Menu
Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun View Gallery (1)
205-235/40-60 R17-18 4 sizes 2012

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

The Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
85%
Wet Grip
81%
Road Feedback
81%
Handling
82%
Wear
77%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
75%
95 Reviews
80% Average
998,525 miles driven
9 Tests (avg: 11th)
Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
80.5
2x / 4 tests
Dry
62.2
1.8x / 3 tests
Comfort
55
0.32x / 2 tests
Value
53.5
0.42x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
83.7
2 tests
Handling
65.8
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 9
Publications: 4
Period: 2013 - 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 95
Avg Rating: 79.6%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.23
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2020 225/50 R17 7/20 11 metrics
2017 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2017 205/55 R16 7/11 0 metrics
2017 AZ Summer Tire Test Auto Express 2017 215/55 R17 10/10 0 metrics
2016 AMS SUV / 4x4 Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2016 215/60 R17 5/9 0 metrics
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2016 205/55 R16 15/50 0 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 9/18 0 metrics
2015 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R15 11/52 0 metrics
2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2013 215/55 R16 12/12 0 metrics
2013 54 Tire Braking Test 2013 195/65 R15 25/54 0 metrics
9
Tests
11th
Average
5th
Best
25th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
7th/20
Good aquaplaning resistance, good wet handling, short dry braking.
Weak lateral stability and understeer in the dry.
2017 AZ Summer Tire Test
215/55 R17 • 2017
10th/10
Good resistance to aquaplaning, acceptable handling on dry surfaces
The longest braking distance on wet surfaces, long braking distance on dry surfaces
7th/11
Size Fuel Wet Noise
17 inch
215/50R17 91 W C B 71
215/60R17 96 H C B 71
205/55R17 91 V C B 71
18 inch
235/40R18 95 W XL C B 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun >>

Questions and Answers for the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Ask a question
February 20, 2017

Are these tires directional please.

The Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun is an asymmetric tire
October 18, 2017

Is this the same tire as the ZE914'A' Ecorun? There are various sellers of this tire and there seem to be many differing descriptions, including one with SO as a suffix. What is going on with this tire? Personally I think that the VW/AUDI group are claiming it as their own!!

ZE914A is OEM version of the tire. No difference between ZE914 and Ecorun.
October 19, 2017

If they are the same, what accounts for their different ratings. The ecorun scores worse than the predecessor. Although the ZE914A has better economy wet grip and noise levels. Anomaly?

Mid life updates and OE requirements can change how a tire behaves during the EU label testing, if that's the scoring you're referring to.
July 24, 2023

I have 2 of these tires in my garage and would like to know whether they will be safe to use as I changed them to all weather M&S tires not long after buying a new car due to the harsh winters in the north of England. I am thinking of fitting them back onto my car now but they are now 8 years old (week 10 of 2015). Would this be a bad idea with the age of them? Bearing in mind that Michelin and Continental say you should change tires at a maximum of 10 years. They have been in dry dark conditions and for the first few years of storage I did turn them regularly (Not much later) They show no signs of aging and they have no cracking etc. Just wondered if you could help me decide.

Unfortunately I have to follow the industry guidelines and recommend 5 years use + 2 years if stored correctly as maximum life. There are however plenty of tires in use which are older.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
Available in 5 tire sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 81 user reviews

Most drivers find the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun to be a strong value touring tire with confident dry grip, solid wet stability for normal driving, predictable handling, and generally even, long wear for many users. Noise and ride harshness are common complaints, and several mid/low-scoring reviews report wet grip and braking deteriorating as tread wears (around 4-5 mm) and occasional early wear. Steering feel is often described as firm/stiff rather than plush. Overall sentiment is positive, with the tire suiting everyday and spirited road use at a good price.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip (when new/normal driving)
  • Handling stability
  • Value/price
  • Wear longevity (for many users)
Areas for Improvement
  • Road noise
  • Ride harshness
  • Wet grip/braking deterioration as they wear

Top 3 Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Reviews

Given 56% while driving a Toyota Corolla T Sport E12 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 15,000 average miles
Not impressed by these tires, they show a lot of wear after just 10k kilometers. They are somewhat noisy on highways, not terrible but noticeable. On dry they perform well, on wet road they don´t fell that stable. Considering that I had ones with W speed rating - I can´t imagine driving them over 160km/h they feel like average touring tire, definitely not suitable for sporty ride.
April 15, 2025
Given 91% while driving a Toyota Premio (205/55 R16) on mostly motorways for 10,000 average miles
What an amazing rubber.

