua	17th	71.7 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-5.6 Km/H	92.76%
Curved Aquaplaning	17th	2.09 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.63 m/sec2	76.84%

Snow

94.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	15th	28.7 M	27.1 M	+1.6 M	94.43%
Snow Traction	11th	2487 N	2619 N	-132 N	94.96%
Snow Handling	16th	57.6 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	97.13%
Snow Slalom	16th	2.77 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.26 m/sec2	91.42%

Comfort

90.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	16th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	18th	66.9 dB	65 dB	+1.9 dB	97.16%

Value

69.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	19th	37630 KM	53000 KM	-15370 KM	71%
Value	18th	13.29 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+5.97 Price/1000	55.08%
Rolling Resistance	19th	9.31 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.54 kg / t	83.46%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

14^th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/69
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 500.00

The Kleber Krisalp HP3, as another Michelin secondary brand alongside BF Goodrich, proves itself as an exceptional snow specialist with absolute top-tier performance on snow-covered roads. It achieves the shortest braking distance on snow in the test and delivers outstanding traction, making it supremely confident in harsh winter conditions. However, like its BF Goodrich sibling, this snow focus creates significant compromises elsewhere. The tire receives downgrades for extended dry braking distances, which raise safety concerns on clear winter days. Wet and dry handling also suffer from the soft compound and aggressive tread design optimized for snow. At approximately €500 per set, it's priced similarly to premium all-rounders that offer better balance. The Kleber is best reserved for drivers in mountainous or consistently snowy regions who prioritize maximum snow safety above all else and accept the compromises on other surfaces as a necessary trade-off.

Dry

93.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	20th	47.3 M	42.6 M	+4.7 M	90.06%
Dry Handling	19th	113.4 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-3.5 Km/H	97.01%

Wet

94.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	18th	56.6 M	50.9 M	+5.7 M	89.93%
Wet Handling	13th	80.9 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-3.5 Km/H	95.85%
Wet Circle	11th	12.52 s	12.04 s	+0.48 s	96.17%
Straight Aqua	2nd	76.9 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.48%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	2.52 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	92.65%

Snow

99.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	1st	27.1 M			100%
Snow Traction	1st	2619 N			100%
Snow Handling	6th	58.7 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-0.6 Km/H	98.99%
Snow Slalom	1st	3.03 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

90.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	16th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	14th	66.5 dB	65 dB	+1.5 dB	97.74%

Value

80%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	13th	45050 KM	53000 KM	-7950 KM	85%
Value	12th	11.1 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+3.78 Price/1000	65.95%
Rolling Resistance	11th	8.72 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.95 kg / t	89.11%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

15^th

Ceat WinterDrive

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/C/70
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 380.00

The Ceat WinterDrive from this Indian manufacturer manages to deliver the absolute best cost-per-kilometer ratio in the test while maintaining respectable snow and dry road performance. This achievement comes from combining a competitive purchase price of approximately €380 per set with good projected mileage, making it extremely economical for high-mileage drivers on tight budgets. The tire performs adequately on snow with acceptable grip and braking, while dry road behavior remains within safe parameters. However, it shows its budget positioning most clearly on wet roads, where overall performance is weaker across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance. Despite these wet-weather limitations, it never enters truly dangerous territory. The Ceat represents a pragmatic choice for cost-conscious drivers who need winter capability but experience limited severe weather, making it suitable for urban environments where roads are typically cleared and wet performance is less critical than absolute bargain pricing.

Dry

98%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	43.5 M	42.6 M	+0.9 M	97.93%
Dry Handling	11th	114.7 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	98.12%

Wet

89.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	19th	57.7 M	50.9 M	+6.8 M	88.21%
Wet Handling	20th	79.8 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-4.6 Km/H	94.55%
Wet Circle	19th	12.69 s	12.04 s	+0.65 s	94.88%
Straight Aqua	16th	71.9 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-5.4 Km/H	93.01%
Curved Aquaplaning	18th	2.06 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.66 m/sec2	75.74%

Snow

96.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	9th	28.2 M	27.1 M	+1.1 M	96.1%
Snow Traction	6th	2547 N	2619 N	-72 N	97.25%
Snow Handling	12th	58 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	97.81%
Snow Slalom	11th	2.84 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2	93.73%

Comfort

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	5th	65.5 dB	65 dB	+0.5 dB	99.24%

Value

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	3rd	51940 KM	53000 KM	-1060 KM	98%
Value	1st	7.32 Price/1000			100%
Rolling Resistance	17th	9.07 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.3 kg / t	85.67%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

16^th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 450.00

The Firestone Winterhawk 4, as Bridgestone's budget brand, positions itself as a snow specialist with very high traction on snow-covered surfaces, making it confident and reassuring when winter conditions are at their worst. It also delivers respectable performance on wet roads, maintaining acceptable safety margins. However, the tire shows its budget orientation and snow-focused design through spongy, imprecise handling on dry pavement, where the soft compound and flexible tread blocks compromise steering response and cornering stability. Extended dry braking distances also raise some safety concerns. At approximately €450 per set, it's positioned in the mid-range price bracket, though the handling compromises make competitors at similar prices more appealing for balanced performance. The Firestone is best suited for drivers in consistently snowy climates who prioritize winter grip and can tolerate vague dry handling, particularly those who drive conservatively and value the Bridgestone connection for quality assurance.

