Menu
Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 View Gallery (1)
165-275/35-65 R14-20 164 sizes 2015

Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04

The Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.7
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
77%
Wear
74%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
77%
65 Reviews
78% Average
531,274 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 31st)
Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04

Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04

Summer Economy
BETA
5.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
66.4
2x / 1 test
Dry
60.9
1.8x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
63.8
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2022
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 65
Avg Rating: 78%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.98
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 31/44 2 metrics
1
Tests
31st
Average
31st
Best
31st
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
31st/44
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
185/60R14 82 H C B 70
175/65R14 82 T C C 70
185/60R14 82 H C B 70
175/65R14 82 T C C 70
15 inch
195/55R15 85 V C B 71
195/65R15 91 V C B 71
195/65R15 91 H C B 71
195/65R15 95 T XL B B 71
185/65R15 88 T C C 70
185/65R15 88 H C C 70
195/55R15 85 V C B 71
195/65R15 91 V C B 71
195/65R15 91 H C B 71
195/65R15 95 T XL B B 71
185/65R15 88 T C C 70
185/65R15 88 H C C 70
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C B 71
205/55R16 91 V C B 71
215/60R16 99 V XL B C 71
205/60R16 96 H XL B B 70
205/55R16 91 H C B 71
205/55R16 91 V C B 71
215/60R16 99 V XL B C 71
205/60R16 96 H XL B B 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 >>

Questions and Answers for the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04

Ask a question
May 27, 2019

Roadstone eurovis sport 225/50 r17 98w Is this a run flat tire

Your chosen tire retailer will be able to indicate whether the size of the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 will be runflat or not, as this is tire size dependant.
October 30, 2019

is the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 tires good and suitable for South African Roads. I m in Durban,South Africa

The Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 is a budget road tires, so if you spend all your time on road and don't mind degraded wet performance, they should be fine.
September 13, 2022

Is the Roadstone eurovis sport04 225/45ZR18 tire runflat or not?

We haven't seen any runflat versions of the Eurovis Sport04 before.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 64 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 positively for strong value, confident dry grip, and generally good wet performance for the price, with many comparing it favorably to mid/premium brands. High-scoring reviews frequently praise comfort and low noise, with several noting decent to good tread life. A minority report poor wet grip and faster front wear, and multiple low/mid-score reviews mention tread cracking. Overall sentiment leans clearly positive given the volume and weight of high scores.

Strengths
  • Good dry grip
  • Competent wet grip for the price
  • Value for money
  • Low noise/comfortable ride
  • Decent wear for many users
  • Stable handling and confidence
Areas for Improvement
  • Reports of tread cracking
  • Wet grip concerns from some users
  • Faster wear on fronts for certain drivers

Top 3 Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 Reviews

Given 50% while driving a Audi A4 Avant 2.0T Quattro (255/35 R19) on mostly motorways for 9,000 average miles
All 4 tires 3 years old on an A4 Quattro.............mot fail due to UV/heat damage on inside & outside edges of tread 9000 miles
January 16, 2025
Given 97% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giuiletta (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,700 spirited miles
As a Pilot and being the owner of several Sport Luxury cars, I require Tires with high Cornering & Braking Grip in both Wet & Dry Conditions. And I am glad to share with my fellow Car Enthusiasts, especially Speedy Drivers, my very best experiences with Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 Tires which over 2 years, I've fitted to all my Cars. Over the last 20 years, I have never had such positive experiences with other brands.
June 27, 2024
Given 84% while driving a Audi 3.2 v6 Quattro (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 13,000 spirited miles
Pros - great value, excellent handling and grip wet or dry throughout life of the tires. Cons - need replacing at 13500 miles, cracks appearing in outer tread areas. Buying same again.
September 22, 2024

How would you rate the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04 Reviews

