Menu

Nokian All Weather+

The Nokian All Weather Plus is a Premium Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
87%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
76%
Wear
92%
Comfort
62%
Buy again
62%
Snow Grip
65%
Ice Grip
65%
6 Reviews
75% Average
42,000 miles driven
Nokian All Weather Plus

Nokian All Weather Plus

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
7.1 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 75.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.84
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Nokian All Weather Plus

Questions and Answers for the Nokian All Weather Plus

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian All Weather Plus. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian All Weather Plus Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Dacia Duster 4x4 (215/65 R16) on mostly motorways for 0 spirited miles
Decent all season tire, have them for 4 years and are nearly to the mark. Still punch some grip but it feels like their are struggling. Most drive on highway , gravel and mud. It's a decent buy.
November 14, 2024
Given 94% while driving a Volvo XC70 D4 AWD (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 4,000 average miles
Purchased these tires after using Michelin's for decades and was very satisfied I did. Wear and handling in rain and snow was exceptional overall compared to my previous Michelin winter tires, but one needs to follow wheel alignment guidelines to achieve safe and good performance results, no matter which manufacturers tires are mounted on ones rims. After just one winter season, these tires still looked like new and tread depth appeared unchanged.
August 16, 2024
Given 33% while driving a Kia Motors Sportage (215/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Maybe teh WORST tires I ever driven!
Who cares about dry grip, this tires are dangerous on wet (slips abnormally even with normal drive in autumn, average temperatures, mild mediterranean weather)

On snowy/ice weather - UNUSABLE-INVALID!!!!

Buy this tire for commiting suicide.

DOT: 3713, Made in Russia
January 14, 2017

How would you rate the Nokian All Weather Plus?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian All Weather Plus Reviews

Given 93% while driving a Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
Appeared to be more noisy at first, however, after 4,000 miles the noise was at the same level as previous Michelin tires. Almost no measurable wear. Front Michelin tires were finished at 20,000 miles, therefore; the wear on the Nokian All Weather + is extremely good.
August 24, 2015
Given 90% while driving a Toyota Avensis (185/65 R14 T) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have been a fan of Nokians for a few years now, they aren't easy to find though so I usually get them online.
After wearing through a set of Daytons in short order I decided to try some of the All Weather+ which have the same tread pattern as the WRG2 Winter tires, these have more of a summer compound which makes them last a lot longer than the Winters.
I have put over 20k miles on these and there is still 4mm left, I'll be replacing them before this winter for sure. I am very happy withh them wear wise and with wet braking they are excellent.
I didn't notice any increase in road noise but they are 65 profile so maybe the taller tire is more forgiving.
I'd recommend these for any high mileage user who wants a secure tire in wet conditions and one that will also work in high temps like this summer.
August 6, 2013
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 64% while driving a Dacia Logan (185/65 R15 H) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
I was actually looking for reviews to see that it wasn't just me or my car, but these tires are brilliant the colder it is and the wetter it is, but talk about DESTROY my driving experience, they are SO noisy !!
April 10, 2012
Rate the Nokian All Weather Plus