Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi Tires

On this page you will find the best real world tire reviews from owners of the Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi.

Do you Drive a Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire! After all, who knows what the best tire for a c 220 cdi better than the owners?

Review Your Tires >>

Tire Reviewed Dry Grip Wet Grip Feedback Handling Wear Comfort
Nokian WR D3 (42) 91% 88% 88% 87% 85% 87%
Michelin Primacy Alpin (5) 84% 96% 80% 84% 80% 88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S (132) 93% 88% 86% 87% 82% 86%
Uniroyal RainExpert (132) 85% 91% 81% 76% 75% 86%
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 (22) 79% 88% 80% 80% 81% 83%
Avon ZZ5 (93) 90% 83% 83% 86% 70% 82%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (312) 90% 88% 81% 84% 73% 78%
Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 (61) 84% 77% 76% 76% 76% 81%
Pirelli CINTURATO P1 (32) 81% 74% 77% 73% 80% 84%
Tigar Winter 1 (10) 73% 74% 76% 70% 81% 82%
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 (193) 83% 77% 77% 72% 78% 71%
Uniroyal RainSport 5 (66) 77% 86% 70% 69% 75% 80%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 (80) 84% 76% 76% 79% 67% 72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005 (137) 83% 81% 74% 74% 67% 74%
Yokohama C Drive2 (31) 79% 73% 70% 69% 71% 81%
Toyo T1R (288) 83% 69% 75% 75% 63% 70%
Kumho Solus KH15 (24) 76% 69% 71% 60% 75% 80%
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 (12) 81% 77% 76% 73% 56% 71%
Goodride SP06 (23) 82% 71% 67% 66% 73% 68%
Nokian All Weather Plus (4) 83% 80% 70% 60% 90% 55%
Dunlop SP Sport Maxx TT (53) 85% 73% 74% 76% 64% 64%
Dunlop SP Sport 01 (124) 78% 67% 71% 69% 69% 65%
Debica Navigator 2 (6) 73% 47% 72% 53% 70% 68%
Landsail DH2 (24) 71% 55% 58% 54% 57% 60%
Runway ENDURO 916 Plus (45) 66% 53% 52% 54% 62% 41%
Fullway HP 108 (12) 71% 51% 54% 50% 63% 50%
Durun A One (21) 67% 46% 59% 51% 45% 49%

Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi Tire Review Highlights

Writing about the Bridgestone Turanza T005 given 83% (205-55-16-)
Driving on mostly motorways for 31060 average miles
Tire is very soft it has a good grip on the road handling also on turns, is fuel-efficient, and can run 50 000 km (tested on my car with new Bridgestone Turanza t005 tires 205 55 16). The biggest setback is the soft walls on the tire, they are vulnerable to any road hole or obstacle that will grope on the tire wall. Eventually, it will form a bubble and start to lose pressure from it.
tire reviewed on 2023-07-12 03:58:41
Writing about the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 given 77% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2023-06-24 08:59:36
Writing about the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 given 74% (225-40-18-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 1000 average miles
Too early to tell, just done roughly 1.000 miles with them but I had previously Nexen tires and I was very happy. They re very quiet and they grip well BUT I will be back for an update. The set is staggered Front 225/40/18 and Rear is 255/35/18.
tire reviewed on 2023-03-16 13:57:03
Writing about the Uniroyal RainSport 5 given 93% (225-45-17-)
Driving on mostly country roads for 40000 average miles
After crashing my car due to aquaplaning, i got scared to drive under wet conditions but these tire just grips under rain ! They lasted 35km till now and still have 3.4mm, the tire is very comfortable, pretty quiet id say. In dry condition if u are not planning to go to a circuit theres not much differences between them and goodyears EG PE2 it understeer a bit when i am too mighty in corners. But overall very nice tire last very long since i am driving 50% town 40% country road and 10%% highway pretty agressivly, they still lasted 40000km and still have quite a margin !! For beginers, daily drive i would highly recommend these tire for the price, comfort and security under wet conditions which is a very important point !
tire reviewed on 2022-05-10 16:55:50
Writing about the Landsail DH2 given 54% (225-55-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 12000 average miles
Trusted our mechanic to put some half decent tires on our car with the service. And they are half decent. Ok for handing and grip. RWD vehicle and no problem like others in the rain. However, they've lasted 11000 miles and are unevenly worn on both front and back. Insides on the back has worn prematurely, outside on the front. Just paid extra for tracking check and it's absolutely fine. Guy checking the alignment suggested a number of things, one of which was the tires. Definitely wouldn't buy again.
tire reviewed on 2021-09-07 08:30:35
Writing about the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S given 79% (255-35-19-W)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
The best and most outstanding thing of ps4s is wet braking, if not pushed too hard, it feels as if the road is dry. My car is just a 2018-20 c-class diesel with 400NM of torque but weights around 1,600kg(kinda heavy), ps4s is not troubled at all in acceleration (ofc my 4 cylinders cant do a thing to it haha) (lil bit slip on first gear when the tires aren't freshly new) and the highlight is that I can go full brake on wet surface without the feeling that the car is unstoppable, it really surprises me on first impression.
tire reviewed on 2021-01-21 10:36:22
Writing about the Bridgestone Turanza T005 given 100% (195-65-15-H)
Driving on mostly country roads for 10000 average miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2019-04-06 06:22:45
Writing about the Durun A One given NAN% (225-45-16-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 4000 average miles
Verry nasty in rain.
tire reviewed on 2018-12-23 04:12:16
Writing about the Tigar Winter 1 given 94% (225-55-16-H)
Driving on a combination of roads for 15000 miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2018-12-07 15:23:24
Writing about the Goodride SP06 given 90% (225-45-17-)
Driving on a combination of roads for 290 average miles
i have had michelin goodyear F1 tires, they wore out very very quickly too expensive also. never again.
i have had continental sport contact 5 they wore out very very quickly also, again way too expenisve.