Given 63% while driving a Renault Kadjar 1.5DCi (225/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 15,000 miles
I've had these tires put on twice on the front (15000) and one on the back so (30000) still have a bit left in the back.
No complaint, but am trying a different brand now trying to get a few more miles out of the front tires.
September 10, 2024
Given 66% while driving a Renault (225/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 14,000 miles
Driving on a Renault 1.5 diesel kadjar these tires lasted 6 month only - 13 to 14000 miles only on the front.
Apart from that I have no complaints at all.
I've just replaced with the same again, but after checking how long the last pair lasted I will try something different in another 13 to 14000 miles.
March 10, 2024
Given 59% while driving a Volvo V60 D3 (235/40 R18) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
Purchased 4 of these for my Volvo V60 R Design and was surprised how queit they were. Pottering about they're fine and in the wet again, fine. If you push on when wet they do tend to lose grip easier than others I've had but on a family shuttle bus they're adequate. I have unfortunately had to remove them with 4mm tread because they have developed cracking between the tread. Would I buy again? Probably not, my next tires are Vredestein Ultrac Satin ready to go on tomorrow so I'm yet to try.
August 14, 2023
Given 74% while driving a Mercedes Benz c 220 cdi (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Too early to tell, just done roughly 1.000 miles with them but I had previously Nexen tires and I was very happy. They re very quiet and they grip well BUT I will be back for an update. The set is staggered Front 225/40/18 and Rear is 255/35/18.
March 16, 2023
Given 47% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 5 3.0 V6 (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Had a set of 4 of these on my Saab when I purchased the car. They were relatively okay in the summer when it was dry, with average noise and pretty good in terms of comfort. Probably suited to a steady or average driving style in a family car that goes around town. As soon as you hit any sort of moisture or cold though, my goodness, what a disappointment! Absolutely diabolical handling in the wet with some incredible levels of understeer on a front-heavy car if you try to go past any sort of over-cautious speed. For this reason alone, I would never buy them again as I would actually consider them borderline dangerous in some situations. On the plus side, 6 months of daily commuting up and down the motorway seems to have worn little of the tread away. So probably ideal if you are a taxi driver wanting to get the longest life.
December 15, 2022
Given 60% while driving a Honda Civic (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
Horrific in the wet pulling out at junctions.
November 29, 2022
Given 77% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class (225/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Eurovis sport 04 best value tire on the market In my opinion just as good as mid / premium brands which l bought in past Great drive handle well on dry & wet roads & wear evenly
November 16, 2022
Given 56% while driving a Citroën DS3 (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 average miles
They generally drive fine in the dry - predictable with decent grip, feedback and handling - but you need to be much more careful in the wet, when they tend to slip and slide around a bit if pushed at all. They seem good for fuel economy but poor in terms of tread wear. My front pair are almost down to 2mm (and now due for replacement) after little more than 10,000 miles. A decent, reliable budget tire if your annual mileage is low.
November 13, 2022
Given 40% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 5 3.0 V6 (235/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
At first these seemed okay, during the long, hot summer spell we have just had, I was only using them on dry roads to begin with, so eagerly awaited the heavens to open. Twice I have now driven in the rain recently and they are absolute garbage when it is wet. Understeer, no grip, spinning when pulling off from a roundabout under normal driving and traction control light on a lot. A shame as in the dry they are respectable for a good value tire. Unfortunately the lack of control in the wet is the final nail in the coffin for me and I am looking at getting something else.
August 25, 2022
Given 73% while driving a BMW 130i M (255/35 R18) on mostly country roads for 25,000 spirited miles
The most impressive feature of these tires was that they lasted 40,000kms (25,000miles). During this 40,000kms I abused them at the race track. And crossed a twisty mountain range hard and fast at least once a week. This was all on NZ roads too. Which are far more harsh than British roads and mostly cheap chip seal, off camber and poorly maintained. Whilst the tires don't give much feedback I think they are perfect for a commuter or tourer. I went to replace them with the same tires and unfortunately they didn't have my size at the time. Went to some Laufenn Z LK03 (don't exist on this site). Whilst these were far better in feel they were no better grip in the wet or dry. However these only lasted 25,000kms on the same roads. I have just replaced the rears back to the Roadstones.
July 17, 2022
Given 83% while driving a Holden 2004 VYII Calais Supercharged V6 (225/55 R16) on for 2,000 miles
Fitted 2 tires to the front drove 2 1000 klm trips tires never moved or felt like they would loose grip up to 130 ks round 60 k bends. Brought 2 more for rear of car
May 30, 2022
Given 54% while driving a Vauxhall Astra Sports Tourer (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,500 easy going miles
I have an Astra J SRi Sports tourer 1.6cdti 110bhp, its driven slow and careful to save costs, averaging 20k per year, long trips, commutes and the usual door to door. I thought I'd try these as they were almost half the price at £200 from ebay, then £40 to fit by my local tire place. They are literally half the tire, they aren't as grippy. especially in the wet and after less than 2 years they started to crack between the treads. The front pair were replaced after less than 15k miles (The original Continental ContiEcoContact 5 did over 30k before needing replacing) and the rear pair are still on after 30k (again the originals did over 60k) but they will be replaced soon as there's still cracks between the treads. Moral of the story buy cheap you buy twice but I appreciate that a lot of people won't have £500 to fork out on tires for what is an average car
February 11, 2022
Rate the Roadstone Eurovis Sport 04