Menu

Falken Wildpeak A/T4W

The Falken Wildpeak A/T4W offers increased offroad capabilities thanks to new staggered shoulder blocks, three ply DURASPEC sidewall technology to improve toughness, an improved towing performance and up to a 65,000 mile tread warranty. The A/T4W is also 3PMS severe-snow-rated, offering performance in harsh winter conditions through full-depth sipes.

8.2
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
65%
Handling
69%
Wear
88%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
83%
Snow Grip
63%
Ice Grip
45%
10 Reviews
74% Average
99,500 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Falken Wildpeak AT4W

Falken Wildpeak AT4W

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
8.2 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
100
0.32x / 2 tests
Value
100
0.42x / 1 test
Off road
98.1
0.68x / 2 tests
Dry
85.5
1.5x / 4 tests
Wet
76.4
1.93x / 4 tests
Ice
49
0.84x / 2 tests
Snow
40.8
1.38x / 8 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
64.8
10 tests
Braking
59.4
5 tests
Traction
45.2
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 1
Period: 2024 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 10
Avg Rating: 73.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.73
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
The Best All Terrain Tires For Winter 2025 Tested Tire Reviews 2025 265/70 R17 5/6 7 metrics
The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025 Tire Reviews 2024 35x12.5R17 1/5 16 metrics

Videos

I Tested the Best All Terrain Tires in the Snow and Ice! ❄️

I Tested the Best All Terrain Tires in the Snow and Ice! ❄️

I Tested the BEST All Terrain Tires in the Dry, Wet, Snow, and Dirt!

I Tested the BEST All Terrain Tires in the Dry, Wet, Snow, and Dirt!

Awards
Test Winner
The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025
2024 · 35x12.5R17
2
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
5th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
The Falken Wildpeak AT4W. finishes a disappointing last place. We've now seen in multiple tests that the LT version at least, has given up some snow performance to get that improved wear resistance over the AT3W. This means it is the only tire of this test I would not rush to use in the winter, but I plan to test all of these and more in the dry, wet and offroad next year, I'm I'm sure the AT4W will shine there.
1st/5
The Falken AT4W delivered the best overall driving experience with excellent on-road comfort, minimal noise, and predictable handling. It had the shortest dry braking distance and offered the most compliant, confidence-inspiring handling both off-road and in wet conditions.
Snow performance was the AT4W's weak point, finishing last in both snow braking and handling tests. While it had good off-road grip, it couldn't quite match the BFGoodrich's absolute traction levels.
As the newest tire in the test, the AT4W showcased modern all-terrain tire development with class-leading refinement and strong all-round performance. Combined with the best value rating thanks to its 60,000-mile warranty, it earned the overall test win despite its snow performance shortcomings.

Questions and Answers for the Falken Wildpeak AT4W

Ask a question
September 14, 2025

The Falken Wildpeak AT4W tire is available in 225/75 R 16C 116 R. It would be excellent for camper vans and motorhomes, which require this type of tire.<br><Br> Thank you for your response.

The good news is that the AT4/W is manufactured in 225/75 R16C 121/120R. The bad news is I'm unsure of its European availability, but you can currently buy it in the US market.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 10 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W highly for excellent off-road traction, confident dry grip, and better-than-expected wet performance, along with low noise and solid comfort for an all-terrain. Several owners also praise its treadwear and easy balancing. A minority report inconsistent winter capability-especially traction and braking on ice and slushy city streets-prompting some to use dedicated winter tires. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with small tradeoffs depending on size and pressure.