Road grip is absolutely insane, and handles like rubber is sticking with the road at speeds over 160KMH.

Makes my 18 years old Toyota Premio drive SUPER STRONG.
January 18, 2025
Given 94% while driving a Mercedes Benz Vito (225/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 30 average miles
I have had these tires for about 3 years. I estimate I've travelled 50,000+ km's.
I'm now due to replace all 4
We have done done quite a few 2,000 k'm trips on good quality highways. The tires were excellent in wet and dry and hard braking.
We have always felt safe driving with these tires.
For me, personally, the steering is always the most important. The only issue I've had has been a screw in the front driver side tire. Still, the tire has held firm. Thus why I'm now replacing all 4 as the wear mark is also approaching. This is my 2nd set and I'm definitely considering these again
Sometimes, it's worth paying a 'little more' knowing the quality is never compromised
Tires have always been 'noise free' and the ride has been very comfortable. Vito's are a good ride anyway
I bought this Vito with 199,000 and some Chinese tires, they were very noisy and a little loose on roundabouts and 90' corners.
The Falken have always handled well.
I am very satisfied with this brand and tire design.
I would definitely recommend them and, No, I'm not on the payroll Ha ha. I am an average road user and bought this Vito in 2016
I am currently upto 291,000 km's
The tire wear has been even right across the tread pattern. I hope this helps other drivers.
I have also carried motorcycles in the rear and again, the drive was easy.
September 4, 2024

How would you rate the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 50% while driving a Toyota Corolla (225/40 R18) on for 2,000 miles
I have had these tires on 3 different Toyota Corolla TS, this is their stock tire, first time I left them on for about 6 months, which was about 6500 miles, as I was loathe to swap them for something nicer until I had put some wear on them, the second and third time (I swapped my 2022 Corolla TS for a 2025 Corolla TS 3 weeks ago) I changed them within the month, less than 1000 miles, as I cannot stand the constant cabin noise from these tires.

Short version, horrible tire, the cabin noise is honestly just outrageous, harsh ride, and doesn't really cope well with the pock marked roads, and if you give it a bit of spirited drive, they 'scrub' on the edge, noticeably, and quite honestly these tires just do not suit the car at all.

Do not be fooled with the 68db rating, this is the drive by noise, which is probably quite close, as most of the noise apparently ends up in the cabin, and make sure you check the pressures too, because Toyota and tire places always over inflate them, which makes these tires even more harsh sounding and gives a rough ride on and lots of surfaces. Also, do not be fooled by the EcoRun name, these tires are not actually that great for fuel economy, C rated, there are lots of tires with a better fuel rating, and they are also not the greatest tires for wet conditions, B rated, and they behave mostly ok in the wet, nothing special, but to be honest, for a car that comes in just short of £40k these tires are a joke when there are so many other better tires for similar money that do a far better job in every aspect than these tires.
I have mixed driving so lots of city/town driving, where they are mostly quietish when just pootling about under 30MPH, which is probably why so many cabbies keep them on, country driving, which is a bit more spirited, and motorway driving, and they are invasive and noisy on all but the smoothest of roads, as long as you are going in a straight line, and even then they are noticeable, and on any other road surface, bring on the rumble at various levels.

I have swapped them on my latest Corolla, as I did on my previous Corolla, for Michelin CC3 Sports, quieter, nicer drive and ride, use slightly less fuel, cope better with the rubbish roads we have here in the UK and they cope so so much better in the cold, aka < 7C, not just when it is snowing, the difference is instantly noticeable.

I would not recommend the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun to anyone, there is no getting away from the fact these are mid grade tires at best, yet with an almost premium grade price, which is crazy really, so just leave them on the car as long as you can live with them and then swap them for a tire that suits your needs and wants, you wont be disappointed, as long as you pick the pick the right tire for your car and driving requirements, you will be amazed at how much quieter your car cabin sounds, there are a ton of great tires that will out perform these tires in pretty much all areas, and will do it quieter job of it too, some are even cheaper than the Falkens or if you can afford it, just pay the extra and get a real premium grade tire.
February 23, 2026
Given 58% while driving a Toyota Corolla (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 7,600 average miles
My 2023 Toyota Corolla came factory-fitted with Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun tires, and after 7,500 miles, they’ve proven to be solid everyday performers with a few compromises.

Ride & Noise: Comfort is good, with the tires soaking up bumps well. However, they’re a bit noisy, especially on coarse asphalt or at motorway speeds.

Grip & Traction: Dry and wet grip are predictable and safe for normal driving. When accelerating hard from a standstill, the traction control activated twice, showing these tires prioritise efficiency over strong off-the-line grip.

Handling & Braking: Handling is neutral with slightly muted steering feel. Braking performance is consistent and confidence-inspiring.

Economy & Wear: After 7,500 miles, tread wear is even and fuel economy is slightly improved thanks to the tire’s low rolling resistance.
November 10, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 91% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (235/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Initially, this was one of the three tires selected for replacement. Initially, some YOKOHAMA tires were installed. They weren't bad, offering good grip and safety, but they weren't suitable for the speed. They were 103V, and the vehicle originally uses 107V. After much consideration at the retailer, I decided to install the FALKEN tires, made in Thailand. Initial handling was a bit odd; they felt unsafe. In the water, they also felt slippery, but they didn't...

...then on the highway at 140 kph, they felt smooth and pleasant, with good grip and quiet. Then, increasing speed to see how they handled corners, 160 kph and 200 kph were great, with smooth and perfect grip. No need to brake before entering the corners, and being able to change lanes while cornering without slowing down. Brilliant grip.

Perfect AquaPlanning. Even in large puddles or pools, there was no sensation of any sudden jumps or movements; it was as if the water was not there. Great again.

I have used HANKOOK (very good but very noisy), TRACMAX (they deform with impacts and present alignment problems), CONTINENTAL (good but they don't last long).

