Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 90% · 15
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 87% · 33
In the 18 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 finished ahead 14 times and the UltraGrip Performance 3 3 times, with one level. The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 5.9% longer in the wear tests; the Pilot Alpin 5 stopped 2% shorter in the dry.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
If you regularly drive on snow/ice (mountain regions, frequent sub-zero mornings, unploughed roads), pick the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 for its consistently superior snow/ice braking and traction plus strong dry performance. If your winters are mainly wet, slushy and above-freezing-and you want maximum wet braking confidence with better value and often longer wear-choose the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3.
Where the UltraGrip Performance 3 is stronger
- Wet-road safety bias: more frequent wins in wet braking (12 vs 4) and strong wet handling/wet circle pace across multiple Auto Bild and sportscar tests
- Often stronger aquaplaning security in bends, including some large advantages (e.g., Auto Bild Winter 2025 curved aquaplaning 2.65 vs 2.23 m/s²)
- Ownership value: repeatedly better value metrics and strong wear/mileage projections (e.g., ADAC 2025: 76,500 km vs 67,000 km; Auto Bild Winter 2025 value index advantage)
Where the Pilot Alpin 5 is stronger
- Snow performance leadership: overwhelmingly more wins in snow braking (15 vs 1) plus frequent wins in snow traction and snow handling
- Dry-road braking authority and strong dry dynamics: dominates dry braking win-count (11 vs 2) and regularly tops dry handling or stays at the sharp end (e.g., Auto Bild Sportscars 2026 dry braking 40.8 m vs 42.5 m)
- Broader winter-condition security including ice: can open meaningful gaps on ice braking/traction in the most grip-limited tests (e.g., 2024/25 performance winter test ice braking ~14.6% advantage)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Pilot Alpin 5 at a glance
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won18 shared tests | 3 | 1 level | 14 |
| Dry32 measurements | 8 | The Pilot Alpin 5 stopped 2% shorter in the dry (14 tests) | 24 |
| Wet71 measurements | 49 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 held a 8.9% higher speed on the wet circle (3 tests) | 20 |
| Snow58 measurements | 8 | The Pilot Alpin 5 stopped 2.5% shorter on snow (17 tests) | 47 |
| Ice4 measurements | 0 | The Pilot Alpin 5 stopped 8.5% shorter on ice (2 tests) | 4 |
| Comfort21 measurements | 5 | 10 | |
| Value22 measurements | 9 | 11 | |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | Level | 9.5/10 |
| Owner rating15 and 33 reviews | 90% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 3 points | 87% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 100% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 16 points | 84% |
| Pricein the 16 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The Pilot Alpin 5 was dearer in 16 of 16 | +9.9% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 175 | 64 sizes made in both | 81 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 18 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
Performance profile
26 measurements from the 18 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance 3
Pilot Alpin 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 8 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Pilot Alpin 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Pilot Alpin 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Pilot Alpin 5 87% from 33. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Pilot Alpin 5 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 140 | 2% | 137 | 2-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78.55 | 0.7% | 78.01 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.4 | 0.7% | 68.9 | 2-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 14.7% | scored | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 16.7% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45.4 | 1.4% | 46 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 135 | 0.6% | 136 | 12-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91 | 1% | 91 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 120 | 0.8% | 121 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.75 | 0.4% | 84.27 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.6 | 1.1% | 50 | 8-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 8.1% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | 8.9% | 13.4 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.6 | 0.6% | 13.69 | 5-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.7 | = | 51.7 | 8-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.5 | 4.2% | 8.2 | 7-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85 | 2.5% | 83 | 1-16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.55 | 3.4% | 5.36 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 521 | 1.1% | 533 | 2-9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.79 | 0.8% | 77.18 | 0-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36.9 | 0.8% | 37.2 | 0-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 0.2% | scored | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.2 | 0.6% | 11.1 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.2 | 1.1% | 12.3 | 3-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46 | 8.5% | 42 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.14 | 12.5% | 4.5 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 25% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 2.5% | scored | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71 | 0.2 dB | 70.76 | 4-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34,182 | 5.9% | 32,163 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.38 | 0.2% | 8.34 | 5-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.89 | 1.7% | 6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | = | 50 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.14 | 11.4% | 0.12 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Pilot Alpin 5 9.5 out of 10.
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Pilot Alpin 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 99 | ||
| 95 | Wet | 90 | ||
| 85 | Comfort | 89 | ||
| 70 | Value | 59 | ||
| 87 | Snow | 92 | ||
| 22 | Ice | 80 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Pilot Alpin 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.8 | Wet Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.6 | Road Feedback | 8.8 | ||
| 8.1 | Handling | 8.9 | ||
| 9 | Wear | 9 | ||
| 8.8 | Comfort | 8.3 | ||
| 9.5 | Snow Grip | 9 | ||
| 8.1 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Pilot Alpin 5 87% from 33. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
- 90%from 15 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 62,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers rate the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 very highly, praising its excellent grip and braking on dry and wet roads, strong traction in snow, and a quiet, comfortable, and predictable ride. Handling is often described as stable and confidence-inspiring, with several noting good highway manners. A minority mention weaker performance on pure ice and a softer, less sporty steering feel at the limit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with only a few caveats.
- strong dry grip and braking
- excellent wet grip and braking
- very good snow traction
- quiet and comfortable ride
- limited grip on pure ice compared to some rivals
- softer steering feel and less sporty lateral grip at high speeds
Summarised by AI from 12 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 15 UltraGrip Performance 3 reviewsThis is exceptional tire in winter i swapped it now with Michelin PA 5 which is even better on snow but lucks a bit on wet. But you cant go wrong with niether of those. I cant wait Michelin s to worn out so i can try pirelli.