Strengths
  • Off-road traction
  • Wet grip (for an at)
  • Treadwear/longevity
  • Low noise/comfortable ride
  • On-road stability/handling
Areas for Improvement
  • Inconsistent snow and ice traction/braking (slush and icy roads)

Top 3 Falken Wildpeak AT4W Reviews

Given 38% while driving a Nissan 2002 patrol (265/70 R18) on mostly motorways for 3,000 easy going miles
I bought these tires from a dealer in starbuck mb and they told me they would be better in snow and ice than my geolander all weather tires had been. Well that was a big lie these tires are not good in snow and ice i have had all season radials that were better than these. I am driving along the other day on white ice on the highway with a strong wind. The tires are so poor that my titan was blowing sideways that is down right dangerous it took me in a store parking lot 50 feet to stop in slushy snow from 15 mph. if you need good tires for winter don't buy these I am not sure how they can have the mountain peak snow symbol
December 23, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Jeep Rengade (265/70 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Rides a lot like the AT3 but just seems a bit smoother. Excellent offroad, they've taken some abuse.
August 12, 2024
Given 87% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (265/70 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Very good in the wet for an all terrain, good offroad, love the aggressive look
September 11, 2024

How would you rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Falken Wildpeak AT4W Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 85% while driving a Ford Ranger (225/75 R15) on for 1,500 miles
I've owned my 2007 Ford Ranger Sport for about 4 years now and the previous tires were truck/suv highway type. I was looking to replace them because they were absolutely horrible in the wet and snow. My ranger would ALWAYS lose traction on wet painted crosswalks, even at normal acceleration, and would take longer than I liked to recover. I don't do any off road driving and wanted the Michelin CrossClimate 2 because I put them on my daughter's Ford Escape and they performed above and beyond in Fargo and Duluth winters. But the CC2 doesn't come in the right size for my Ranger and all of the light truck street/highway tires rated poorly in wet and snow. In desperation I looked into the AT tire world and found many reviews that gave the WP AT4 high marks in wet and snow. The first rain shower after I put them on, I went looking for my crosswalk nemesis and was extremely pleased. No loss of traction at normal acceleration and when I punched it to force traction loss, traction was regained as soon as I cleared the paint. We've had several snow falls and some ice already this winter and I've had good experience. When I hit the gas a little too hard on a turn and start a fishtail, the tires grab again as soon as I let off the gas. I hit a patch of ice at the end of my block one morning and the tires and anitlock brakes kept me from sliding into the intersect for the first time since I bought my truck. On dry pavement, they are louder and ride more trucky, but I soon got used to it. Overall, my early impression is that I made a good choice.
January 11, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 84% while driving a Ford F 150 (295/75 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
The actual size of my tires are 35x11.5r17 in a C load range. I upgraded from a 285/70r17 at4w in a Passenger load range. When I upgraded to the 285's the performance gain over the goodyear wrangler duratracs I had was immense. They cornered better, had less noise, held a balance much better, and had much better traction in the wet. The 35's did not have a gain or loss in performance in dry performance at all, but the wet traction is slightly worse. The only negative I have for the bigger tires is they felt a little lazy on turn in but I fixed that by bumping the pressures up just a little. All of these tires were on a 2021 f150 that is lifted 2inches in the front 1 in in the rear, and has a steeda rear sway bay. It is worth noting that the duratracs had 30k miles and had 9-10/32nds inch of tread (16 new) and the 285 falkens had 20k miles and had 11/32 inch tread (no idea new) and the 35's only have 6k miles on them so far.
December 31, 2025
Initial Impressions Review
Given 57% while driving a Toyota 4Runner (265/70 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 easy going miles
I bought the new a/t4w based of how the older a/t3w was reviewed of how it performed in the snow. I wanted an all terrain tire that lasted long and did well for many types of driving conditions. The a/t4w's do well in dry road and off conditions. Their wet road performance is acceptable. they are quite and comfortable on the road as well. The snow and ice performance is where they lack a lot. For a 3 peak mountain snow rated tire, and the previous models ratings I was very disappointed in these tires. Falken advertises these tires as being engineered for severe winter conditions. They really missed the mark on that. If you live in a dry warm climate, these tires would do well. If you have all the seasons and expect them to do well on snowy slippery roads I would look else where. Unfortunately I will be replacing these tires due to poor snow and ice performance after only 15,000 miles,