Off-road, the FALKENs feel good. Low noise and normal grip at normal speeds.
September 28, 2025
Given 56% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Good tire overall but has bad road noise after using for a year (around 20000KMs)
Grip is ok
September 6, 2023
Given 66% while driving a Alfa Romeo GT 2.0 JTS (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
it is a reasonably priced tire they are comfortable and long-lasting the wear is good as well. it is quite an understeer-prone tire in the dry and it doesn't grip as well as a Michelin ps5 or a Pirelli P-zero but it's still acceptable they get worse if you warm them up for some reason I don't recommend these for sporty drivers but for a normal commuter car these are good, especially for the price
April 12, 2023
Given 90% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 700 average miles
Got these recently, put them to the test on a road trip with different grades of tarmac in Kenya. Great handling, wet braking is a bit shaky but tires stick to the road overall especially factoring in the price. Let's see how they fare on.
March 30, 2023
Given 73% while driving a Toyota Corolla (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
The falken drive rather well for a relativly cheap tire. Had them fitted from the factory on my 2020 Corolla Hybrid. however it's performance isn't to be compared with a Premium tire. The tires provided a good amount of grip in dry and wet weather. While braking bringing the car to a good stop without slipping. even on the colder days. The road feedback is also good, it feels more like a sporty tire with good feedback, a tad heavier steering. This however mean it does not give the best comfort. Also don't let the "Ecorun" label fool you, this tire has a rather high resistance and isn't really economical on the fuel. The biggest downsides for me were, that it's rather noisy inside the cabin and can provide a harsh ride when the road gets bad. They seem to hold up pretty well against wear. Overall for it's price, it's a pretty good tire! But would not recommendid over a Premium tire like Goodyear, Pirelli...
December 20, 2022
Given 54% while driving a Nissan Juke (215/55 R17) on mostly town for 8,000 average miles
i cant complain about any aspect of the tires performance in typical british conditions however as for wear, i purchased 4 in august 2021 and do mainly town driving with occasional motorway driving (once a month) and the front tires have virtually worn out at just 8000 miles, ive contacted falken hq in germanyboth in february 2022 and again in march 2022 but have not even had the curtesy of a reply. ive purchased budget/ecconomy radial tires before for previous cars and got at least 18 months approx 20,000 miles out of a front set of tires so i cant recommend these tires for financial reason alone.
March 4, 2022
Given 74% while driving a Toyota Raize (215/55 R18) on mostly town for 30 easy going miles
Just change my continental uc6 with this falken, suprisingly its very comfort to handle road bump. The Noise still there but not worse like UC6. Other performace grip & handling cant say much because i only ride 50km from delers.
January 22, 2022
Given 66% while driving a Volkswagen Mk7 Golf 1.4 Tsi 150hp ACT (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Quiet for a tire with some performance aspirations. Useful upgrade in wet and dry performance and handling compared to a good "touring tire". Steering response not significantly different from a touring tire. Quite a lot of squeal when pushed hard in the dry, with progressive breakaway. Wearing evenly and reasonably. I expect to get at least 20k miles out of these (to be swapped front-to-back once, soon). Bump thump (ride) though is significantly worse than the touring tires I used to run on this car. More like that of a high performance tire, than a "mild" performance tire in this respect. Great price without compromise in quality. No significant change noticed in rolling resistance compared to my previous set of Bridgestone eco touring tires, so probably OK in this respect.
November 30, 2021
Given 72% while driving a Audi A6 Avant 3.2 Quattro (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 average miles
I bought my Falkens second hand in New Zealand for $450NZD (about $300 USD). They were in nearly new condition, and the previous owner was selling them because they were too heavy for his liking. Once I fitted them to the car, I didn't immediately notice a difference from my other tires (Bridgestone Potenza Re003, 225 50 r17, and Pirelli Dragon sports and Firestones in 245 40 r18 - I have two sets of wheels). I've done about 10,000km or 6000 miles. In general, they seem to be pretty decent all-rounders, especially considering the price. I generally drive pretty gently but I do enjoy using the car a bit on a nice twisty road, and in a 2 ton plus car, the tires take a proper beating. I've noticed the tires get louder as they get warmer, and if you go through a corner a little faster than usual (though not thrashing it), you'll hear them get louder. They'll eventually start squealing, long before they actually lose traction. It's kind of annoying on really smooth quiet asphalt where you can push the car a little through a corner at a speed you know is perfectly safe for the tires, yet they start getting quite loud. Luckily my car, being an A6, has plenty of sound insulation. In the wet, again, I have no fears when it comes to cornering. I haven't had a chance to really push them and see where they slip up (I have Quattro so it's not easy to find corners where that's easy and safe to do), but they seem to hold their own relatively well - I've noticed no major downfalls in that regard from my other tires). I really can't comment on braking because I rarely get into situations where I need to brake hard, but I have no concerns at this point if they're at the right pressure (for my car, around 40ish psi). Wear again, I can't really comment on much as I've only done 10,000km, but in that time I think they've definitely reduced in tread. Where I live, we go through tires very quickly because of the nature of our roads (hilly, windy(corner-y), bumpy, chip seal, etc). Would I buy again? Yeah, I would definitely at that price point. Brand new, I'm not sure how much they'll set you back, but second hand, nearly new, I think I got a pretty good deal.
May 27, 2021
Given 97% while driving a Peugeot 208 1.2VTi (205/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
I´m From Chile, in my country we have many irregular roads, (great highways, average roads in city, anothers whit bumps, and roads whit gravel and dirt) this tires, are amazing in all tracks, when put on in my peugeot, the tires NEVER lost preassure. before this tires, i wear Michellin EcoSaver, really good, but, for the irregular roads in Chile, The Michelin tires are damage very fast. I Recomend this Falken Ziex 914 EcoRun Sorry my english, but it's not my native lenguaje.
November 4, 2020
Rate the Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun