Test Publication:
215/55 R17
10 tires
4 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Publication:
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Size:
215/55 R17
Tires Tested:
10 tires
We are very late in the season for this one, so we're not going to write too much on this. For 2022 Auto Zeitung tested ten crossover SUV tire sizes in 215/55 R17 using a Ford Puma.
The excellent testers at AZ were obviously happy with the majority of the tires tested as they gave out seven awards to the top seven tires! It's also worth noting the Continental tire in this test was the ultra low rolling resistance EcoContact 6, not the PremiumContact 6 you'd expect.
Sadly AZ didn't get the chance to do any offroad testing, not that these tires are intended for much offroad use, but if you would like to see how these sorts of tires perform on dirt and grass you can check out the Tire Reviews SUV test here.
Dry
The new Vredestein Ultrac and Maxxis Premitra HP5 led the way in dry braking, in a close set of results.
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Nokian WetProof
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
Dry handling had the Michelin Primacy 4 as the fastest tire around the lap, but with the top nine tires separated by just 0.7 seconds, it was again very close.
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Nokian WetProof
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
Wet
Maxxis also led the way during wet braking, with the Primacy 4 best of the rest.
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Nokian WetProof
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
- Vredestein Ultrac
Vredestein was back at the front in wet handling.
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Nokian WetProof
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Continental EcoContact 6
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
Vredestein also offered the best straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Nokian WetProof
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Continental EcoContact 6
Environment
Unusually there was no fraction of numbers in the noise results.
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
- Nokian WetProof
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- BFGoodrich Advantage
The eco bias Continental EcoContact 6 had much lower rolling resistance than the rest of the tires.
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Michelin Primacy 4
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Vredestein Ultrac
- Nokian WetProof
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
As usual, the Michelin was the most expensive set of tires on test.
- Maxxis Premitra HP5
- Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
- Vredestein Ultrac
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Nokian WetProof
- Yokohama BluEarth GT AE51
- Bridgestone Turanza T005
- Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance
- Continental EcoContact 6
- Michelin Primacy 4
Results
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 is number one in this test. Longitudinal wet grip, cornering, aquaplaning, the key to this success are top scores in all safety-related criteria - regardless of
whether it's raining or the road is dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
36.7 M |
36.2 M |
+0.5 M |
98.64% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
61.8 s |
61.5 s |
+0.3 s |
99.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
46.8 M |
46.5 M |
+0.3 M |
99.36% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
90.1 s |
87.8 s |
+2.3 s |
97.45% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
76.7 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
500 |
350 |
+150 |
70% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.19 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+1.15 kg / t |
84.01% |
Second place for the new Ultrac from Vredestein, which shines in the wet but misses out on overall victory due to long wet braking distances. Good performance overall, especially on dry roads.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36.2 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
61.8 s |
61.5 s |
+0.3 s |
99.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
50.2 M |
46.5 M |
+3.7 M |
92.63% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
87.8 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
80.7 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
450 |
350 |
+100 |
77.78% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.46 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+2.42 kg / t |
71.39% |
Third place for the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, it offered high levels of grip in the wet and dry and also has particularly low noise.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
38 M |
36.2 M |
+1.8 M |
95.26% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
61.6 s |
61.5 s |
+0.1 s |
99.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
46.9 M |
46.5 M |
+0.4 M |
99.15% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
90.3 s |
87.8 s |
+2.5 s |
97.23% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
74.7 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-6 Km/H |
92.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
520 |
350 |
+170 |
67.31% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.19 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+1.15 kg / t |
84.01% |
The Primacy 4 has balanced grip in the dry and wet, focusing on safety qualities rather than dynamic driving.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
37.1 M |
36.2 M |
+0.9 M |
97.57% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
61.5 s |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
46.7 M |
46.5 M |
+0.2 M |
99.57% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
91.7 s |
87.8 s |
+3.9 s |
95.75% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
76.6 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
94.92% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
550 |
350 |
+200 |
63.64% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.36 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+1.32 kg / t |
82.07% |
The Maxxis Premitra 5, which has already won two awards in our tire tests, is highly recommended. In the wet it is extremely grippy and safe, but this comes at the expense of efficiency.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
36.2 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
62 s |
61.5 s |
+0.5 s |
99.19% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
46.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
88.5 s |
87.8 s |
+0.7 s |
99.21% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
79.2 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
98.14% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
350 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
9.15 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+3.11 kg / t |
66.01% |
The Nokian Wetproof is excellent in the wet and solid in the dry. Not a clear recommendation however the limit of wet handling can be tricky.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
36.5 M |
36.2 M |
+0.3 M |
99.18% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
61.9 s |
61.5 s |
+0.4 s |
99.35% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
47.6 M |
46.5 M |
+1.1 M |
97.69% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
90.9 s |
87.8 s |
+3.1 s |
96.59% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
79.7 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
460 |
350 |
+110 |
76.09% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.53 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+2.49 kg / t |
70.81% |
With a top value for rolling resistance, the Continental Eco Contact 6 confirmed its label efficiency rating in seventh place. Grippy in the wet, but significant aquaplaning weaknesses.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
38 M |
36.2 M |
+1.8 M |
95.26% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
61.6 s |
61.5 s |
+0.1 s |
99.84% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
47.5 M |
46.5 M |
+1 M |
97.89% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
94.4 s |
87.8 s |
+6.6 s |
93.01% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
70.9 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-9.8 Km/H |
87.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
530 |
350 |
+180 |
66.04% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
6.04 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
The ZE-310 has safe handling however it has high rolling resistance and average comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
37.4 M |
36.2 M |
+1.2 M |
96.79% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
61.8 s |
61.5 s |
+0.3 s |
99.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
49.2 M |
46.5 M |
+2.7 M |
94.51% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
92.4 s |
87.8 s |
+4.6 s |
95.02% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
79.3 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
400 |
350 |
+50 |
87.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
9.31 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+3.27 kg / t |
64.88% |
The BF Goodrich Advantage struggled in the wet to finish in 9th place.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
37.1 M |
36.2 M |
+0.9 M |
97.57% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
62.2 s |
61.5 s |
+0.7 s |
98.87% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
47.1 M |
46.5 M |
+0.6 M |
98.73% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
94.5 s |
87.8 s |
+6.7 s |
92.91% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
73.6 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-7.1 Km/H |
91.2% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
450 |
350 |
+100 |
77.78% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.36 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+2.32 kg / t |
72.25% |
Bottom in the wet, lacking grip when it matters. The Yokohama BluEarth-GT AE-51 is better in the dry, although there is no connection to the road and the rolling resistance is too high.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
38 M |
36.2 M |
+1.8 M |
95.26% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
62.6 s |
61.5 s |
+1.1 s |
98.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
50.1 M |
46.5 M |
+3.6 M |
92.81% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
97.6 s |
87.8 s |
+9.8 s |
89.96% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
74.4 Km/H |
80.7 Km/H |
-6.3 Km/H |
92.19% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
480 |
350 |
+130 |
72.92% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
7.37 kg / t |
6.04 kg / t |
+1.33 kg / t |
81.95% |