December 28, 2025
Given 79% while driving a Lexus GX460 (265/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 15,000 average miles
Dry and wet grip feel good in my use which is mainly long highway stretches but with plenty of medium speed curvy back roads. I run them on my 2013 Lexus GX460. Have not had opportunity to test in snow or ice as of yet. Off road grip has been great with that mostly being loose gravel, soft dirt, and some mud/water crossings typically with rock bottoms. Wear has been very good in my experience so far with about 15,000 miles on them yet. I expect they will last to about 60,000 at the rate they are going however I will likely swap before making it that far. Previous tires I can compare to on this vehicle are Michelin primacy A/S and Toyo AT3. Compared to the Toyos, wear and handling are improved as well as needing less weight to be in balance. Comfort leans to the Toyo but it is close.
December 10, 2025
Given 89% while driving a Toyota Land cruiser prado (255/80 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
I use the WildPeak AT4w as my primary off-road tire on a Land Cruiser 250 (Prado). The tires are reasonably comfortable and responsive in daily driving and on long road trips, but really shine when I air them down and take them off-road on rocky mountain trails. I'm very pleased with the NVH characteristics of the WildPeak AT4w - they are louder than the OEM road tires, but not excessively so. Since the tires need to be at 39 psi on road, the ride can be a little harsh over bigger on road impacts (like pot holes and expansion joints.) I chose the AT4w in part to get a true 33" tire in a narrower width for better grip on rocky terrain. In my experience on dirt, rock, and sand, I found the grip to be excellent even in wet conditions. Excellent off-road and above average on road. If you aren't planning to use these on dirt, rock, sand, or mud, then you'd probably be better off finding a more road focused AT tire. The pic shows how well the tires conformed over rocky terrain aired down to around 20 psi.
December 10, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Nissan Frontier (265/75 R16) on mostly motorways for 10,000 easy going miles
I have the AT4Ws mounted up to my 2015 Nissan Frontier King Cab Pro4X 6spd and they are my first new set of tires on this truck. These tires have been on the truck for 16,000 km now and have been rotated twice, with the rears crossed forwards and the fronts moved straight back. When new, these had 14/32nds of an inch of tread, and they currently have 13/32nds across the entire tread. I drive very gently with no hard acceleration, braking, or turning so these tires were never subject to high forces which may explain the minimal wear. The AT4Ws give me unlimited confidence in the dry, leave me unfazed in the wet, and unconcerned in the snow. I have occasionally taken my truck into the dirt and mud on light trails and never faced difficulty. However, when comparing it to the Hakka R3s I have on my SUV, the snow braking can definitely be improved hence the 7 rating.
December 1, 2025
Given 74% while driving a Ford Bronco (285/70 R17) on a combination of roads for 23,000 easy going miles
As an AT4W owner with 37k KM's (now at roughly 16/32mm of treadlife left), I have a set of LT 285/70/17 on a 2DR Bronco and some days they exceed my expectations and others fall short. I've driven around Ontario, out east around PEI and Nova Scotia, down south through Michigan and Chicago so I've driven them in all elements. For example, driving through a Michigan blizzard, Northern Ontario back-road snow and ice, I felt remarkably comfortable, but city turning in the fall after it's been raining for an hour? I look like "that guy" throwing my back end out or driving through a larger than expected puddle of water, it gets floaty.

I wished I could have gotten a set of AT3W's based on how well they were received, but the AT4W's don't live up to my expectations as a year round tire. Because Ontario gets all 4 seasons, I'll probably end up using these for warm springs/Summer and get a dedicated winter. Perhaps the P-rated spec would've been a better choice for me because of the LT's harder compound and lack of wet performance but I'm not sure.

Pros:
Comfortable
Dead quiet for an AT tire
Deep Snow / Dry Pavement
Off Road
Doesn't throw rocks nearly as bad as the Bridgestone Dueler AT's

Cons:
Wet / Slush
Freezing cold "dry" pavement (-10 to -30 Celcius)

Overall generally impressed with the AT4W's, disappointed in its city winter/wet performance but back roads year-round the AT4W excels. This is my first set of 3PMS AT Tire, so I don't have an AT baseline to compare to. Finally, I'd give them a 7.5/10 based on its warm weather performance, off-road capability and deep snow confidence but deductions in wet performance and predictability/confidence.
November 11, 2025
Rate the Falken Wildpeak AT4W