i now have these tires and you know what, i get a better ride quality and better repsponse. I don,t know about you guys, but modern day cars suspention seems far far far too hard or jerky on the ride. I don,t know what car builders have done to suspention but they have made a right pigs ear of it.

anway these cheaper tryes are doing just as good, grip very well and in the wet also no problems there at all. And you know what folks i have put these on sport 220 cdi mercedes and you know what im chuffed to bits. There a good good solid tire, so for me i won,t be spending silly money on tires in the future im done with that. Those expensive tires are not worth all that money no way not at all.

so now im going and experimenting with nice looking tires but a cheaper brand and im glad i did. There just as good and lasting great and doing a good stand up quality job on handling and wear and tear.

no problems here.
tire reviewed on 2017-12-31 07:07:14
Writing about the Nokian WR D3 given 84% (205-55-16-H)
Driving on a combination of roads for 0 miles
No comments left
tire reviewed on 2017-09-26 08:09:00
Writing about the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 given 70% (255-35-18-W)
Driving on mostly motorways for 400 spirited miles
Ive had cars fitted previously fitted with OEM continentals, Nankangs, Events and Falkens.
Events were terrible in all aspects, nankangs werent much better.
I had Falkens FK459 EcoRun on my last car cars which I thought were pretty good for the price payed.

My current car originally wore MO rated Continental SportContact 5 tires when new.
I thought they were as good as a tire could get but they wore down pretty quickly I thought
Since then I moved to Michelin PS3s then PS4s.

Recently had to buy new rears(255/3518). (the fronts are 225/40/18).

After seeing as Ford, Audi, Mercedes and Mini had all chose Hankooks for there OEM spec tires in 2016/2017, I replaced my rear michelins with some Hankook Ventus Evo2 K117 tires despite some other reviews mentioning there poor wear rate.

I quickly realised that they are not as rigid in the sidewalls as the PS4 Mitchelins are but the compensation for this is better ride quality, I also think the Hankooks have less noise being generated whilst cruising.
Grip in the wet is better than I expected, Ive found these Hankooks to be more progressive than the Michelins with the back tires seemingly coping better handling the power between the two back wheels whilst the ground is wet.

Over the next 4 months until my winter tires will put back on its give me time to see if longterm there any good before the summer fronts need replacing.

Even though theres only 400miles in one or twice Ive had some spin from the back wheels but only when pulling away sharply on wet roads, the tires may need a few more hundred miles before a true character can be found for the tires.

Im anticipating that wear may be poor due to other reviews with the tires.
Its still early days yet.

The rim protection ridge could,be improved though.

tire reviewed on 2017-09-04 18:30:33
Drive this car? Why not add your own tire review and help other owners pick the right tire