Tires were handling fine although I haven't tried other tires with this vehicle. Wear was extreme!! Totally worn out after 29000 km under mild driving behaviour and not a particularly high load.

Was very disappointed to find VW had fitted these tires to my new 2024 Caddy. Handled ok in wet and dry conditions. Drove across some level grass outside a job and got stuck on the flat. Even worse in snow, had no confidence taking it out if there’s a chance of snow. Changed the tires after 7000 miles. I would never recommend these tires

I drove about 7.000 miles on for my 2024 vw T-cross . I do not understand why vw use this tire especially turning the corner is nightmare with that tire also comfort is bad . My car was not sport car or I can not say I have driven in high speed corners but anyway even for b suv I can not advice .It does not safe me at all . Please vw spend some money for tire .

Have YOU got experience with the Giti GitiSynergyH2? Help millions of other tire buyers

Review your Giti GitiSynergyH2 >

In February 2024 I acquired a new vw Caddy 5 for my company, to my great surprise it was equipped with this brand of GITI tires that I have never heard before, knowing that my partner acquired the same vehicle in October 2023 but which was equipped with Hankook Ventus Prime 4 tires, I used his vehicle for 5 months until receiving my vehicle. With Hankook tires, I did not encounter any problem in behavior on the highway whether on dry or wet, even at high speeds 180-190 km / h and in bends, the vehicle was perfectly stable with good road holding. Unfortunately, upon receiving my vehicle fitted with GITI Synergy H2 tires, I felt a great deal of discomfort and a painful effort in controlling the vehicle on the highway, especially at speeds above 130 km/h, until one day, in order to avoid a flying MDF plate, I almost lost control of the vehicle, which slid the rear wheels at 140 km/h, and on dry roads, I needed nerves of steel to countersteer several times at this speed and get back on track. After this incident, I plan to get rid of these dreadful tires, which are already less than 30,000 km away. I think that the manufacturer VW has regressed a lot in the quality of its vehicles and doesn't care about fitting anything.

I have them for only 3000km on my Subaru Legacy 2.0 and they are great. They are more than great on the wet surfaces and this is the most crucial of a tire for my opinion as in the dry most of them are perfect. If you want more... I am not so sure yet. I had in my car Falken 310 and Hankook ventus prime 3 and they are better than both of them. I have no say about how they will handle time and wear. The Hankooks were better than Falken in general (even if the falken was more a handling tire). My only problem with tme was that they were V speed rated and I wanted H but the merchandiser in Greece didn't import the V rated version.
I will get back after 15000 km.

Quite an uncanny tire... It grips in wet like an expensive tire, and on dry like a budget tire but still doesn't compromise on safety. As closely good to Michelin XM2 I used before. It is slightly noisy and high rolling resistance BUT only on the first 1000km-ish I noticed. After it has break-in it is smooth and quieter. Have driven 8000+ KMs and the tread level is still at 85% more or less with calm driving. Definitely looks like a long lasting tires. No complains for its price.

I’m very surprised by the way the tire performs on wet weathers. Give me a lot of confidence driving on wet roads. Dry grip is surprisingly quite normal as what you would expect from its price point. Ain’t that noisy a tire as I’ve used nosier ones before. It’s acceptable for me.

I have these giti synergy h2 215/55/17on a brand new Ford tourneo 2023
These are the worst tires I have ever experienced in noise levels
Every imperfection on the road is heard very boomy
Comfort isn’t the best either AVOID!
Looking to change to Michelin crossclimate 2

Bought these to replace a mix of Goodyear and Michelin economy offerings that came fitted to my car. Early days yet, so can't comment on wear, but so far I'm very pleased with them. Can't really tell the difference except they may be a little noisier. Driven sensibly on a mix of town roads and motorways. No issues in the wet as I've had with el cheapo ditchfinders in the past. For a double 'A' rated tire at £93 per corner fully fitted, they seem good value for money.

very n5t very noisey out of 10- 7

Have these fitted to a Peugeot 5008 Mk2. Got them at SGD105 a corner which is very price competitive with Chinese tires. They remind me very much of the first gen Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance in noise level (average) and grip. The two biggest negatives of these tires are the lack of steering feel due to a large dead zone and the comfort over bumps and expansion joints - they "ring" and you can feel the tire resonating. But for SGD105, you can't really complain. Would choose these again over Chinese-designed tires any day.

Been using it for 3 month It's feedback is harder at 420 treadwear comparing to Yokohama es32 at 300 treadwear which I use previously. It's harder too, and at 72db it's louder than Yokohama es32. But for it's price, I have no complaints. It's difficult to find "A"

Changed to these tires five months ago and travelled almost 3500 miles on mostly highways and city roads. Impressed with these tires and performances, given the competitive price point. I had the T001 and XM2 on my ride, and would say that the Synergy H2 compares well, except in terms of noise levels. However, the wet performance more than make up this. Well purchase again.

Just bought at 365 automotive approx 70/pcs Budget tire no complaint. A rating for rain. Very wide rain grove, there is some space even with my index

Best grip on wet so far. Had more confident cutting across puddles and bends as compared to my previous Michelin Energy Saver and Bridgestone Ecopias. Clocked over 20000km on the tires and it only seemed 30% worn. Really worth the price.