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
- 87%from 33 reviews
- 84%would buy again
- 357,850 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 highly overall (average 82.7%), with the clearest consensus around strong snow traction and unusually capable dry-road performance for a winter tire. Wet grip also earns plenty of praise, and a smaller group highlights sharp steering feel and secure snow handling. Complaints are more mixed, but around a quarter of owners mention either firmer-than-expected ride comfort or disappointing ice performance, and a smaller minority report noticeable road noise and weak slush behavior.
- Strong snow traction and confidence in winter conditions
- Outstanding dry grip for a winter tire
- Very good wet grip
- Secure, sporty handling on dry roads
- Ice grip can be poor and unpredictable for some
- Firm or bumpy ride comfort for a winter tire
- Noticeable road noise at speed
Summarised by AI from 27 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 33 Pilot Alpin 5 reviewsGreat tire, i replaced my GY Ultragrip performance 3 with this and i can say they are even better on snow than GY. Where Michelin lacks to GY is on wet. I find goodyear a bit better on wet surfaces but both tires are excepional.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 175 sizes of the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 81 of the Pilot Alpin 5, 64 of them made in both.
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 175 sizes, 14 to 23 inch | 81 sizes, 16 to 23 inch |
| Made in both | 64 sizes 205/60 R16215/65 R16225/50 R17235/45 R17235/55 R17215/40 R18215/50 R18225/40 R18225/45 R18225/50 R18225/55 R18235/40 R18and 52 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B60%C39%D0%A0% | B58%C40%D2% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C74%B16%D9%A1%E0% | C60%D30%B9% |
| EU label noise | 69-74 dB B87%A13% | 68-75 dB B70%A30% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 415 of 415 | 96 of 96 |
| On the market since | - | 2017 |
| Replaced | - | Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 (2012) |
| Awards | Commended: Best Winter Tire (DriverReviews, 2025/26) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Pilot Alpin 5 was the dearer tire in 16 of the 16 tests that listed prices, by 9.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance 3 and Michelin's Pilot Alpin 5 sit in the same “performance winter” niche: tires designed for drivers who still want crisp steering and stable high-speed behavior, but need genuine winter capability. Across 17 shared professional tests (multiple sizes and both car/SUV fitments), they repeatedly trade blows depending on the surface: Michelin tends to build its results around snow and dry-road authority, while Goodyear often looks tuned for wet-road confidence and running costs.
The headline outcome is clear in the aggregate results: the Pilot Alpin 5 takes 13 overall wins versus 3 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 (with 1 draw). But that top-line hides an important consumer reality-if your “winter” is frequently wet and slushy rather than consistently snowy, the Goodyear's repeated wet-braking and wet-handling advantages can matter more day-to-day than Michelin's snow-edge.
Conclusion
Across the shared tests, Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is the more consistently top-scoring tire overall, largely because it repeatedly dominates the winter-specific disciplines and pairs that with strong dry-road braking/handling. The pattern is stark on snow: Michelin wins snow braking 15 times to Goodyear's 1, and it is also ahead most of the time in snow traction and snow handling. Typical margins aren't huge, but they're persistent-e.g., in Auto Bild Winter 2025 (225/40 R18) Michelin stops 0.7 m shorter on snow (27.8 m vs 28.5 m), while in Auto Bild Sportscars 2024 (235/35 R19) the gap grows to 1.4 m (30.2 m vs 31.6 m). In more extreme low-grip conditions, the Michelin can separate more clearly: in the 2024/25 performance winter test it led ice braking by ~14.6% (9.46 m vs 11.08 m).
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 earns its wins with wet-road security and cost-of-ownership strengths. It leads wet braking more often (12 wins vs 4) and frequently posts faster wet handling/wet circle results; in several Auto Bild and sportscar tests it also shows notably stronger resistance to curved aquaplaning (e.g., Auto Bild Winter 2025: 2.65 vs 2.23 m/s², ~19% advantage). Add in repeated advantages in value metrics and wear projections (e.g., ADAC 2025: 76,500 km vs 67,000 km; Auto Bild Winter 2025 value index advantage), and the Goodyear becomes the smarter pick for mild, rainy winters and high annual mileage.
Practical takeaway: choose the Pilot Alpin 5 if you prioritize maximum snow/ice safety margin and consistently strong dry performance (and you can accept the premium price). Choose the UltraGrip Performance 3 if your winter is predominantly wet, you want the most reassuring wet braking/handling behavior, and you care about long-life/value-accepting that in frequent deep-snow or icy scenarios, Michelin's extra winter bite is the safer bet.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Pilot Alpin 5: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 the better tire?
In the 18 independent tests that ran both tires, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 finished ahead 14 times and the UltraGrip Performance 3 3 times, with one level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Pilot Alpin 5 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Pilot Alpin 5?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 49 of the 71 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held a 8.9% higher speed on the wet circle across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Pilot Alpin 5 led 24 of the 32 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2% shorter in the dry across 14 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Pilot Alpin 5 led 47 of the 58 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.5% shorter on snow across 17 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 5.9% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) and used 1.7% less fuel (2 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 9/10 for the Pilot Alpin 5.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 8.3/10 for the Pilot Alpin 5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Pilot Alpin 5 87% from 33. 100% of UltraGrip Performance 3 owners would buy it again, against 84% for the Pilot Alpin 5.
Which is more expensive?
In the 16 tests that listed prices, the Pilot Alpin 5 was the dearer tire in 16 of them, by 9.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 is made in 175 sizes (14 to 23 inch) and the Pilot Alpin 5 in 81 (16 to 23 inch). 64 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the UltraGrip Performance 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Pilot Alpin 5 B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 21 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Alpin 7
8-4 in 12 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
11-2 in 13 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
Every Goodyear vs Michelin test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion