Menu
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 View Gallery (1)
195-285/55-80 R15-19 32 sizes 2021

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Hankook Tires All Terrain and Off Road All Season

The Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
89%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
74%
Handling
75%
Wear
86%
Comfort
88%
Buy again
82%
Snow Grip
43%
Ice Grip
33%
15 Reviews
72% Average
262,102 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 4th)
Updated January 2026
Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10

Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10

All Season Premium
BETA
7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 26 Jun 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2017
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 15
Avg Rating: 72.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tire Test Drive Out 2017 265/65 R17 4/7 0 metrics
All Tests
View Test Results
1
Tests
4th
Average
4th
Best
4th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tire Test
265/65 R17 • 2017
4th/7
View Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
235/75R15 109 T XL D D 72
17 inch
265/65R17 112 T D D 72
265/65R17 112 T B D 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10

Ask a question
What is the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 most commonly carries EU label ratings of D for fuel efficiency, D for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
Has the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 been replaced?
The Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 has been replaced by the Hankook Dynapro AT2.
What sizes does the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 come in?
The Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 is available in 32 sizes, ranging from 195-285/55-80 R15-19.
Q and A (1)
November 10, 2017

Please what is the ply rating on the hankook RF10 tires I can't find it anywhere.

Unfortunately we're unsure on the ply of the RF10. If you email Hankook support they should be able to help.

Top 3 Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 Reviews

Given 43% while driving a Ford (265/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 7 average miles
2022 Ford Ranger 4X4 - OEM tires supplied when the truck was on the assembly line.
We just returned from a 2,500 km trip over the Rockies and back in early December. Temperatures ranged from +12°C to -6°C. It rained, it snowed, it was sunny and icy. These tires .... In fresh snow, we slid 200' stopping. On ice which is bad close to 0°C; they are unreliable. This is a trip we have made perhaps 20 times; it was the scariest trip I've ever had in 50 years. On wet pavement; they often lose traction coming off the lights even at medium throttle.
They had 10,000 km when the trip began; now at 12,500 km. Going East; the box was empty; returning we had ~400 lbs in the back which should have helped with traction - NOT. I've done this trip in a 2-wheel drive F-150 with no problems.
Helpful 904
January 12, 2024
Given 34% while driving a GMC Sierra 2500HD (285/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 35 average miles
Truly the second worst tire I have ever owned. Put on a 2003 GMC 2500HD. Drove 35,000 miles on them and that was a stretch. Would not grip on wet pavement. I would get stuck in the yard on flat pavement they were so bad! Would avoid snow because they would slide everywhere.
Would never buy this tire again!
Helpful 872
February 11, 2024
Initial Impressions Review
Toyota Landcruiser (225/45 R17) on for 60,000 miles
Good tires, had them 10 years. 60k . Not issues.
Helpful 181
January 2, 2026

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10? Rate the tires you actually drive — and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10?
I drive something else — review any tire →
148 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Nissan 2002 patrol (255/65 R17) on mostly country roads for 40,000 miles
40000 miles on a set
Helpful 959
May 24, 2019
Given 97% while driving a Ford Ranger (235/75 R15) on mostly country roads for 20,000 average miles
Excellent tires at reasonable price. Performed better than Goodriches and General Grabbers I had previously. Very good off road and in snow. Have ordered a set for my new Isuzu 4x4 pickup.
Helpful 912
July 21, 2018
Given 87% while driving a Ford Ranger (255/70 R16 T) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
I got these tires as BF Goodrich were way out of my price range I had them fitted back in December of 2017 and it has been a very good purchase compared to the continental Tires it had from new the tires give great grip and I have never had the back end slip out once with the Hankook Tires compared to the continental tires which made me choose to change from a road tire to an all-terrain tire to be fair I have taken an increase in fuel consumption but it is so small its negligible to me but if you need a good all round all terrain tire then this tire sits in my top 3 good ATT's for its price
Helpful 964
June 2, 2018
Suzuki grand vitara (235/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 50 spirited miles
Excellent tires. Vehicle Suzuki Grand Vitara. On my second set of tires now. Got 80,000 Kms out of the first set. Used off road 10% of the time. Good in mud,sand, on road, off road. I live in the upper North Island of New Zealand and have tried various types of tire on this vehicle over the years. They are the best tire compromise for on road and off road driving I have ever owned. Only let down is the purchase cost! I haven't driven them in snow as it doesn't snow here. They can, in extreme off road driving be vulnerable to side wall damage. I have had a rail line go through one tire and large screwdriver go through another. These were both hidden in grass off road.
Helpful 638
January 4, 2018
Given 90% while driving a Hyundai Terracan (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
I've been use on my Hyundai Terracan 31/10,50/15 RF10's since 2016 winter. Used on dry,wet and snow. Great tires,these are very silent even 31".
Helpful 637
December 6, 2017
Given 93% while driving a Kia Motors Sorento XS (245/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 45,000 spirited miles
Had these on my Sorento for the last 4 years.brilliant tire,never feel anything but safe,even in torrential rain. Laugh at snow,and I don`t mean an inch or so,ploughed through a good 7-8 inches without the slightest of trouble. Only problem with them is that they are not available in a size for the Navara i`ve just replaced the Sorento with.
Helpful 665
August 5, 2016
Given 91% while driving a Suzuki Jimny (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 50,000 average miles
I've run these tires on my Suzuki SJ and then moved them on to my Jimny. They are a fantastic tire - great on the motorway, incredible grip through the lanes and have never let me down on mud or snow. I reckon they've done at least 50,000 miles and there's still 4/5mm of tread left. I've looked around and nothing comes close for the money (in my opinion). Just about to order another set to be ready for the winter. M.H-E
Helpful 591
September 22, 2014
Given 81% while driving a Land Rover Discovery 2 (255/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 7,000 average miles
very good tire, disco's and range rovers are great critics of tires, anything wrong with your tire choice and they will let you know. This tire is quiet grippy dry & wet and long wearing.
Helpful 708
April 16, 2014
Given 100% while driving a Nissan 2002 patrol (315/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 10 spirited miles
these are on my 2002 Nissan patrol 3.0 tdi uses a bit more diesel being so big (eg 315/75/r16 = 35")but they look good and drive great even on these uneven damaged roads here in Christchurch new Zealand
Helpful 693
February 12, 2014
Given 79% while driving a Nissan Navara 2.5tdi (245/45 R16) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
only had them on for 3 months when a small stick went through the sidewall on one of my back tires , had to throw it away and buy a new one ,, am thinking that maybe the sidewall is very thin ?? would love some feedback from anyone that's had a similar problem ..
Helpful 1056
September 28, 2013
Given 91% while driving a Suzuki Jimny (205/70 R15 T) on mostly country roads for 20,000 easy going miles
excelent tires. right up there with the top names in every aspect. great allrounder and at a reasonable price. for most users this is as good as it gets. wet, dry, snow, winter or summer these tires will see you safely home.
Helpful 638
October 23, 2011
Which tires do you drive?
Driving the Hankook DynaPro ATM RF10?
No — review a different tire →
Rate your tires