Dry

93.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	19th	47.2 M	42.6 M	+4.6 M	90.25%
Dry Handling	20th	112.8 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-4.1 Km/H	96.49%

Wet

92.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	8th	54.4 M	50.9 M	+3.5 M	93.57%
Wet Handling	10th	81.5 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.9 Km/H	96.56%
Wet Circle	13th	12.55 s	12.04 s	+0.51 s	95.94%
Straight Aqua	10th	75.9 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1.4 Km/H	98.19%
Curved Aquaplaning	14th	2.18 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.54 m/sec2	80.15%

Snow

96.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	9th	28.2 M	27.1 M	+1.1 M	96.1%
Snow Traction	3rd	2577 N	2619 N	-42 N	98.4%
Snow Handling	11th	58.1 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.2 Km/H	97.98%
Snow Slalom	9th	2.88 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2	95.05%

Comfort

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	11th	66.3 dB	65 dB	+1.3 dB	98.04%

Value

83.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	13th	45050 KM	53000 KM	-7950 KM	85%
Value	8th	9.99 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.67 Price/1000	73.27%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.48 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.71 kg / t	91.63%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

16^th

Toyo Observe Winter Sport 1

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 480.00

The Toyo Observe Winter Sport 1 delivers surprisingly strong performance on wet and dry roads but suffers from significant weaknesses on snow that undermine its credibility as a winter tire. On dry pavement, the tire achieves an impressive second-place finish in braking, while wet braking is also competitive at fourth place. However, the snow performance is deeply concerning—the Toyo finishes dead last among all finalists in snow slalom, braking, handling, and near the bottom in traction. For a tire marketed as a winter sport tire, this failure to deliver adequate snow capability is disqualifying for many buyers. The tire might work for drivers in regions with very mild winters who face mostly wet conditions, but anyone expecting real snow should look elsewhere. The imbalanced performance profile suggests Toyo prioritized dry and wet capability at the expense of winter-specific characteristics, resulting in a tire that fails to meet the core requirements of its category.

Dry

98.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	42.9 M	42.6 M	+0.3 M	99.3%
Dry Handling	11th	114.7 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	98.12%

Wet

97.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	52 M	50.9 M	+1.1 M	97.88%
Wet Handling	5th	82.3 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.1 Km/H	97.51%
Wet Circle	4th	12.17 s	12.04 s	+0.13 s	98.93%
Straight Aqua	8th	76 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	98.32%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	2.53 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2	93.01%

Snow

90.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	20th	29.7 M	27.1 M	+2.6 M	91.25%
Snow Traction	18th	2354 N	2619 N	-265 N	89.88%
Snow Handling	20th	55.3 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-4 Km/H	93.25%
Snow Slalom	20th	2.61 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.42 m/sec2	86.14%

Comfort

94.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	19th	67 dB	65 dB	+2 dB	97.01%

Value

86.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	6th	49820 KM	53000 KM	-3180 KM	94%
Value	5th	9.63 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.31 Price/1000	76.01%
Rolling Resistance	8th	8.65 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+0.88 kg / t	89.83%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

18^th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/C/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 440.00

The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2, as another Continental budget brand alongside Barum, demonstrates respectable dry road performance with decent handling characteristics that feel more car-like than many winter tires. However, this dry-biased behavior creates an unbalanced package with particular weaknesses on wet roads, where performance across handling, braking, and aquaplaning resistance falls short of acceptable standards for safe winter driving. The snow performance is adequate but unremarkable. At approximately €440 per set, it sits in a challenging price position—more expensive than the better-balanced Barum sibling but lacking the performance to justify the premium over that proven budget option. The tire struggles to find a clear identity or target customer, as drivers seeking dry performance would choose sportier options while those prioritizing winter safety would select better wet and snow performers. It represents a compromise that doesn't particularly excel at anything.

Dry

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	17th	46.9 M	42.6 M	+4.3 M	90.83%
Dry Handling	14th	114.4 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-2.5 Km/H	97.86%

Wet

93.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	19th	57.7 M	50.9 M	+6.8 M	88.21%
Wet Handling	19th	80.1 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-4.3 Km/H	94.91%
Wet Circle	20th	12.93 s	12.04 s	+0.89 s	93.12%
Straight Aqua	11th	75.4 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-1.9 Km/H	97.54%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.55 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.17 m/sec2	93.75%

Snow

97.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	28 M	27.1 M	+0.9 M	96.79%
Snow Traction	7th	2537 N	2619 N	-82 N	96.87%
Snow Handling	14th	57.9 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.4 Km/H	97.64%
Snow Slalom	3rd	2.99 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.04 m/sec2	98.68%

Comfort

98.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	15th	66.7 dB	65 dB	+1.7 dB	97.45%

Value

81.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	17th	43990 KM	53000 KM	-9010 KM	83%
Value	9th	10 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+2.68 Price/1000	73.2%
Rolling Resistance	13th	8.9 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.13 kg / t	87.3%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

19^th

Linglong Sport Master Winter

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/A/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 360.00

The Linglong Sport Master Winter from the Chinese manufacturer manages to deliver respectable driving characteristics on both dry and snow-covered roads, showing that emerging brands are improving their winter tire development capabilities. High lateral grip on wet surfaces is another positive attribute. However, the tire is severely let down by extended braking distances on snow—ironic given its winter designation—which create serious safety concerns in the most critical winter driving situation. Overall snow performance beyond straight-line braking is also weaker than established competitors. At approximately €360 per set, it's among the cheapest options from recognized brands, but the snow braking weakness is too significant to overlook, even at this bargain price. The tire might be acceptable for mild-winter regions where snow is rare and quickly cleared, but for actual winter driving conditions, the compromised emergency braking capability makes it impossible to recommend over similarly priced but safer alternatives from established budget brands.

Dry

97.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	44.2 M	42.6 M	+1.6 M	96.38%
Dry Handling	7th	115.2 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	98.55%

Wet

89.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	14th	55.8 M	50.9 M	+4.9 M	91.22%
Wet Handling	18th	80.2 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-4.2 Km/H	95.02%
Wet Circle	17th	12.66 s	12.04 s	+0.62 s	95.1%
Straight Aqua	18th	71.6 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-5.7 Km/H	92.63%
Curved Aquaplaning	20th	2 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.72 m/sec2	73.53%

Snow

93.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	15th	28.7 M	27.1 M	+1.6 M	94.43%
Snow Traction	19th	2341 N	2619 N	-278 N	89.39%
Snow Handling	16th	57.6 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	97.13%
Snow Slalom	14th	2.8 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2	92.41%

Comfort

94.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	6th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	9th	65.9 dB	65 dB	+0.9 dB	98.63%

Value

85.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	11th	46110 KM	53000 KM	-6890 KM	87%
Value	2nd	7.81 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+0.49 Price/1000	93.73%
Rolling Resistance	20th	10.37 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+2.6 kg / t	74.93%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

20^th

Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro

225/40 R18 92V

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 510.00

The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro demonstrates respectable driving performance on dry pavement, maintaining decent handling characteristics and acceptable behavior in clear conditions. However, this Japanese-branded tire (developed by Sumitomo) reveals significant weaknesses where they matter most for winter safety. It shows weaker overall performance on snow with compromised grip and handling, while extended braking distances in both wet and dry conditions raise serious safety concerns. The tire also suffers from particularly rapid wear, resulting in the lowest projected mileage in the entire test—nearly 20,000 kilometers less than the longest-lasting competitors. This accelerated wear makes it extremely expensive over its shortened lifetime despite a mid-range purchase price around €510. The combination of safety compromises and poor durability makes the Falken impossible to recommend, as drivers would face both increased risk and the inconvenience and cost of premature replacement.

Dry

97.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	9th	44.7 M	42.6 M	+2.1 M	95.3%
Dry Handling	4th	116.4 Km/H	116.9 Km/H	-0.5 Km/H	99.57%

Wet

90.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	15th	55.9 M	50.9 M	+5 M	91.06%
Wet Handling	8th	81.6 Km/H	84.4 Km/H	-2.8 Km/H	96.68%
Wet Circle	6th	12.33 s	12.04 s	+0.29 s	97.65%
Straight Aqua	20th	71.1 Km/H	77.3 Km/H	-6.2 Km/H	91.98%
Curved Aquaplaning	19th	2.04 m/sec2	2.72 m/sec2	-0.68 m/sec2	75%

Snow

91.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	19th	29.5 M	27.1 M	+2.4 M	91.86%
Snow Traction	20th	2314 N	2619 N	-305 N	88.35%
Snow Handling	19th	55.7 Km/H	59.3 Km/H	-3.6 Km/H	93.93%
Snow Slalom	19th	2.74 m/sec2	3.03 m/sec2	-0.29 m/sec2	90.43%

Comfort

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	1st	65 dB			100%

Value

66.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wear	20th	33920 KM	53000 KM	-19080 KM	64%
Value	20th	15.04 Price/1000	7.32 Price/1000	+7.72 Price/1000	48.67%
Rolling Resistance	15th	9.03 kg / t	7.77 kg / t	+1.26 kg / t	86.05%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts